Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72941. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72941

Mandibular Bony Exostoses or Hyperostosis: A Case Report

Akshaya Ravi 1,, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha 1, Karthik Rajaram Mohan 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11614749  PMID: 39634962

Abstract

Mandibular bony exostoses or hyperostoses are benign, non-neoplastic, localized bony outgrowths that are broad-based, slow-growing, and surface masses on the buccal or lingual surface of the mandible alveolar bone. Such exostoses grow over several years. Exostoses are more common in the maxilla posterior region along the maxillary tuberosity, called palatal exostoses. Torus palatinus occurs in the mid-line of the hard palate; mandibular torus or torus mandibularis occurs along the mandibular canine, premolar regions. We report a rare case of such bony exostoses on the lingual surface of the mandible in a 70-year-old edentulous male.

Keywords: : alveolar bone, edentulous mandible, exostoses, osseous crater, palatal

Introduction

Mandibular bony exostoses are non-neoplastic, benign, painless, surface bony protuberant masses that increase patient concern about esthetics and compromise periodontal health by causing food lodgment [1]. Etiology still needs to be well established [2]. This bony lump or mass is attributed to an abnormal increase in masticatory forces on the teeth. They slowly increase in size in patients, increasing with age and time. Nery et al. stated that 276 of 681 dry skulls had palatal exostoses. The European, Asian, Mexican-Peruvian, and African dried skull samples had 45.54%, 47.25%, 27.27%, and 25%, respectively [3]. The prevalence rate of mandibular bony exostoses is 14.4% for oral exostoses and is observed in patients with bruxism and attrition [3]. Of 618 patients (264 women and 354 men) aged 10-82 years at the University of Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan, only 2.4% had palatal exostoses. The occurrence of exostoses occurs with increasing age [4]. Auškalnis et al. reported a prevalence of 1.8% among 162 twins (81 twin pairs) [5].

Case presentation

A 70-year-old male presented to our department for a routine dental check-up. His past medical history revealed no comorbidities such as uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension. His family history was non-contributory, with no harmful oral habits like chewing or smoking tobacco and no alcohol consumption. The past surgical history revealed that he underwent an uneventful dental extraction of his left mandibular posterior teeth three months ago. The past dental history revealed he had been a denture wearer for the past month but did not wear his denture regularly. The extraoral examination did not reveal similar masses on any part of his body. The intraoral soft tissue clinical examination revealed a whitish area on the edentulous alveolar ridge. On inspection, it was non-scrapable, non-tender, and suggestive of ridge keratosis due to a removable prosthesis. The hard tissue examination on inspection revealed a brownish-yellow-colored bony protuberance measuring about 1 x 1.5 cm on the lingual or palatal aspect of the posterior left mandibular alveolar bone concerning the mandibular second molar region above the mylohyoid ridge (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Intraoral clinical examination revealed a bony protuberance on the lingual aspect of the mandible (yellow arrow).

Figure 1

The mass was bony-hard on palpation in consistency, sessile, and non-tender. Orthopantomography revealed a radiopaque mass in relation to the left mandibular second molar region. The contrast or density of the radiopaque mass blends with the adjacent cortical mandibular alveolar bone (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Orthopantomography revealed a radiopaque protuberance in the edentulous mandibular second molar region (yellow arrow).

Figure 2

Based on the above clinical findings, a provisional diagnosis of bony exostoses was made. The differential diagnosis includes bone spurs, osteoma, osteosarcoma, and osteoradionecrosis. The osteonecrosis and osteoradionecrosis were ruled out based on the absence of a history of bisphosphonates or radiotherapy in our patient. The differential diagnosis of bony exostoses is enumerated (Table 1).

Table 1. Differential diagnosis of bony exostoses.

Clinical differential diagnosis Clinical features
Hyperostoses or bony exostoses Bony exostoses are a benign proliferation of cancellous bone. They occur in either the buccal or palatal aspect of the mandible. The density of such exostoses usually blends with the adjacent bone [1-4]
Dense Bone Island An intraosseous counterpart of idiopathic osteosclerosis. They occur from internal bony growths of cancellous bone inside the mandibular cortical bone [5]
Bone spur A localized area of hyperactivity in bone. They occur as firm, asymptomatic bony masses along the line of insertion of muscle fibers along the course of their action [6]
Chronic osteomyelitis Low dense bone. A piece of necrotic bone (sequestrum) is usually detached from the bone. Proliferating reaction with elevation of the periosteum results in an onion-peel-like appearance on the outer surface of the cortical bone. History of traumatized or difficult dental extraction. Swelling with extraoral sinus, tenderness on palpation, and pathological fracture occur if left untreated [7]
Osteoma/osteochondroma Usually attached to the outer cortical plate. They have a dense outer cortical border [8,9]
Osteosarcoma Sunburst appearance is seen due to the rapid peeling of the outer periosteal covering of the affected bone. Poor prognosis [10]
Osteonecrosis History of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis [11].
Osteoradionecrosis History of radiotherapy for the treatment of oral cancer [12].

Limitations

Conventional radiographs such as mandibular occlusal radiographs and specialized radiographic techniques such as multislice computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT) were not performed on this patient. In this case, the final diagnosis was based only on history and clinical findings. The patient did not consent to biopsy or surgical excision, as he was completely asymptomatic.

Discussion

Exostoses are more common as a person grows older [13]. During the 10th to 13th week of gestation, endochondral ossification occurs around the protruded medial lamina of the mandible reaching Meckel's cartilage immediately before mylohyoid muscle attachment, resulting in bony prominence [13].

Exostosis development is a complicated process that can be triggered by any factor that causes gingival tissue injury and inflammation [14,15]. In genetically predisposed people, however, significant occlusal stress, which is frequently seen in TMJ dysfunction, is the key environmental component contributing to exostosis development [16]. Exostoses are bony overgrowths that can occur due to unusually high masticatory stresses on the teeth. They can grow to around 2-3 cm in diameter. They contribute to food lodgment, impairing periodontium [17]. Exostoses can occur as unilateral, painless masses, causing facial asymmetry.

Exostoses are reported along the mandibular angle. The authors pointed out the rarity of buccal exostosis on the mandibular angle as an anatomic location. Exostoses may form as a result of functional factors. In certain older adults, there is a growing association between severe exostoses and considerable tooth attrition.

According to the theory of subpontic hyperostosis, excessive occlusal stress causes the crystal alveolar bone to form beneath the pontic region, opposing the occlusion pressures of mastication [17]. Exostoses are lumps of calcified bones that result in facial deformity and are surgically removed following an intraoral approach [18]. Exostoses can be surgically removed with a mallet and chisel, and such exostoses are used as autografts to treat shallow bone crater defects [18]. Exostoses can occur in the condyle, resulting in clicking and pain in the temporomandibular joint [18]. Siegel et al. reported cases of exostoses following a skin vestibuloplasty procedure [19,20].

Clinical significance

The clinical significance of this case report is the presence of an exposed bone mimicking the clinical features of osteonecrosis or osteoradionecrosis and providing a diagnostic challenge to oral physicians. Hence, careful history-taking and clinical examination are essential to avoid unwanted fear and apprehension in the patient.

Conclusions

A comprehensive, detailed history-taking and knowledge of clinical and radiographic features of exostoses are essential to rule out other differential diagnoses such as torus, bone spur, chronic osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, and osteosarcomas that may warrant unnecessary biopsy or surgical procedures and alleviate unwanted apprehension and anxiety in the patient. No treatment is indicated for such exostoses unless it interferes with a function such as denture insertion or periodontal regeneration procedures requiring gingivectomy.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Karthik Rajaram Mohan, Akshaya Ravi, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Karthik Rajaram Mohan, Akshaya Ravi, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

Drafting of the manuscript:  Karthik Rajaram Mohan, Akshaya Ravi, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Karthik Rajaram Mohan, Akshaya Ravi, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

Supervision:  Karthik Rajaram Mohan, Akshaya Ravi, Ramachandra Reddy Gowda Venkatesha

References

  • 1.Alveolar exostosis - revisited: a narrative review of the literature. Smitha K, Smitha GP. Saudi J Dent Res. 2015;6:67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.A rare case of mandibular exostoses and its review. Nayak SS, Nayak VS. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:0–2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17305.7159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Palatal exostosis in the molar region. Nery EB, Corn H, Eisenstein IL. J Periodontol. 1977;48:663–666. doi: 10.1902/jop.1977.48.10.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prevalence and clinical characteristics of tori and jaw exostoses in a teaching hospital in Jordan. Sawair FA, Shayyab MH, Al-Rababah MA, Saku T. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19936420/ Saudi Med J. 2009;30:1557–1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oral bony outgrowths: prevalence and genetic factor influence. Study of twins. Auškalnis A, Bernhardt O, Putnienė E, Šidlauskas A, Andriuškevičiūtė I, Basevičienė N. Medicina (Kaunas) 2015;51:228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buccal and palatal exostoses: prevalence and concurrence with tori. Jainkittivong A, Langlais RP. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:48–53. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.105905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. A narrative and pictorial review. Sergi CM, Miller E, Demellawy DE, Shen F, Zhang M. Front Immunol. 2022;13:959575. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.959575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Central compact osteoma of the mandible: case report featuring unusual radiographic and computed tomographic presentations and brief literature review. Ghita I, Brooks JK, Bordener SL, Emmerling MR, Price JB, Younis RH. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122:516–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Osteochondromatous exostosis of the condyle. Sanders B, McKelvy B. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;95:1151–1153. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Young adult with osteosarcoma of the mandible and the challenge in management: review of the pediatric and adult literatures. Kuo C, Kent PM. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41:21–27. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Osteonecrosis. Pavelka K. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14:399–414. doi: 10.1053/berh.2000.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davis DD, Hanley ME, Cooper JS. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Osteoradionecrosis. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Origin of the torus mandibularis: an embryological hypothesis. Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Sakiyama K, Verdugo-López S, Amano O, Murakami G, Abe S. Clin Anat. 2013;26:944–952. doi: 10.1002/ca.22275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The role of occlusal stress and gingival infection in the formation of exostoses on mandible and maxilla from Neolithic China. Pechenkina EA, Benfer RA Jr. Homo. 2002;53:112–130. doi: 10.1078/0018-442x-00040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buccal exostosis: a rare entity. Medsinge SV, Kohad R, Budhiraja H, Singh A, Gurha S, Sharma A. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441241/ J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:62–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Buccal-sided mandibular angle exostosis - a rare case report. Basha S, Dutt SC. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2:237–239. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.86476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oral pathology: exostosis deforming face features. Kukuła K, Plakwicz P. Br Dent J. 2016;221:50–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Exostosis: a donor site for autograft. Puttaswamaiah RN, Galgali SR, Gowda VS. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:860–862. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Skin graft vestibuloplasty exostosis. A report of two cases. Hegtvedt AK, Terry BC, Burkes EJ, Patty SR. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:149–152. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90315-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Development of exostoses following skin graft vestibuloplasty: report of a case. Siegel WM, Pappas JR. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:483–484. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(86)80017-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES