Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 30;14:29767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80669-8

Table 2.

Classification criteria for the degree of coupling coordination.

Coupling coordination degree Coordination level Relative development degree Coupling coordination type
0 ≤ D < 0.1 Extremely imbalanced 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Extremely imbalanced agroecological security lag type X1
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Extremely imbalanced agroecological security and rural green development co-loss type X2
1.2 < γ Extremely imbalanced rural green development lag type X3
0.1 ≤ D < 0.2 Seriously imbalanced 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Seriously imbalanced agroecological security lag type X4
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Seriously imbalanced agroecological security and rural green development co-loss type X5
1.2 < γ Seriously imbalanced rural green development lag type X6
0.2 ≤ D < 0.3 Moderately imbalanced 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Moderately imbalanced agroecological security lag type X7
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Moderately imbalanced agroecological security and rural green development co-loss type X8
1.2 < γ Moderately imbalanced rural green development lag type X9
0.3 ≤ D < 0.4 Mildly imbalanced 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Mildly imbalanced agroecological security lag type X10
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Mildly imbalanced agroecological security and rural green development co-loss type X11
1.2 < γ Mildly imbalanced rural green development lag type X12
0.4 ≤ D < 0.5 Minimally imbalanced 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Minimally imbalanced agroecological security lag type X13
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Minimally imbalanced agroecological security and rural green development co-loss type X14
1.2 < γ Minimally imbalanced rural green development lag type X15
0.5 ≤ D < 0.6 Barely coordinated 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Barely coordinated agroecological security lag type X16
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Barely coordinated agroecological security and rural green development synchronous type X17
1.2 < γ Barely coordinated rural green development lag type X18
0.6 ≤ D < 0.7 Primarily coordinated 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Primarily coordinated agroecological security lag type X19
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Primarily coordinated agroecological security and rural green development synchronous type X20
1.2 < γ Primarily coordinated rural green development lag type X21
0.7 ≤ D < 0.8 Moderately coordinated 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Moderately coordinated agroecological security lag type X22
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Moderately coordinated agroecological security and rural green development synchronous type X23
1.2 < γ Moderately coordinated rural green development lag type X24
0.8 ≤ D < 0.9 Well- coordinated 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Well-coordinated agroecological security lag type X25
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Well-coordinated agroecological security and rural green development synchronous type X26
1.2 < γ Well-coordinated rural green development lag type X27
0.9 ≤ D < 1 Highly coordinated 0 < γ ≤ 0.8 Highly coordinated agroecological security lag type X28
0.8 < γ ≤ 1.2 Highly coordinated agroecological security and rural green development synchronous type X29
1.2 < γ Highly coordinated rural green development lag type X30