Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 30;25:981. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08065-x

Table 2.

Comparative analysis of radiologic parameters by the the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis

PJK + PJK – Total p-value
Preop
 SS 23.8 ± 10.9 24.8 ± 14.4 24.5 ± 13.6 0.68
 PT 29.2 ± 9.1 28.1 ± 11.6 28.4 ± 11.0 0.56
 PI 53.0 ± 11.2 52.7 ± 13.5 52.8 ± 12.9 0.91
 LL 5.2 ± 22.8 6.9 ± 23.2 6.5 ± 23.0 0.68
 PI–LL 47.8 ± 24.6 46.1 ± 23.0 46.5 ± 23.4 0.68
 SVA 171.1 ± 86.2 177.1 ± 80.7 175.6 ± 81.9 0.70
 PJA 2.1 ± 5.2 2.7 ± 5.9 2.5 ± 9.5 0.58
Postop
 SS 24.7 ± 9.3 26.1 ± 9.6 25.7 ± 9.5 0.45
 PT 28.8 ± 8.9 25.4 ± 8.8 26.3 ± 8.9 0.04
 PI 53.6 ± 11.0 51.5 ± 12.0 52.0 ± 11.7 0.34
 LL 39.8 ± 9.4 35.5 ± 10.7 36.6 ± 10.5 0.03
 PI–LL 13.8 ± 11.3 15.9 ± 10.9 15.4 ± 11.0 0.30
 SVA 66.2 ± 41.2 59.4 ± 42.4 61.2 ± 42.2 0.39

SS, sacral slope; PT, pelvic tilt; PI, pelvic incidence; LL, lumbar lordosis; PI–LL, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis; SVA, sagittal vertical axis

p-value < 0.05 are shown in bold