Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 31;10(1):29–37. doi: 10.17996/anc.24-00002

Table 3. Reclassification table stratified by SPECT findings.

a. Models containing visual scores on 3-h anterior planar images
Model without H/M ratio Model with H/M ratio
Probability <50% 50–80% >80% Total
Patients with positive PYP SPECT
 <50% 10 1 0 11
 50–80% 2 18 8 28
 >80% 0 0 14 14
 Total 12 19 22 53
Patients with negative PYP SPECT
 <50% 105 0 0 105
   50–80% 3 8 1 12
 >80% 0 0 0 0
 Total 108 8 1 117
Net reclassification improvement 0.56 (95% CI, 0.25–0.87; P <0.001)
Integrated discrimination improvement 0.038 (95% CI, 0.005 to 0.072; P = 0.026)
b. Models containing visual scores and H/CL ratio on 3-h anterior planar images
Model without H/M ratio Model with H/M ratio
Probability <50% 50–80% >80% Total
Patients with positive PYP SPECT
 <50% 40 2 0 42
 50–80% 0 0 0 0
 >80% 1 2 8 11
 Total 41 4 8 53
Patients with negative PYP SPECT
 <50% 9 3 0 12
 50–80% 0 0 1 1
 >80% 0 8 96 104
 Total 9 11 97 117
Net reclassification improvement 0.49 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.81; P=0.003)
Integrated discrimination improvement 0.036 (95% CI, 0.004 to 0.069; P=0.029)

CI, confidence interval