Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 17;2:25. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00056-3

Table 2.

Predictors of help-seeking among women facing IPV

Variables Unadjusted PR Adjusted PR
β (95% CI) p-value β (95% CI) p-value
Individual level
 Marital status of woman
  Currently married Reference
  Formerly married 2.0 (1.6–2.2)  < 0.001 Not applicable
 Woman currently working
  No Reference
  Yes 1.5 (1.4–1.6)  < 0.001 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.274
Relationship-household level
 Number of living children
  0 Reference
   ≤ 2 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.001 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.188
   > 2 0.7 (0.6–0.9)  < 0.001 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.165
 Husband drinks alcohol
  No Reference
  Yes 1.9 (1.8–2.1)  < 0.001 1.7 (1.5–2.0)  < 0.001
 Women empowerment (makes decisions about own health, large purchases, mobility)
  No Reference
  Yes 0.8 (0.8–0.9)  < 0.001 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 0.082
 Wealth quintile
  Poorest Reference
  Poorer 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.317 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.477
  Middle 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 0.065 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.443
  Richer 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 0.073 1.2 (1.0–1.5) 0.079
  Richest 1.4 (1.2–1.6)  < 0.001 1.4 (1.1–1.9) 0.009
 Father ever beat her mother (parental IPV)
  No Reference
  Yes 1.4 (1.3–1.5)  < 0.001 1.3 (1.1–1.4)  < 0.001
  Do not know 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.036 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.388
Community level
 Place of residence
  Urban Reference
  Rural 0.8 (0.7–0.9)  < 0.001 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 0.266

The following covariates were adjusted in multivariate model including place of residence, respondent’s current working status, respondent’s occupation, current marital status, respondent’s age at first marriage, number of children, husband/partner worked in last 12 months, wealth index, husband consumes alcohol, respondent’s control over decision-making, and respondent witnessed IPV as a child