Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0312102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312102

Resinous included phloem as a key indicator of authentic or fake agarwood

Jian Feng 1, Yangyang Liu 1,*, Peiwei Liu 1, Yun Yang 1, Anzhen Xie 1, Jianhe Wei 1,2,*
Editor: Pankaj Bhardwaj3
PMCID: PMC11611195  PMID: 39621726

Abstract

Agarwood, the resinous wood of the genus Aquilaria Lam. and Gyrinops Gaertn. of the family Thymelaeaceae, is a very valuable traditional medicinal material and spice. Due to the high economic value of agarwood, unscrupulous merchants have led to the prevalence of fake agarwood in the trade market in pursuit of high profits. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the characteristics of agarwood and establish a simple and rapid method to identify authenticity. This study compared the authenticity of the microstructure of agarwood from different producing areas with that of artificially simulated fake agarwood. The included phloem of authentic agarwood contains brown to brownish resin. And these resins were naturally and stably distributed. The fake agarwood is divided into two categories: one itself is non-agarwood wood (without included phloem), and the other is artificially counterfeiting. However, the filling of resin in the included phloem of agarwood did not occur after artificially simulated counterfeiting treatments. Of the 18 commercially available samples, 10 had the same microstructure as agarwood, but six of them were not completely filled with resin in the included phloem. Therefore, the resinous included phloem is a key characteristic structure of agarwood. It can be used as a basis for authenticity identification of agarwood. This will provide a convenient and rapid method for promoting and popularizing agarwood authentication in trade, customs enforcement, CITES management, and other fields.

Introduction

Agarwood is the resinous wood of the genera Aquilaria Lam. and Gyrinops Gaertn. of the family Thymelaeaceae. Its natural distribution range includes China, India, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea [1–3]. Agarwood has different names in different cultures of the world, such as ‘Chēngxiáng’ in China, ‘gaharu’ in Indonesia and Malaysia, ‘agar’ in India, ‘oud’ in the Middle East, and ‘jin-koh’ in Japan [4, 5]. Agarwood has been used as a traditional medicine for nearly two thousand years [1] to treat joint pain and is an anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, sedative, and anticancer agent [6–8]. Agarwood is also a valuable spice with a wide range of applications in fragrances and religion. For example, the volatile oil of agarwood is used as a scent fixative in top-quality perfumes, smoked using agarwood such as agarwood threads, and processed into artifacts such as bead strings [2, 9]. However, a healthy agarwood tree must be physically, chemically, and microbiologically harmed to gradually form agarwood, but the growth is slow and yields are low [10–13]. All species of Aquilaria and Gyrinops genera have been listed in Appendix II of the convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (CITES) since 2004 [14]. Therefore, the agarwood trade has been closely monitored by international regulators to ensure that such activities do not continue to damage the continued survival of these species in the wild.

Nonetheless, the volume of agarwood traded in the international agarwood trading market reaches several hundred tons each year, with a turnover of tens of millions of dollars. The end market for agarwood is mainly concentrated in Asia and the Middle East [15]. Due to the high demand and high profits in the agarwood market, unscrupulous traders have resorted to counterfeiting and adulteration through various means, such as high-pressure oil injection, soaking spices to pretend to be high-quality agarwood, or using other wood instead of agarwood, especially processing them into handicrafts (beads, bracelets, and statues), this phenomenon is more common [16, 17]. However, the current research on agarwood mainly includes the formation mechanism [18, 19], species identification [20], the separation of sesquiterpenes and 2-(2-phenylethyl) chromones [21], development of modern chromatographic and mass spectrometry analysis methods [22–24], and pharmacology [25, 26]. Although some of the currently developed methods and standards for quality analysis of agarwood can meet the quality analysis and accurate identification of agarwood [27], However, these methods and standards are not suitable for rapid on-site testing of agarwood due to the disadvantages of the large number of samples required, expensive equipment, specialized technicians, and long-term limitations. Liu et al. proposed that the included phloem, also known as interxylary phloem, and rays are the main sites of resin formation in A. sinensis [28, 29]. The agar-wit technique was used to induce agarwood formation in A. sinensis, which was completely filled with resin the included phloem after one month [30]. Zhang et al. proposed the concept of included phloem, which refers to stranded or striped bundles of abnormal secondary phloem formed by the development of individual vascular formations embedded and dispersed in the secondary xylem of plant roots or stems [31]. Therefore, an understanding of the anatomical structure of agarwood would enable establishing a simple and rapid method for authenticity identification.

Light microscopy is the most widely used method for botanical and timber identification, and the International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA) has established a classic database of wood anatomy [32–34]. The presence of resinous included phloem has been reported for A. sinensis, Aquilaria malaccensis Lam, and Aquilaria yunnanensis S.C. Huang [15, 35, 36], but whether or not resinous included phloem is a characteristic structure of agarwood is not clear. For the identification of authentic agarwood, it needs to be confirmed whether the resin in the included phloem is naturally occurring or can be formed by artificially adding extracts. Therefore, it is important to establish a reliable method to identify authentic agarwood. In this study, we validated the resinous included phloem as a key characteristic structure for the authentication of agarwood. This will provide a convenient and rapid method for promoting and popularizing agarwood authentication in trade, customs enforcement, and CITES management.

Materials and methods

Materials collection

A total of 53 samples were collected in this study (S1 Table). 20 samples (C1-C20) from 17 agarwood-producing areas in 8 countries (China, Bangladesh, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, and Indonesia), of which 18 samples had species information (Fig 1). 15 samples (C21-C35) made of fake agarwood from the laboratory, mainly referring to the common counterfeiting methods (steaming with extracts) in the market (Fig 2). 18 samples of agarwood (C36-C53) were collected from the trading market (Fig 3). Such collections are permitted and legal. All voucher specimens of agarwood were kept in the herbarium of the agarwood Identification Center, Hainan Branch, Institute of Medicinal Plants, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Fig 1. The experimental agarwood samples from various producing areas.

Fig 1

C1-C20: sample number.

Fig 2. The experimental agarwood samples from laboratory-made fake agarwood.

Fig 2

C21-C35: sample number. Resin-free agarwood (C21), ordinary agarwood A (C22), and ordinary agarwood B (C23) was soaked in four agarwood extracts and steaming at 90°C for 12 hours in a water bath, followed by 0.5 hours in a 70°C water bath. AQE is an aqueous extract of agarwood. ALE is an alcoholic extract of agarwood. SUE is a supercritical extract of agarwood. ALEH is an alcoholic extract with a high resin content (Chi-Nan) of agarwood. WAB is water.

Fig 3. The experimental agarwood from the market.

Fig 3

C36-C53: sample number.

Apparatus and reagents

A biological microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Japan) fitted with a camera system (Nikon DS-5Mc, Japan) was used to observe and record the microscopic features of the agarwood samples. The tools included a water bath kettle (HH4, China), tissue softener (glycerin-ethanol, 1:1), chloral hydrate solution (Macklin, China), scalpel, and centrifugal tube.

Treatment, observation and data analysis

We mimicked the steaming methods that are commonly used on the market to produce fake agarwood. Usually, agarwood extracts are mixed with resin-free agarwood wood or low-quality agarwood and counterfeited by steaming. The main steps of the laboratory-made fake agarwood were to place resin-free agarwood and ordinary agarwood in centrifuge tubes containing aqueous extract solution of agarwood (AQE), alcoholic extract solution of agarwood (ALE), supercritical extract solution of agarwood (SUE), and alcoholic extract solution with high resin content Chi-Nan agarwood (ALEH), respectively, and then steam-firing them for 12 hours at 90°C in a water bath (Fig 2). All samples were divided into small pieces and placed individually into centrifuge tubes filled with water and heated at 70°C for 0.5 hours. Using the freehand sectioning approach, thin slices were cut along the sample transection section. At least 12 thin slices were cut out for each sample. Thin-sectioned samples were placed in chloral hydrate solution and examined with a biological microscope, with 12 thin sections randomly observed for each sample, and a field of view with a magnification of 100 was selected to take photographs and measure the dimensions of the included phloem, the vessel, and the ray of the agarwood samples. The analyzed data were recorded using Excel and included the tangential length and radial width of the included phloem, the tangential and radial width of the vessel, and the width of the rays. The analytical results of each microstructure were plotted using Graphpad software.

Results

Microstructural characteristics of authentic agarwood

Twenty samples of authentic agarwood from various producing areas are shown in Fig 1, and the microstructures of the transection section are in Fig 4. The resinous included phloem, and resinous rays and vessels were observed in all samples. The included phloem is diffuse, can be oblong, ribbon-shaped, or island-shaped, and is filled with brown or yellow-brown resin. The tangential and radial widths were 391.63 ± 158.08 (86.98–927.62) μm and 133.49 ± 63.78 (48.09–280) μm, respectively (S1 Fig). Rays are radially extending, exclusively uniseriate, 22.32 ± 9.16 (5.1–62.07) μm wide, and uninterruptedly connected to the included phloem (S1 Fig). Vessels are radially single or multiple, circular or ovoid, with tangential and radial widths of 76.60 ± 28.81 (11.04–223.77) μm and 57.39 ± 24.13 (4.11–162.11) μm, respectively (S1 Fig). Although the size of the included phloem of agarwood is irregular and some samples (e.g., C6/C7) are not completely filled with resin, it is present in all samples, and it is inferred that the resinous included phloem is a characteristic structure of authentic agarwood.

Fig 4. Microstructure of the transection section of the authentic agarwood from various producing areas.

Fig 4

C1-C20: sample number. IP: included phloem; R: ray; V: vessel. Scale bars 100 μm.

Microstructural characteristics of manufactured fake agarwood

Although the resinous included phloem is characteristic structures of agarwood, it has not been verified whether the resins in these structures are naturally occurring or can be formed at a later stage by artificial addition. Therefore, this study used resin-free agarwood and ordinary agarwood to simulate the counterfeiting process by steaming the samples with the addition of agarwood extracts and observed the distribution of resin in the included phloem and its difference from the authentic agarwood. After steaming at 90°C for 12 hours, the samples were all darkened in appearance to varying degrees, as shown in Fig 2. The samples were sectioned, and the microstructures of the included phloem, rays, and vessels were all observed, as shown in Fig 5. Compared to the control samples C21, C22, and C23, the resin did not accumulate efficiently in the included phloem of the samples after treatment with the four agarwood extracts, which was especially observed in the resin-free agarwood (samples C24, C25, C26, and C27). Meanwhile, the abovementioned samples were further subjected to a water bath at 70°C for 0.5 h. The samples were further sectioned to observe the microstructure of the samples, as shown in Fig 6. The resin in the included phloem of ordinary agarwood A and B remains stable. Thus, the resin in the included phloem of agarwood is naturally occurring and cannot be effectively accumulated even by the artificial addition of agarwood extracts.

Fig 5. Microstructures of the transection section of the manufactured fake agarwood steaming 90°C for 12 hours.

Fig 5

C21-C35: sample number; IP: included phloem; R: ray; V: vessel. Scale bars 200 μm.

Fig 6. Microstructures of the transection section of the manufactured fake agarwood after a treatment process followed by a water bath at 70°C for 0.5 hours.

Fig 6

C21-C35: sample number; IP: included phloem; R: ray; V: vessel. Scale bars 200 μm.

Validation of microstructural characteristics of agarwood samples from the trading market

We observed the microstructures of 18 agarwood samples from the trading market (Fig 7). After comparison with the authentic agarwood, it was revealed that the microstructures of 10 samples (C36, C37, C38, C39, C40, C42, C47, C51, C52, and C53) were consistent with that of agarwood, and the microstructures of eight samples were not consistent with that of agarwood. Samples C36, C37, C38, C39, and C53 had their included phloem completely filled with resin, while samples C40, C42, C47, C51, and C52 had their included phloem barely filled with resin, with only a small amount of resin dispersed. The microstructure of the remaining eight samples differed from that of the agarwood, although in that they appeared to contain a brown substance. In addition, we soaked the remaining samples in water at room temperature. Interestingly, we found that the color of the soaking solution in the agarwood samples was pale yellow. However, the immersed solution colors of the samples C42 and C47 were yellow and reddish brown, respectively. The color of the immersed solution gradually deepened, accompanied by a pungent odor. Therefore, the resinous included phloem can be utilized to simply identify the authenticity of agarwood.

Fig 7. The microstructure of the transection section of the agarwood samples from the trading market.

Fig 7

C36-C53: sample number. IP: included phloem; R: ray; V: vessel. Scale bars-100 μm.

Discussion

The resinous included phloem is a characteristic structure of authentic agarwood

Wood identification is very important in the timber trade, fighting against illegal logging, wood certification, and forensic identification. Microanatomy sometimes provides information hidden by gross anatomy [37]. The xylem of Aquilaria is the most important structure, and it provides a place for resin formation and accumulation [35, 36]. The included phloem and rays are interconnected to form a living parenchyma cell network in A. sinensis wood [28]. Therefore, verifying the prevalence of resinous included phloem in agarwood plays a decisive role in identifying the authenticity of agarwood. In this study, we found that the microstructures of all authentic agarwood contained included phloem with a natural and regular distribution of brown or yellow-brown resin, although some samples had included phloem of different sizes. Gasson et al. report that all Aquilaria and Gyrinops are CITES listings and that the woods are anatomically quite similar [37, 38]. To further verify this hypothesis, we searched for the presence of included phloem in published papers related to species of the genera Aquilaria and Gyrinops, as well as other genera of the Thymolaceae. The search revealed that the wood of 12 species of the genus Aquilaria and four species of the genus Gyrinops contain included phloem (Table 1). Their microstructures are basically the same, which is consistent with the results of this paper. In addition, the species of the genus Gonystylus Teijsm. & Binn., Aetoxylon Airy Shaw, and Phaleria Jack of the family Thymelaeaceae do not included phloem. However, there is no regularity in the size of the included phloem in different species. The size of the included phloem may be related to the plant species of agarwood, the growing environment, the time and the way of agarwood formation.

Table 1. The presence or absence of included phloem structures in different agarwood species.

Species Included phloem References
A. agallochum + [40]; This study
A. beccariana + [41]
A. crassna + [42]; This study
A. cumingiana + [41]
A. filaria + This study
A. hirta + [43]
A. khasiana + [44]
A. malaccensis + [36, 42, 43]; This study
A. microcarpa + [43, 45]
A. sinensis + [15, 28, 29, 35, 42, 46]; This study
A. subintegra + This study
A. yunnanensis + [47]; This study
Gyrinops caudata + [41]
G. moluccana + [41]
G. versteegii + [42, 48, 49]
G. walla + [50]
Gonystylus affinis - [10]
G. bancanus - [10]
G. brunnescens - [10]
G.confuses - [10]
G. punctatus - [37]
G. macrophyllus - [51]
Aetoxylon sympetalum - [52]
Pbaleria sp. - [41]

Note: + Included phloem exist.—Included phloem does not exist.

It is worth noting that some species have also been reported to contain included phloem. This included phloem have the following characteristics: 1) The included phloem is very narrow, with only two to four cells per cell, such as noted in Stylidium glandulosum Salisb. (Stylidiaceae). 2) The included phloem is broad and roughly circular, such as seen in Strychnos madagascariensis Poir. (Loganiaceae). 3) The included phloem is crushed or stranded, such as noted in Salvadora persica L. (Salvadoraceae); 4) The included phloem is small and numerous in the early stage, with a short lifespan and a gradual decrease in number in the later stage, such as occurs in Oenothera linifolia Nutt. (Onagraceae) [39]. However, the microstructure of the included phloem of these reported species is completely different from that of agarwood. Despite the samples similarity in appearance to agarwood, the anatomical methods utilized in this paper allow for the rapid identification of fake agarwood.

The resin in the included phloem of agarwood is naturally occurring and cannot be effectively accumulated by artificial additions

Agarwood is formed when the agarwood trees are damaged by physical force, insect, or fungal infection, and the resinous substance is embedded at the wound and gradually accumulates over time [10–13]. In our study, the fake samples were dark or black in color due to the counterfeiting of agarwood by the steaming method, and their appearance and smell were similar to those of authentic agarwood. However, by microscopic observation, the resin in the included phloem of these fake agarwood samples (resin-free agarwood wood and ordinary agarwood) did not accumulate effectively. It has been reported that the addition of illegal additives (carbon powder, rosin, extracts, colored oil, kerosene, etc.) can be used to increase the wood’s weight and color and create a appearance resemblance to high-quality agarwood [1].

In general, the included phloem of authentic agarwood are supposed to contain resin. The results of this study revealed that the resin in the included phloem of some of the agarwood samples were incompletely filled, a phenomenon that may be related to the short time of agarwood formation, the unstable method of induction, or incomplete primary processing. It has also been shown that when agarwood is immersed in water, the resin dissolves very slowly, and the resin remains stable for a certain period of time [53]. Our validation experiments also confirmed that there was no significant loss or reduction of resin in the included phloem of the authentic agarwood under the same steaming conditions. In addition, we found that the color of the soaking water solution in the authentic agarwood samples stayed pale yellow all the time. However, the soaking water solution colors of 2 samples from the trading market were yellow and reddish brown, respectively. The color of the immersed solution gradually deepened, accompanied by a pungent odor. Therefore, we conclude that additives have been added to the agarwood.

Searching for resinous included phloem under the microscope provides a convenient and rapid method for the authentication of agarwood

We selected included phloem as important elements to identify in all samples of agarwood. The method was validated by identifying the authentic agarwood sourced from the market, as well as fake agarwood. We have formed this method of authentication of agarwood into a standard operation procedure, as shown in Fig 8. which first described the appearance trait of the samples, followed by basic sample processing, including sampling, warm bath, permeabilization, and sealing; finally, the included phloem containing resin were observed under the microscope to determine the authenticity of the samples. Microstructure identification provides reliable results compared to the trait identification of agarwood. In addition, compared with chemical analysis and molecular identification, the microstructure identification method is simple, low cost, and does not require expensive and sophisticated equipment. The microstructure identification method used in this study was evaluated in terms of equipment, testing time, cost, technicians, and reliability of results and it was able to identify the authenticity of agarwood quickly, conveniently, and accurately (Table 2).

Fig 8. Standard operating procedures for microstructure identification of agarwood.

Fig 8

Table 2. Comparison of the results of this study with existing techniques for the identification of agarwood.

Item Microstructure Traits Chemical analysis Molecular identification
Equipment Microscope Eyes, hands, and nose Chromatograph, mass spectrometer, and its combination instrument PCR amplifier, and DNA Sequencers
Detection time 1–2 hours Less than 0.5 hour 5–8 hours More than10 hours
Cost $7 Uncertainty $120 $140
Technician Not required Required Required Required
Result reliability Reliable; The internal structure and resins of the agarwood to be measured can be observed. Unreliable; It requires a great deal of experience and judgment. It can identify the quality of incense but cannot determine whether it is fake. It can identify the species of agarwood but cannotdetermine whether it is fake.

Conclusion

In this study, by comparing the authenticity of the microstructures of agarwood from different producing areas and artificially simulated fake agarwood, it was found that the included phloem of authentic agarwood was filled with brown to brownish resins, which were also deposited in the rays, naturally distributed, and stably present. The filling of resin in the included phloem of agarwood did not occur after artificially simulated counterfeiting treatments. Fake agarwood is divided into two categories, one itself is non-agarwood wood (without included phloem), and the other is artificially counterfeiting (there is included phloem, but it does not contain resin, or counterfeiting filler material can be dissolved out). Therefore, the resinous included phloem is an important characteristic structure of agarwood and can be used as a basis for authenticity identification. This will provide a convenient and rapid method for the promotion and popularization of agarwood authentication in trade, customs enforcement, CITES management, and other fields.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The sizes of authentic agarwood included phloem, ray, and vessel.

A and B: the tangential and radial widths of the included phloem; C: ray width; D and E: the tangential and radial widths of the vessel.

(TIF)

pone.0312102.s001.tif (799.5KB, tif)
S1 Table. Information on the samples used in this study.

# Wild agarwood, ## Artificially induced agarwood.; a) aqueous extract solution of agarwood (AQE), b) alcoholic extract solution of agarwood (ALE), c) supercritical extract solution of agarwood (SUE), d) alcoholic extract solution with high resin content Chi-Nan agarwood (ALEH).

(DOCX)

pone.0312102.s002.docx (19KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We thank the agarwood Identification Center, Hainan Branch, Institute of Medicinal Plants, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College for supporting the collection of samples and microstructure experiments in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (822MS145); the project of medical and health science and technology innovation engineering of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021-1-I2M-032);Hainan Provincial Nanhai xinxing Science and Technology Innovation Talent Platform Project (NHXXRCXM202341); Hainan Provincial Key Research and Development Project (ZDYF2021SHFZ047); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81703660); the earmarked fund for CARS (CARS-21). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Barden A, Anak NA, Mulliken T, Song M. Heart of the matter: agarwood use and trade and CITES implementation for Aquilaria malaccensis. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee SY, Mohamed R. The Origin and Domestication of Aquilaria, an Important Agarwood-Producing Genus. In: MOHAMED R. (eds) agarwood. Tropical Forestry. Springer, Singapore; 2016. 10.1007/978-981-10-0833-7_1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wyn LT, Anak NA. Wood for the trees: a review of the agarwood (gaharu) trade in Malaysia. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Malaysia; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hashim YZH, Kerr PG, Abbas P, Salleh HM. Aquilaria spp. (agarwood) as source of health beneficial compounds: A review of traditional use, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016; 189: 331–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu YY, Wei JH, Gao ZH, Lyu JC. A review of quality assessment and grading for agarwood. Chin Herbal Med. 2017; 9: 22–30. 10.1016/S1674-6384(17)60072-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chitre T, Bhutada P, Nandakumar K, Somani R. Miniyar P, Mundhada Y, et al. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of heartwood of Aquilaria agallocha in laboratory animals. Pharmacol online. 2007; 1: 288–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rahman H, Eswaraiah MC, Dutta AM. Anti-arthritic activity of leaves and oil of Aquilaria agallocha. Haya: Saudi J life sci. 2016; 1: 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takemoto H, Ito M, Shiraki T, Yagura T, Honda G. Sedative effects of vapor inhalation of agarwood oil and spikenard extract and identification of their active components. J Nat Med. 2008; 62: 41–46. doi: 10.1007/s11418-007-0177-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu J. Global distribution of incense resources and the current status of research on the method of agarwood formation. China food drug admin mag. 2020; 12: 100–104. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5390.2020.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nobuchi T, Siripatanadilok S. Preliminary observation of Aquilaria crassna wood associated with the formation of aloeswood. Bull Kyoto Univ Forests. 1991; 63: 226–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu YY, Chen HQ, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Wei JH, Meng H, et al. Whole-tree agarwood-inducing technique: An efficient novel technique for producing high-quality agarwood in cultivated Aquilaria sinensis trees. Molecules, 2013; 18: 3086–3106. 10.3390/molecules18033086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalita J, Bhattacharyya PR, Boruah HPD, Unni BG, Lekhak H, Nath SC. Association of Zeuzera conferta Walker on agarwood formation in Aquilaria malaccensis Lamk. Asian J Plant Sci Res. 2015; 5: 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen XY, Sui C, Liu YY, Yang Y, Liu PW, Zhang Z, et al. Agarwood formation induced by fermentation liquid of Lasiodiplodia theobromae, the dominating fungus in wounded wood of Aquilaria sinensis. Curr Microbiol. 2017; 74: 460–468. 10.1007/s00284-016-1193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Appendices I, II and III, valid from 25 may 2024. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/app/2024/E-Appendices-2024-05-25.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yin Y, Jiao L, Dong M, Jiang X, Zhang S. Wood Resources, Identification, and Utilization of Agarwood in China. In: MOHAMED R. (eds) agarwood. Tropical Forestry. Springer, Singapore; 2016. 10.1007/978-981-10-0833-7_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Persoon GA, van Beek HH. Growing ‘The Wood of The Gods’: Agarwood Production in Southeast Asia. In: Snelder D.J., Lasco R.D. (eds) Smallholder Tree Growing for Rural Development and Environmental Services. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht; 2008. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8261-0_12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jim CY. Cross-border itinerant poaching of agarwood in Hong Kong’s peri-urban forests. Urban For Urban Green. 2015; 14: 420–432. 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu YH, Zhang Z, Wang MX, Wei JH, Chen HJ, Gao ZH, et al. Identification of genes related to agarwood formation: transcriptome analysis of healthy and wounded tissues of Aquilaria sinensis. BMC genomics. 2013; 14: 1–16. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan CS, Isa NM, Ismail I, Zainal Z. Agarwood induction: current developments and future perspectives. Front plant sci. 2019; 10: 122. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin YX, Feng TT, Dai JP, Liu QZ, Cai YM, Kuang JR, et al. DNA barcoding identification of IUCN Red listed threatened species in the genus Aquilaria (Thymelaeaceae) using machine learning approaches. Phytochem Lett. 2023; 55: 105–111. 10.1016/j.phytol.2023.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang ZH, Fang HB, Tao CT, Jiao YB, Cheng YX. Eight new 2-(2-phenylethyl) chromone derivatives from agarwood of Aquilaria sinensis with anti-inflammatory activity. Fitoterapia. 2023; 169: 105564. 10.1016/j.fitote.2023.105564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Espinoza EO, Lancaster CA, Kreitals NM, Hata M, Cody RB, Blanchette RA. Distinguishing wild from cultivated agarwood (Aquilaria spp.) using direct analysis in real time and time of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2014; 28: 281–289. 10.1002/rcm.6779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu Z, Dong WH, Wang YL, Li W, Guo ZY, Mei WL, et al. Identification of aroma‐active components from cultivated agarwood ‘Qi-Nan’based on GC-O-MS combined with aroma extract dilution analysis. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 2023; 38: 392–403. 10.1002/ffj.3754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Du Z, Wang HJ, Li XL, Dong MY, Chi BQ, Tian ZH, et al. Rapid screening and characterization of 2-(2-phenylethyl) chromones in agarwood by UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS. Food Chem. 2023; 424: 136400. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang CH, Peng DQ, Liu YY, Wu YL, Guo P, Wei JH. Agarwood alcohol extract protects against gastric ulcer by inhibiting oxidation and inflammation. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021; 9944685. doi: 10.1155/2021/9944685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gogoi R, Sarma N, Begum T, Chanda SK, Lekhak H, Sastry GN, et al. Agarwood (Aquilaria malaccensis L.) a quality fragrant and medicinally significant plant based essential oil with pharmacological potentials and genotoxicity. Ind Crop Prod. 2023; 197: 116535. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the people´s republic of China, Volume I. China Med Sci Tech Press; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu PW, Zhang XL, Yang Y, Sui C, Xu YH, Wei JH. Interxylary phloem and xylem rays are the structural foundation of agarwood resin formation in the stems of Aquilaria sinensis. Trees, 2019; 33: 533–542. 10.1007/s00468-018-1799-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu PW, Zhang YX, Yang Y, Lv FF, Wei JH. Programmed cell death might involve in progress of wounding induced agarwood formation in stems of Aquilaria sinensis. Microsc Res Techniq. 2022; 1–9. 10.1002/jemt.24140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang Y, Meng H, Lyu FF, Fan XH, Liu PW, He X, et al. Temporal characteristics of agarwood formation in Aquilaria sinensis after applying whole-tree agarwood-inducing technique. Chinese Herbal Medicines. 2023; 15: 37–44. 10.1016/j.chmed.2022.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang YX, Liu PW. Intexylary phloem: Definition, distrution, development and function. Hubei Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 54: 3589–3592. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Youssef J, Döll-Boscardin PM, Farago PV, Duarta MR, Budel JM. Gochnatia polymorpha: macro- and microscopic identification of leaf and stem for pharmacognostic quality control. Rev Bras de Farmacogn. 2013; 23: 588–591. 10.1590/S0102-695X2013005000054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yuan YD, Liu X, Wang JP, Zhang JC. Morphological and microscopic identification of three major medicinal Dendrobium species in Ta-pieh Mountains area. Microsc Res Techniq. 2019; 82: 483–493. 10.1002/jemt.23191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wheeler EA, Gasson PE, Baas P. Using The Inside Wood Web Site: Potentials And Pitfalls. IAWA J. 2020; 41: 412–462. 10.1163/22941932-bja10032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang XL, Liu YY, Chen HJ, Xu YH, Zhang Z, Yang Y, et al. Study on xylem structure and histochemistry in Aquilaria sinensis. J Shangdong Univ (Nat Sci). 2012; 47: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.6040 /j.issn.1671-9352.2012.07.001. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mohamed R, Wong MT, Halis R. Microscopic Observation of ‘Gaharu’ Wood from Aquilaria malaccensis. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 2013; 36: 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gasson P, Warner K, Lewis GP. Wood anatomy of Caesalpinia s.l.: Caesalpinia s.s., Coulteria, Erythrostemon, Guilandina, Libidibia, Mezoneuron, Poincianella and Tara (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae). IAWA J. 2009; 30: 247–276. 10.1163/22941932-90000218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gasson P, Baas P, Wheeler E. Wood anatomy of CITES-Listed tree species. IAWA J. 2011; 32: 155–198. 10.1163/22941932-90000050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carlquist S. Interxylary phloem: Diversity and functions. Brittonia. 2013; 65: 477–495. 10.1007/s12228-012-9298-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim IR, Park SJ. Anatomical features of agarwood xylem. Kor J Herbology. 2005; 20: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andianto A. Ciri anatomi lima jenis kayu penghasil gaharu dan dua jenis kerabatnya. Jur Pen Hasil Hutan. 2010; 28: 169–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Luo B, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Maroem SN, Mulyaningsih T, Itoh T. The occurrence and structure of radial sieve tubes in the secondary xylem of Aquilaria and Gyrinops. IAWA J. 2019; 1–16. 10.1163/22941932-00002013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nordahlia AS, Lim SC, Anwar UMK. Wood anatomical features of Aquilaria (Thymelaeaceae) and Gonystylus (Gonystylaceae) in Malaysia. Malayan Nat J. 2017; 69: 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang Y, Feng J, Zhu JX, Liu YY, Chen DL, Wei JH. Quality of agarwood produced by whole tree agarwood-inducing technique (Agar-Wit) from China and Southeast Asian countries. Chin Pharm J. 2019; 54: 1988–1994. 10.11669/cpj.2019.23.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saikia N, Nath SC. Anatomical Characters of few Infraspecific Variants of Aquilaria malaccensis Lamk. Bull Bot Surv India. 2004; 46: 468–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Feng J, Hou WC, Chen L, Chen XQ, Yang Y, Liu YY, et al. Quality analysis and evaluation of agarwood produced by "Chi-Nan" germplasm based on standard of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Mod Chin Med. 2022; 24: 432–437. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Su J, Liu Z, Li RC, Ren CQ, Yang XJ. Preliminary Study on Timber Structure of Aquilaria yunnanensis. Chin J Trop Agric. 2016; 36: 30–34. 10.12008/j.issn.1009-2196.2016.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tabata Y, Widjaja E, Mulyaningsih T, Parman I, Wiriadinata H, Mandang YI, et al. Structural survey and artificial induction of aloeswood. Wood Research: Bull Wood Res Inst Kyoto Univ. 2003; 90: 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hidayat W, Mulyaningsih T, Muspiah A. Agarwood formation in Gyrinops versteegii seedlingstage using four types of inducers. Jur Sylva Lestari. 2022; 10: 233–243. 10.23960/jsl.v10i2.523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Subasinghe SMCUP, Hettiarachchi DS. Agarwood resin production and resin quality of Gyrinops walla Gaertn. Int J Agric Sci. 2013; 3: 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Scurfield G, Silva SR, Ingle HD. Vessel wall structure: An investigation using scanning electron microscopy. Aust J Bot. 1970; 18: 301–312. 10.1071/BT9700301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yan ZC, Chen Y, Zhou C. Research on Aetoxylon sympetalum wood of Thymelaeaceae. Qual Tech Superv Res. 2019; 2: 27–29. 10.15902/j.cnki.zljsjdyj.2019.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jok VA, Radzi NC, Hamid KHK. Agarwood oil yield as a result of changes in cell morphology due to soaking process. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015; 195: 2443–2450. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pankaj Bhardwaj

23 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-12796The presence of resinous included phloem indicative of genuine or fake agarwoodPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. The independent reviewers have highlighted few important shortcomings in your manuscript. Please go through the comments and submit your revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 07 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pankaj Bhardwaj, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

The American Journal Experts (AJE) (https://www.aje.com/) is one such service that has extensive experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. Please note that having the manuscript copyedited by AJE or any other editing services does not guarantee selection for peer review or acceptance for publication.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (822MS145); the project of medical and health science and technology innovation engineering of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021-1-I2M-032);Hainan Provincial Nanhai xinxing Science and Technology Innovation Talent Platform Project (NHXXRCXM202341); Hainan Provincial Nanhai xinxing Science and Technology Innovation Talent Platform Project (NHXXRCXM202341); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81703660); the earmarked fund for CARS (CARS-21).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This work describes the method for identifying authentic agarwood.

General observations:

1. The language needs improvement.

2. The supplementary information can form a part of the main text.

3. Data related to the anatomical characteristics and be provided as supplementary information.

The sectionwise comments are provided as attachment.

Reviewer #2: 1. The manuscript is very flimsy in its scientific content and poor in language. It needs a major revision before being considered further for evaluation.

2. The authors have included many paragraphs that are irrelevant; it seems like they were included just to increase the volume of the text.

3. The details of any statistical analysis conducted are not clear.

4. Is the repeatability of the experiments doubtful?

5. The title of the manuscript is inappropriate and does not spell out the objective of the study clearly.

6. The manuscript contains many typographical errors.

7. The plagiarism of the manuscript may also be checked.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: SHARADA MALLUBHOTLA

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewers Comments Article-240128.docx

pone.0312102.s003.docx (14.2KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: Article-240128 with comments.docx

pone.0312102.s004.docx (29.8MB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0312102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312102.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Sep 2024

Point-by-point response to reviewer 1

Reply to journal requirements

We are very grateful to the reviewer for the specification of this paper, and we have made the required article-by-article changes as detailed below:

Q1. The language needs improvement.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. The language of the manuscript has been revised and embellished.

Q2. The supplementary information can form a part of the main text.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. Changes have been made in response to your comments, and S1a Fig, S1b Fig, S1c Fig, and S1 Table have been added to the manuscript. To avoid duplication, Table 1 has been placed in the annexed material as S1 Table. Revisions to other elements have been identified in the manuscript with yellow underlining.

Q3. Data related to the anatomical characteristics and be provided as supplementary information. The sectionwise comments are provided as attachment.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. In response to your comments, we have made some changes and have provided the data charts for anatomical features as an attachment, and other content changes are identified with a yellow underline.

Q4. Title: Could be modified as 1) Assessing Authenticity in Agarwood through the Presence of Resinous Included Phloem; 2) Resinous Included Phloem as a Key Indicator of fake or authentic Agarwood.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We have chosen your point 2 as a more appropriate title for the article and have revised it in the manuscript.

Q5. Introduction: 1) Language needs improvement; 2) A logical flow is lacking in the introduction. It fails to introduce the need for identifying included phloem characterisitics to establish a reliable method for identifying authentic agarwood.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We have made changes to the introduction.

Q6. Materials and Methods: 1) Clarify the terms "uncertain agarwood", " producing areas " to ensure it's easily understood by readers. 2) What does ‘mainly referring to the common counterfeiting methods in the market’ mean? 3) When you mention 53 batches, how many samples were present in each batch? Or do you mean 53 samples? 4) Ensure consistency in terminology. Retain either batch or sample. 5) How many observations were recorded per sample? 6) What statistical analysis was employed? 7) Overall, the essential details of the sample collection process is conveyed, but breaking down the information and providing clarifications can enhance readability and comprehension.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We have revised and clarified the seven issues you raised in the manuscript.

Q7. Results: The results effectively communicate the findings, but there are areas where clarity and conciseness could be improved.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We have followed the changes made to the results section.

Q8. Discussion: 1) The readability of the discussion is moderate. While the information presented is clear in most parts, there are areas where the complexity of the subject matter or the improper usage of grammar poses a challenge. 2) With minor revisions to simplify the language and complex concepts, the readability of the report could be improved. 3) Consider rephrasing or condensing repetitive information to avoid redundancy.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We have made the changes you suggested.

Point-by-point response to reviewer 2

Reply to journal requirements

We are very grateful to reviewer for the specification of this paper, and we have made the required article-by-article changes as detailed below:

Q1. The manuscript is very flimsy in its scientific content and poor in language. It needs a major revision before being considered further for evaluation.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. The language and content of the manuscript has been revised and embellished.

Q2. The authors have included many paragraphs that are irrelevant; it seems like they were included just to increase the volume of the text.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. The contents of the manuscript have been verified and revised.

Q3. The details of any statistical analysis conducted are not clear.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. Sample observation and statistical analysis methods have been added to the Materials and Methods section.

Q4. Is the repeatability of the experiments doubtful?

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We firmly believe that the results of the manuscript are reliable. We analyzed the samples of authentic agarwood from different producing areas by observation, and at least 12 replicates of thin slices of each sample were extracted for microstructure observation and analysis. Methodological validation was also carried out on artificially fake agarwood, and the resin-containing included phloem was found to be the characteristic structure of authentic agarwood. In addition, our team specializes in the research of authentication and quality control of agarwood and has established the China's first agarwood authentication center, which is also confirmed by the CMA accreditation issued by the Chinese government. The methods used in this research are simple and practical and meet the use of agarwood-related industries.

Q5. The title of the manuscript is inappropriate and does not spell out the objective of the study clearly.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. We chose the appropriate title “Resinous included phloem as a key indicator of authentic or fake agarwood” and revised it in the original manuscript.

Q6. The manuscript contains many typographical errors.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. Changes have been checked and corrected in the manuscript.

Q7. The plagiarism of the manuscript may also be checked.

Answer: Thank you very much for your review. The data in our manuscript is authentic and reliable and there is no plagiarism. our team specializes in the research of authentication and quality control of agarwood and has established the China's first agarwood authentication center, which is also confirmed by the CMA accreditation issued by the Chinese government. The methods used in this research are simple and practical and meet the use of agarwood-related industries. The experimental data in the manuscripts involved are authentic.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers1+2.docx

pone.0312102.s005.docx (17KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Pankaj Bhardwaj

2 Oct 2024

Resinous included phloem as a key indicator of authentic or fake agarwood

PONE-D-24-12796R1

Dear Dr. Liu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pankaj Bhardwaj, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All corrections / suggestions in the article - The presence of resinous included phloem indicative of genuine or fake agarwood have been addressed. The article can be accepted.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed the comments to my satisfaction.

The statistial analysis an important component of practical research has been substantially added to the manuscript.

The manuscript can now be accepted after formatting the references as per journal guidelines.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: SHARADA MALLUBHOTLA

**********

Acceptance letter

Pankaj Bhardwaj

16 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-12796R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pankaj Bhardwaj

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The sizes of authentic agarwood included phloem, ray, and vessel.

    A and B: the tangential and radial widths of the included phloem; C: ray width; D and E: the tangential and radial widths of the vessel.

    (TIF)

    pone.0312102.s001.tif (799.5KB, tif)
    S1 Table. Information on the samples used in this study.

    # Wild agarwood, ## Artificially induced agarwood.; a) aqueous extract solution of agarwood (AQE), b) alcoholic extract solution of agarwood (ALE), c) supercritical extract solution of agarwood (SUE), d) alcoholic extract solution with high resin content Chi-Nan agarwood (ALEH).

    (DOCX)

    pone.0312102.s002.docx (19KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers Comments Article-240128.docx

    pone.0312102.s003.docx (14.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Article-240128 with comments.docx

    pone.0312102.s004.docx (29.8MB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers1+2.docx

    pone.0312102.s005.docx (17KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES