Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 18;12:1410825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1410825

Table 4.

Organizational level factors influencing burnout.

Factor (N (%)) Constructs No burnout 48 (37%) Burnout present 81 (63%) Total 129 (100%) Chi square 𝛘2 p value
Specialty Specialty
Surgery 9 (19%) 10 (12%) 19 (15%) 0.984 0.321
Pediatrics/ OBGYN 6 (12%) 15 (19%) 21 (16%) 0.801 0.371
Medicine 15 (31%) 33 (41%) 48 (37%) 1.162 0.281
Other 18 (38%) 23 (28%) 41 (32%) 1.152 0.283
Noted excessive administrative tasks Workload 39 (81%) 73 (90%) 112 (87%) 2.074 0.150
Noted sufficient time for documentation 12 (25%) 5 (6%) 17 (13%) 9.337 0.002
Describes themselves as overworked 8 (17%) 51 (63%) 59 (46%) 26.029 <0.001
Noted turnover as a significant problem in practice Turnover 38 (79%) 75 (93%) 113 (88%) 5.000 0.025
Describes primary work area as hectic or chaotic 6 (12%) 41 (51%) 47 (36%) 18.908 <0.001
Knew organizational mechanisms to promote wellbeing Culture 30 (62%) 33 (41%) 63 (49%) 5.711 0.017
Perceived minimal support at work regarding coping with stress 21 (44%) 72 (89%) 93 (72%) 30.523 <0.001
Noted four or more positive experiencesa in past year 35 (73%) 31 (38%) 66 (51%) 14.478 <0.001

OB/GYN, Obstetrics/gynecology.

a

Options included: Professional fulfillment; Gratitude from patients; Rewarding relationships with trainees/ colleagues; Validation of hard work/efforts; Satisfaction with performance; Confidence in clinical ability; Intellectual stimulation; Demonstration of good leadership/management skills; Professional recognition.