Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 4;16(2):793–801. doi: 10.1039/d4sc07267g

Fig. 5. Quality comparation of crystals incubated at outdoor temperature and simulated outdoor temperature conditions in an instrument. (a) Temperature variation curves of the outdoor temperature over 48 hours. (b) Representative CLSM image of crystals incubated without urea at outdoor temperature. (c) Representative CLSM image of crystals incubated with 2.8 M urea at outdoor temperature. (d) 1D SAXS curves and 2D patterns of the assemblies incubated without urea (black) and with 2.8 M urea (green) at outdoor temperature. (e) Temperature variation curves of the simulated outdoor temperature conditions over 48 hours. (f) Representative CLSM image of crystals incubated without urea under the simulated outdoor temperature conditions. (g) Representative CLSM image of crystals incubated with 2.8 M urea under the simulated outdoor temperature conditions. (h) Histogram of the size distribution of the crystals incubated at outdoor temperature (green) and simulated outdoor temperature (blue) for 48 hours.

Fig. 5