Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;33(12):3189–3211. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03755-4

Table 4.

Characteristics of the included study populations

PROM References Population Disease Instrument administration Measurement properties
n Agea Genderb Stage Treatment Setting Country (language) Response rate (%)
TESS Kask et al. [90] 136 65.6 (14.4) 66 (48.5) Local STS (lower extremity) Surgery Clinical Finland (Finnish) 70 Structural validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, reliability and hypotheses testing for construct validity
Ketola et al. [91] 55 62.8 (14.6) 27 (49.1) Local STS (upper extremity) Limb-sparing surgery Clinical Finland (Finnish) 85 Internal consistency, measurement invariance and hypotheses testing for construct validity
QuickDASH Ketola et al. [91] 55 62.8 (14.6) 27 (49.1) Local STS (upper extremity) Limb-sparing surgery Clinical Finland (Finnish) 85 Internal consistency, measurement invariance and hypotheses testing for construct validity
EORTC-QLQ-C30 Gough et al. [54] 27; 14c 52.2 (14) 21 (32) Locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic STS Palliative chemotherapy or under surveillance after first-line palliative chemotherapy having responded favorably Clinical United Kingdom (English) 84 Content validity (the relevance of the PROM items)

PROM patient-reported outcome measure, STS soft-tissue sarcoma

aMean (SD) or median [IQR]

bMale patients (%)

cTwenty-seven patients were included for quantitative analysis; 14 patients for qualitative analysis