Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 6;24:1557. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11906-z

Table 1.

Description of the variables and corresponding instruments used in the study

Variables Demand or resource Items Scale range Mean
(SD)
Median
(Q1-Q3)
α
Min Max
Outcomes
 Stressa,b 3 1 5 3.3 (0.8) 3.3 (2.8–4.0) 0.85
 Emotional exhaustionc 5 1 5 2.3 (1.0) 2.2 (1.4–3.0) 0.90
 Satisfaction with cared 8 1 7 5.8 (0.8) 5.9 (5.3–6.4) 0.91
Independent variables
 Improvement readinessc Resource 5 1 5 3.6 (0.8) 3.8 (3.2–4.2) 0.90
 Teamwork climatec Resource 7 1 5 3.8 (0.7) 3.9 (3.3–4.4) 0.81
 Growth opportunitiesc Resource 6 1 5 3.9 (0.8) 4.0 (3.5–4.5) 0.90
 Participation in decision-makingc Resource 6 1 5 3.6 (0.8) 3.7 (3.2–4.2) 0.86
 Sense of community at worka,b Resource 3 1 5 1.8 (0.7) 1.7 (1.3–2.0) 0.84
 Workloadc Demand 5 1 5 3.8 (0.8) 3.9 (3.4–4.4) 0.86
 Frustration with technologyc,e Demand 1 1 4 1.9 (0.9) 2.0 (1.0–3.0)

aHigh mean values indicate low stress symptoms and a low sense of community at work, respectively

bCOPSOQiii. A 5-point Likert scale. (1 = “always”, 5 = “never/hardly ever”)

cSCORE. A 5-point Likert scale. (1 = “disagree strongly”, 5 = “agree strongly”)

dSSC. A 7-point Likert scale. (1 = “not at all”, 7 = “to a very high degree”)

eSingle item from SCORE. A 4-point Likert scale. (1 = “rarely or none of the time”, 4 = “all of the time”)