Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006880.pub2

Comparison 2. CUSA versus clamp‐crush with vascular occlusion.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Peri‐operative mortality 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.43 [0.25, 118.96]
2 Liver failure 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.06, 16.93]
3 Bleeding requiring percutaneous drainage 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Bile leak requiring percutaneous drainage 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.04, 5.65]
5 Wound infection 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.01, 8.25]
6 Transection blood loss (ml/sq cm) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.5 [1.01, 3.99]
7 Number requiring transfusion 1 50 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 11.29 [1.29, 98.89]
8 Peak bilirubin (mumol/litre) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.0 [‐24.40, 14.40]
9 Peak prothrombin activity (percentage of activity) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [‐10.09, 12.09]
10 Transection time (minutes) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐19.00 [‐60.65, 18.65]
11 Transection speed (sq cm/minute) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.6 [0.89, 2.31]