Table 3. Reclassification table stratified by SPECT findings.
a. Models containing visual scores on 3-h anterior planar images | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model without H/M ratio | Model with H/M ratio | |||
Probability | <50% | 50–80% | >80% | Total |
Patients with positive PYP SPECT | ||||
<50% | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
50–80% | 2 | 18 | 8 | 28 |
>80% | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Total | 12 | 19 | 22 | 53 |
Patients with negative PYP SPECT | ||||
<50% | 105 | 0 | 0 | 105 |
50–80% | 3 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
>80% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 108 | 8 | 1 | 117 |
Net reclassification improvement | 0.56 (95% CI, 0.25–0.87; P <0.001) | |||
Integrated discrimination improvement | 0.038 (95% CI, 0.005 to 0.072; P = 0.026) |
b. Models containing visual scores and H/CL ratio on 3-h anterior planar images | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model without H/M ratio | Model with H/M ratio | |||
Probability | <50% | 50–80% | >80% | Total |
Patients with positive PYP SPECT | ||||
<50% | 40 | 2 | 0 | 42 |
50–80% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
>80% | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
Total | 41 | 4 | 8 | 53 |
Patients with negative PYP SPECT | ||||
<50% | 9 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
50–80% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
>80% | 0 | 8 | 96 | 104 |
Total | 9 | 11 | 97 | 117 |
Net reclassification improvement | 0.49 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.81; P=0.003) | |||
Integrated discrimination improvement | 0.036 (95% CI, 0.004 to 0.069; P=0.029) |
CI, confidence interval