Table 3.
Results of multilevel analyses examining change in cortisol (AUCg and AUCi) across the intervention by condition with WHM condition as reference group.
Outcome | Predictor | B | p | 95%CI |
r | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LL | UL | |||||
AUCg |
Intercept | 2.402 | <0.001 | 1.627 | 3.176 | – |
Post-Intervention | −0.038 | 0.730 | −0.257 | 0.181 | 0.04 | |
Condition | −0.049 | 0.727 | −0.329 | 0.230 | 0.03 | |
BMI | −0.009 | 0.486 | −0.033 | 0.016 | 0.08 | |
Age | −0.007 | 0.252 | −0.018 | 0.005 | 0.13 | |
Post-Intervention x Condition |
−0.121 |
0.417 |
−0.418 |
0.175 |
0.10 |
|
Outcome |
Predictor |
B |
p |
95%CI |
r |
|
LL |
UL |
|||||
AUCi | Intercept | 3.393 | <0.001 | 3.154 | 3.632 | – |
Post-Intervention | −0.169 | <0.001 | −0.261 | −0.076 | 0.38 | |
Condition | 0.020 | 0.675 | −0.075 | 0.115 | 0.04 | |
BMI | −0.009 | 0.029 | −0.016 | −0.001 | 0.25 | |
Age | 0.001 | 0.609 | −0.003 | 0.004 | 0.06 | |
Post-Intervention x Condition | 0.076 | 0.234 | −0.050 | 0.201 | 0.14 |
Note. CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit. r was calculated using the method used by Kashdan and Steger (2006): r = √(t2/t2+df); AUCg = area under the curve with respect to ground for cortisol; AUCi = area under the curve with respect to increase for cortisol.