Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 25;11:1471243. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1471243

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses for the effect of acupuncture on premature ovary inefficiency.

Continuous outcomes Subgroups Studies SMD (95%CI) I2 (%) P
LH Overall 15 −1.96 (−3.10 to −0.82) 89.1 0.001
Type of intervention Acupuncture 8 −2.71 (−6.86 to 1.44) 90.9 0.001
Acupuncture plus TCM 2 −0.64 (−1.10 to −0.18) 46.4 0.17
Acupuncture plus HRT 2 −6.80 (−13.84 to 0.23) 54.2 0.14
Needle acupuncture 1 0.07 (−2.97 to 3.11)
Needle acupuncture plus TCM 1 −0.22 (−0.48 to 0.04)
Electroacupuncture plus TCM 2 −1.29 (−1.60 to −0.98) 0.0 0.99
Auricular points plus TCM 1 −1.46 (−3.26 to 0.34)
Acupoint catgut embedding plus TCM 1 −0.40 (−2.84 to 2.06)
Warm acupuncture 1 0.32 (−5.64 to 6.28)
Acupuncture and moxibustion 1 −5.81 (−7.42 to −4.20)
Moxibustion plus TCM 1 0.84 (−0.47 to 1.23)
Quality of studies Low 5 −1.97 (−4.77 to 0.83) 89.2 0.001
Moderate 7 −2.41 (−5.65 to 0.84) 93.1 0.001
High 3 −1.78 (−4.60 to 1.01) 34.6 0.21
Sample size ≥1,000 participants 4 −2.68 (−8.38 to 3.03) 96.4 0.001
<1,000 participants 11 −0.80 (−1.31 to −0.28) 39.3 0.08
Duration of treatment NR 5 −3.91 (−6.46 to −1.36) 59.3 0.04
≥5 months 5 −0.88 (−5.32 to 3.55) 85.1 0.001
<5 months 5 −1.68 (−2.81 to −0.55) 91.5 0.001
FSH Overall 17 −3.05 (−3.89 to −2.20) 94.5 0.001
Type of intervention Acupuncture 11 −4.84 (−7.60 to −2.08) 96.2 0.001
Acupuncture plus TCM 3 −0.70 (−1.31 to −0.09) 61.1 0.07
Acupuncture plus HRT 3 −5.79 (−11.19 to −0.40) 67.1 0.05
Needle acupuncture 1 −9.08 (−12.60 to −5.56)
Needle acupuncture plus TCM 1 −0.62 (−1.02 to −0.22)
Electroacupuncture plus TCM 2 −1.17 (−1.38 to −0.97) 0.0 0.88
Auricular points plus TCM 1 −2.19 (−2.97 to −1.41)
Acupoint catgut embedding 2 −0.77 (−37.14 to 35.60) 95.5 0.001
Acupoint catgut embedding plus TCM 1 −0.72 (−2.13 to 0.69)
Acupoint catgut embedding plus HRT 1 −10.05 (−22.09 to 1.97)
Warm acupuncture 1 2.50 (−5.67 to 10.67)
Acupuncture and moxibustion 3 3.15 (−4.52 to 10.83) 87.0 0.002
Moxibustion 1 2.32 (−5.84 to 10.48)
Moxibustion plus TCM 1 −0.02 (−0.38 to 0.34)
Quality of studies Low 5 −6.15 (−10.39 to −1.90) 94.3 0.001
Moderate 9 −2.75 (−4.61 to −0.90) 95.5 0.001
High 3 −2.55 (−4.44 to −0.65) 90.4 0.001
Sample size ≥1,000 participants 5 −3.87 (−10.72 to 2.98) 97.2 0.001
<1,000 participants 12 −2.50 (−3.23 to −1.77) 91.6 0.001
Duration of treatment NR 5 −7.59 (−10.74 to −4.44) 71.0 0.008
≥5 months 5 −1.30 (−5.05 to 2.44) 95.5 0.001
<5 months 7 −1.96 (−2.79 to −1.14) 94.9 0.001
Estradiol (E2) Overall 15 4.03 (2.01 to 6.05) 95.5 0.001
Type of intervention Acupuncture 9 6.59 (2.38 to 10.80) 97.4 0.001
Acupuncture plus TCM 2 0.40 (−0.79 to 1.60) 55.3 0.13
Acupuncture plus HRT 2 3.00 (−4.29 to 10.28) 30.1 0.23
Needle acupuncture 1 1.37 (−3.08 to 5.82)
Needle acupuncture plus TCM 1 0.60 (0.14 to 1.06)
Electroacupuncture plus TCM 2 0.63 (−0.40 to 1.66) 0.0 0.87
Auricular points plus TCM 1 1.63 (1.21 to 2.05)
Acupoint catgut embedding 1 8.06 (−10.88 to −5.24)
Acupoint catgut embedding plus TCM 1 1.32 (0.69 to 1.95)
Warm acupuncture 1 4.60 (−24.55 to 15.35)
Acupuncture and moxibustion 2 13.35 (−7.32 to 34.02) 87.4 0.05
Moxibustion plus TCM 1 0.64 (0.27 to 1.01)
Quality of studies Low 5 11.99 (3.67 to 20.32) 87.9 0.001
Moderate 7 4.37 (0.51 to 8.31) 97.9 0.001
High 3 0.62 (−1.15 to 2.39) 66.4 0.05
Sample size ≥1,000 participants 4 4.64 (−10.55 to 19.84) 98.8 0.001
<1,000 participants 11 0.98 (0.17 to 1.80) 71.9 0.0.001
Duration of treatment NR 4 25.90 (17.84 to 33.95) 0.0 0.86
≥5 months 5 0.14 (−2.50 to 2.78) 79.0 0.001
<5 months 6 4.65 (1.68 to 7.62) 98.2 0.001

SMD, standardized mean difference; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; NR, not reported; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; LH, luteinizing hormone; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone.