Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD006929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006929.pub2

Teri 2005b.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. Study duration: 2 months.
Participants 31 residents and 25 staff from four assisted living residences. Residents were predominantly female, had a mean age of 85.8 years and a MMSE mean score of 16.0. The mean age of staff was 37.4 years.
Interventions Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences (STAR) based on a manual.
Control ‐ usual onsite training
Primary aim of intervention: Dementia specific training program to teach direct care staff to improve care and reduce problems in residents with dementia.
(See Table 2)
Outcomes Geriatric Depression Scale (GDP)
Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)
Revised Memory and Behaviour Problem Checklist (RMBPC)
Agitated Behaviours in Dementia (ABID)
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Short Sence of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ)
(See Table 3)
Notes Country of origin: Seattle, Washington, USA.
STAR is conducted over 2 months, through 2 half day group workshops and four individualised sessions.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk 'Four assisted living residences were randomly assigned to intervention or control'
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation procedure not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk A training manual and protocol were used. Opportunities to discuss site specific issues that might hinder implementation or sustainability were provided. Unclear as to the level of blinding of participants and staff other than outcome assessors.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Interviewers blind to treatment condition conducted pre‐training and post‐training assessments
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No attrition to report.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No RMBPC frequency data reported. Doesent state the number of participants in each group, this information had to be sought by authors.
Other bias Low risk Training by authors.