Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 3;14:30082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81637-y

Table 2.

Adjusted OR (95% CI) for the associations between phr and diabetes/prediabetes.

PHR Range Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Diabetes
Continuous 1.15 (1.12, 1.18) 1.14 (1.10, 1.18) 1.13 (1.09, 1.17)
Categories
Q1 < 3.51 1 1 1
Q2 3.51–4.56 1.39 (1.19, 1.61) 1.35 (1.09, 1.68) 1.32 (1.06, 1.64)
Q3 4.56–5.87 1.58 (1.36, 1.83) 1.46 (1.18, 1.82) 1.42 (1.14, 1.77)
Q4 > 5.87 2.27 (1.96, 2.62) 2.18 (1.74, 2.73) 2.08 (1.66, 2.61)
p-trend < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Prediabetes
Continuous 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) 1.11 (1.08, 1.15) 1.18 (1.06, 1.32)
Categories
Q1 < 3.51 1 1 1
Q2 3.51–4.56 1.16 (1.03, 1.30) 1.29 (1.10, 1.51) 2.09 (1.38, 3.17)
Q3 4.56–5.87 1.30 (1.16, 1.46) 1.43 (1.21, 1.69) 2.38 (1.43, 3.98)
Q4 > 5.87 1.65 (1.47, 1.85) 1.79 (1.50, 2.12) 2.68 (1.61, 4.45)
p-trend < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Diabetes and Prediabetes
Continuous 1.13 (1.11, 1.16) 1.13 (1.08, 1.16) 1.17 (1.05, 1.30)
Categories
Q1 < 3.51 1 1 1
Q2 3.51–4.56 1.21 (1.08, 1.35) 1.26 (1.09, 1.47) 1.89 (1.24, 2.87)
Q3 4.56–5.87 1.39 (1.25, 1.56) 1.44 (1.20, 1.68) 2.18 (1.30, 3.64)
Q4 > 5.87 1.93 (1.73, 2.16) 1.88 (1.60, 2.21) 2.55 (1.52, 4.28)
p-trend < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

The PHR was categorized into four quartiles and tests for trend (p–trend) based on variable containing the median value for each quartiles. PHR also was utilized as continuous variables and p-value was used to test significance.

Model 1 included only PHR as the independent variable. Model 2 included adjustments for sex, race, age, poverty status, smoking status, alcohol status, education, BMI, and physical activity. Model 3 built on Model 2 by further adjusting for hypertension, CVD, CKD, TG, LDL-C, hs-CRP, SUA and Cr.