Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464

Table 3. Compliance for all elements and subelements of PLSs.

Element Subelement Frequency in author instructions (N=53) Compliance score all PLSs Percentage compliance Compliance rating*
Word count/PLS length Maximum number of words 38 70 92.1% High
PLS length 15 10 50% Low
Content Based on manuscript 24 46 95.8% High
Background 17 26 76.5% Medium
Methods 15 25 83.3% High
Main findings/take-home message 29 35 60.0% Medium
Impact/’so what’ of research 18 23 63.9% Medium
Other 3 1 16.7% Very low
Structure Bullet points 10 8 40% Low
Paragraph style or similar 48 68 70.1% Medium
Other 3 3 50% Low
Wording/language Plain English/easy to understand 43 31 36.0% Low
Active voice 29 25 43.1% Low
First person 3 0 0% Very low
Person-centred language 9 14 77.8% Medium
Reading level/Readability 2 4 50% Low
Other 18 18 50% Low
Jargon, acronyms and abbreviations Jargon—explain or avoid 32 31 48.4% Low
Abbreviations—explain or avoid 29 56 96.6% High
*

High =≥80%, medium=51%–79%, low=50%–31%, Vvery low =≤30%.

PLSsplain language summaries