Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40665. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040665

Table 5.

Comparisons of FWU model with baseline and intermediate models for predicting survival outcomes using C-index and iAUC

Model comparison Model C-index (SE) iAUC (SE) P value
(C-index)
P value
(iAUC)
FWU vs Baseline FWU 0.815 (0.017) 0.775 (0.016) <.001 <.001
Baseline 0.664 (0.020) 0.646 (0.010)
FWU vs Intermediate FWU 0.815 (0.017) 0.775 (0.016) .010 .002
Intermediate 0.799 (0.019) 0.761 (0.017)

The FWU model incorporates sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, stage, vascular invasion, type of gastrectomy, hemoglobin level, serum albumin level, and FWU BMR. The intermediate model incorporated the same covariates as the FWU model, except for the FWU BMR. The baseline model relied solely on the stage.

C-index = concordance index, FWU = the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University, iAUC = integrated area under the curve, SE = standard error.