Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;14:29860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81511-x

Table 1.

Comparison of segmentation results of different models.

Methods IoU per class (%) mIoU mPA Parame Flops
K. obovata A. corniculatum B. gymnorhiza R. stylosa (%) (%) ters(M) (G)
FCN17 62.81 75.66 88.36 88.91 78.94 87.88 47.23 15.96
U-Net18 72.65 75.55 84.74 88.58 80.38 90.24 28.99 50.94
DeepLab v322 73.45 74.41 82.79 87.80 79.61 88.85 65.85 20.46
DeepLab v3+21 79.77 85.73 89.86 91.99 86.84 87.72 41.32 16.40
Swin-T39 87.30 91.05 92.69 93.84 91.22 95.70 59.02 60.28
UperNet23 78.44 86.89 90.85 91.37 86.89 93.11 64.05 59.32
HrNet41 81.91 84.73 90.82 91.88 87.33 93.95 65.85 38.69
Ours-ResNet 86.91 91.55 92.95 94.32 91.43 95.62 30.41 17.70
Ours-ConvNext 88.27 93.02 93.37 94.18 92.21 95.98 33.63 11.70