Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;10(6):00314-2024. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00314-2024

TABLE 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients without fibrosis and patients with fibrosis on initial and on follow-up computed tomography (CT)

Patients without fibrosis (n=45) Patients with fibrosis on initial CT (n=5) Patients with fibrosis on final CT (n=11) Patients with fibrosis on initial or on final CT (n=16)
Baseline characteristics at aPAP diagnosis
Age, years 41.0 (33.0–49.0) 48.0 (47.0–56.0) 41.0 (39.5–54.0)* 47.6 (40.5–55.0)#
 Male gender 26 (58%) 4 (80%) 7 (64%) 11 (69%)
 GM-CSF titre 600 (245–1155) 300 (115–850) 300 (100–750) 300 (115–850)
Comorbidities
 Active smokers 20 (47%) 3 (60%) 6 (55%) 9 (56%)
 COPD 2 (4.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
 Asthma 4 (9.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
 Dust exposure 12 (28%) 3 (60%) 7 (64%)* 10 (62%)#
 Diabetes mellitus 3 (6.8%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 2 (12%)
 High blood pressure 10 (23%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 4 (25%)
 Dyslipidaemia 4 (9.1%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
Symptoms at diagnosis
 No symptoms 5 (13%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
 Cough 20 (51%) 3 (60%) 7 (64%) 10 (62%)
 Dyspnoea 28 (65%) 5 (100%) 10 (91%)* 15 (94%)#
 Sputum 6 (15%) 3 (60%) 2 (18%) 5 (31%)
 Digital clubbing 1 (2.6%) 1 (20%) 1 (9.1%) 2 (12%)
 Fever 4 (10%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
 Weight loss 12 (32%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 2 (13%)
 Oxygen need 8 (18%) 2 (40%) 3 (27%) 5 (31%)
Functional data at aPAP diagnosis
 FVC (% predicted) 82.5 (78.0–91.8) 88.4 (80.0–90.0) 86.5 (71.2–101) 87.9 (73.2–103)
 FEV1 (% predicted) 83.2 (76.2–91.5) 90.0 (87.0–90.8) 85.0 (75.0–95.0) 88.8 (80.0–97.0)
DLCO (% predicted) 53.0 (36.8–70.0) 60.0 (47.5–65.0) 58.4 (44.0–63.5) 59.0 (42.0–65.0)
 6MWT, m 510 (472–521) 490 (468–499) 498 (470–509) −2.00 (−4.00–9.00)
 Desaturation during 6MWT −0.500 (−6.50–5.75) −8.00 (2.00–8.00) −2.00 (−3.00–14.0) 7.00 (2.00–9.00)
PaO2, mmHg 72.0 (64.0–88.0) 59.0 (47.0–61.0) 68.0 (57.0–83.0) 67.0 (56.0–82.0)
PCO2, mmHg 34.7 (32.0–39.0) 35.0 (34.2–35.8) 36.0 (32.5–37.5) 35.0 (32.8–37.2)
Treatments
 Whole-lung lavage 25 (57%) 3 (60%) 7 (64%) 10 (62%)
 Inhaled GM-CSF therapy 8 (21%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 4 (25%)
 Subcutaneous injection of GM-CSF 15 (36%) 1 (20%) 4 (36%) 5 (31%)
 Rituximab 12 (29%) 2 (40%) 1 (9.1%) 3 (19%)
 Other immunosuppressive treatment 1 (2.4%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 1 (7.1%)
 Plasmapheresis 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10%) 1 (6.7%)
Infections
 All infections 19 (42%) 4 (80%) 7 (64%) 11 (69%)
 Non-opportunistic infections 16 (36%) 2 (40%) 6 (55%) 8 (50%)
 Opportunistic infections 9 (20%) 3 (60%) 4 (36%) 7 (44%)
Nocardia spp. 4 (8.9%) 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (6.2%)
Clinical outcomes
 Complete resolution 13 (32%) 3 (60%) 3 (30%) 6 (40%)
 All-cause mortality 2 (4.4%) 1 (20%) 3 (27%)* 4 (25%)#

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (%). aPAP: autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis; GM-CSF: granulocyte–monocyte colony-stimulating factor; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; 6MWT: 6-min walking test; PaO2: arterial oxygen tension; PCO2: carbon dioxide tension. ¶: Dust exposure includes patients who had worked in the building sector. *: p<0.05 compared with the column of 45 patients without fibrosis. #: p<0.05 compared with the column of 45 patients without fibrosis. Bold indicates significant values.