Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 11;10(11):1780–1797. doi: 10.3390/tomography10110131

Table 5.

Summary of the findings of papers studying DECT application in head and neck lymph node evaluation.

Author Aim DECT-Parameters Findings
Foust et al. [26] Role of DECT parameters as predictors of nodal metastasis in OPSCC. IC
λHU
Both parameters were lower in metastatic lymph nodes.
Tawfik et al. [109] Evaluate difference in DECT parameters between normal, inflammatory, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma cervical lymph nodes. IC
IO
DECT-derived IC and IO differ significantly among normal, inflammatory, and metastatic SCC cervical lymph nodes.
Luo et al. [51] Potential of DECT parameters in identifying metastatic cervical lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. ED
IC
NIC
λHU
DEI
All parameters showed significantly decreased values in metastatic nodes.

HNSCC = head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; OPSCC = oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; NIC = normalized iodine concentration; IC = iodine concentration; λHU = slope of the spectral Hounsfield unite curve; Zeff = effective atomic number; ED = electron density; HU = Hounsfield unit; IO = iodine overlay; DEI = dual-energy index; AP = arterial phase; VP = venous phase; LNM = lymph node metastasis.