Table 2.
References | Aim of the review | Review eligibility criteria | Search period | Outcomes (units of measurement)a | Synthesis methodb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study designs included | Population and setting | Intervention strategy(ies) tested | |||||
Appleton et al. 33 | To identify and synthesise the current evidence for the use of repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing vegetable liking and consumption | Between‐group or within‐group studies | No restrictions on population or setting |
Repeated taste‐based exposure; Taste‐based conditioning strategies |
Inception to February 2018 | Vegetable consumption (NR) | Meta‐analysis |
Broers et al. 34 | To test the effects of nudging to encourage people to select more fruits and vegetables | Experimental or cross‐sectional studies | No restrictions on population or setting | Nudging | Inception to December 2016 | Vegetable choice (grams, servings); Vegetable sales (voucher sales, food sales) | Meta‐analysis |
Dabravolskaj et al. 35 | To examine the effectiveness of school‐based intervention types perceived by Canadian stakeholders in health and education as feasible, acceptable and sustainable in terms of improving physical activity (PA), fruit and vegetable intake and body weight | Comparative studies |
Children and adolescents (4–18 years) School |
Obesity prevention interventions | January 2012 to January 2020 | Vegetable consumption (servings/day, times/day) | Meta‐analysis |
de Medeiros et al. 29 | To evaluate the effects of school‐based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent food consumption | RCTs |
Adolescents (10–19 years) School |
Education | Inception to June 2019 | Vegetable consumption (times/week) | Meta‐analysis |
Diep et al. 36 | To test the hypotheses that interventions clearly based on theory, multiple theories or a formal intervention planning process will be more effective in changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children than interventions with no behavioural theoretical foundation | Comparative studies |
Children and adolescents (2–18 years) NR |
Behaviour change techniques | 1989–2013 | Vegetable consumption (NR) | Meta‐analysis |
Hendrie et al. 30 | To identify intervention characteristics associated with increasing consumption of vegetables in children (2–12 years) | Prospective studies |
Children (2–12 years) Home and community settings |
No restrictions | 2004 to June 2014 | Vegetable consumption (grams, servings, times/day); Vegetable provision (number of vegetables available or served); Vegetable purchasing (shopping receipts) | Quantitative (% change) |
Jabbari et al. 37 | To systematically examine the effects of community‐based interventions on fruit and vegetable consumption in adults | RCTs or non‐RCTs |
Adults (≥18 years) Community |
NR | January 2000 to July 2021 | Vegetable consumption (servings/day) | Meta‐analysis |
Micha et al. 38 | To systematically review and quantify the impact of school food environment policies on dietary habits, adiposity and metabolic risk in children | RCTs or quasi‐experimental studies |
Children and adolescents (2–18 years) School |
School food environment policies | Inception to December 2017 | Vegetable consumption (reported intakes), or sales/purchase data as proxy for consumption) | Meta‐analysis |
Mingay et al. 39 | To examine interventions in secondary schools that provide a routine meal service and the impact on adolescents' food behaviours, health and dining experience in this setting | RCTs, non‐RCTs or single‐group pre–post studies |
Adolescents (10–19 years) School |
Food provision | Inception to December 2021 |
Vegetable consumption (% of serve consumed of a meal component by students, mean number of serves consumed per student/day); Vegetable selection (% of students selecting a meal component mean number of serves selected per student/day) |
Meta‐analysis |
Nathan et al. 40 | To assess the effectiveness of lunchbox interventions aiming to improve the foods and beverages packed and consumed by children at centre‐based care or school and subsequent impact on children's adiposity | RCTs or non‐RCTs |
Children and adolescents (2–18 years) Home |
Lunchbox interventions | 1995 to January 2017 | Vegetable consumption or provision (serves, portions or grams) | Meta‐analysis |
Nekitsing et al. 41 | To identify the most successful strategies to enhance vegetable intake in preschool children aged 2–5 years | No restrictions |
Children (2–5 years) No restrictions |
No restrictions | 2005 to January 2016 | Vegetable consumption (grams, observations, FFQ score) | Meta‐analysis |
Neves et al. 42 | To evaluate the efficacy of randomised clinical trials of nutritional interventions in food habits among older people | RCTs |
Older adults (≥60 years) NR |
Educational interventions | Inception to October 2018 | Vegetable consumption (NR) | Meta‐analysis |
Nour et al. 43 | To evaluate the efficacy and external validity of electronic (eHealth) and mobile phone (mHealth)‐based interventions that promote vegetable intake in young adults | RCTs |
Young adults (18–35 years) NR |
Digital – eHealth and mHealth interventions | 1990 to August 2015 | Vegetable consumption (servings, cups, frequency or percentage consumption) | Meta‐analysis |
Nury et al. 44 | To examine the effects of different nutritional intervention strategies in the school setting on anthropometric and quality of diet outcomes by comparing and ranking outcomes in a network meta‐analysis | Cluster RCTs |
Children and adolescents 4–18 years School |
Nutritional interventions; no restrictions | Inception to May 2022 | Vegetable consumption (grams, portions, cups, pieces or servings) | Meta‐analysis |
Peñalvo et al. 45 | To comprehensively study the effectiveness of multi‐component worksite wellness programmes for improving diet and cardiometabolic risk factors | RCTs or quasi‐experimental studies |
Employed individuals Workplace |
Multi‐component workplace wellness programmes | January 1990 to June 2020 | Vegetable consumption (servings/day) | Meta‐analysis |
Pineda et al. 46 | To assess the effectiveness of interventions on the food environment within and around schools to improve dietary intake and prevent childhood obesity | NR |
School‐aged children and adolescents (≤19 years) School |
Obesity prevention or healthy eating interventions | Inception to January 2020 | Vegetable consumption (NR); Vegetable purchasing (NR) | Meta‐analysis |
Touyz et al. 47 | To examine the effectiveness of parent‐targeted in‐home interventions in increasing fruit and vegetable intake in children | RCTs, non‐RCTs or pre–post studies |
Children (2–12 years) and their parents Home |
Parent‐targeted; no restrictions | January 2000 to August 2016 | Vegetable consumption (grams or servings/day) | Meta‐analysis |
Vaughan et al. 48 | To investigate the impact of school‐based cooking classes on cooking skills, food literacy and vegetable intake of children aged 4–12 years | RCTs, cluster RCTs or quasi‐experimental studies |
Children (4–12 years) School |
Practical nutrition education classes | January 2001 to December 2021 | Vegetable consumption (servings/day, intake score, number of days vegetables consumed at supper) | Meta‐analysis |
Yang et al. 49 | To synthesise the characteristics of blended interventions and meta‐analyse the effectiveness of blended interventions in promoting PA‐, diet‐ and weight‐related outcomes among adults | RCTs or cluster RCTs |
Adults (≥18 years) NR |
Face‐to‐face and eHealth blended interventions | January 2002 to July 2022 | Vegetable consumption (NR) | Meta‐analysis |
Yoong et al. 50 | To assess the effectiveness of healthy eating interventions delivered in ECEC settings for improving dietary intake in children aged 6 months to 6 years, relative to usual care, no intervention or an alternative, non‐dietary intervention | RCTs including cluster RCTs, stepped‐wedge RCTs, factorial RCTs, multiple baseline RCTs and randomised crossover trials |
Children (6 months–6 years) Early childhood education and care settings |
Healthy eating interventions | Inception to February 2022 | Vegetable consumption (servings, portions, times, weight) | Meta‐analysis |
Abbreviations: FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; mo, months; NR, not reported; RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Only outcomes relevant to the aim of this rapid review were extracted, that is, vegetable intake or purchase.
Where the synthesis method differed between outcomes, the synthesis method for the analysis of vegetables was extracted.