Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 19;16(22):3941. doi: 10.3390/nu16223941

Table 2.

Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses of FBG for PC risk.

Category Logistic
Regression
Group Univariable Multivariable
PC HC OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p a
FBG All Continuous scale 54 279 1.03 (1.02~1.04) <0.0001 1.04 (1.03~1.05) <0.0001
FBG (≥126 mg/dL) 28 26 10.5 (5.37~20.5) <0.0001 13.4 (6.24~28.7) <0.0001
FBG (<126 mg/dL) 26 253 Ref Ref
Male Continuous scale 26 134 1.03 (1.01~1.04) <0.0001 1.03 (1.02~1.05) <0.0001
FBG (≥126 mg/dL) 14 20 6.65 (2.69~16.4) <0.0001 7.70 (2.65~22.5) 0.0002
FBG (<126 mg/dL) 12 114 Ref Ref
Female Continuous scale 28 145 1.05 (1.02~1.07) <0.0001 1.05 (1.03~1.08) <0.0001
FBG (≥126 mg/dL) 14 6 23.2 (7.69~69.8) <0.0001 32.3 (9.28~112.4) <0.0001
FBG (<126 mg/dL) 14 139 Ref Ref

ORs and 95% CIs were evaluated for analyzing the relationship between FBG concentration and PC risk using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. FBG levels were categorized as ≥126 mg/dL and <126 mg/dL. a p-Values were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, and smoking status. One FBG data value was missing from each of the two groups. Abbreviations: FBG, fasting blood glucose; PC, pancreatic cancer; HC, healthy control; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference value.