Table 4.
Sense of embodiment, by Group and Avatar synchrony.
| FEP | CTL | Robust ANOVA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Async. | Sync. | Async. | Sync. | Main effect of Group | Main effect of Avatar synchrony | Interaction effect | |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Qa, p | Qb, p | Qab, p | |
| BIQ – Total (/3) | 1.27 (1.56) | 1.70 (2.09) | 0.84 (2.12) | 1.59 (1.40) |
Qa
= -0.18 p = .82 |
Qb
= -0.47
p = .03 |
Qab
= 0.33 p = .74 |
| BIQ – Agency (/3) | 1.10 (1.45) | 1.40 (1.07) | 1.14 (1.77) | 1.69 (1.30) |
Qa
= 0.51 p = .25 |
Qb
= -0.36 p = .14 |
Qab
= -0.08 p = .86 |
| BIQ – Ownership (/3) | -0.40 (2.01) | 0.80 (1.75) | -0.57 (2.02) | 0.37 (1.75) |
Qa
= -0.20 p = .98 |
Qb
= -0.14 p = .78 |
Qab
= 0.96 p = .47 |
| BIQ – Self-location (/3) | 0.70 (1.34) | 1.70 (1.34) | 0.46 (1.84) | 1.03 (1.64) |
Qa
= 0.04 p = .96 |
Qb
= -0.24 p = .41 |
Qab
= 0.88 p = .22 |
| BIQ – Control 1 (/3) | -1.20 (1.81) | -0.80 (1.81) | -0.23 (1.88) | -0.06 (2.01) |
Qa
= 0.86 p = .42 |
Qb
= -0.19 p = .39 |
Qab
= 0.25 p = .53 |
| BIQ – Control 2 (/3) | -0.40 (1.78) | 0.00 (1.63) | -0.77 (2.14) | -1.06 (1.95) |
Qa
= -0.94 p = .19 |
Qb
= -0.10 p = .70 |
Qab
= -0.13 p = .80 |
| Distance to the ball (meters) | 0.89 (1.03) | 0.71 (1.12) | 0.77 (0.99) | 0.95 (1.11) |
Qa
= -0.13 p = .78 |
Qb
= -0.09 p = .42 |
Qab
= -0.43
p = .02 |
FEP, first-episode psychosis; CTL, healthy controls; Async., asynchronous avatar; Sync., synchronous avatar; BIQ, Body-Illusion Questionnaire; Q, robust ANOVA statistic; p, robust ANOVA p-value. In bold: statistically significant results.