Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2024 Oct 24;12(11):9799–9809. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4546

A Comprehensive Analysis of Potassium Bromate, a Possible Carcinogen, in Popular Baked Foodstuffs of Bangladesh

Md Mazharul Islam 1, Supath Xavier Besra 1, Shahnaz Akhtar Nishat 1, Abida Sultana 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11606807  PMID: 39619963

ABSTRACT

Potassium bromate (KBrO3), employed ubiquitously as an oxidizing agent in commonly consumed baked foods and as a flour improver to enhance dough quality, has been recognized as a possible human carcinogen. Despite stringent prohibitions in numerous nations eliciting substantial apprehension worldwide, notably in Bangladesh, the pervasive occurrence of KBrO3 in baked foods persists as a formidable public health quandary. This study aimed to investigate the presence of KBrO3 in five different popular baked foods comprising a total of 104 samples, such as bread (n = 39), cake (n = 33), burger buns (n = 13), pizza (n = 10), and naan (n = 9), collected from different districts across Bangladesh. The amounts of KBrO3 were quantified using UV–visible spectrophotometric method. A calibration curve was obtained with a satisfactory linearity and a correlation coefficient (R 2) 0.998. The sensitivity was confirmed by limits of detection (LOD = 0.0180 mg L−1) and quantification (LOQ = 0.0548 mg L−1). The recovery rates for spiked samples were 87%–103%, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the measurements. KBrO3 concentrations varied significantly across the samples: BDL to 5.53 ± 0.24 mg kg−1 in breads, BDL to 6.18 ± 0.01 mg kg−1 in cakes, 0.86 ± 0.01 to 1.69 ± 0.01 mg kg−1 in burger buns, 0.92 ± 0.01 to 4.35 ± 0.01 mg kg−1 in pizzas, and BDL to 5.37 ± 0.02 mg kg−1 in naans. The concentrations of KBrO3 in bread, cake, burger buns, pizza, and naans surpass the recommended threshold established by the FDA factors of 276.5, 309.0, 84.5, 217.5, and 268.5, respectively. The study revealed particularly high levels of KBrO3 presence in the targeted baked foods in all of the sampling districts, highlighting a serious food safety concern in Bangladesh.

Keywords: baked foodstuffs, carcinogenicity, potassium bromate, regulatory compliance, UV–visible spectrophotometer


This study aimed to investigate the presence of KBrO3 in five different popular baked foods comprising a total of 104 samples. The study revealed particularly high levels of KBrO3 presence in the targeted baked foods in all the sampling districts, highlighting a serious food safety concern in Bangladesh.

graphic file with name FSN3-12-9799-g002.jpg

1. Introduction

Baked products like bread, cake, burger buns, pizza, and naan are favored by people of all ages in developing countries, particularly Bangladesh, for their nutritional value and easy accessibility. They serve as convenient snacks or breakfast options, meeting the needs of busy individuals seeking quick and satisfying meals. The popularity of these ready‐to‐eat foods is driven by factors such as urbanization and greater female workforce participation (Horning et al. 2017). Studies have highlighted their role in addressing minor hunger pangs (Hossain et al. 2023) and providing a convenient food solution for consumers on the go. This has led to a growing demand for baked foods offering extended shelf life, an appealing taste, portability, and nutritional value, typically comprising flour, leavening agents, salts, yeast, and water, with potential additions such as eggs, sugar, meat, shortening, and other chemicals based on desired characteristics and taste on the products (Amani et al. 2021; Mahmud et al. 2021). The bakery industry in Bangladesh is witnessing substantial growth, driven by evolving consumer tastes and increasing purchasing power, with the bread market projected to reach 4.51 billion kg by 2028, showing a 6.3% volume growth by 2024 (Akij Bakers Limited (ABL) 2023).

Potassium bromate (KBrO3) is an odorless, colorless, and tasteless white crystalline oxidizing agent utilized in various industrial applications, notably employed in the food sector as an alluring food additive (Yalçin and Çavuşoğlu 2022). For over 90 years, KBrO3 has been widely used as a flour additive due to its ability to improve dough elasticity (Oloyede and Sunmonu 2009), retain CO2 during leavening (Hama 2022), and enhance bread texture and volume (Magomya and Yebpella 2020). It also improves elasticity, cohesion, swelling ability, and visual appeal, resulting in a fluffy and soft finished product (Emeje et al. 2015; Naze, Epete, and Owhoeke 2018). It is likely the most cost‐effective oxidizer in the fermentation and proofing phase for bread production (Uwah and Ikwebe 2020), but excessive use can leave harmful residues in the final product. During baking, heat converts KBrO3 to the less toxic KBr (Ati‐Hellal et al. 2018), yet residual concentrations can still pose health risks (Ncheuveu Nkwatoh, Fon, and Navti 2023). It is recognized as a potential and probable human carcinogen (IARC 1986). Consequently, numerous organizations and countries have prohibited its use as a flour additive (Chauhan and Jain 2016; FAO/WHO JECFA 1992). KBrO3 in the bloodstream can generate highly reactive compounds, posing a risk of DNA damage and contributing to cancer formation, as supported by studies on animal models like rats (Magomya and Yebpella 2020; Olusola et al. 2024). Numerous literature findings document the cytotoxic, genotoxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and biochemical adverse effects associated with KBrO3 exposure (Zhang et al. 2011). Acutely, humans may experience symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, while chronic exposure may lead to conditions including reduced urine output, deafness, vertigo, low blood pressure, neurological impairment, kidney dysfunction, and decreased platelet count (Ajarem et al. 2016; Shanmugavel et al. 2020). Apart from its carcinogenic properties, KBrO3 has been observed to affect the nutritional quality of bread, leading to a depletion of essential vitamins such as vitamin A2, B1, B2, and niacin when used excessively (Okafor, Ezeonu, and Ogbodo 2011).

This research aims to comprehensively estimate the presence of the possible carcinogen KBrO3 in various baked goods (bread, cake, burger bun, pizza, and naan) available in Dhaka, its surrounding cities and other prominent divisional cities, and districts in Bangladesh by using UV–visible spectrophotometric methods. The study intends to validate an established analytical method to accurately quantify KBrO3 residues in finished baked products. This research provides critical data that can inform regulatory authorities and prompt necessary actions to mitigate the use of this harmful additive in the food industry. Ultimately, the objective is to ensure enhanced food safety and protect public health in Bangladesh by establishing a reliable methodology for monitoring KBrO3 levels in bread, cake, burger bun, pizza, and naan samples.

2. Experimental

2.1. Solvents and Reagents

Chemicals of analytical grade purity and distilled deionized water were used throughout the experimental work. Potassium bromate (Smart lab, Indonesia), 37% Hydrochloric acid (BDH, UK), and promethazine hydrochloride (Harika Drugs Private Limited, Hyderabad, India) were used for bromate determination. Solvents such as n‐hexane (RCI Labscan Limited, Bangkok, Thailand) and ethyl acetate (RCI Labscan Limited, Bangkok, Thailand) were utilized for extraction processes at different levels of the experiment. Sulfuric acid (95%–97%, Merck, Germany) and Potassium bromide (Merck, Germany) were both used in this research work. Sodium Chloride, anhydrous Sodium sulfate, and Sodium thiosulfate were acquired from Scharlau, Germany.

2.2. Instruments

All the investigations were conducted with the aid of an oven and furnace (GSM 11/8 Hope Valley, S336RB, England), kitchen blender (Miyako Chopper, Japan), an analytical balance (model‐ AL 104, Company‐ Mettler Toledo, US), an electric balance (FR‐200, NDO‐450ND, Japan), a rotary vacuum evaporator (Heidolph, Germany), a centrifuge machine (Hanil Science Industrial Co. Ltd., Model‐Combi 514 R) with rotation up to 4000 rpm, a double beam UV spectrophotometer (Model: UV‐1800, Shimadzu), and a vortex machine (Cat/Art No. 444‐1372 (EU), Made in Germany).

2.3. Sampling Strategy

In total, 104 samples were collected from various bakeries, restaurants, supershops, and fast‐food places in Dhaka and different districts of Bangladesh. There were 39 breads, 33 cakes, 13 burger buns, 10 pizzas, and 9 naan samples as these baked products are now getting popular to this modern hectic daily life of people of all classes (Islam and Ullah 2010; Shifat, Shibli, and Islam 2023). The choice of these samples was based on the highest consumption and popularity among the populace in each location (Dudziak, Stoma, and Osmólska 2023). The samples were coded as bread samples (B‐1 to B‐39 in Table 2), cake samples (C‐1 to C‐33 in Table 3), burger bun samples (BB‐1 to BB‐13 in Table 4), pizza samples (P‐1 to P‐10 in Table 5) and naan samples (N‐1 to N‐9 in Table 5). The samples were gathered at the beginning of the day and immediately taken to the laboratory for analysis. All samples were acquired and analyzed within the recommended time of consumption (Compaore et al. 2022).

TABLE 2.

Bromate in bread samples (n = 39) collected from different regions of Bangladesh.

Bread sample Sampling date Location Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%) Bread sample Sampling date Location Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%)
Dhaka division (B‐1 to B‐19)
B‐1 20.04.2022 Mirpur 1.35 ± 0.01 0.39 B‐11 23.05.2022 Dhanmondi 1.01 ± 0.03 2.91
B‐2 21.04.2022 Lalbagh 0.77 ± 0.02 2.44 B‐12 26.05.2022 Gazipur 0.90 ± 0.03 2.97
B‐3 24.04.2022 Jatrabari 0.96 ± 0.01 0.55 B‐13 29.05.2022 Narsingdi 0.71 ± 0.01 1.12
B‐4 25.04.2022 Mohammadpur 3.46 ± 0.01 0.31 B‐14 29.05.2022 Rajbari 5.53 ± 0.24 4.37
B‐5 28.04.2022 Tongi 1.08 ± 0.01 0.49 B‐15 30.05.2022 Narayanganj 0.81 ± 0.02 2.30
B‐6 15.05.2022 Tejgaon 0.92 ± 0.01 0.58 B‐16 31.05.2022 Munshiganj 2.01 ± 0.01 0.80
B‐7 15.05.2022 Uttara 0.83 ± 0.02 2.60 B‐17 24.05.2022 Tangail 2.56 ± 0.01 0.21
B‐8 16.05.2022 Motijheel 0.82 ± 0.01 1.31 B‐18 27.05.2022 Faridpur 0.70 ± 0.01 1.15
B‐9 19.05.2022 Gulshan 1.15 ± 0.01 0.84 B‐19 28.05.2022 Madaripur 0.75 ± 0.01 1.06
B‐10 22.05.2022 Akran, Savar 1.23 ± 0.04 3.06 — — — — —
Northern Region of Bangladesh (B‐20 to B‐29) Southern Region of Bangladesh (B‐30 to B‐39)
B‐20 24.05.2022 Mymensingh 0.77 ± 0.03 4.01 B‐30 15.06.2022 Jessore 0.74 ± 0.03 4.57
B‐21 01.06.2022 Sylhet 0.72 ± 0.01 0.43 B‐31 16.06.2022 Noakhali 4.56 ± 0.31 6.86
B‐22 06.06.2022 Dinajpur 0.95 ± 0.01 0.64 B‐32 19.06.2022 Patuakhali 4.51 ± 0.22 4.95
B‐23 29.06.2022 Panchagarh 0.80 ± 0.01 1.54 B‐33 21.06.2022 Chattogram 0.95 ± 0.07 7.79
B‐24 10.07.2022 Pabna 0.93 ± 0.01 1.00 B‐34 30.06.2022 Barisal 0.96 ± 0.02 2.91
B‐25 18.07.2022 Kishoreganj 1.21 ± 0.01 1.02 B‐35 01.07.2022 Cumilla 0.79 ± 0.01 0.77
B‐26 21.07.2022 Rajshahi BDL — B‐36 02.07.2022 Khulna BDL —
B‐27 27.07.2022 Bogra 1.74 ± 0.01 0.89 B‐37 29.07.2022 Bandarban 0.71 ± 0.01 1.74
B‐28 31.07.2022 Tangail 1.95 ± 0.01 0.47 B‐38 12.08.2022 Bagerhat 0.66 ± 0.01 1.88
B‐29 08.08.2022 Joypurhat 1.14 ± 0.01 0.27 B‐39 13.08.2022 Bhola 0.96 ± 0.13 14.55

Note: Values are given as the mean ± SD of three measurements. BDL is the below detection limit.

TABLE 3.

Bromate in cake samples (n = 33) collected from different regions of Bangladesh.

Cake sample Sampling date Location Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%) Cake sample Sampling date Location Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%)
C‐1 13.04.22 Shahbag 2.06 ± 0.01 2.15 C‐18 20.06.22 Tejgaon 2.36 ± 0.01 3.05
C‐2 18.04.22 Khilgaon 1.71 ± 0.01 3.05 C‐19 26.06.22 Joypurhaat 2.85 ± 0.01 2.08
C‐3 20.04.22 Chankharpool 4.66 ± 0.01 1.14 C‐20 29.06.22 Pabna 2.51 ± 0.01 1.06
C‐4 21.04.22 Azimpur 3.14 ± 0.02 7.18 C‐21 05.07.22 Panchagarh 2.39 ± 0.01 6.04
C‐5 24.04.22 Mymensingh 1.09 ± 0.01 9.95 C‐22 13.07.22 Barishal 6.18 ± 0.01 1.34
C‐6 27.04.22 Jatrabari 3.15 ± 0.02 6.40 C‐23 17.07.22 Cumilla 4.52 ± 0.01 1.33
C‐7 08.05.22 Gazipur 2.01 ± 0.01 2.46 C‐24 20.07.22 Jessore BDL —
C‐8 11.05.22 Mirpur 2.65 ± 0.01 1.57 C‐25 24.07.22 Narsingdi 2.98 ± 0.01 2.70
C‐9 12.05.22 Mohammadpur BDL — C‐26 27.07.22 Rajshahi 2.26 ± 0.01 3.42
C‐10 16.05.22 Dhanmondi 3.78 ± 0.01 3.10 C‐27 01.08.22 Kishoreganj 1.81 ± 0.01 5.55
C‐11 19.05.22 Lalmatia 0.84 ± 0.01 11.08 C‐28 04.08.22 Bandarbaan 1.19 ± 0.01 10.21
C‐12 24.05.22 Shyamoli 1.23 ± 0.01 2.49 C‐29 08.08.22 Chattogram 4.62 ± 0.01 1.96
C‐13 29.05.22 Savar 1.30 ± 0.01 5.58 C‐30 11.08.22 Motijheel 1.06 ± 0.01 17.80
C‐14 02.06.22 Patuakhali 3.21 ± 0.01 0.79 C‐31 14.08.22 Narayanganj 4.09 ± 0.01 2.60
C‐15 07.06.22 Rajbari 2.70 ± 0.01 2.27 C‐32 18.08.22 Lalbagh 2.72 ± 0.01 4.28
C‐16 13.06.22 Khulna 4.42 ± 0.02 3.07 C‐33 22.08.22 Sylhet 1.76 ± 0.01 7.98
C‐17 16.06.22 Dinajpur 3.82 ± 0.02 3.90 — — — — —

TABLE 4.

Bromate in burger bun samples (n = 13) collected from Dhaka city.

Bun Samples Sampling date Location Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%)
BB‐1 13.07.2022 Mirpur‐1 1.12 ± 0.02 1.65
BB‐2 14.07.2022 Dhanmondi (Road 8) 0.86 ± 0.01 0.36
BB‐3 23.07.2022 Mirpur‐2 0.96 ± 0.01 0.64
BB‐4 22.07.2022 Lalbagh 1.02 ± 0.01 1.21
BB‐5 24.07.2022 Azimpur 1.34 ± 0.01 0.69
BB‐6 28.07.2022 Dhanmondi (Road 10) 1.69 ± 0.01 0.18
BB‐7 01.08.2022 Khilgaon 1.34 ± 0.01 0.92
BB‐8 01.08.2022 Dhanmondi (Road 12) 1.19 ± 0.01 1.56
BB‐9 01.08.2022 Mohammadpur‐West 1.17 ± 0.01 1.05
BB‐10 05.08.2022 Mirpur‐10 1.16 ± 0.02 1.34
BB‐11 05.08.2022 Rampura 0.96 ± 0.01 0.64
BB‐12 06.08.2022 Mohammadpur‐East 1.53 ± 0.01 1.01
BB‐13 10.08.2022 Mirpur‐11 1.18 ± 0.02 1.82

TABLE 5.

Bromate in different pizza and naan samples collected from Dhaka city.

Pizza samples (n = 10) Naan samples (n = 12)
Pizza samples Sampling date Area of collection Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%) Naan samples Sampling date Area of collection Bromate (mg kg−1) RSD (%)
P‐1 03.08.22 Dhanmondi (Road 8) 4.35 ± 0.01 2.46 N‐1 14.04.22 Shahbag 1.04 ± 0.01 21.92
P‐2 03.08.22 Dhanmondi (Road 10) 1.52 ± 0.01 9.85 N‐2 21.04.22 Mogbazar 1.53 ± 0.01 9.33
P‐3 07.08.22 Lalbagh 2.01 ± 0.01 2.44 N‐3 08.05.22 Anandabazar 0.93 ± 0.01 20.33
P‐4 10.08.22 Abdul Hasnat Road 2.2 ± 10.01 3.22 N‐4 19.05.22 Jatrabari 1.31 ± 0.01 4.91
P‐5 14.08.22 Lalbagh 1.77 ± 0.01 3.86 N‐5 02.06.22 Mirpur 0.85 ± 0.01 14.56
P‐6 16.08.22 Hossaini Dalan Road 2.52 ± 0.01 4.48 N‐6 13.06.22 Mohammadpur 1.85 ± 0.03 16.17
P‐7 16.08.22 Azimpur 2.77 ± 0.01 3.25 N‐7 29.06.22 Shyamoli 0.93 ± 0.01 16.60
P‐8 18.08.22 Satrowza 1.57 ± 0.01 5.13 N‐8 07.06.22 Savar 5.37 ± 0.02 3.47
P‐9 21.08.22 Dhanmondi (Road 12) 2.23 ± 0.01 3.74 N‐9 14.08.22 Uttara BDL —
P‐10 22.08.22 Shyamoli 0.92 ± 0.01 13.12 — — — — —

2.4. Sample Pretreatment

From the center of each sample type, approximately 10–12 g was obtained and dried at 75°C in an oven for about 2 h (Irogbeyi et al. 2019; Dagari et al. 2022). Due to the greasy nature of the cakes and the presence of cheese, meats, and various other toppings in the case of pizza, the final extract for spectrophotometric analysis was rendered turbid. Hence, a defatting process was required to remove the cloudiness of the final extract, which was achieved by heating the samples with n‐hexane in a water bath (Hua et al. 2020). The defatted samples were then dried in an oven. All the dried samples were then pulverized in a grinder into finely powdered samples, put in zip‐lock bags, and stored in a refrigerator for further analysis.

2.5. Preparation of Standard Solution

The primary stock solution of concentration 50 mg L−1 was prepared by dissolving 0.0025 g of KBrO3 in a 50.0 mL volumetric flask with distilled water. Aliquots of 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 μL from the primary stock solution were taken in individual 10.0 mL volumetric flasks to which 1.0 mL of 0.01 M promethazine (PMZ) and 0.2 M of 12 M HCl were added. The mixtures were then diluted up to the 10.0 mL mark of the volumetric flasks to obtain the final concentrations of the potassium bromate in the range of 0.5 to 5.0 mg L−1. The solutions were well shaken in an ultrasonicator for about 1 min and the absorbance was measured at 515 nm (λ max) against a reagent blank (El‐Harti et al. 2011; Mahmud et al. 2021). The results obtained were used to plot the calibration curve (Figure 1a) and the regression equation of the calibration plot was calculated by the least squares method for further determination of the amount of potassium bromate in the samples. An overlain spectrum of the prepared standard solution is shown in Figure 1b to show the different absorption at different concentrations.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Calibration curve (a) and the overlain spectrum of KBrO3 (b).

2.6. Method Validation

The method validation was conducted through the analysis of KBrO3 standard solutions within a range of 0.5–5.0 mg L−1. A calibration curve was obtained with satisfactory linearity with an acceptable range: R 2 > 0.8 for chemistry (Chicco, Warrens, and Jurman 2021), correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.998 (Alzeer et al. 2023). The sensitivity of the instruments was performed by the LOD (LOD = 0.0180 mg L−1) and LOQ (LOQ = 0.0548 μg/mL). The LOD and LOQ were calculated using the following equations (Apostol et al. 2009):

LOD=3.3σbandLOQ=10σb

where σ = standard deviation of intercept of the plot of absorbance versus bromate concentration of the samples, b = slope of the plot of absorbance versus bromate concentration of the samples. The accuracy was tested by calculating the recovery of different bakery samples spiked with known amounts of potassium bromated (Xu et al. 2012; Naveen et al. 2018). A recovery analysis was conducted, which included five different samples (B‐1, C‐12, BB‐5, P‐5 and N‐2) for spiking at 1.25 mg kg−1 to assess the accuracy and precision of the current method employed for the determination of bromate. To 1 g of each sample measured 500 μL of 50 mg L−1 of bromate was added to spike the samples (Sima et al. 2024). For about 10 min, the sample matrixes were left to stand for mixing. As previously described method (El‐Harti et al. 2011), bromate analysis was performed on each spiked sample. The following formula was utilized for the determination of the recovery (R) percentage.

R%=Amount of bromate in the spiked sample−Amount of bromate in the unspiked sampleAdded amount of bromate×100

2.7. Sample Analysis

A preliminary confirmative test was performed directly on a portion of the sample with 2.0 mL of 0.01 M PMZ and 0.6 mL of 12 M hydrochloric acid (Rahil and Sharaa 2023). The change in color of each sample to pink suggests the presence of KBrO3 (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Preliminary tests: Before and after adding PMZ and hydrochloric acid.

Quantitative determination of potassium bromate in the samples was carried out according to spectrophotometric method described by El‐Harti et al. (2011). From the previously pulverized samples stored in zip‐lock bags, 1.0 g of the finely powdered sample was weighed into a conical flask to which 20 mL of distilled water was added for the extraction of potassium bromate from the sample. The mixture was shaken thoroughly with the aid of a vortex machine and then filtered using a Whatman no.1 filter paper. The filtrate (8.0 mL) was transferred into a 10.0 mL volumetric flask to which 2.0 mL of 0.01 M PMZ followed by 0.20 mL of 12 M hydrochloric acid were added. The mixture was shaken well for about a minute and the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured using a double‐ beam UV‐ spectrophotometer at 515 nm (Mahmud et al. 2021) (Figure 3). The concentration of potassium bromate in the sample was derived from the linear regression curve obtained from the standard solutions of potassium bromate as mentioned above.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Sample spectra (a) Sample P‐4 and (b) Sample C‐29.

3. Results and Discussion

The method validation was performed by the analysis of KBrO3 calibration solutions within 0.5–5.0 mg L−1 (Ati‐Hellal et al. 2018). A calibration curve was obtained with a satisfactory linearity with a correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.998. The sensitivity of the instrument was confirmed by the LOD (LOD = 0.0180 mg L−1) and LOQ (LOQ = 0.0548 mg L−1). The method showed good recoveries ranging from 87%–103% (Table 1) indicating the excellent accuracy and precision of the sample analysis method.

TABLE 1.

Method validation parameters for the bromated determination in baked products.

Parameters Value Comments
Wavelength (λ max) 515 nm UV–visible spectrophotometer
Regression equation y = 0.123x–0.005 Linear equation
Linearity 0.5–5.0 mg kg−1 For calibration
R 2 0.998 In acceptable range
LOD 0.0180 mg kg−1 Minimum detectable concentration
LOQ 0.0548 mg kg−1 Minimum quantifiable concentration
Recovery: Spiking level 1.25 mg kg−1 Recovery: 87%–103% Five replicates ware done for this spiking level

The presence of bromate in bread samples from different regions of Bangladesh (Table 2) reveals significant variability in contamination levels, with some areas showing notably higher concentrations than others (Olusola et al. 2024). Bromate levels in bread samples ranged from below detection limits (BDLs) to 5.53 mg kg−1, indicating varying baking practices across regions. In the Dhaka Division, the highest bromate concentration was in Rajbari (5.53 mg kg−1, sample B‐14), which significantly exceeds the other samples from this division. This high level raises concerns about the potential health risks associated with bromate, a known carcinogen (Ayembilla et al. 2024). Similarly, Mohammadpur (3.46 mg kg−1, sample B‐4) and Tangail (2.56 mg kg−1, sample B‐17) also showed elevated levels, suggesting localized contamination or specific baking additives that include potassium bromate.

The samples of the Northern Region of Bangladesh exhibited generally lower bromate levels, except Bogra (1.74 mg kg−1, sample B‐27) and Tangail (1.95 mg kg−1, sample B‐28). Interestingly, Rajshahi and Khulna samples (B‐26 and B‐36) were BDL, which might reflect different regulatory practices or the use of bromate‐free baking agents in these areas. In the samples of the Southern Region of Bangladesh, significant bromate levels were found in Noakhali (4.56 mg kg−1, sample B‐31) and Patuakhali (4.51 mg kg−1, sample B‐32). The variability in bromate levels here, ranging from BDL to 4.56 mg kg−1, suggests inconsistent adherence to food safety regulations or variable sourcing of baking ingredients (Ayembilla et al. 2024). The relative standard deviations (RSDs) across the samples indicate the precision of the measurements, with most samples showing RSDs below 5%, except for a few outliers like Bhola (14.55%, sample B‐39) suggesting an inhomogeneous distribution of bromate within the sample or variations in the sample preparation process (Coleman 2012). In Dhaka Division, 100% of samples exceeded the FDA's permissible limit of 0.02 mg kg−1 (American Bakers Association and American Institute of Baking International (ABA/AIBI) 2008; Ekop, Obot, and Ikpatt 2008), with an average concentration of 1.45 mg kg−1, up to 276.5 times the permissible level. The Northern Region had 90% of samples exceeding the limit, averaging 1.33 mg kg−1, up to 79.5 times the limit. The Southern Region also had 90% of samples above the limit, with an average of 1.65 mg kg−1, up to 228 times the limit (Figure 4). These findings indicate significant health risks, necessitating urgent regulatory action. Overall, these findings underscore the need for stringent monitoring and regulation of bromate in bread to ensure food safety across Bangladesh. Mahmud et al., conducted a spectrophotometric analysis of 21 collected bread samples from bakeries and shops in and around Dhaka City revealing that 67% had KBrO3 levels exceeding global FDA permissible limits, with the highest concentration detected at 9.29 mg kg−1 (Mahmud et al. 2021). But in this study, 94% sample exceeded the permissible limit and most of the samples contained KBrO3 much less than that of Mahmud et al. One of our recent studies revealed that, out of 30 randomly collected bread samples (including buns, white bread, and sliced bread) from various parts of Dhaka city, potassium bromate levels ranged from 1.24 to 24.91 mg kg−1. It was found that 73% of these samples contained potassium bromate levels exceeding the FDA's permissible safe limit for bread (Sima et al. 2024). Another study analyzing bread samples found potassium bromate levels ranging from 0.0001 to 12.16 μg/g; out of 210 samples, 119 contained potassium bromate, with 35 exceeding the FDA limit and 84 below the safe threshold (Dagari et al. 2022). Rana et al. analyzed 14 bread samples from various brands from bakeries, retailers, and fast‐food outlets in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, with the fruit bun from brand I exhibiting the highest concentration (39.73 mg kg−1) of potassium bromate and the white bread from brand III showing the lowest (10.72 mg kg−1) (Rana, Chaturvedi, and Sharma 2020). Ekere et al., assessed bread samples, randomly collected from 10 different vendors in the Jos metropolis, which exhibited potassium bromate ranging from 250 to 4375 mg/kg, with a mean concentration significantly exceeding the maximum permissible level of 0.02 mg kg−1 (Ekere et al. 2020). Nkwatoh et al. collected 31 samples of popular bread types from bakeries and vendors in Bamenda, North West Region of Cameroon, finding potassium bromate concentrations in all samples (100%) ranging from 48.50 mg kg−1 to 10,148.50 mg kg−1, which exceeded the FDA's maximum acceptable limit of 50 mg kg−1 by 9–203 times (Ncheuveu Nkwatoh, Fon, and Navti 2023).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Overview of bromate content in baked goods across the country.

The bromate levels in cake samples from different regions of Bangladesh revealed a broad range of concentrations (Table 3). Among the 33 samples, the highest bromate concentration was detected in a cake from Barishal (6.18 mg kg−1, sample C‐22), while the lowest detectable concentration was in Lalmatia (0.84 mg kg−1, sample C‐11). Two samples (from Mohammadpur and Jessore) had bromate levels BDL. The RSD values ranged from 0.79% to 17.80%, indicating varying levels of precision in the measurements. High RSD values in samples from Mymensingh (9.95%), Lalmatia (11.08%), and Bandarbaan (10.21%) suggest potential inconsistencies in bromate distribution within these cakes or variations in the analytical procedure. The widespread presence of bromate, a potential carcinogen, in cakes across many regions underscores the need for stringent regulatory measures and consistent monitoring to ensure food safety. The analysis of cake samples across the country revealed an average potassium bromate concentration of 2.74 mg kg−1. Potassium bromate was detected in 93% of the samples, all of which exceeded the FDA's permissible limit of 0.02 mg kg−1. The contamination levels ranged from 42 to 309 times the permissible limit, with an average exceedance of 137.21 times (Figure 4). This widespread and significant contamination highlights a serious public health concern requiring immediate regulatory attention.

The bromate levels in 13 burger bun samples collected from various locations in Dhaka city were analyzed, revealing concentrations ranging from 0.86 mg kg−1 to 1.69 mg kg−1 (Table 4). The highest bromate concentration was found in a sample from Dhanmondi (Road 10) at 1.69 mg kg−1, while the lowest was from Dhanmondi (Road 8) at 0.86 mg kg−1. The RSD values varied from 0.18% to 1.82%, indicating high measurement precision. Consistent bromate presence was noted across different locations, including Mirpur, Dhanmondi, and Mohammadpur, with most samples showing similar bromate levels. This suggests that bromate is widely used in burger buns in Dhaka. The low RSD values, especially for Dhanmondi (Road 10) at 0.18%, demonstrate reliable and precise analytical methods. The detection of bromate in all tested samples raises significant public health concerns due to its potential carcinogenic effects. These findings underscore the urgent need for regulatory intervention and ongoing monitoring to ensure bromate levels in bakery products are minimized.

Additionally, the study suggests that further research is needed to identify the sources of bromate contamination in burger buns. Implementing strategies to eliminate bromate from the food production process will be crucial to enhancing food safety. Ensuring compliance with food safety standards and raising awareness among producers and consumers about the risks associated with bromate can help mitigate these health hazards. Analysis of burger bun samples from Dhaka city showed an average bromated of 1.19 mg kg−1. It was present in 100% of the samples, all exceeding the FDA's permissible limit of 0.02 mg kg−1. The contamination ranged from 43.0 to 84.5 times the permissible limit, with an average exceedance of 59.69 times (Figure 4). This indicates a significant public health risk, underscoring the need for stringent regulatory measures.

The bromate levels in 10 pizza and 12 naan samples collected from various locations in Dhaka city show significant variation (Table 5). The pizza samples had bromate concentrations ranging from 0.92 to 4.35 mg kg−1. The highest bromate concentration was detected in a pizza sample from Dhanmondi (road 8) (4.35 mg kg−1), while the lowest was from Shyamoli (0.92 mg kg−1). The RSD for pizza samples ranged from 2.44% to 13.12%, indicating varying degrees of measurement precision, with some samples showing notable variability. The analysis of pizza samples from Dhaka city revealed an average potassium bromate concentration of 2.19 mg kg−1. KBrO3 was found in 100% of the samples, all exceeding the FDA's permissible limit of 0.02 mg kg−1. The contamination levels ranged from 46.00 to 217.50 times the permissible limit, with an average excess of 109.30 times (Figure 4). This substantial contamination indicates a serious public health risk, emphasizing the urgent need for regulatory intervention.

In contrast, the naan samples had bromate concentrations between 0.85 and 5.37 mg kg−1, with one sample from Uttara having bromate levels in BDL. The highest bromate level in naan was found in a sample from Savar (5.37 mg kg−1, sample N‐8). The RSD values for naan samples ranged from 3.47% to 21.92%, with particularly high variability in samples from Shahbag (21.92%) and Ananda bazar (20.33%), suggesting inconsistent bromate distribution or potential analytical challenges. The widespread detection of bromate in both pizza and naan samples raises significant food safety concerns, given bromate's classification as a potential carcinogen. The analysis of naan samples from Dhaka city showed an average potassium bromate concentration of 1.73 mg kg−1. KBrO3 was present in 88% of the samples, all of which exceeded the FDA's permissible limit of 0.02 mg kg−1. The contamination levels ranged from 42.50 to 268.50 times the permissible limit, with an average exceedance of 86.31 times (Figure 4). This significant contamination underscores a serious public health concern, necessitating prompt regulatory action.

The Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution (BSTI) allows a maximum of 5 mg of potassium bromate per kilogram of bread (Mahmud 2021). In some nations, maximum acceptable levels have been set for finished baked goods: the United States allows up to 0.02 mg kg−1, Japan up to 10 mg kg−1, and China up to 50 mg kg−1 (Oyekunle et al. 2014; Kurokawa et al. 1990). Despite these bans and restrictions, potassium bromate continues to be used extensively in bread making (Elsheikh et al. 2016). The bakery sector must adhere to protocols and guidelines to reduce potential residues of bromate in baked products to a safe threshold determined by FDA risk assessment at 0.02 mg kg−1 (American Bakers Association and American Institute of Baking International (ABA/AIBI) 2008; Ekop, Obot, and Ikpatt 2008). The elevated levels of potassium bromate detected in this investigation could potentially stem from its overutilization, constrained baking temperatures, and abbreviated baking durations, facilitating the complete conversion of potassium bromate into a benign and less hazardous potassium bromide byproduct (Akunyili 2004). Typically, bakers may opt for heightened concentrations of potassium bromate due to its capacity to enhance the aesthetic appeal of bread to consumers (Mahmud et al. 2021). These findings underscore the importance of stringent quality control measures in the production of bakery products to minimize bromate levels and protect public health. Future research should focus on identifying the sources of bromate contamination and developing strategies to eliminate its presence in food products.

4. Conclusion

The research on the estimation of the potential carcinogen KBrO3 in baked goods across Bangladesh reveals concerning trends. Few studies have quantified KBrO3 in bread, and none have examined other baked products like cake, burger buns, pizza, and naan until now, except for this research in Bangladesh. The presence of KBrO3 in bread samples from all divisions, nationwide cake samples, and specific bakery products in Dhaka exceeded permissible limits, highlighting significant food safety issues. The findings emphasize the need for regulatory measures to protect public health. Immediate actions such as stringent monitoring of bakery processes, enforcement of quality control standards, and public awareness campaigns are crucial. Further research should focus on finding alternative additives or baking techniques that eliminate the need for KBrO3. Collaboration between government agencies, food manufacturers, and consumer advocacy groups is essential to implement effective strategies and ensure the safety of baked goods in Bangladesh. Proactive measures and a strong food safety culture can help reduce the prevalence of KBrO3 in baked goods and promote healthier food practices.

Author Contributions

Abida Sultana: conceptualization (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), supervision (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Md. Mazharul Islam: writing – original draft (equal). Supath Xavier Besra: formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), validation (equal), visualization (equal). Shahnaz Akhtar Nishat: formal analysis (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), validation (equal).

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledges the financial support from the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh.

Funding: This study was supported by the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the authors.

References

  1. Ajarem, J. , Altoom N. G., Allam A. A., Maodaa S. N., Maksoud M. A. A., and Chow B. K.. 2016. “Oral Administration of Potassium Bromate Induces Neurobehavioral Changes, Alters Cerebral Neurotransmitters Level and Impairs Brain Tissue of Swiss Mice.” Behavioral and Brain Functions 12, no. 1: 14. 10.1186/s12993-016-0098-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akij Bakers Limited (ABL) . 2023. “Flourishing Perspectives: The Bakery Industry in Bangladesh and Akij Bakers Limited's Prominence.” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/flourishing‐perspectives‐bakery‐industry‐bangladesh/.
  3. Akunyili, N. D. 2004. “Potassium Bromate in Bread‐Wheat Are the Implication.” NAFDAC 1: 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alzeer, H. S. , Alzaid S. F., Aldawsari F. S., and Alshehri Y. M.. 2023. “Development and Validation of a Simple Method for the Determination of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Nasal Spray.” Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 31, no. 10: 101793. 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amani, H. , Firtha F., Jakab I., Baranyai L., and Badak‐Kerti K.. 2021. “Nondestructive Evaluation of Baking Parameters on pogácsa Texture.” Journal of Texture Studies 52, no. 4: 510–519. 10.1111/jtxs.12619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. American Bakers Association and American Institute of Baking International, ABA/AIBI . 2008. “Commercial Baking Industry Guide For the Safe Use of Potassium Bromate.” Manhattan: ABA and AIB International, 16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Apostol, I. , Miller K. J., Ratto J., and Kelner D. N.. 2009. “Comparison of Different Approaches for Evaluation of the Detection and Quantitation Limits of a Purity Method: A Case Study Using a Capillary Isoelectrofocusing Method for a Monoclonal Antibody.” Analytical Biochemistry 385, no. 1: 101–106. 10.1016/j.ab.2008.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ati‐Hellal, M. E. , Doggui R., Krifa Y., and Ati J. E.. 2018. “Potassium Bromate as a Food Additive: A Case Study of Tunisian Breads.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25, no. 3: 2702–2706. 10.1007/s11356-017-0712-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayembilla, J. , Quarcoo A., Whyte B., et al. 2024. “Health Risk Assessment of Potassium Bromate in Bread in Ghana.” Heliyon 10, no. 2: e24519. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chauhan, D. , and Jain P. A.. 2016. “Scientific Study of Genotoxic‐Carcinogenic Impacts of Potassium Bromate as Food Additive on Human Health.” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3: 1136–1139. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chicco, D. , Warrens M. J., and Jurman G.. 2021. “The Coefficient of Determination R‐Squared Is More Informative Than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation.” Computer Science 7: e623. 10.7717/peerj-cs.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coleman, D. 2012. “Statistics in Analytical Chemistry: Part 48—Relative Standard Deviations (RSDS).” https://americanlaboratory.com/913‐Technical‐Articles/114240‐Part‐48‐Relative‐Standard‐Deviations‐RSDs/.
  13. Compaore, M. K. A. , Kpoda S. D., Bazie R. B. S., et al. 2022. “Microbiological Quality Assessment of Five Common Foods Sold at Different Points of Sale in Burkina‐Faso.” PLoS One 17, no. 4: e0258435. 10.1371/journal.pone.0258435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dagari, N. M. S. , Jafiya N. L., Idris N. M., and Baffa A. A.. 2022. “Determination of Potassium Bromade in Bread Samples From Gashua and Nguru Communities of Yobe State, Nigeria.” International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive 3, no. 1: 58–65. 10.53771/ijstra.2022.3.1.0062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dudziak, A. , Stoma M., and Osmólska E.. 2023. “Analysis of Consumer Behaviour in the Context of the Place of Purchasing Food Products With Particular Emphasis on Local Products.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 2413. 10.3390/ijerph20032413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekere, A. S. , Odoh T. T., Mkurzurum C., and Ekere G. O.. 2020. “Determination of Potassium Bromate in Bread Samples in Jos Metropolis.” Global Scientific Journals 8, no. 4: 768–774. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ekop, A. S. , Obot I. B., and Ikpatt E. N.. 2008. “Anti‐Nutritional Factors and Potassium Bromate Content in Bread and Flour Samples in Uyo Metropolis, Nigeria.” Journal of Chemistry 5, no. 4: 736–741. 10.1155/2008/530596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. El‐Harti, J. , Rahali Y., Benmoussa A., et al. 2011. “A Simple and Rapid Method for Spectrophotometric Determination of Bromate in Bread.” Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 10, no. 1: 1803–1808. [Google Scholar]
  19. Elsheikh, A. S. , Fadul T. F., Aboagla E. M., and Gameel A. A. R.. 2016. “Effects of Potassium Bromate on Male Rat Growth and Testicular Histology.” Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 5, no. 5: 376–380. 10.1016/j.apjr.2016.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Emeje, M. O. , Ifiora B. I., Ezenyi C. I., and Ofoefule S. I.. 2015. “Assessment of Bread Safety in Nigeria: One Decade After the Ban on the Use of Potassium Bromate.” Journal of Food Processing and Technology 6: 394–397. [Google Scholar]
  21. FAO/WHO JECFA . 1992. Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives: Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants, 25–33. Geneva, Switzerland: FAO/WHO JECFA. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hama, A. 2022. “Determination of Potassium Bromate in Bread Brands in Sulaimani City, Kurdistan‐Iraq.UHD.” Journal of Science and Technology 6, no. 1: 76–79. 10.21928/uhdjst.v6n1y2022.pp76-79. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Horning, M. L. , Fulkerson J. A., Friend S. E., and Story M.. 2017. “Reasons Parents Buy Prepackaged, Processed Meals: It Is More Complicated Than "I Don't Have Time".” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 49, no. 1: 60–66. 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hossain, M. I. , Faruk M. O., Tuha M. A. S. M., et al. 2023. “Comparative Safety Analysis of Newly Prepackaged Backed Food Products and Those Approaching the Expiry Date in Bangladesh.” Heliyon 9, no. 7: e17513. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hua, K. , Feng J., Yang X., et al. 2020. “Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone.” Orthopaedic Surgery 12, no. 2: 617–630. 10.1111/os.12639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. IARC . 1986. “Potassium Bromate.” In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans, Lyon. Some Chemicals that Cause Tumors of the Kidney or Urinary Bladder in Rodents and Some Other Substances, 481–496. France: IARC. [Google Scholar]
  27. Irogbeyi, L. A. , Ifeoma Nweke N., Akuodor G. C., Unekwe P. C., and Asika E. C.. 2019. “Evaluation of Levels of Potassium Bromate and Some Heavy Metals in Bread and Wheat Flour Sold in Aba Metropolis, South Eastern Nigeria.” Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology 8, no. 3: 71–77. 10.22038/apjmt.2019.13792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Islam, N. , and Ullah G. M. S.. 2010. “Factors Affecting Consumers Preferences on Fast Food Items in Bangladesh.” Journal of Applied Business Research 26, no. 4: 131–146. 10.19030/jabr.v26i4.313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kurokawa, Y. , Maekawa A., Takahashi M., and Hayashi Y.. 1990. “Toxicity and Carcinogenicity of Potassium Bromate–A New Renal Carcinogen.” Environmental Health Perspectives 87: 309–335. 10.1289/ehp.9087309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Magomya, A. M. , and Yebpella G. G.. 2020. “Analysis of Potassium Bromate in Bread and Flour Samples Sold in Jalingo Metropolis, Northern Nigeria.” IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 13, no. 2: 1–5. 10.9790/2402-1402010105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahmud, I. 2021. “Harmful Ingredients in Bread.” Prothomalo. https://en.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/harmful‐ingredients‐in‐bread.
  32. Mahmud, S. S. , Moni M., Imran A. B., and Foyez T.. 2021. “Analysis of the Suspected Cancer‐Causing Potassium Bromate Additive in Bread Samples Available on the Market in and Around Dhaka City in Bangladesh.” Food Science & Nutrition 9, no. 7: 3752–3757. 10.1002/fsn3.2338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Naveen, P. , Lingaraju H. B., Deepak M., Medhini B., and Prasad K. S.. 2018. “Method Development and Validation for the Determination of Caffeine: An Alkaloid From Coffea Arabica by High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography Method.” Pharmacognosy Research 10, no. 1: 88–91. 10.4103/pr.pr_79_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Naze, A. , Epete O., and Owhoeke E.. 2018. “Bromate Content in Thirty Different Brands of Bread Baked in Port Harcourt Metropolis Rivers State, Nigeria.” Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 22, no. 8: 1321. 10.4314/jasem.v22i8.29. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ncheuveu Nkwatoh, T. , Fon T. P., and Navti L. K.. 2023. “Potassium Bromate in Bread, Health Risks to Bread Consumers and Toxicity Symptoms Amongst Bakers in Bamenda, North West Region of Cameroon.” Heliyon 9, no. 2: e13146. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Okafor, C. , Ezeonu F., and Ogbodo S.. 2011. “The Effect of Potassium Bromated on the Vitamin a and Iron of Wheat Flour and Dough Regular Paper.” Biochemistry 5, no. 4: 245–248. [Google Scholar]
  37. Oloyede, O. B. , and Sunmonu T. O.. 2009. “Potassium Bromate Content of Selected Bread Samples in Ilorin, Central Nigeria and Its Effect on Some Enzymes of Rat Liver and Kidney.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 47, no. 8: 2067–2070. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Olusola, J. , Aturamu A., Akeju K., Ogunsakin R., and Awotoye O.. 2024. “Assessment of Health Risks From Potassium Bromate Abnd Trace Metals in Bread Consumption in Ado Ekiti, Southwest, Nigeria.” Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals 8: 100158. 10.1016/j.jtemin.2024.100158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oyekunle, J. A. O. , Adekunle A. S., Ogunfowokan A. O., Olutona G. O., and Omolere O. B.. 2014. “Bromate and Trace Metal Levels in Bread Loaves From Outlets Within Ile‐Ife Metropolis, Southwestern Nigeria.” Toxicology Reports 1: 224–230. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rahil, S. , and Sharaa I. E.. 2023. “Analysis of Potassium Bromate Contents of Commonly Consumed Loaves of Bread Samples in Tokra‐Libya.” Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 22, no. 3: 116–119. 10.51984/jopas.v22i3.2757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rana, R. S. , Chaturvedi P., and Sharma C.. 2020. “Analysis of Potassium Bromate in Bread Samples of Jaipur City, India.” Annals. Food Science and Technology 21, no. 1: 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shanmugavel, V. , Komala Santhi K., Kurup A. H., Kalakandan S., Anandharaj A., and Rawson A.. 2020. “Potassium Bromate: Effects on Bread Components, Health, Environment and Method of Analysis: A Review.” Food Chemistry 311: 125964. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shifat, A. M. , Shibli N. R., and Islam M. M.. 2023. “How Fast‐Food Create an Impact on Youth Culture: In Dhanmondi.” Cognizance Journal 3, no. 8: 1087–1109. 10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i08.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sima, N. J. , Bisshas S., Rudra A., Shoeb M., and Sultana A.. 2024. “Estimation of Potassium Bromate‐ An Alarming Carcinogen in Commercial Bread Samples Around Dhaka City.” Dhaka University Journal of Science 72, no. 1: 1–6. 10.3329/dujs.v72i1.71027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Uwah, E. I. , and Ikwebe E. D.. 2020. “Trace Metals, Potassium Bromate and Nutritional Potentials in Bread From Bakeries in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.” American Journal of Applied Chemistry 8, no. 3: 63. 10.11648/j.ajac.20200803.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Xu, J. , Zhu L., Shen H., et al. 2012. “A Critical View on Spike Recovery for Accuracy Evaluation of Analytical Method for Medicinal Herbs.” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 62: 210–215. 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yalçin, E. , and Çavuşoğlu K.. 2022. “Toxicity Assessment of Potassium Bromate and the Remedial Role of Grape Seed Extract.” Scientific Reports 12, no. 1: 20529. 10.1038/s41598-022-25084-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, Y. , Jiang L., Jiang L., et al. 2011. “Possible Involvement of Oxidative Stress in Potassium Bromate‐Induced Genotoxicity in Human HepG2 Cells.” Chemico‐Biological Interactions 189, no. 3: 186–191. 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the authors.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES