Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 21;56:40855. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40855

Table II.

Key potential barriers and facilitators in rehabilitation service provision

Potential challenges/barriers Potential facilitators/enablers
  • Unclear role/responsibilities of rehabilitation professionals within patient flow processes, expected timeframes/KPIs for discharge planning & liaison with external services

  • Limited communication documentation for interdisciplinary input in the care processes for discharge planning

  • Limited pre-admission discharge planning for planned surgical cases for rehabilitation

  • Inadequate complex care planning and care coordination for sub-acute services

  • Limited liaison of subacute services with interdisciplinary teams

  • Limited rehabilitation resources, and coordinated timely referrals to subacute services & follow-up mechanisms

  • Limited prehabilitation and pre-treatment workups prior to admission for some patients

  • Inadequate patient and family communication concerning the discharge plan

  • Limited skilled expertise in rehabilitation & geriatric services

  • Poor integration of AH and rehabilitation physicians within acute cancer care team plans

  • Lack of presence of a designated rehabilitation ward resulting in delay in referral

  • No defined sub-acute referral pathways

  • Acute care consultant-driven decision-making

  • Limited documentation/assessment of patient rehabilitation needs

  • Unplanned admissions from the community

  • Limited robust process to ensure early identification of patient functional complexity & discharge barriers

  • Delayed flagging of patient needs/issues (clinical, functional, social), e.g., NDIS

  • Limited clinical pathways and protocols for rehabilitation treatments

  • Lack of standardized patient assessment screening tool for function

  • Establishment of an Access and Flow Ward Clinical Group

  • Discharge Coordinator service, introduction of a Discharge Coordinator and Rehabilitation Physician role

  • Implementation of standardized screening and assessment tools to stratify patients’ discharge risk and ensure early and appropriate referrals

  • Suitable discharge pathways available for patients including at home services

  • Support and education to staff regarding rehabilitation needs and assessment

  • Developed communication strategies to involve patients and families in decision-making

  • Use of electronic platform for improved communication amongst team members and improved visibility of patient care across clinical groups

  • Liaison with key stakeholders for improved access to rehabilitation services

  • Refinement of the role and responsibilities of treating staff

  • Daily meetings with discharge coordinators and treating teams

  • Earlier engagement of ambulatory and sub-acute services

  • Building a stronger relationship between cancer services and the subacute care team, including community rehabilitation

  • Increase awareness of in-reach and rehabilitation consultation services for acute cancer patients

  • Rehabilitation medicine involvement in the peri-operative context (functional assessment); peri-operative period to identify risks, suggest risk mitigation strategies, and prepare eventual disposition options

  • Building stronger relationships with external inpatient subacute services

  • Interdisciplinary stakeholder group meetings for resources, infrastructure, workflow, etc.

  • Enhanced support of consumer forums

  • Commencement of a new Rehabilitation Medicine Clinic to support AH staff

AH: allied health; NDIS: National Disability Insurance Scheme.