Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 3;7(12):e2448521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48521

Table 2. Reoperation Rates for Robotic-Assisted Hernia Repairs Based on Surgeons’ Cumulative Experience.

Repair type and cumulative volume of robotic-assisted repairs, every 10 cases Reoperation rate within 7 y of index surgery, % (95% CI) Change in reoperation rate relative to baseline, % (95% CI)a
All repairs
10 14.2 (13.3-15.0) 1 [Reference]
20 12.2 (11.5-12.9) 2.0 (1.9-2.1)
30 10.4 (9.7-11.1) 3.8 (3.7-3.8)
40 8.9 (8.1-9.7) 5.3 (5.2-5.3)
50 7.6 (6.8-8.4) 6.6 (6.59-6.60)
Umbilical hernia repairs
10 11.6 (10.9-12.3) 1 [Reference]
20 9.9 (9.2-10.6) 1.7 (1.6-1.7)
30 8.4 (7.8-9.1) 3.2 (3.1-3.2)
40 7.2 (6.5-7.9) 4.4 (4.39-4.40)
50 6.1 (5.4-6.8) 5.5 (5.45-5.50)
Incisional hernia repairs
10 14.8 (13.9-15.6) 1 [Reference]
20 12.7 (11.9-13.4) 2.1 (2.0-2.2)
30 10.9 (10.1-11.6) 3.9 (3.8-4.0)
40 9.3 (8.5-10.1) 5.5 (5.4-5.6)
50 7.9 (7.1-8.7) 6.9 (6.8-6.9)
a

The first 10 cases are the baseline.