Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;41(4):225–235. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2024.2023.0450

Table 2. Distribution of induction regimens, consolidative transplants, maintenance therapy, and treatment responses.

Number of patients (%)

53

Induction treatment, n (%)

 Only PI-based

29 (54.7)

 Only IMID-based

2 (3.7)

 PI- and IMID-based

8 (15.1)

 PI and/or IMIDs + PACE

9 (16.9)

*Only VAD

5 (9.4)

Response to induction therapy, n (%)

 CR/VGPR

8 (15.1)/13 (24.5)

PR/MR

7 (13.2)/5 (9.4)

SD/progression

6 (11.3)/3 (5.7)

Unspecified

11 (20.8)

HSCT, n (%)

Yes (autologous/allogeneic)

21 (20/1) (39.6)

No

32 (60.4)

Maintenance, n (%)

13 (24.5)

Lenalidomide

7 (13.2)

Bortezomib

3 (5.6)

PI and IMID combination

3 (5.6)

Final status after first-line treatment, n (%)

51

Refractory

22 (41.5)

Relapse

20 (37.7)

Remission

9 (16.9)

CR: Complete response; HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IMID: immunomodulatory agent; MR: minimal response; PACE: cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide; PI: proteasome inhibitor; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; VAD: vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone; VGPR: very good partial response.

Only PI-based: VD: Bortezomib, dexamethasone; VCD: bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone. Only IMID-based: MPT: Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide.

PI- and IMID-based: VRD: Bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; VTD: bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone. PI and/or IMIDs + PACE: VCD or VTD + PACE.

*: PI (bortezomib) and/or IMIDs (lenalidomide and thalidomide) were used in the subsequent treatment processes of the patients.