Table 5.
Summary of the findings of papers studying DECT application in head and neck lymph node evaluation.
Author | Aim | DECT-Parameters | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Foust et al. [26] | Role of DECT parameters as predictors of nodal metastasis in OPSCC. | IC λHU |
Both parameters were lower in metastatic lymph nodes. |
Tawfik et al. [109] | Evaluate difference in DECT parameters between normal, inflammatory, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma cervical lymph nodes. | IC IO |
DECT-derived IC and IO differ significantly among normal, inflammatory, and metastatic SCC cervical lymph nodes. |
Luo et al. [51] | Potential of DECT parameters in identifying metastatic cervical lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. | ED IC NIC λHU DEI |
All parameters showed significantly decreased values in metastatic nodes. |
HNSCC = head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; OPSCC = oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; NIC = normalized iodine concentration; IC = iodine concentration; λHU = slope of the spectral Hounsfield unite curve; Zeff = effective atomic number; ED = electron density; HU = Hounsfield unit; IO = iodine overlay; DEI = dual-energy index; AP = arterial phase; VP = venous phase; LNM = lymph node metastasis.