Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 3;19:819. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05298-3

Table 2.

Comparison of arthroscopic findings and procedures between the two groups*

Revision, N = 12 Primary, N = 48 P Value
Location of loose bodies
 Peripheral compartment 12 (100) 44 (91.7) .301
 Central compartment 9 (75.0) 44 (91.7) .108
Milgram stage .513
 Stage 2 6 (50.0) 29 (39.6)
 Stage 3 6 (50.0) 19 (60.4)
Synovial hypertrophy 12 (100) 44 (100) 1
Labral repair 9 (75.0) 23 (47.9) .093
Femoroplasty 8 (66.7) 28 (58.3) .598
Acetabuloplasty 3 (25.0) 12 (25.0) 1
Acetabular cartilage .162
Outerbridge grade 0 2 (16.7) 25 (52.1)
 Outerbridge grade 1 3 (25.0) 7 (14.6)
 Outerbridge grade 2 2 (16.7) 8 (16.7)
 Outerbridge grade 3 3 (25.0) 6 (12.5)
 Outerbridge grade 4 2 (16.7) 2 (4.2)
Femoral head cartilage .735
 Outerbridge grade 0 9 (75.0) 39 (81.3)
 Outerbridge grade 1 2 (16.7) 4 (8.3)
 Outerbridge grade 2 1 (8.3) 3 (6.3)
 Outerbridge grade 3 0 2 (4.2)
 Outerbridge grade 4 0 0
Capsular repair 12 (100) 48 (100) 1

*Values are presented as No. of hips (%)