Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 3;38(12):7165–7171. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11275-y

Table 5.

Intergroup comparison of the cumulative error parameter score for all five attempts of the four exercises

Exercise Parameter Intervention (3D) Control (2D) P-value
Exercise 1—Peg board II Drops (no.) 1.5 (1–3.5) 3 (2–4) 0.14
Instrument collisions (no.) 14 (9.25–19) 17 (12.5–28.5) 0.12
Exercise 2—Thread the rings Drops (no.) 4 (2–10.25) 6 (3–7) 0.57
Instrument collisions (no.) 61 (42.25–66.5) 71 (38–80.5) 0.26
Exercise 3—Ring tower transfer Drops (no.) 4 (2.75–7) 5 (5–10.5) 0.07
Instrument collisions (no.) 3.5 (0–9.5) 9 (3.5–12) 0.09
Wire collisions (no.) 96 (80–112.5) 120 (108.5–131.5) 0.008*
Tower knockoffs (no.) 3 (1–6.25) 4 (1–8) 0.40
Exercise 4—Wound closure—horizontal Instrument collisions (no.) 41.5 (29.25–66.5) 78 (27–122) 0.12
Missed targets (no.) 31.5 (25.5–48.75) 59 (23–100) 0.12

All values are listed as median and interquartile range

*Statistically significant values