Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 30;24:382. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02685-9

Table 2.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between the PG-TEA and TG-RY groups

Factor PG-TEA(N = 43) TG-RY(N = 80) t/X2 P
Operation time(min,x ± s) 188 ± 18 235 ± 22 12.142 0.010
Blood loss(mL,x ± s) 35 ± 15 40 ± 13 2.014 0.046
Lymph node number(x ± s) 21 ± 3 30 ± 4 0/171 0.001
First exhaust time(days) 3.4 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 0.9 0.383 0.703
First fluid taken time(days) 3.6 ± 0.7 3.6 ± 0.7 -0.032 0.975
First defecation time(days) 4.1 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 0.8 0.067 0.946
Gastric tube removal time(days) 2.6 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.6 -1.404 0.163
Drainage tube removal time(days) 7.0 ± 1.1 6.9 ± 1.2 -0.343 0.732
Anastomotic fistula 0.058 0.809
 Yes 2 3
 No 42 77
Anastomotic ulcer 2.536 0.149
 Yes 8 7
 No 35 73
Anastomotic stenosis 2.789 0.182
 Yes 4 2
 No 39 78
Anastomosis reinforcement 3.086 0.079
 No 10 9
 Yes 33 71
Clavien‒Dindo degree 4.025 0.232
 I 6 18
 II 26 52
 IIIA 9 8
 IIIB 2 2
Postoperative hospitalization days(days) 12.3 ± 2.0 11.9 ± 1.8 -1.289 0.200
Postoperative adjuvant therapy 3.419 0.078
 Yes 35 74
 No 8 6

PG-TEA proximal gastrectomy tubular esophagogastric anastomosis, TG-RY total gastrectomy Roux-en-Y reconstruction