TABLE 2.
MAb | ID90 (μg/ml)b | Dm (μg/ml)c | rd | CIe at
|
Dose reduction indexf at
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID50 | ID90 | ID50 | ID90 | ||||
IgG1 b12 | 20 | 16 | 0.99 | 25 | 29 | ||
2F5 | 50 | 20 | 0.99 | 1.5 | 2 | ||
2G12 | 200 | 72 | 0.91 | 11 | 33 | ||
Combination (1:20:10) | 1.3, 25, 12.5 g | 0.65, 13, 6.5 g | 0.99 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Neutralization synergy of antibody combinations for HIV-1JR-CSF was assessed by using the classical approach to analyzing synergy in which dose-response curves were determined for each of the antibodies alone and for antibody combinations mixed at a constant ratio. The ratio at which the antibodies were mixed was based on their relative neutralization potency (ID90). The presence or absence of synergy was assessed by comparing ID90 values and by using the computer program CalcuSyn. Dm, r, CI, and dose reduction index values were determined using the CalcuSyn computer program (10).
ID90s were calculated by estimating the 90% neutralization titer from the neutralization curves.
Dm, median effect dose; antibody concentration at half-maximal neutralization.
r, linear correlation coefficient.
According to Chou, Talalay, and Hayball, CIs of 0.3 to 0.7 indicate synergism, 0.7 to 0.85 indicate moderate synergism, 0.85 to 0.9 indicate slight synergism, 0.9 to 1.1 indicate additivity, and greater CIs indicate antagonism (10, 11).
Dose reduction index, the ratio of doses required for each antibody to reach the indicated degree of neutralization (9, 10).
Concentrations of b12, 2F5, and 2G12 in the mixture, respectively.