Table 8.
Genetic models | Viral infection | Effect size and 95 % interval |
Heterogeneity |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | OR | Lower limit | Upper limit | P-value | I2 | P-het | τ2 | P-Begg | P-Egger | ||
D vs. I | Viral infections- | 3 | 1,523 | 1,002 | 2,316 | 0,049 | 67,63 | 0,046 | 0,092 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 1,555 | 1,031 | 2,346 | 0,035 | 76,35 | 0,005 | 0,132 | NS | 0,006 | |
DD vs. DI + II | Viral infections- | 3 | 1,403 | 1,011 | 1,947 | 0,043 | 0,00 | 0,894 | 0,000 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 1,438 | 1,116 | 1,853 | 0,005 | 0,00 | 0,500 | 0,000 | NS | NS | |
DD + DI vs. II | Viral infections- | 3 | 2,412 | 0,610 | 9,536 | 0,209 | 87,72 | 0,000 | 1,291 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 2,163 | 0,704 | 6,646 | 0,178 | 85,47 | 0,000 | 1.077 | NS | 0,035 | |
DD + II vs. DI | Viral infections- | 3 | 0,817 | 0,354 | 1,887 | 0,636 | 84,07 | 0,002 | 0,456 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 1,040 | 0,632 | 1,711 | 0,878 | 69,54 | 0,020 | 0,175 | NS | NS | |
DI vs II | Viral infections- | 3 | 2,207 | 0,481 | 10,125 | 0,308 | 88,58 | 0,000 | 1,602 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 1,830 | 0,571 | 5,866 | 0,309 | 84,70 | 0,000 | 1,155 | NS | 0,029 | |
DD vs II | Viral infections- | 3 | 2,551 | 0,745 | 8,742 | 0,136 | 81,78 | 0,004 | 0,964 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 2,421 | 0,804 | 7,288 | 0,116 | 83,13 | 0,000 | 1,003 | NS | 0,046 | |
DD vs DI | Viral infections- | 3 | 1,218 | 0,855 | 1,733 | 0,275 | 0,00 | 0,684 | 0,000 | NS | NS |
Viral infections+ | 4 | 1,399 | 1,065 | 1,839 | 0,016 | 0,00 | 0,892 | 0,000 | NS | NS |
Bold: significant P-value (<0,05); N: number of studies; NS: Not Significant; OR: odds ratio; I2 : heterogeneity test; τ2 , tau-squared; I/D : insertion/deletion; P- het, p-heterogeneity ; bp: base pairs. The overall analysis gives estimations among subgroups; Viral infection+: presence infection; Viral infection-: absence infection.