Fig. 1.

Proportion of potential intakes of nutrients and energy from foods categorised according to the proposed (Canada Gazette I (CGI)) and final (Canada Gazette II (CGI)) front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations. n 13 495. Potential intakes from foods away from home, defined as foods consumed in a limited-service or full-service restaurant⁽³²⁾, were categorised and analysed separately from other FOPL regulation categories. Intakes of nutrients and energy were estimated using the balanced repeated replication technique with 500 replicates to obtain representative population-level estimates and adjusted for potential confounders confounders (age, sex, energy intake (except for saturated fat and sugars, as intakes were expressed as a proportion to total energy intake), and misreporting status (i.e. under-, plausible- and over-reporters)). One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the difference between the potential intakes of nutrients and energy from foods categorised according to CGI and CGII. Statistical significance was set at P < 0·001. All potential intakes were significantly different (P < 0·001) except potential intakes of total and free sugars from that would be exempted from the regulations (P = 0·02 and P = 0·98, respectively). *Potential intakes from foods categorised according to CGII were obtained from Lee et al.⁽²⁷⁾. ^†As levels of energy and other nutrients-of-public health concern are not subject to FOPL regulations, intakes from exempted foods referred to foods meeting or exceeding the exemption criteria for all three nutrients-of-concern. Therefore, foods categorised under “No ‘High in’ nutrition symbol” include products that may have conditional exemptions for specific nutrient(s)-of-concern (e.g. dairy products exempted for saturated fat or sodium only). Abbreviations: CG, Canada Gazette; FOPL, front-of-pack labelling.