Tzung 2008.
Methods | This was a randomised, investigator‐blinded, actively‐controlled study. It was unclear if intention‐to‐treat analysis was conducted. |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria of the trial
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | There were no conflicts of interest. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "...randomised trial." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: The paper provided insufficient details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Clinician/ Investigator | Low risk | Quote: "...an investigator‐blinded trial." |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Participants | High risk | Quote: "...an investigator‐blinded trial." Comment: The participants were not blinded to the treatment. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Outcome assessor | Low risk | Quote: "...an investigator‐blinded trial." Comment: The blinded investigator was probably the assessor. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 40 participants were randomised; 32 participants completed the study. 5 participants in group A and 3 in group B dropped out for reasons unrelated to the treatment. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All of the study's prespecified (primary and secondary) outcomes that were of interest were reported in the prespecified way. |
Other bias | Low risk | This was free of other sources of bias. |