Table 7. Model selection tables for provisioning rate, failed provisioning rate and latency to resume provisioning models for Western Bluebirds exposed to continuous noise.
| Response | Candidate models | K | AICc | ΔAICc | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisioning rate | ||||
| Sound amplitude (+) | 3 | 69.09 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Null | 2 | 78.03 | 8.94 | 0.00 |
| Failed provisioning rate | ||||
| Null | 2 | 59.40 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Lay date (+) | 3 | 61.25 | 1.85 | 0.28 |
| Latency to resume provisioning | ||||
| Sound amplitude (−) | 3 | 184.44 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Null | 2 | 186.58 | 2.14 | 0.00 |
Note:
+/− shows the direction of the trends. Bolded parameters reflect those with effects that have 95% CIs that do not overlap zero.