Skip to main content
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth logoLink to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
. 2024 Nov 28;24:802. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06998-8

Effect of pregnancy intention on completion of maternity continuum of care in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis

Birye Dessalegn Mekonnen 1,2,✉, Vidanka Vasilevski 1,3, Ayele Geleto Bali 1,3, Linda Sweet 1,3
PMCID: PMC11603981  PMID: 39609727

Abstract

Background

The maternity continuum of care is a strategy to provide timely and quality maternal and child healthcare through preconception, pregnancy, childbirth, postnatal, and the early childhood periods. The maternity continuum of care effectively reduces global maternal and neonatal deaths. However, several factors are reported to cause low completion of the maternity continuum of care in sub–Saharan Africa. There has been substantial debate in the literature as to whether pregnancy intention influences the completion of the maternity continuum of care. Although several studies have been conducted to determine the influence of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care, findings are inconsistent and have not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this review aims to determine the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care in sub–Saharan African countries.

Methods

A systematic search of articles was performed from MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care, Global Health, Scopus, and Web of Science. The identified articles were imported into Covidence and independently screened by two researchers for abstract and title, and then full-text. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Cochran’s Q test and I2 were used for assessing the potential heterogeneity of the studies. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s regression test and inspection of a funnel plot. A fixed-effects meta-analysis model was used to compute the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care.

Results

Ten studies involving 343,932 participants were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimate of the meta-analysis found that women with intended pregnancy had 2.12 times higher odds of completing the maternity continuum of care (pooled odds ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.33, 3.36) as compared to women with unintended pregnancy.

Conclusion

Intended pregnancy has a statistically significant positive effect on completing the maternity continuum of care. Policymakers and healthcare providers need to implement strategies to encourage women to plan their pregnancies through the strengthening of pre-conception care and contraceptive counselling to prevent unintended pregnancies.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42023409134.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-024-06998-8.

Keywords: Intended pregnancy, Unintended pregnancy, Maternity continuum of care, Sub-Saharan African, Systematic review

Background

Maternal mortality remains high, with a global Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) in 2020 of 223 per 100,000 live births [1]. In 2020, approximately 287,000 women died because of complications related to pregnancy, childbirth, or postpartum [2, 3]. Almost all (95%) of these maternal deaths occurred in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries contributing approximately 70% of these deaths [3]. In SSA, the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 59, much higher than in all low-income countries, which is 1 in 160 [4]. One of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets is to decrease the global MMR to 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 [5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) advocate for global strategies such as the completion of the maternity continuum of care to reduce the rates of maternal, neonatal, and child mortality with the aim to achieve the SDG target [6, 7].

The continuum of care is a holistic approach that addresses integrated service delivery throughout preconception, pregnancy, childbirth, postnatal, and childhood periods at family, community, and facility levels [8, 9]. The maternity continuum of care is a common strategy in LMICs to provide timely and quality maternal, and newborn healthcare [10, 11]. Evidence has shown that maternal and neonatal deaths can be averted through completing the maternity continuum of care, which is safe, effective, accessible, and equitable [12, 13]. Although the importance of an effective maternity continuum of care is well recognised, it is not well practised in SSA [14]. Recent studies have shown that completing the maternity continuum of care in SSA countries ranges from 25% [15] to 35.81% [16]. Many pregnant women start their contact late or do not visit a health facility at all, giving birth at home [17, 18].

Several factors that cause the low completion of the maternity continuum of care are reported across studies. Poor quality of care, disrespect during service delivery, low satisfaction with healthcare services, and lack of transportation have been reported [19, 20]. Conversely, higher educational status, having a history of pregnancy termination, timely initiation of antenatal care, planned pregnancy, women’s autonomy, shared decision-making with husband/partners, and distance to the closest health facility were identified as positive determinants for the completion of the maternity continuum of care [15, 16, 21–25].

Pregnancy intention determines the completion of the continuum of maternity care [26]. Women who have planned their pregnancies tend to be more cautious about their pregnancy, are psychologically prepared, and have higher health-seeking behaviour for maternal and neonatal healthcare services than women with unplanned pregnancies [27, 28]. Reducing the rates of unintended pregnancies and increasing completion of the maternity continuum of care would reduce maternal and neonatal deaths [29, 30]. Unintended pregnancy correlates with late initiation of antenatal care [18, 31], low rate of antenatal care visit [27, 31, 32], low rate of institutional childbirth [27, 32], and low rate of postnatal care [27], compared to planned pregnancies. Unintended pregnancy resulted in a 25 – 39% reduction in maternity care use [33] and an increased risk of pregnancy complications [34–36]. Despite its impact on maternal and newborn health, global rates of unintended pregnancy vary widely, ranging from 11 per 1,000 in Montenegro to 145 per 1,000 in Uganda [37]. Evidence has shown that the pooled prevalence of unintended pregnancy in SSA was 34% [38].

Given the high prevalence of unintended pregnancies in SSA and its potential impact on maternal, newborn, and child health, assessing the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care is important for informing maternal health policy and practice. Although studies have identified pregnancy intention as a determinant of the completion of maternity continuum of care, findings are inconsistent and there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis conducted to estimate the effect of pregnancy intention on completion of the maternity continuum of care in SSA countries. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care in SSA countries.

Methods

Registration and reporting

The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) after checking for other similar review protocols (registration Identifier: CRD42023409134). We prepared and reported this review following the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist [39].

Information sources and search strategy

Key search terms were developed for the following three concepts: pregnancy intention, maternity continuum of care, and Sub-Saharan Africa. The search terms included both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to increase the specificity of search terms, and free text keywords to capture records without subject headings, such as recently added records to a database. A variety of truncation, proximity, Boolean operators, and phrases were used for the various databases. A systematic literature search was conducted on April 05, 2023, in databases that contain maternity care evidence. These included MEDLINE Complete (EBSCOhost platform), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost platform), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost platform), EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care, Global Health (EBSCOhost platform), Scopus, and Web of Science. Furthermore, the reference lists of the identified studies and reviews were checked in Google Scholar for potentially relevant articles. The search strategy was initially developed in EBSCOhost MEDLINE and then modified for other databases (Supplementary File 1). A senior librarian reviewed the search strategies and provided advice to optimise the search.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

We included observational studies that reported pregnancy intention as an exposure variable and the completion of the maternity continuum of care as an outcome variable. Quantitative or mixed-method studies published since 2000 reporting on SSA countries that were peer-reviewed, and published in English language were included. Furthermore, only articles that reported the adjusted odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were included.

Exclusion criteria

We excluded studies that were conducted on maternity continuum of care dropout, or only reported on either antenatal care, institutional childbirth, or postnatal care but did not report the completion of the maternity continuum of care as an outcome variable. Additionally, qualitative studies, case reports, case series, commentaries, case studies, review articles, conference abstracts, and opinion pieces were excluded.

Study selection

Studies were screened using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) systematic review software. Following the removal of duplicates, the titles and abstracts of all identified records were screened against the eligibility criteria. Three reviewers (BDM, VV, AGB) were responsible for abstract and full-text screening. Two authors independently screened the studies initially by title and abstract, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer (LS). The full texts of potentially eligible articles were retrieved and then systematically screened using the same process. The result of the search, screening, and selection process is shown in a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram.

Outcome measurement

The outcome of interest in this review was the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care. For this review, a complete maternity continuum of care was defined as a woman who had received antenatal care, use of skilled birth attendants during childbirth, and use of postnatal care within six weeks following childbirth [11]. In the primary studies, women were asked to state if their pregnancy was planned or unplanned. Accordingly, pregnancy intention was classified into intended and unintended. Intended pregnancy was considered when the woman reported that she planned or wanted her last pregnancy at the time of conception. Unintended pregnancy was characterised as unwanted pregnancy (no children are desired at all) or mistimed pregnancy (wanted at some time but occurred sooner than desired). Both were considered a pregnancy that the woman had not desired at the time of conception [40, 41].

Data extraction

Data were independently extracted in a standardised data abstraction format prepared using Microsoft Excel by two reviewers (BDM and VV), with any variance or unclear information resolved by discussion with the third and fourth reviewers (AGB, LS). All relevant information from each included study, such as author(s), study setting and design, publication year, sample size, study population, response rate, odds ratio with 95% CI for the association of pregnancy intention with maternity continuum of care, and the definition of maternity continuum of care was documented. The total number of participants was also extracted with the completion of the maternity continuum of care and pregnancy intention (intendeded or unintended).

Quality assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies was used to evaluate the methodological quality of each study [42]. The NOS tool is used to assess three domains and enables studies to be rated with a maximum score of ten. The first domain focuses on the selection of study groups (sample size, representativeness of the sample, non-response rate, ascertainment of the exposure) and is rated with a maximum score of five. The second domain focuses on the comparability of groups and if the study controlled for the important factors that potentially influence the outcome of interest with a possibility of gaining a maximum score of two. The third domain is concerned with the assessment of ascertainment of the outcomes of interest (assessment of outcome, appropriateness of statistical test) with a maximum score of three. Finally, the scores for each study are tallied. The quality of the studies is rated based on the overall score. Studies with a score of 9 or 10 were deemed very-good quality, and those with a score of 7 or 8 were deemed to be good quality. Studies with a score of 5 or 6 were deemed satisfactory, with studies having a score of four or less being deemed unsatisfactory quality. Papers with a score of four or less were to be removed from the review due to poor quality. Two reviewers (BDM, AGB) evaluated the quality of each original study, with conflicts resolved through the third and fourth reviewers (LS, VV). While we could not identify the original source adapted specifically for cross sectional studies, similar previous studies have been used this tool [33, 43, 44].

Data analysis

The adjusted odds ratios as the measure of effect were extracted from each primary study. The log ORs and corresponding sampling variances were calculated for each study. Stata statistical software version 17 was used to execute all statistical analyses. The summary effect sizes with 95% CI were calculated and displayed graphically with forest plots and tables. The inverse of the variance was performed to calculate the weight of each study in the pooled estimate. A fixed-effect meta-analysis model was applied to compute the pooled effect of pregnancy intention on completion of the maternity continuum of care because no significant heterogeneity was detected. In this analysis, mistimed and unwanted pregnancy were used interchangeably if primary studies had reported one of the two instead of unintended pregnancy compared to planned or intended pregnancy.

The Cochran’s Q test was used to statistically estimate the variation among the primary studies and heterogeneity was quantified by I2. Substantial heterogeneity was considered at p-value < 0.1 or I2 > 50% [45]. Publication bias was estimated using Egger’s regression test for small-study effects at a p-value < 0.05 and checked with a visual inspection of the funnel plot symmetry [46]. We did a subgroup analysis based on the number of antenatal care visits that women had received during pregnancy as defined by the studies (i.e.,1 or more antenatal visits versus 4 or more antenatal visits). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of results and the effects of outliers on the meta-analysis.

Results

Study selection

A total of 1,216 articles were identified from the database searches, with a further 11 studies sourced from manual searches of reference lists of relevant studies. After the comprehensive screening process, ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were retained for the meta-analysis. The reasons for articles exclusion were wrong outcomes, wrong intervention, insufficient data, and inconsistent exposure category (categorisation of the exposure variable as intended, mistimed, and unwanted; and then made intended pregnancy as a reference variable which made it difficult to get the adjusted odds ratio). Article screening process and the reasons for exclusion are provided in supplementary file 2. Article screening and the selection processes are illustrated in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the studies screening process

Studies characteristics

All the studies included in the review were cross-sectional designs. The sample sizes of the selected articles ranged from 310 to 337,297, with an overall sample of 343,932 women. The studies were conducted from January 2013 to October 2021 and published between 2018 and 2022. Most of the studies (n = 7, 70%) were conducted in Ethiopia [24, 25, 47–51]. All the studies assessed pregnancy intention and maternity continuum of care retrospectively. Studies included in the review used different types of data collection tools, such as demographic and health survey questionnaires [52], structured questionnaires developed through literature reviews [24, 25, 47–51], or a questionnaire developed by the researchers [53]. The studies employed different random sampling techniques, such as a multi-stage random sampling [47, 51, 54], multi-stage cluster sampling [48], simple random sampling [24, 25, 50], multistage stratified sampling [52], and stratified random sampling [49, 53]. Summaries of the ten papers are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of maternity continuum of care in SSA, 2023

Authors Study country Study population Definition of maternity continuum of care Sample size Response rate (%) Pregnancy intention Completion of maternity continuum of care Adjusted odds ratio
(95% CI)
Controlled confounding factors
Yes No
Ahmed et al. 2022 [51] Ethiopia Women who give birth within 12 months before the study period Mothers who received ANC 4+, SBA, and PNC within 48 h after birth 823 99 Intended (n = 603) 92 724

1.3

(0.6, 2.6)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, women’s occupation, husband’s occupation, residence, decision on maternal and child health, wealth quintile, parity, the timing of first ANC, complications encountered during the last pregnancy, knowledge of danger signs of postpartum, birth preparedness and complication readiness plan, distance from health facilities
Unintended (n = 213)
Asratie et al. 2022 [52] Multi-country in SSA Women who give birth and had children aged 0–36 months Women who received ANC 1+, SBA, and PNC within 6 weeks postpartum 337,297 100 Intended (n = 306,423) 120,786 216,511

2.51

(1.82, 3.12)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, marital status, wealth status, exposure to media, residence, region, distance to the nearby health facility, health insurance, number of under 5 age children alive, parity, history of terminated pregnancy, the content of ANC, decision maker to attend maternal healthcare, use of medication during pregnancy, time to start ANC, site of ANC visit, informed about pregnancy complications, health care provider support,
Unintended (n = 30,874)
Buli et al. 2022 [49] Ethiopia Women who gave birth within 6 months before the study Mothers who received ANC 4+, SBA, and PNC within the first week after childbirth 630 99.5 Intended 84 252

3.29

(1.02,10.57)

Residence, women’s educational status, husband’s educational status, women’s employment status, monthly income, traveling time to reach health facility on foot, mode of transportation, maternal age at first pregnancy, number of children, knowledge of appropriate time for first ANC booking, early ANC booking within the first trimester, receiving adequate ANC services, attendance of pregnant women’s conference, place of ANC visits, informed about pregnancy-related complications, had birth preparedness and complication readiness plan, accompanied by partners, informed about postpartum danger signs, informed when to return for PNC before discharge
Unintended 8 84
Cherie et al. 2021 [47] Ethiopia Mothers who gave birth and found between the first week to 6 months after childbirth Women who had received ANC 4+, SBA, and had at least 3 PNC visits 732 100 Intended 57 253

2.45

(1.36, 4.4)

Residence, pre-pregnancy family planning use, counselling about family planning, exposure to media, women’s autonomy in making health care decisions, heard about PNC
Unintended 25 397
Emiru et al. 2020 [48] Ethiopia Women who gave birth within 12 months before the survey date Women who had received ANC 4+, SBA, and PNC within 48 h after birth 1337 95.8

Intended

(n = 1062)

155 1126

2.09

(0.66, 6.69)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, women’s occupation, husband’s occupation, residence, religion, household wealth index, health facility readiness level, birth interval, history of poor foetal outcome, complications encountered during the last pregnancy, knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy, timing of first ANC, content of ANC, mode of delivery
Unintended (n = 219)
Enos et al. 2021 [53] Ghana Women who give birth within 24 months before the study Women who had received ANC 1+, SBA, and PNC along the continuum of care 310 100 Intended 203 107

2.1

(0.6, 7.73)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, residence, income status, health insurance, distance to the health facility, parity, exposure to media, had ANC4 + visits, delivery at a health facility
Unintended
Haile et al. 2020 [25] Ethiopia Women who started ANC and had PNC within six or more weeks after childbirth Women who had received ANC 4+, SBA, and at least one PNC within 6 weeks after childbirth 438 98.6 Intended 38 295

3.5

(1.1, 11.4)

Women’s education status, women’s employment status, perceived time to reach health facilities, pre-pregnancy contraceptive use, knowledge of key pregnancy danger signs, birth order, time for first ANC booking, birth preparedness and complications readiness plan
Unintended 4 95
Sertsewold et al. 2021 [50] Ethiopia Reproductive-age women who gave birth within 12 months before the data collection period Women who had ANC 4+, SBA, and at least one PNC within 6 weeks after childbirth 620 99 Intended 83 211

1.98

(0.42, 9.3)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, residence, monthly income, perceived time to reach health facilities, distance from health facility, mode of transport, perceived quality of care, women’s autonomy, knowledge of maternal healthcare, attitude towards maternal healthcare, birth order, history of contraceptive use
Unintended 16 204
Shibanuma et al. 2018 [54] Ghana Reproductive-age women who experienced their latest pregnancy as a live birth or stillbirth Women who had received ANC 4+, SBA, and PNC within 48 h, 2, and 6 weeks of childbirth 1500 93.4

Intended

(n = 816)

111 1290

1.38

(0.46, 4.14)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, religion, partner’s age, partner’s education, number of children aged under 5 years, money prepared for delivery, held health insurance card, number of pregnancies, received support from a household member during and after delivery, any complications for women during pregnancy, or delivery or postpartum, any complications for the child
Unintended (n = 585)
Shitie et al. 2020 [24] Ethiopia Mothers who gave birth within 12 months before the study Women who had received ANC 1+, SBA, and PNC within 48 h after childbirth 651 95.4 Intended 250 243

3.33

(1.87, 5.9)

Women’s age, women’s educational status, marital status, residence, women’s occupation, exposure to media, husband’s education, husband’s occupation, women’s autonomy in health care decision-making, parity
Unintended 29 99

ANC = antenatal care, SBA = skilled birth attendant, PNC = postnatal care

Quality assessment results

All studies used random sampling. Except for one, all studies had adequate sample size, and nine studies had adequate response rates. However, only two studies used validated tools for the ascertainment of the exposure. All studies clearly described and used an appropriate statistical test to analyse the data. Only one study assessed the outcome of interest with record linkage. It was noted that all studies controlled the most important factors and demographic characteristics that potentially influence the maternity continuum of care. Three studies were ranked as a very good quality, and the remaining seven studies were rated as good quality, so all were retained in the analysis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Quality assessment of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies, 2023

Authors, year Selection (Maximum score of 5) Comparability (Maximum score of 2) Outcome (Maximum score of 3) NOS score
Representativeness of the sample (max. 1 score) Sample size (max. 1 score) Non-response rate (max. 1 score) Ascertainment of the exposure (max. 2 scores) The subjects in different outcome groups are comparable, based on the study design or analysis (Confounding factors are controlled) Assessment of outcome (max. 2 scores) Statistical test is appropriate (max. 1 score)
Ahmed et al. 2022 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8
Asratie et al. 2022 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 9
Buli et al. 2023 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8
Cherie et al. 2021 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8
Emiru et al. 2020 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 9
Enos et al. 2021 1 1 1 2 1 1 7
Haile et al. 2020 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 9
Sertsewold et al. 2021 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8
Shibanuma et al. 2018 1 1 1 2 1 1 7
Shitie et al. 2020 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8

Effect of pregnancy intention on the maternity continuum of care

Ten studies incorporating 343,932 participants contributed to the meta-analysis on the effect of pregnancy intention on completing the maternity continuum of care. Meta-analysis of these studies revealed that the odds of completing the maternity continuum of care were two times higher (pooled OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.33, 3.36) in women who had intended pregnancy as compared to those with unintended pregnancy. In this analysis, no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0.00%, p = 1.00) was identified across the studies (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plot of the pooled effect of pregnancy intention on the maternity continuum of care in SSA

Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the number of antenatal care visits used by primary studies to define the completion of the maternity continuum of care (at least one antenatal care visit vs. four or more visits). The results of the three studies that defined the maternity continuum of care using at least one antenatal care visit showed that women with intended pregnancies had higher odds of completing the maternity continuum of care (pooled OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.39, 4.71) compared to those with unintended pregnancies. However, the results of the seven studies that defined completion of the maternity continuum of care using four or more antenatal care visits showed no difference in completion of the maternity continuum of care (pooled OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.80, 3.32) between women with intended and unintended pregnancies (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Subgroup analysis of the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care by the number of antenatal care visits. ANC = antenatal care episodes, SBA = skilled birth attendant during childbirth, PNC = postnatal care episode before 6 weeks after childbirth

Publication bias

The results of both Egger’s linear regression test and Begg’s rank correlation test indicated that there was no statistically significant publication bias. The scatter of the studies in the funnel plot demonstrated that publication bias was not observed (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Funnel plot of the included studies

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis of the included studies was performed using a fixed effect model to assess the stability of results and the effect of outliers on the meta-analysis. The result shows that there was no strong evidence of individual study influence on the pooled results (Table 3).

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis for the study effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of maternity continuum of care in SSA

Study ID/ Author, year Estimate [95%Confidence Interval]
Ahmed R et al. 2022 2.4162951 1.4329036 4.0745807
Asratie M H et al. 2022 1.7735143 0.91662556 3.4314477
Buli T D et al. 2023 2.1066282 1.3228363 3.3548236
Cherie N et al. 2021 2.0839372 1.2814891 3.3888652
Emiru AA et al. 2020 2.1161008 1.3243159 3.3812795
Enos J Y et al. 2021 2.1157479 1.326221 3.3752966
Haile D et al. 2020 2.1068153 1.3233635 3.3540826
Sertsewold S G et al. 2021 2.1170218 1.3289025 3.3725436
Shibanuma A et al. 2018 2.1774986 1.3493922 3.5138042
Shitie A et al. 2020 2.0626242 1.2816175 3.3195696
Combined 2.1154812 1.3313128 3.3615396

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the available data on the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care in SSA women. A total of ten studies with adjusted effect estimates were included. Among the studies included in the review, three studies with a total sample of 338,228 defined the completion of the maternity continuum of care as having at least one antenatal care visit, skilled birth attendant, and postnatal care, while the other seven studies with a total sample of 5,704 used four or more antenatal care visit, skilled birth attendant, and postnatal care. The subgroup analysis of studies defining maternity continuum of care completion with at least one antenatal visit showed a significant positive effect of pregnancy intention on completion of the maternity continuum of care. In contrast, studies using four or more antenatal visits to define continuum of care completion found no difference between women with intended and unintended pregnancies. The variation in sample size likely influenced the subgroup analysis. Smaller sample sizes produce wider confidence intervals, indicating greater uncertainty and lower precision in effect estimates, which may reduce the ability to detect significant differences [55, 56].

Notably, the overall meta-analysis showed a significant positive effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care. This highlights the importance of planning a pregnancy and in maternity care engagement. Importantly, the WHO recommendation suggests a shift from a minimum of four ANC visits to a minimum of eight ANC contacts for reducing maternal and perinatal deaths, with the first contact taking place within 12 weeks of gestation [57]. However, none of the studies included in this review used eight or more ANC contacts for defining the completion of the maternity continuum of care. Countries hesitancy to adopt the new guidelines or late implementation of the recommendations is likely to result in a delay in obtaining data that specifies eight or more ANC contacts [58, 59]. There needs to be strong advocacy and support for LMICs to follow current guidelines for reducing maternal mortality rates and achieving SDGs. To encourage this, further analysis of the impact of pregnancy intention and other factors on the completion of the maternity continuum of care incorporating the minimum of eight ANC contacts is needed.

The review showed that women with intended pregnancy were more likely to complete the maternity continuum of care. Research has shown that unintended pregnancy was a major factor in the reduced use of essential maternal healthcare services during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum [26, 33, 60, 61]. This is further supported by previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the completion of the maternity continuum of care and its determinants in Ethiopia [21, 22]. The observed effect of pregnancy intention on completing the maternity continuum of care could be linked to women with unintended pregnancies being unaware of their pregnancy, or giving it less priority, which can reduce their engagement with essential maternal healthcare services. Evidence has shown that mothers who planned their pregnancy were more likely to realise their pregnancy status early and engage with recommended maternal healthcare services in a timely manner [27, 28, 61, 62]. In contrast, women with unintended pregnancies may delay or avoid accessing maternity care to keep their pregnancies secret due to community norms or fear of social stigma [63]. Furthermore, women with unintended pregnancies are more likely to have low social support and self-efficacy [64], making it difficult to identify healthcare needs, seek, access, and use maternity care services.

Evidence has highlighted that identifying the challenges and opportunities for maternal healthcare service use is vital for achieving universal access to maternal healthcare services and the SDGs, particularly in countries where coverage of maternity care remains low [65–68]. This review found that intended pregnancy could be an important factor in enhancing the completion of the maternity continuum of care. Therefore, preventing unintended pregnancies by improving access to sexual and reproductive health education and services, and promoting contraceptive use in SSA countries is essential [69–71]. Furthermore, examining the barriers and enablers for accessing and using contraception services to reduce unmet needs and enhance engagement is also necessary [72–76]. On the other hand, increasing women’s knowledge about the importance of pregnancy planning and early pregnancy detection through effective pre-conception care would support the timely initiation of engaging with the maternity continuum of care [73, 77]. Preconception care provides women the opportunity to receive counselling about pregnancy planning and interventions that improve outcomes for mothers and newborns, regardless of pregnancy status or intention [78–80].

The findings of this study underscore the need to discuss with women about their pregnancy intentions and provide health education emphasising the benefit of completing the maternity continuum of care. Furthermore, a robust pathway that explicitly reaches out to women with unintended pregnancies could be established to improve engagement with the maternity continuum of care. Evidence suggests that community health workers can track women to initiate and continue care along the maternity continuum of care [81–83]. While this analysis was restricted to the effect of pregnancy intention on the maternity continuum of care completion, it is important to recognise that pregnancy intention is not the only factor influencing care engagement. There are also several individual, relationship, community, and societal level factors that influence the maternity continuum of care [15, 84–86].

Strengths and limitations

This review involved a systematic search of several databases to retrieve all relevant articles and engaged multiple reviewers to ensure the methodological rigor of the review. In addition, this review provided the first pooled quantitative estimate of the effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care in SSA. However, it is necessary to interpret the findings with caution regarding the following limitations. Firstly, as all the included studies employed a cross-sectional study design, certainty in the causal effect of pregnancy intention on the completion of the maternity continuum of care could not be established. Secondly, some studies defined the maternity continuum of care with at least one ANC visit instead of four or more visits. To address this variation, a subgroup analysis was performed based on the number of ANC visits. Thirdly, we defined the completion of the maternity continuum of care as including at least one PNC visit, due to variations in the timing and frequency of PNC visits used in the included studies. Finally, we included only peer-reviewed articles published in English; hence, there is a possibility that some potentially relevant studies published in a language other than English may have been missed.

Conclusions

The results of this review revealed that intended pregnancy has a significant positive effect on the completion of the maternity continuum of care. Hence, policymakers and healthcare providers should encourage reproductive health services that focus on improving women’s health in the preconception period when pregnancy is desired or strengthening contraceptive use and counselling to help prevent unintended pregnancies. Furthermore, interventions designed to prevent unintended pregnancies and promote planning for future pregnancies can further encourage the completion of the maternity continuum of care. Addressing community and cultural barriers is crucial for enhancing engagement with the maternity continuum of care, as these factors can discourage women with unintended pregnancies from seeking necessary services. Furthermore, community norms and perceptions around contraception significantly influence women’s ability to make informed pregnancy decisions, impacting their reproductive choices and contraceptive use. Moreover, prospective primary research which adheres to the new recommendations of minimum eight ANC contacts is needed to produce better evidence of factors that impact on the completion of the maternity continuum of care.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (35.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (26.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deakin University Librarian for their assistance in developing the systematic search strategy. The authors would like to extend gratitude to Deakin University Biostatistics Unit for their statistical consultation on the meta-analysis.

Abbreviations

ANC

Antenatal care

LMCs

Low- and middle-income countries

MMR

Maternal Mortality Ratio

NOS

Newcastle-Ottawa scale

PNC

Postnatal care

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

SBA

Skilled birth attendant

SSA

Sub-Saharan African countries

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal

WHO

World Health Organization

Author contributions

All authors developed the conception of the review and study design. BDM conducted the literature review, study screening, data extraction, quality assessment, data analysis, interpretation of results, and drafting of the manuscript. VV, AGB and LS contributed to study screening, quality assessment, data extraction, assist data analysis, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The first author is supported by Deakin University with a PhD research scholarship.

Data availability

All relevant data is included either in the manuscript or as supplementary files.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division., World Health Organization 23 February 2023 [ https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068759
  • 2.WHO. Ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM): World Health Organization; 23 February 2023 [ https://www.who.int/initiatives/ending-preventable-maternal-mortality
  • 3.WHO. Maternal mortality: World Health Organization 22 February 2023 [ https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
  • 4.Alkema L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Hogan D, Mathers C, Mills S et al. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013-estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank, and the United Nations population division. Disclosure. 2014.
  • 5.Bongaarts J. World Health Organization Health in 2015: From MDGs, Millennium Development Goals, to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals Geneva: WHO Press, 2016. 212 p. $60.00 (pbk.). Wiley Online Library; 2016.
  • 6.WHO. Strategies towards ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). 2015.
  • 7.Kikuchi K, Ansah EK, Okawa S, Enuameh Y, Yasuoka J, Nanishi K, et al. Effective linkages of continuum of care for improving neonatal, perinatal, and maternal mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0139288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Kinney MV, Bianchi F, Graham WJ. Evidence to inform the future for maternal and newborn health. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2016;36:169 – 83. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Lassi ZS, Majeed A, Rashid S, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA. The interconnections between maternal and newborn health–evidence and implications for policy. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(sup1):3–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shibanuma A, Ansah EK, Kikuchi K, Yeji F, Okawa S, Tawiah C, et al. Evaluation of a package of continuum of care interventions for improved maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes and service coverage in Ghana: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2021;18(6):e1003663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh K, Story WT, Moran AC. Assessing the continuum of care pathway for maternal health in South Asia and sub-saharan Africa. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:281–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.WHO. Ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM): A renewed focus for improving maternal and newborn health and well-being. 2021.
  • 13.Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014;384(9940):347–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kikuchi K, Gyapong M, Shibanuma A, Ansah E, Okawa S, Addei S et al. EMBRACE intervention to improve the continuum of care in maternal and newborn health in Ghana: the RE-AIM framework-based evaluation. J Global Health. 2021;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Alem AZ, Shitu K, Alamneh TS. Coverage and factors associated with completion of continuum of care for maternal health in sub-saharan Africa: a multicountry analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asratie MH, Belay DG. Pooled prevalence and determinants of completion of Maternity Continuum of Care in Sub-saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis of recent demographic and health surveys. Front Global Women’s Health. 2022;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Chaka EE, Abdurahman AA, Nedjat S, Majdzadeh R. Utilization and determinants of postnatal care services in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019;29(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Ezeanosike OB, Uneke CJ. Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2019;9(10):e031890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ochieng CA, Odhiambo AS. Barriers to formal health care seeking during pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal period: a qualitative study in Siaya County in rural Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tiruneh GT, Demissie M, Worku A, Berhane Y. Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mose A, Haile K, Timerga A. Prevalence of completion of maternity continuum of care and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2022;12(11):e062461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Addisu D, Mekie M, Melkie A, Abie H, Dagnew E, Bezie M, et al. Continuum of maternal healthcare services utilization and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Women’s Health. 2022;18:17455057221091732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sserwanja Q, Musaba MW, Mutisya LM, Olal E, Mukunya D. Continuum of maternity care in Zambia: a national representative survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shitie A, Assefa N, Dhressa M, Dilnessa T. Completion and factors associated with maternity continuum of care among mothers who gave birth in the last one year in Enemay district, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Pregnancy. 2020;2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Haile D, Kondale M, Andarge E, Tunje A, Fikadu T, Boti N. Level of completion along continuum of care for maternal and newborn health services and factors associated with it among women in Arba Minch Zuria Woreda, Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0221670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khan MN, Harris ML, Loxton D. Assessing the effect of pregnancy intention at conception on the continuum of care in maternal healthcare services use in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0242729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saptarini I, Setyonaluri D. Pregnancy intention and utilization of maternal and child health care services in Indonesia. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2018;9(1):27–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Amo-Adjei J, Anamaale Tuoyire D. Effects of planned, mistimed and unwanted pregnancies on the use of prenatal health services in sub‐Saharan Africa: a multicountry analysis of demographic and health survey data. Tropical Med Int Health. 2016;21(12):1552–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Darroch JE, Sully E, Biddlecom A. Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health, 2017—supplementary tables. New York, NY: The Guttmacher Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prata N, Weidert K, Sreenivas A. Meeting the need: youth and family planning in sub-saharan Africa. Contraception. 2013;88(1):83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tolossa T, Turi E, Fetensa G, Fekadu G, Kebede F. Association between pregnancy intention and late initiation of antenatal care among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Reviews. 2020;9:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rahman M, Nasrin SO, Rahman M, Rahman A, Mostofa G, Jesmin SS, et al. Maternal pregnancy intention and its association with low birthweight and pregnancy complications in Bangladesh: findings from a hospital-based study. Int Health. 2019;11(6):447–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Khan MN, Harris ML, Shifti DM, Laar AS, Loxton D. Effects of unintended pregnancy on maternal healthcare services utilization in low-and lower-middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2019;64:743–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dehingia N, Dixit A, Atmavilas Y, Chandurkar D, Singh K, Silverman J, et al. Unintended pregnancy and maternal health complications: cross-sectional analysis of data from rural Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ochieng Arunda M, Agardh A, Larsson M, Asamoah BO. Survival patterns of neonates born to adolescent mothers and the effect of pregnancy intentions and marital status on newborn survival in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, 2014–2016. Global Health Action. 2022;15(1):2101731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hall JA, Benton L, Copas A, Stephenson J. Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:670–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bearak JM, Popinchalk A, Beavin C, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015–2019. BMJ Global Health. 2022;7(3):e007151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bain LE, Zweekhorst MB, de Cock Buning T. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub–saharan Africa: a systematic review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(2):187–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yepes-Nuñez J, Urrutia G, Romero-Garcia M, Alonso-Fernandez S. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista espanola de cardiologia. (English ed). 2021;74(9):790–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003:94–101. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 41.Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000.
  • 43.Musa A, Chojenta C, Geleto A, Loxton D. The associations between intimate partner violence and maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Geleto A, Chojenta C, Musa A, Loxton D. WOMEN’s knowledge of Obstetric Danger signs in Ethiopia (WOMEN’s KODE): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Reviews. 2019;8(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11(2):193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin L, Chu H. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2018;74(3):785–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cherie N, Abdulkerim M, Abegaz Z, Walle Baze G. Maternity continuum of care and its determinants among mothers who gave birth in Legambo district, South Wollo, northeast Ethiopia. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(4):e409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Emiru AA, Alene GD, Debelew GT. Women’s retention on the continuum of maternal care pathway in west Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia: multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Buli TD, Wakgari N, Ganfure G, Wondimu F, Dube DL, Moti G et al. Completion of the continuum of maternity care and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last 6 months in Chelia district, West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2022;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Sertsewold SG, Debie A, Geberu DM. Continuum of maternal healthcare services utilisation and associated factors among women who gave birth in Siyadebirena Wayu district, Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2021;11(11):e051148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ahmed R, Sultan M, Abose S, Assefa B, Nuramo A, Alemu A, et al. Levels and associated factors of the maternal healthcare continuum in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0275752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hunie Asratie M, Belay DG. Pooled prevalence and determinants of completion of Maternity Continuum of Care in Sub-saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis of recent demographic and health surveys. Front Global Women’s Health. 2022;3:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Enos JY, Amoako RD, Doku IK. Utilization, predictors and gaps in the continuum of care for maternal and newborn health in Ghana. Int J Maternal Child Health AIDS. 2021;10(1):98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shibanuma A, Yeji F, Okawa S, Mahama E, Kikuchi K, Narh C, et al. The coverage of continuum of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a cross-sectional study of woman-child pairs in Ghana. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(4):e000786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis: Wiley; 2021.
  • 56.Schünemann HJVG, Higgins JPT, Santesso N, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions [last updated August 2023]. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5. Cochrane, 2024. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • 57.WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization; 2016. [PubMed]
  • 58.Jiwani SS, Amouzou-Aguirre A, Carvajal L, Chou D, Keita Y, Moran AC et al. Timing and number of antenatal care contacts in low and middle-income countries: analysis in the countdown to 2030 priority countries. J Global Health. 2020;10(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Giles M, Mason E, Muñoz F, Moran A, Lambach P, Merten S, et al. Antenatal care service delivery and factors affecting effective tetanus vaccine coverage in low-and middle-income countries: results of the maternal immunisation and Antenatal Care situational analysis (MIACSA) project. Vaccine. 2020;38(33):5278–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guliani H, Sepehri A, Serieux J. Determinants of prenatal care use: evidence from 32 low-income countries across Asia, Sub-saharan Africa and Latin America. Health Policy Plann. 2014;29(5):589–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hajizadeh M, Nghiem S. Does unwanted pregnancy lead to adverse health and healthcare utilization for mother and child? Evidence from low-and middle-income countries. Int J Public Health. 2020;65:457–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ochako R, Gichuhi W. Pregnancy wantedness, frequency and timing of antenatal care visit among women of childbearing age in Kenya. Reproductive Health. 2016;13:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moseson H, Mahanaimy M, Dehlendorf C, Gerdts C. Society is, at the end of the day, still going to stigmatize you no matter which way: A qualitative study of the impact of stigma on social support during unintended pregnancy in early adulthood. PloS one. 2019;14(5):e0217308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Shahry P, Kalhori SRN, Esfandiyari A, Zamani-Alavijeh F. A comparative study of perceived social support and self-efficacy among women with wanted and unwanted pregnancy. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016;4(2):176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Faye CM, Wehrmeister FC, Melesse DY, Mutua MKK, Maïga A, Taylor CM, et al. Large and persistent subnational inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health intervention coverage in sub-saharan Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5(1):e002232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fullman N, Yearwood J, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, et al. Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2236–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kyei-Nimakoh M, Carolan-Olah M, McCann TV. Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-saharan Africa—a systematic review. Syst Reviews. 2017;6:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ansu-Mensah M, Danquah FI, Bawontuo V, Ansu-Mensah P, Mohammed T, Udoh RH, et al. Quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review of providers’ and managers’ perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, Ehiri JE. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2016(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Hindin MJ, Kalamar AM, Thompson T-A, Upadhyay UD. Interventions to prevent unintended and repeat pregnancy among young people in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the published and gray literature. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(3):S8–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mbizvo MT, Kasonda K, Muntalima N-C, Rosen JG, Inambwae S, Namukonda ES, et al. Comprehensive sexuality education linked to sexual and reproductive health services reduces early and unintended pregnancies among in-school adolescent girls in Zambia. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bowring AL, Schwartz S, Lyons C, Rao A, Olawore O, Njindam IM, et al. Unmet need for family planning and experience of unintended pregnancy among female sex workers in urban Cameroon: results from a national cross-sectional study. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2020;8(1):82–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kallner HK, Danielsson KG. Prevention of unintended pregnancy and use of contraception—important factors for preconception care. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;121(4):252–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cabral MA, Schroeder R, Armstrong EM, El Ayadi AM, Gürel AL, Chang J, et al. Pregnancy intentions, contraceptive knowledge and educational aspirations among community college students. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018;50(4):181–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McLean KE, Thulin EJ. If the woman doesn’t prevent, you will become pregnant: exploring male involvement in Contraceptive Use Preceding unplanned pregnancy in Sierra Leone. Stud Fam Plann. 2022;53(1):153–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wondie AG. The association between unmet need for contraception and unintended pregnancy among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia. Med Access@ Point Care. 2021;5:23992026211033436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lang AY, Harrison CL, Barrett G, Hall JA, Moran LJ, Boyle JA. Opportunities for enhancing pregnancy planning and preconception health behaviours of Australian women. Women Birth. 2021;34(2):e153–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dean S, Rudan I, Althabe F, Webb Girard A, Howson C, Langer A, et al. Setting research priorities for preconception care in low-and middle-income countries: aiming to reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity. PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chivers BR, Boyle JA, Lang AY, Teede HJ, Moran LJ, Harrison CL. Preconception health and lifestyle behaviours of women planning a pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hall J, Chawla M, Watson D, Jacob CM, Schoenaker D, Connolly A, et al. Addressing reproductive health needs across the life course: an integrated, community-based model combining contraception and preconception care. Lancet Public Health. 2023;8(1):e76–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rai RK. Tracking women and children in a Continuum of Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and Child Healthcare (RMNCH) in India. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2014;4(3):239–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Osaki K, Hattori T, Kosen S. The role of home-based records in the establishment of a continuum of care for mothers, newborns, and children in Indonesia. Global Health Action. 2013;6(1):20429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Agarwal S, Curtis S, Angeles G, Speizer I, Singh K, Thomas J. Are community health workers effective in retaining women in the maternity care continuum? Evidence from India. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(4):e001557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Iqbal S, Maqsood S, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Continuum of care in maternal, newborn and child health in Pakistan: analysis of trends and determinants from 2006 to 2012. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gandhi S, Gandhi S, Dash U, Suresh Babu M. Predictors of the utilisation of continuum of maternal health care services in India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Seidu A-A, Ahinkorah BO, Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Budu E, Yaya S. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health in 17 sub-saharan African countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (35.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (26.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data is included either in the manuscript or as supplementary files.


Articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES