Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 29;1(1):100814. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100814

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

No. (%)
P Value for Comparison Across Centers
N = 2899
Sex .396
 Male 1590 (54.8%)
 Female 1308 (45.1%)
 Unknown 1
Race <.001
 African American /Black 576 (19.9%)
 Asian 120 (4.1%)
 Other 165 (5.7%)
 White 2038 (70.3%)
Weight at birth (kg) .392
 Mean (SD) 2.99 (0.69)
Gestational age .676
 Term (≥37 wk) 2310 (79.7%)
 Late preterm (32-37 wk) 507 (17.5%)
 Preterm (<32 wk) 80 (2.8%)
 Unknown 2 (0.1%)
Additional congenital malformation <.001
 Yes 537 (18.5%)
 No 2362 (81.5%)

Participants included children ≤14 months of age who underwent surgical repair for congenital heart disease across 5 centers, A1-A5 (all large children’s hospitals participating in the Cytogenomics of Cardiovascular Malformations Consortium). The proportion of patients who had genetic testing (testing rate) and the proportion of patients whose genetic testing results were reported as abnormal (testing yield) were analyzed, across 4 major genetic testing methods: chromosome analysis, FISH analysis, CMA, and molecular testing. The proportion of patients who received testing, the choice of modality, and the yield of testing differed significantly across centers.

CMA, chromosomal microarray analysis; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.