Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA
. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):328–338. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236168

Information retrieved from a database and the augmentation of personal knowledge.

R de Bliek 1, C P Friedman 1, B M Wildemuth 1, J M Martz 1, R G Twarog 1, D File 1
PMCID: PMC116215  PMID: 7719819

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree to which information retrieved from a biomedical database can augment personal knowledge in addressing novel problems, and how the ability to retrieve information evolves over time. DESIGN: This longitudinal study comprised three assessments of two cohorts of medical students. The first assessment occurred just before student course experience in bacteriology, the second occurred just after the course, and the third occurred five months later. At each assessment, the students were initially given a set of bacteriology problems to solve using their personal knowledge only. Each student was then reassigned a sample of problems he or she had answered incorrectly, to work again with assistance from a database containing information about bacteria and bacteriologic concepts. The initial pass through the problems generated a "personal knowledge" score; the second pass generated a "database-assisted" score for each student at each assessment. RESULTS: Over two cohorts, students' personal knowledge scores were very low (approximately 12%) at the first assessment. They rose substantially at the second assessment (approximately 48%) but decreased six months later (approximately 25%). By contrast, database-assisted scores rose linearly: from approximately 44% at the first assessment to approximately 57% at the second assessment, to approximately 75% at the third assessment. CONCLUSION: The persistent increase in database-assisted scores, even when personal knowledge had attenuated, was the most remarkable finding of this study. While some of the increase may be attributed to artifacts of the design, the pattern seems to result from the retained ability to recognize problem-relevant information in a database even when it cannot be recalled.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bellardo T. An investigation of online searcher traits and their relationship to search outcome. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1985 Jul;36(4):241–250. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630360404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broering N. C. The mini MEDLINE SYSTEM: a library-based end-user search system. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1985 Apr;73(2):138–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Covell D. G., Uman G. C., Manning P. R. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friedman C. P., de Bliek R., Gilmer J. S., Twarog R. G., File D. D. Influence of a computer database and problem exercises on students' knowledge of bacteriology. Acad Med. 1992 May;67(5):332–338. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199205000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedman C. P., de Bliek R., Twarog R., France C. L., Lemmond G., File D. D. Studying the utilization and effects of a computer-based educational intervention in bacteriology. Res Med Educ. 1988;27:100–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ginn D. S., Pinkowski P. E., Tylman W. T. Evolution of an end-user training program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Apr;75(2):117–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Mousseau J., Baker L. M., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G., Norman G. R. Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Nov;103(5):812–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-5-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haynes R. B., Ramsden M. F., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: impact of user fees. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Oct;79(4):377–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levine H. G., Forman P. M. A study of retention of knowledge of neurosciences information. J Med Educ. 1973 Sep;48(9):867–869. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197309000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MILLER G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Dilks C. J., Ramsden M. F., Ryan N. C., Baker L., Flemming T., Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90042-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norman G. R., Rosenthal D., Brooks L. R., Allen S. W., Muzzin L. J. The development of expertise in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 1989 Aug;125(8):1063–1068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poisson E. H. End-user searching in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Oct;74(4):293–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Williamson J. W., German P. S., Weiss R., Skinner E. A., Bowes F., 3rd Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):151–160. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES