Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 10;24:101992. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101992

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) The optimal geometric geometry binding energy variation after adsorption of SA in probe 1, probe 2, probe 3, probe 4, and probe 5. (b) Electrostatic potentials penetration diagram for the optimized geometries of probe 1–5 + SA.