Table 3.
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PREDICTORS | HYPERTENSION (n = 11,776) | UNDIAGNOSED HYPERTENSION (n = 3,383) | UNTREATED HYPERTENSION (n = 1,479) | |||
|
|
|
||||
COEFFICIENT1 (95%CI) | % CONTRIBUTION | COEFFICIENT1 (95%CI) | % CONTRIBUTION | COEFFICIENT1 (95%CI) | % CONTRIBUTION | |
| ||||||
Age | –0.0178 (–0.019, –0.016)a |
–41.01 | 0.0159 (0.013, 0.019)a |
43.68 |
–0.0052
(–0.008, –0.002) c |
–30.2 |
| ||||||
Currently married | 0.0002 (–0.0004, 0.0008) |
0.44 | –0.0035 (–0.006, –0.001)c |
–9.62 | –0.0012 (–0.004, 0.002) |
–6.97 |
| ||||||
Currently working | 0.0003 (–0.0034, 0.0039) |
0.64 | 0.0002 (–0.005, 0.006) |
0.55 | –0.0027 (–0.007, 0.002) |
–15.78 |
| ||||||
BMI | 0.0579 (0.0522, 0.0638)a |
133.41 |
–0.0352
(–0.048, –0.023) a |
–96.7 | –0.0048 (–0.015, 0.006) |
–27.9 |
| ||||||
Education | 0.0029 (–0.005, 0.11) |
6.68 | 0.0156 (0.031, 0.007)c |
42.86 | 0.0023 (–0.016, 0.021) |
13.37 |
| ||||||
Gender | 0.0002 (–0.0008, 0.0005) |
0.46 | 0.0093 (0.007, 0.012) a |
21.43 | 0.0027 (–0.004, 0.009) |
15.7 |
| ||||||
Living in a patriarchal family | –0.0008 –(0.0005, 0.0003) |
–0.19 | 0.0009 (–0.0005, 0.0007) |
0.25 | 0.0019 (–0.0006, 0.004) |
11.04 |
| ||||||
No. of adult members | –0.0057 (–0.0105, 0.008) |
–13.04 | 0.0013 (–0.007, 0.009) |
3.57 | 0.0022 (–0.004, 0.008) |
12.78 |
| ||||||
No. of household members | 0.0005 (–0.0015, 0.0025) |
1.19 | –0.0016 (–0.006, 0.003) |
–4.39 | –0.0007 (–0.0027, 0.001) |
–4.07 |
| ||||||
Place of residence | 0.0051 (–0.0009, 0.011) |
11.82 | –0.0065 (–0.020, 0.007) |
–17.86 | –0.0080 (–0.019, 0.002) |
–46.51 |
| ||||||
Division | –0.0009 (–0.0019, 0.0018) |
–0.21 | –0.0005 (–0.005, 0.004) |
–1.37 | –0.0033 (–0.008, 0.002) |
–19.18 |
| ||||||
Total explained gap (%)2 | 0.0434 (65.1%) | 100 | –0.0364 (30%) | 100 | –0.0172 (43.9%) | 100 |
| ||||||
Difference3 | –0.0666 | –0.1218 | –0.0391 | |||
|
Here a, b, and c indicate p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05.
1 A positive (negative) coefficient of the covariate indicates that it widens (reduces) the gap between the poor and the non-poor to experience the occurrence of the outcome variables.
2 Within the explained gap of the prevalence of hypertension, as having undiagnosed hypertension, and untreated hypertension 65.1%, 30%, and 43.9% can explained by the differences between the poor and non-poor individuals in the distribution of age, currently married, currently working, BMI, education, gender, living in a patriarchal family, no. of adult members, no. of household members, place of residence, and division respectively.
3 The difference between hypertension, as having undiagnosed hypertension, and untreated hypertension amongst poor-non-poor.