Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 1;9(3):28–36. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.12.9.3.28

Table 1.

Triage tool structure and format.

Triage tool structure n/N %
Derivation/format Variable checklista 42/54 80%
Statistical prediction model (score) 10/54 19%
Statistical prediction model (electronic application) 1/54 1%
Target age group Adult only 35/54 66%
Adult focused 11/54 21%
Paediatric 5/54 9%
Elderly 2/54 4%
Intended population defined Serious injuries 3/54 6%
Suspected major trauma 8/54 15%
Significant mechanism 1/54 2%
Serious injuries or significant mechanism 1/54 2%
Suspected major trauma, except nursing home residents or CFS>4 excluded 1/54 2%
Injury 36/54 66%
Not defined
Variable domains present Physiology 54/54 100%
Anatomical injury 48/53 91%
Mechanism of injury 33/53 62%
Special circumstances 20/53 38%
Unstructured clinical judgement Formally incorporated 18/53 34%
Decision support Option for senior clinical advice 15/53 28%

aVariable checklists were derived through expert opinion and available as paper/hard-copy versions, embedded within electronic patient report forms or mobile applications.