Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 18;12:1410825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1410825

Table 6.

Adjusted odds ratios of burnout by select SEM factors.

Bootstrapped estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of burnout
Factor OR 95% CI AORa 95% CI
Individual
Positive coping style 0.26*** 0.12–0.54 0.21** 0.08–0.56
Perceived control over workload 0.24* 0.07–0.77 0.17* 0.04–0.66
Satisfied with current job 0.12*** 0.04–0.34 0.11*** 0.03–0.39
Likes going to work 0.11*** 0.04–0.28 0.10*** 0.03–0.32
Interpersonal
Irritable toward co-workers in past year 2.07 0.99–4.34 2.03 0.85–4.82
Organizational
Noted sufficient time for documentation 0.20** 0.06–0.64 0.17* 0.03–0.96
Describes themselves as overworked 8.50*** 3.36–21.50 10.58*** 3.30–33.91
Noted turnover as a significant problem in practice 0.30 0.09–1.05 0.34 0.10–1.24
Describes primary work area as hectic or chaotic 7.17*** 2.47–20.85 7.54*** 2.33–24.38
Knows organizational mechanisms to promote wellbeing 0.41* 0.19–0.89 0.40* 0.17–0.95
Perceived minimal support at work regarding coping with stress 0.10*** 0.04–0.26 0.09*** 0.02–0.31
Noted four or more positive experiencesb in past year 0.23*** 0.10–0.51 0.23** 0.09–0.58
Military
Happy with career path and promotion plan 0.19*** 0.08–0.41 0.16*** 0.06–0.44

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01,*** p < 0.001.

a

Adjusted for military branch, sex, race, deployment status and length of military service.

b

Experiences included: Professional fulfillment; Gratitude from patients; Rewarding relationships with trainees/ colleagues; Validation of hard work/efforts; Satisfaction with performance; Confidence in clinical ability; Intellectual stimulation; Demonstration of good leadership/management skills; Professional recognition.