Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006880.pub2

1. Radiofrequency dissecting sealer versus clamp‐crush.

Outcome Number of studies Number of patients Meta‐analysis Other trials
Peri‐operative mortality 3 180 Not estimable
Liver failure 2 100 0.74 [0.14, 3.95]
Bleeding requiring percutaneous drainage 1 50 Not estimable
Bile leak requiring operation 2 130 1.69 [0.22, 13.15]  
Bile leak requiring percutaneous drainage 2 130 0.70 [0.13, 3.73]
Biliary fistula 1 50 8.63 [0.42, 176.32]  
Infected abdominal collections 2 130 11.02 [1.38, 88.28]
Wound infection 1 50 7.58 [0.84, 68.46]
Transection blood loss (ml/sq cm) 1 50 1.90 [0.92, 2.88]
Blood transfused (units) 1.5 units vs 0 units (Arita 2005)
Number requiring transfusion 3 180 1.19 [0.50, 2.82]
Peak bilirubin (mumol/litre) 1 50 0.00 [‐19.40, 19.40]
Peak prothrombin activity (percentage of activity) 1 50 1.00 [‐25.66, 27.66]
Aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) 1 50 No difference (Lesurtel 2005)
Transection speed (sq cm/minute) 1 50 ‐1.40 [‐2.23, ‐0.57]
Operating time (minutes) 1 50 292 vs 278 (Lupo 2007)
Intensive therapy unit stay (days) 1 50 1 vs 1 median (Lesurtel 2005)
Hospital stay (days) 2 100 9 vs 9 median (Lesurtel 2005)
16 vs 18 median (Arita 2005)
Costs (Euros per patient) 1 not applicable 1618 vs 497 Lesurtel 2005

cm = centimetre 
 ml = millilitre 
 mumol = micromole 
 sq = square