Table 3.
Association of program attention, completion, and outcomes by participant socio-demographic characteristics
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HbA1ca | 1.0 | ||||||||
| 2 | Mean reduction in weight (lbs)b | 0.11 | 1 | |||||||
| 3 | Genderc | 0.02 | −0.001 | 1 | ||||||
| 4 | Age | −0.07 | 0.10 | −0.01 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | BMI | −0.02 | −0.11 | 0.02 | −.40** | 1 | ||||
| 6 | Diabetes Statusd | .65** | −0.13 | −0.005 | −0.05 | −0.10 | 1 | |||
| 7 | HbA1c <8% at 12 months | .72** | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.04 | −0.08 | .29** | 1 | ||
| 8 | Attendancee | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.02 | .31** | −.31* | 0.06 | .27* | 1 | |
| 9 | Weight at 12 months | 0.11 | −0.02 | 0.16 | 0.02 | −.34* | .28* | −0.07 | .22* | 1 |
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). a HbA1c was assessed post-program (12-month assessment). b Mean reduction in weight (in lbs) was assessed by difference in 12-month weight and baseline value. c Gender was a categorical variable where 0 = male and 1 = female (reference category). d Diabetes status was a categorical variable where 0 = individuals with prediabetes and 1 = diabetes (reference category). e Number of educational sessions attended.