Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 20;15:1482099. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1482099

Table 2.

Relative Cd and Mn uptake efficiency and Mn/Cd ratio of OsNramp5 single and double mutants.

Mn/Cd
ratio
Relative Cd uptake (%) Relative Mn uptake (%)
Mean ± SD p-value Mean ± SD p-value
Mock 0.0 ± 0.0 ** 0.0 ± 0.0 **
WT 1.0 100.0 ± 0.0 ** 100.0 ± 0.0
M235A 11.3 7.8 ± 0.5 88.5 ± 12.4
M235C 7.5 8.6 ± 0.8 65.0 ± 30.4
A232S+M235A 17.0 5.7 ± 1.7 96.4 ± 4.6
A232S+M235C 13.6 4.7 ± 0.4 64.1 ± 12.4
A232C+M235A 12.8 5.5 ± 1.5 69.8 ± 12.5
A232M 6.2 6.8 ± 0.3 42.3 ± 6.0 **
A232C+M235C 6.0 7.3 ± 0.5 43.7 ± 15.8 **
A232V 5.0 8.7 ± 1.7 43.1 ± 34.7 **
A232S 2.2 20.0 ± 1.9 ** 44.0 ± 15.8 **
A232C 1.5 27.8 ± 3.5 ** 42.5 ± 13.9 **
A232V+M235C 1.5 12.8 ± 2.2 ** 19.1 ± 5.1 **
A232V+M235A 1.3 11.2 ± 7.8 14.5 ± 11.2 **
A232M+M235A 0.8 16.1 ± 0.9 ** 12.1 ± 12.9 **
A232M+M235C -1.1 9.6 ± 0.8 -10.7 ± 1.9 **

The results shown in Figure 3 were analyzed based on the estimated relative Cd/Mn uptake (%) and Mn/Cd ratio. The mean and standard deviation (SD) are shown (N=3) with statistical evaluation compared to M235A using Dunnett’s test (** p <0.01).