Table 2. Reoperation Rates for Robotic-Assisted Hernia Repairs Based on Surgeons’ Cumulative Experience.
Repair type and cumulative volume of robotic-assisted repairs, every 10 cases | Reoperation rate within 7 y of index surgery, % (95% CI) | Change in reoperation rate relative to baseline, % (95% CI)a |
---|---|---|
All repairs | ||
10 | 14.2 (13.3-15.0) | 1 [Reference] |
20 | 12.2 (11.5-12.9) | 2.0 (1.9-2.1) |
30 | 10.4 (9.7-11.1) | 3.8 (3.7-3.8) |
40 | 8.9 (8.1-9.7) | 5.3 (5.2-5.3) |
50 | 7.6 (6.8-8.4) | 6.6 (6.59-6.60) |
Umbilical hernia repairs | ||
10 | 11.6 (10.9-12.3) | 1 [Reference] |
20 | 9.9 (9.2-10.6) | 1.7 (1.6-1.7) |
30 | 8.4 (7.8-9.1) | 3.2 (3.1-3.2) |
40 | 7.2 (6.5-7.9) | 4.4 (4.39-4.40) |
50 | 6.1 (5.4-6.8) | 5.5 (5.45-5.50) |
Incisional hernia repairs | ||
10 | 14.8 (13.9-15.6) | 1 [Reference] |
20 | 12.7 (11.9-13.4) | 2.1 (2.0-2.2) |
30 | 10.9 (10.1-11.6) | 3.9 (3.8-4.0) |
40 | 9.3 (8.5-10.1) | 5.5 (5.4-5.6) |
50 | 7.9 (7.1-8.7) | 6.9 (6.8-6.9) |
The first 10 cases are the baseline.