Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 23;8(22):5896–5905. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013882

Table 2.

Acute bleeding events and hemostatic management before and after emicizumab initiation for the complete cohort (N = 62)

Before emicizumab initiation After emicizumab initiation
Bleeds
 Patients with acute bleeding 59 (95.2%) 8 (12.9%)
 Patients with severe acute bleeding 48 (77.4%) 3 (4.8%)
Acute bleeding site
 Soft tissue 48 (77.4%) 3 (4.8%)
 Hematuria 8 (12.9%) 2 (3.2%)
 Gastrointestinal 6 (9.7%) 2 (3.2%)
 Hemarthrosis 5 (8.1%) 3 (4.8%)
 Retroperitoneal 5 (8.1%) 0 (0%)
 Mucosal 3 (4.8%) 0 (0%)
 Epistaxis 2 (3.2%) 0 (0%)
 Central nervous system 2 (3.2%) 0 (0%)
 Pulmonary 1 (1.6%) 0 (0%)
 Retinal 1 (1.6%) 0 (0%)
 None 3§ (4.8%) 54 (87.1%)
Bleeding trigger
 Spontaneous 38 (61.3%) 4 (6.5%)
 Procedural 11 (17.7%) 2 (3.2%)
 Traumatic 7 (11.3%) 3 (4.8%)
 Unknown 3 (4.8%) 1 (1.6%)
Rescue hemostatic agents used
 rFVIIa 26 (41.9%) 8 (12.9%)
 Recombinant porcine FVIII 21 (33.9%) 1 (1.6%)
 aPCC 20 (32.3%) 0 (0%)
 FVIII replacement factor 8 (12.9%) 1 (1.6%)
 Antifibrinolytic 7 (11.3%) 1 (1.6%)
 Plasma 4 (6.5%) 0 (0%)
 DDAVP 2 (3.2%) 0 (0%)
 Cryoprecipitate 2 (3.2%) 0 (0%)
 PCC 1 (1.6%) 0 (0%)
 Platelet transfusion 1 (1.6%) 0 (0%)
 None 13 (21.0%) 54 (87.1%)
RBC transfusions administered
 No 26 (41.9%) 59 (95.2%)
 Yes 36 (58.1%) 3 (4.8%)
 pRBC units, median (range) 5 (1-30) 3 (1-7)
Procedures required for hemostasis
 Yes|| 19 (30.6%) 3 (4.8%)
 No 43 (69.4%) 59 (95.2%)
Hospitalization (d), median (range) 11 (0-60) 3 (0-30)
Control of initial bleeding
 Complete resolution or NA 23 (37.1%) 62 (100.0%)
 Partial resolution 22 (35.5%) 0 (0%)
 No control 17 (27.4%) 0 (0%)
Mean breakthrough bleed rate per patient-week, (95% CI)# 0.02 (0.00-0.03)
Mean 12-wk breakthrough bleed rate per patient# 0.18 (0.03-0.34)

CI, confidence interval; DDAVP, desmopressin; NA, not applicable.

Severe acute bleeding defined as a drop in hemoglobin of >2 g/dL, requiring >2 RBC transfusions, and/or organ-, limb-, or life-threatening.

Three of the 8 patients had breakthrough bleeding only during the emicizumab loading phase, including 1 who had a severe bleed that required pRBCs. Supplemental Table 1 further describes breakthrough bleeds during the emicizumab maintenance phase.

Percentages do not add up to 100% because respondents could select multiple answers for this variable.

§

All 3 patients had remote bleeding before the AHA diagnosis.

||

Procedures included arterial embolization, endoscopy, intubation, fasciotomy, drainage, cauterization, and cystoscopy.

All patients had resolution of initial bleeding after starting emicizumab. Four patients experienced new breakthrough bleeding during loading, and there were 6 bleeds in 5 patients during maintenance. All ultimately had resolution of bleeding while on emicizumab.

#

Calculations based on patients with at least 12 weeks of follow-up (n = 55).