Abstract
About 40% of approved drugs and nearly 90% of drug candidates are poorly water-soluble drugs. Low solubility reduces the drugability. Effectively improving the solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs is a critical issue that needs to be urgently addressed in drug development and application. This review briefly introduces the conventional solubilization techniques such as solubilizers, hydrotropes, cosolvents, prodrugs, salt modification, micronization, cyclodextrin inclusion, solid dispersions, and details the crystallization strategies, ionic liquids, and polymer-based, lipid-based, and inorganic-based carriers in improving solubility and bioavailability. Some of the most commonly used approved carrier materials for solubilization techniques are presented. Several approved poorly water-soluble drugs using solubilization techniques are summarized. Furthermore, this review summarizes the solubilization mechanism of each solubilization technique, reviews the latest research advances and challenges, and evaluates the potential for clinical translation. This review could guide the selection of a solubilization approach, dosage form, and administration route for poorly water-soluble drugs. Moreover, we discuss several promising solubilization techniques attracting increasing attention worldwide.
Key words: Poorly water-soluble drugs, Solubilization techniques, Nanocrystals, Cocrystals, Ionic liquids, Polymer-based carriers, Lipid-based carriers, Inorganic carriers
Graphical abstract
This review intends to summarize the solubilization techniques used for poorly water-soluble drugs, with a view to providing guidance to researchers to select solubilization techniques.

1. Introduction
About 40% of approved drugs and nearly 90% of drug candidates are poorly water-soluble drugs (PWSDs)1. Low solubility affects the drug dissolution rate, failing to achieve adequate blood concentrations. Clinically, it is often solved by increasing the dosage, which also brings new problems such as adverse effects, high treatment costs and poor patient compliance2. In addition, studies in vitro cannot fully simulate the human body environment. PWSDs have poor in vitro‒in vivo correlation, and studies are often terminated in the clinical trial stage.
The formulation design is more significant in accelerating the launch of investigational drugs and promoting the redevelopment of marketed refractory drugs. Conventional solubilization techniques include adding solubilizers, hydrotropes, cosolvents, prodrugs, pH modulation and salt modification, micronization, cyclodextrin (CD) inclusion, and solid dispersions (SDs). Long-term use of surfactants is potentially toxic, cosolvents are diluted with the risk of vascular occlusion, and salt modification requires that drugs have ionizable groups3. In response to the above limitations, several new strategies have been developed, including crystallization strategies, ionic liquids (ILs), and drug delivery systems (DDSs). The crystallization strategy focuses on nanocrystals and cocrystals, both are carrier-free DDSs. Nanocrystals have high drug loading and high safety, are easy to produce industrially, and are suitable for almost all PWSDs4. Drug-drug cocrystals (DDCs) improve dissolution rate and bioavailability without changing drugs' molecular structure. DDCs show significant advantages in co-delivery and synergistic therapy. ILs are considered “green alternatives” to organic reagents, increasing solubility and permeability. Conversion of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) into ILs can effectively address solid drug polymorphisms5.
DDSs mainly include polymer-based carriers (e.g., micelles, dendrimers, and gels), lipid-based carriers (e.g., nanoemulsions, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDSs), liposomes, transferosomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), and lipid nanocapsules (LNCs)), and inorganic carriers (e.g., mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (MCNs), layered double hydroxides (LDHs), and metal nanoparticles (MNPs)). Polymer-based carriers are widely available and can be readily synthesized for delivery with specific properties. Environmentally sensitive blocks in polymers can further control drug release6. Lipid-based carriers have high biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low immunogenicity. They are powerful delivery carriers for grease balls and the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) IV drugs7. The size, structure and geometry of inorganic carriers can be easily adjusted to jointly diagnose and treat diseases8,9. Notably, nanocarriers with small particle sizes and large specific surface areas are significant in drug delivery10,11. Nanocarriers' modification enables targeted delivery and environmentally responsive release, reducing toxicity and improving therapeutic efficacy12, 13, 14, 15.
Several reviews summarized some specific techniques to solubilize PWSDs for improving the oral bioavailability16,17, including CD inclusion, crystallization strategy, and SDs18, 19, 20, 21, 22. However, many new solubilization techniques, such as ILs and DDCs, are emerging and have promoted the PWSD development in the last 5 years. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of traditional and novel solubilization techniques for PWSDs. We reviewed the solubilization mechanisms, potential advantages, challenges faced, and pclinical translational potential of each solubilization technique. We highlight the ILs for PWSD delivery. ILs are used as solvents and penetration enhancers for transdermal delivery, and they can also be formed into nanocarriers (microemulsions, nanoemulsions, and micelles, etc.) for controlled release or targeted delivery. In addition, we have summarized the clinical application of solubilization techniques. We hope that this review could guide the scientist to select solubilization techniques according to the drug types, administration route, treatment purpose, etc.
2. Conventional solubilization techniques
2.1. Solubilizers, hydrotropes, and cosolvents
Solubilizers are amphiphilic surfactants that form micelles in aqueous phase when surfactant concentration exceeds the critical micelle concentration (CMC). PWSDs enter micelles' hydrophobic region or are adsorbed on micelles' surface23. Surfactants can be categorized into cationic24, 25, 26, 27, anionic28,29, and nonionic surfactants30, 31, 32, 33, 34. Temperature is one factor influencing the solubilizing capacity of surfactants. When the temperature exceeds the critical micelle temperature, its solubilizing ability can be enhanced35. Therefore, the risk of drug precipitation increases with decreasing temperature. The type and amount of solubilizer are also responsible for solubilizing ability32. Surfactants' toxicity is related to their properties, with cationic surfactants being the most toxic while nonionic surfactants are the least. Excess surfactants have the potential to cause local or systemic adverse reactions and induce membrane reorganization and morphological changes to alter cellular integrity, leading to cellular hemolysis36,37.
Hydrotropes are usually low molecular compounds that combine with PWSDs through chemical bonds (such as ligand bonds) to form soluble complexes, complex salts, or aggregates. Common hydrotropes include organic acids and their sodium salts, amides, and amines38, 39, 40. Hydrotropes reduce the risk of solvent residues due to using organic solvents41. Unlike colloidal solutions formed by solubilizers, solutions formed by hydrotropes are true solutions. When hydrotropes exceed the minimum hydrotrope concentration (MHC) in aqueous solution, complexes are formed by intermolecular binding through non-covalent interactions42,43. Unlike CMC, MHC is not hydrophobic enough to support aggregate formation with micelle-like organization44. In addition, MHC is typically applied at higher concentrations than CMC, and the molar content of MHC is in the molar range, whereas the molar content of CMC is typically in the millimolar range or even lower43.
Cosolvency is a phenomenon in which the drug solubility is significantly increased in mixed solvents at specific ratios45. Cosolvents are usually water-soluble organic solvents that effectively increase nonpolar drug solubility by reducing the solvent polarity and approaching the nonpolar solutes' polarity46. Common cosolvents include ethanol, methanol, propylene glycol, and others47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53. In general, cosolvents' solubilization is positively related to solute polarity54. Cosolvents are commonly used in combination with other solubilization strategies. The combination of surfactants and cosolvents is effective in avoiding drug precipitation when diluting cosolvent preparations before intravenous administration3,55. When combining CDs with cosolvents, cosolvents increase free drug concentration, which increases the CDs' complexation drive3. CDs can complex both small molecule cosolvents and drugs, forming highly soluble drug-cosolvent-CDs ternary complex56.
2.2. Synthesis of water-soluble drug prodrugs
Prodrugs are compounds that are transformed in vivo to have pharmacological activity57. Prodrugs can be categorized into carrier linked prodrugs and bioprecursors57. Carrier linked prodrugs improve drug solubility by adding polar functional groups57,58. Bioprecursors are inactive compounds, and their metabolites are active compounds59. Currently, approximately 10% of approved drugs are considered prodrugs, and at least 30 prodrugs are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)58. Fostemsavir, a phosphonomethyl prodrug made by introducing a phosphate group into Temsavir, is more than 500-fold more water-soluble and has been approved for the treatment of HIV-infected patients who cannot be treated with other therapies60. Polymer prodrugs are formed by the covalent linkage of the drug to polymer and self-assemble into nanocarriers61,62. Polymer prodrug nanocarriers can avoid burst release effect, increase drug loading, control drug release, and realize drug co-delivery63, 64, 65, 66. Luo et al.67 attached doxorubicin (DOX) to poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide] via disulfide bonds to form a glutathione (GSH)-sensitive polymer prodrug. This prodrug was self-assembled to form nanoparticles (NPs) and encapsulated with a Ce6 photosensitizer for chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy.
2.3. pH regulation and formation of soluble salts
Adjusting pH and forming soluble salts from weakly acidic or weakly alkaline drugs are preferred methods for optimizing ionizable3. Approximately 40% of approved drugs are pharmaceutical salts by the FDA68. The most commonly used salt-forming counterions in FDA-approved drugs are hydrochloride, sodium salt, and toluene sulfonate salts68,69. Numerous antibiotic and anticancer drugs are solubilized with hydrochloride, successful launches including moxifloxacin, clindamycin, fidaxomicinib and so on. Salt formation improves the solubility and bioavailability of ionizable drugs by increasing the dissociation degree, altering crystalline lattice and intrinsic properties70. According to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, adjusting pH also leads to exponential changes in ionizable drug solubility3. Salt-forming counterions may themselves have toxicity. For example, oral fumarate is prone to gastrointestinal complications71. In addition, the homoionic effect predisposes to drug precipitation72.
2.4. CD inclusion
CDs are cyclic oligosaccharides consisting of multiple d-(+)-glucopyranose units linked by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds73. CDs have hydrophilic external surface and hydrophobic internal cavities74,75. Drugs are combined with internal hydrophobic cavities by non-covalent bonding to form inclusion complexes76. β-CD is the most commonly used natural CD, however, low solubility and severe nephrotoxicity limit its application77. Hydrophilic CD derivatives, such as hydroxypropyl-β-CD, hydroxypropyl-γ-CD and sulfobutylether-β-CD, have high stability and low toxicity78, 79, 80, 81. Zulresso® solubilizes brexanolone with sulfobutylether-β-CD, which has been approved to treat postpartum depression82. CD-based polymers are materials that combine CDs with polymers, including CD-based poly rotaxanes, grafted CD, cross-linked CD, and star/multi-arm CD polymers83. CD-based polymers can form micelles, NPs, nanogels, nanofibers, and hydrogels, and have potential applications in drug delivery84, 85, 86, 87. Drugs can be formed as CD inclusions, coupled to polymers, or encapsulated in DDSs88. The involment of stimuli-responsive bonds and ligands allows these DDSs to have stimuli-responsive release and targeted delivery89.
2.5. SDs
SDs uniformly disperse PWSDs in microcrystalline, amorphous, or molecular states in carriers, which allow for the solidification of liquid drugs90,91. SDs can significantly reduce particle size and improve drug wettability compared to micronization. Marketed SDs are available in tablet and capsule dosage forms16. SDs can be categorized into four generations according to carrier materials (Fig. 1). The first-generation SDs have excellent thermodynamic stability but slower drug release92. The second-generation SDs use polymers to prepare amorphous SDs (ASDs), which exhibit higher solubility and dissolution rate93, 94, 95. However, ASDs are in a high-energy state and belong to thermodynamically unstable systems, which are susceptible to crystallization when stored at high temperature and high humidity96. Although adding surfactants or polymer materials to formulations avoids recrystallization and improves drug wettability and stability, long-term storage stability remains not optimistic97,98. Therefore, marketed solid dispersing formulations have a short validity period.
Figure 1.
Four generations of solid dispersions classified by carrier materials.
The third-generation SDs use surfactants as carriers, avoiding drug recrystallization99. Poloxamer and Soluplus are commonly used surfactant carriers100,101. Łyszczarz et al.102 prepared SDs of aripiprazole using poloxamer 407 (P407), which increased drug solubility more than 100-fold. The fourth-generation SDs use enteric-soluble or water-insoluble carriers to achieve sustained and controlled release of PWSDs92,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109. Drug properties, polymers' types, and preparation technology are crucial to the development of SDs. Braftovi®, Oriahnn™, Tukysa™, and others are successful cases that can be referenced110,111.
The conventional solubilization techniques used to solubilize PWSDs, including solubilization mechanisms, solubilization components, technical benefits, and challenges are summarized in Table 1. Conventional solubilization techniques can be used for solubilization of BCS II drugs, but for BCS IV drugs with poor permeability, they usually need to be combined with some emerging solubilization techniques.
Table 1.
Conventional solubilization strategies for solubilizing insoluble drugs.
| Solubilization technology | Solubilization mechanism | Solubilizing component | Benefit | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solubilizers | Forming micelles in the aqueous phase using surfactants. | Cationic surfactants (DTAB, DDAB, CTAB), anionic surfactants (SDS, NaC), and nonionic surfactants (poloxamer and polyol-based surfactants). | Intravenous administration. Reduces surface tension. |
Toxicity of excessive use of surfactants. |
| Hydrotropes | Forming soluble complexes, complex salts, or aggregates. | Organic acids and their sodium salts (e.g., amino acids, citric acid, sodium salicylate), amides, and amines (e.g., nicotinamide, N-methylglucamine, urea). | Avoidance of surfactants and organic solvents. Increase the solubility of drugs by several or even dozens of times. |
Requires a high concentration of hydrotrope. |
| Cosolvents | Reducing the polarity of the solvent mixture closely reflects nonpolar solutes' polarity. | Ethanol, methanol, propylene glycol, glycerol, DMSO, and PEG. | Suitable for drugs that lack ionizable functionality and show low affinity for solubilization by surfactants or lipids. | Reduced solubilization power on dilution. Pain on administration. Cell-based toxicity. |
| Synthesis of water-soluble drug prodrugs | Modifying the chemical structure of drugs. | Adding polar functional groups (e.g., phosphates, esters, carbamates, amides, carbonates, N-mannich bases, ethers, among others). | Improvement of aqueous solubility and pharmacokinetic profile of parent drug. Enable parenteral administration. Improved metabolic stability and targeting. Prolonged duration of action. Fewer side effects. |
Complex and time-consuming development of prodrugs. While solubility may increase, the prodrug may be less permeable. Difficulty in initial screening of prodrugs in a single animal model. |
| pH regulation and formation of soluble salts | Increasing the dissociation degree and altering crystalline lattice and intrinsic properties of ionizable drugs. | Hydrochloride, sodium salt, and toluene sulfonate salts, etc. | Suitable for ionizable drugs. Significantly enhance dissolution rate/solubility (often > 103 fold). |
Pharmaceutical salt and intrinsic toxicity of counterions. |
| CD inclusion | CDs form non-covalent dynamic inclusion complexes in solution. | α-CD, β-CD, γ-CD, methyl-β-CD, hydroxypropyl-β-CD, sulfobutylether-β-CD and hydroxypropyl-γ-CD, etc. | Convert drugs into microcrystalline or amorphous powders. Eliminate unpleasant smells or tastes. Prevent drug–drug or drug–additive interactions. |
Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity associated with large CD applications. |
| Solid dispersions | Reduced particle size. Drug in an amorphous state. High porosity particles. Improved particle wettability. |
Urea, organic acids, sugars, polymer materials, surfactants and enteric-soluble carriers. | Solidification of liquid drugs. Highly dispersed drug in the carrier. More effective than particle size reduction methods. |
Low drug loading capacity due to carrier dosage limitation. Thermodynamic instability of drug in the amorphous form. Aging easily after prolonged storage. Difficult to manufacture and scale up. |
DTAB, dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide; DDAB, dodecylethyldimethylammonium bromide; CTAB, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; NaC, sodium cholate; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PEG, polyethylene glycol; CD, cyclodextrin.
3. Crystallization strategy
3.1. Nanocrystals
Micronization reduces the drug particle size to the micron scale, which improves the dissolution rate and oral bioavailability by increasing the wettability and decreasing lattice energy112, 113, 114, 115. Nanosized drugs have a larger specific surface area, and their dissolution rate will be further increased.
Nanocrystals are submicron drug particles (10–1000 nm) stabilized by stabilizers (surfactants, polymers or proteins)116. Compared with DDSs, nanocrystals do not need carrier materials and have a simple prescription composition, resulting in high drug-loading capacity and easy industrial production. Currently, twenty nanocrystal products have been approved (Table 2). Nanocrystals are manufactured by top-down approaches (media milling, high-pressure homogenization), bottom-up approaches (antisolvent precipitation, supercritical fluid technology, spray drying) and combined approaches (Fig. 2A)117, 118, 119. He et al.120 used machine learning techniques to accurately predict nanocrystals' particle size and polymer dispersity index (PDI) prepared by high-pressure homogenization and ball-wet milling. The application of machine learning approaches can accelerate the development of nanocrystals.
Table 2.
Drug-nanocrystal products in the clinic.
| Brand name | API | Indication | Route of administration | Company | Approval year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gris-PEG | Griseofulvin | Fungal infection | Oral | Novartis | 1995 |
| Ritalin LA | Methylphenidate hydrochloride | Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | Oral | Novartis | 1995 |
| Verelan PM | Verapamil | Essential hypertension | Oral | Schwarz Pharma | 1998 |
| Celebrex | Celecoxib | Anti-inflammation | Oral | Pfizer | 1998 |
| Focalin XR | Dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride | Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | Oral | Novartis | 2001 |
| Avinza | Morphine sulfate | Moderate to severe pain | Oral | King Pharm | 2002 |
| Zanaflex | Tizanidine hydrochloride | Muscle spasticity | Oral | Acorda | 2002 |
| Emend | Aprepitant | Nausea and vomiting | Oral | Merck | 2003 |
| Tricor | Fenofibrate | Hypercholesterolemia | Oral | Abbott | 2004 |
| Megace ES | Megestrol acetate | Loss of appetite and wasting syndrome with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome | Oral | Par Pharm | 2005 |
| Tridlide | Fenofibrate | Hypercholesterolemia | Oral | Skye Pharma | 2005 |
| Naprelan | Naproxen sodium | Analgesia and anti-inflammation | Oral | Wyeth | 2006 |
| Invega Sustenna | Paliperidone palmitate | Schizophrenia | IM | Janssen | 2009 |
| Ryanodex | Dantrolene sodium | Malignant hyperthermia | IV | Eagle | 2014 |
| Invega Trinza | Paliperidone palmitate | Schizophrenia | IM | Janssen | 2015 |
| Rapamune | Sirolimus | Prophylaxis of organ rejection and lymphangioleiomyomatosis | Oral | Pfizer | 2015 |
| Aristada | Aripiprazole lauroxil | Schizophrenia | IM | Alkermes | 2018 |
| Invega Hafyera | Paliperidone palmitate | Schizophrenia | IM | Janssen | 2021 |
| Cabenuva | Cabotegravir | HIV-1 infection | IM | Viiv | 2021 |
| Apretude | Cabotegravir | HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis | IM | Viiv | 2021 |
IM, intramuscular injection; IV, intravenous injection.
Figure 2.
(A) The production methods of nanocrystals. Top-down approaches include media milling and high-pressure homogenization. Bottom-up approaches include antisolvent precipitation, supercritical fluid technology and spray drying. (B) Nanocrystals are used for oral, intravenous, and intramuscular administration. (C) Composition of cocrystal and drug–drug cocrystal. Drug–drug cocrystals often have a synergistic effect.
According to the Noyes–Whitney equation, nanocrystals with large specific surface areas can significantly improve dissolution rate. Nanocrystals administered orally are partly dissolved into drug molecules for passive diffusion and partly enter the blood or lymphatic circulation121. Furthermore, nanocrystals can reduce the absorption fluctuation caused by feeding/fasting122. In addition to preventing aggregation and precipitation, stabilizers can also affect drug dissolution rate and pharmacokinetic (PK)123, 124, 125, 126, 127. Zhang et al.125 used polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), poloxamer 188 (P188), P407, and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) as stabilizers to prepare naringenin nanocrystals. The nanocrystals prepared by the four stabilizers had similar particle size, potential, morphology and crystallinity. The most decisive interaction between PVP and naringenin inhibited naringenin dimer formation and maintained the supersaturation, showing a high dissolution rate, oral bioavailability, and excellent anti-inflammatory effects. Qin et al.124 prepared celecoxib (CXB) nanocrystals using PVP K17, d-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1000 succinate and P188 as stabilizers. CXB nanocrystals via intramuscular injection with PVP K17 as stabilizers showed long-acting release, while the other nanocrystals showed rapid release.
Nanocrystals administered intravenously show similar in vivo behavior to NPs, which are phagocytosed by macrophages and accumulated in the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) organs128. Wang et al.129 doped trace environmentally responsive fluorescent dyes into curcumin (CUR) nanocrystals and visually demonstrated the nanocrystals' fate via real-time imaging. Fluorescent dyes were quenched immediately in the aqueous environment, ensuring that only the fluorescence emitted by the nanocrystals was detected. CUR nanocrystals injected intravenously accumulate in the MPS organs, such as the liver and lungs. Maintaining nanocrystals' integrity in blood circulation facilitates surface modification for targeting ligands. Luo et al.130 prepared self-assembled cabazitaxel nanocrystals in vivo for the targeted treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cabazitaxel nanocrystals absorbed albumin, transferrin, apolipoprotein A-IV and apolipoprotein E in plasma. Transferrin, apolipoprotein A-IV and apolipoprotein E made cabazitaxel nanocrystals target tumor cells in situ, blood–brain barrier (BBB)/blood-tumor barrier and activated platelets supporting tumor metastasis, respectively. Self-assembled cabazitaxel nanocrystals showed excellent therapeutic effects in tumor, brain, and lung metastasis models. Cell membrane-coated NPs have extended systemic circulation and natural targeting ability because of surface-specific protein and immune recognition escape ability131. Furthermore, cell membrane-coated nanocrystals have high drug loading and high stability. Lin et al.132 prepared platelet membrane-coated paclitaxel (PTX) nanocrystals (PPNCs) for postoperative tumor chemotherapy. Compared with PTX nanocrystals, the particle size of PPNCs showed no noticeable increase during storage at 4 °C for 2 months. Due to the selective adhesion of platelet membranes to damaged blood vessels, PPNCs actively targeted and accumulated in postoperative residual lesions and tumor hemorrhage sites. Chai et al.133 prepared red blood cell (RBC) membrane-coated docetaxel nanocrystals and then modified targeting ligands on the cell membrane to treat glioma.
Nanocrystals administered intramuscularly provide sustained release, improve patient compliance, and have been widely used in treating acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and schizophrenia (Fig. 2B)134, 135, 136, 137. For example, Aristada®, developed by Alkermes, is injected every 1 to 2 months for adult schizophrenia therapy. Limited tissue fluid in the muscle or subcutaneous site allows for slow dissolution and sustained release. Further, prodrug nanocrystals show longer extended releases due to the slow prodrug conversion in vivo. Deodhar et al.138 linked 18-carbon fatty acids with dolutegravir through ester bonds and prepared them into nanocrystals for antiretroviral therapy. Prodrug nanocrystals injected intramuscularly with a single dose of 45 mg/kg dolutegravir achieved ultra-long-lasting release in mice and rats for up to one year. In rhesus monkeys, a second booster dose was injected on day 217. Cabotegravir's fatty acid ester nanocrystals also allowed injecting once a year139. Nanocrystals for intramuscular injection may cause inflammatory responses, granulomas, and fibrosis. This leads nanocrystals to be phagocytosed by macrophages and forms a secondary reservoir, which delays the drug's dissolution and absorption140. Ho et al.141 found that small-sized crystals (d50 = 0.8 or 2.3 μm) were widely distributed in muscle tissues, resulting in mild inflammatory reactions. After 4 weeks, the inflammatory reaction and secondary reservoir almost disappeared, and the drugs were dissolved entirely and distributed in the blood. However, large-sized crystals showed concentrated inflammatory lesions. After 4 weeks, a circular single-focus drug library remained, hindering drug dissolution and systemic exposure. Therefore, small-sized crystals may have good local tolerance and bioaccessibility and are more clinically relevant.
Nanocrystals can increase the solubility of almost all PWSDs. Gamma irradiation, filtration sterilization, and thermal sterilization have been used to sterilize nanosuspensions, laying the groundwork for marketing parenterally administered nanocrystals142.
3.2. Cocrystals
Cocrystals are crystalline and composed of two or more components in a stoichiometric ratio through non-covalent bonds. One component is an API, and the other components are cocrystal coformers (CCFs) or APIs143,144. Cocrystals improve drugs' physicochemical or mechanical properties (solubility, stability, fluidity, and compressibility) without changing chemical structure145. The selection of CCFs is crucial to designing cocrystals. Experimental screening methods (differential scanning calorimetry and phase diagrams) are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Virtual screening methods (hydrogen bond synthons, Hansen solubility parameter, crystal structure prediction, and machine learning models based on artificial neural networks) can improve the effectiveness and accuracy145, 146, 147. Eight cocrystal products have been approved for clinical application (Table 3)148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155.
Table 3.
Cocrystal products in the clinic.
| Brand name | Combination | Indication | Route of administration | Company | Approval year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lexapro | Escitalopram oxalate and oxalic acid | Anxiety disorders and major depression | Oral | Forest | 2002 | 148 |
| Abilify | Aripiprazole and fumaric acid | Schizophrenia | Oral | Otsuka | 2002 | 149 |
| Suglat | Ipragliflozin and l-proline | Type 2 diabetes | Oral | Kotobuki and Astellas | 2014 | 150 |
| Entresto | Valsartan and sacubitril | Chronic heart failure | Oral | Novartis | 2015 | 151 |
| Odomzo | Sonidegib and phosphoric acid | Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma | Oral | Novartis | 2015 | 152 |
| Steglatro | Ertugliflozin and L-pyroglutamic acid | Type 2 diabetes | Oral | Merck and Pfizer | 2017 | 153 |
| Mayzent | Siponimod and fumaric acid | Active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis | Oral | Novartis | 2019 | 154 |
| Seglentis | Celecoxib and racemic tramadol hydrochloride | Acute pain in adults | Oral | Esteve | 2021 | 155 |
Cocrystals have been widely used to improve solubility and bioavailability. For example, the solubility of ketoconazole (KCZ)-glutaric acid cocrystal was 1800-fold increased compared to the pure drug in water156. The AUC0–32h of miconazole-succinic acid cocrystal was 2.4 times enhanced compared to the pure drug157. Cocrystal solubility is related to the intermolecular interaction in the lattice and the solvation of components19. CCFs with high solubility can effectively improve cocrystal solubility. Ren et al.158 prepared myricetin cocrystals with nicotinamide, isonicotinamide, caffeine, and proline. The solubility of CCFs from large to small is proline, nicotinamide, isonicotinamide, and caffeine, consistent with the apparent solubility order of the four cocrystals. In addition, cocrystal solubility also depends on the pH, ionic strength, surfactant concentration and type158, 159, 160. The rapid dissolution of cocrystals may cause insoluble drug precipitation. Extending drug supersaturation by adding suitable polymers can solve this problem161, 162, 163.
DDCs are composed of APIs (Fig. 2C). DDCs are expected to solve the problems of differences in solubility and stability between APIs in combinations to exert synergistic or dual pharmacotherapeutic effects164. For example, Seglentis®, a cocrystal of tramadol hydrochloride and CXB in a 1:1 molecular ratio, has four different and complementary analgesic mechanisms for acute pain in adults165. DDCs have strict requirements for composition structure. Strong hydrogen bonding or interaction forces between the two components are necessary to form DDCs. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, antitubercular, and diuretic drugs are the three main classes of drugs that form DDCs, possibly due to the high number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors in the drug molecules166. In addition, DDCs alter the components' PK. For example, the intrinsic dissolution rate of tramadol hydrochloride in Seglentis® was reduced 7-fold, while that of CXB was increased 3-fold167. In human PK experiments, the absorption of tramadol hydrochloride decreased (P < 0.001), while the absorption of CXB increased (P < 0.01). The results corresponded to in vitro dissolution data and indicated that DDCs alter the PK behavior of tramadol and CXB.
Cocrystal preparation methods mainly include grinding and solution crystallization, which are only suitable for small-scale screening and preparation. New technologies, such as hot melt extrusion, supercritical fluid technology and resonant acoustic mixing, make it possible for industrial production and continuous manufacturing168,169. The advantages and disadvantages of cocrystal preparation methods are summarized in Table 4170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177. In addition, the Regulatory Classification of Pharmaceutical Co-Crystals published by the FDA considers that cocrystals are equivalent to the polymorphism of API178. Therefore, cocrystals can be approved through the 505 (b) (2) pathway179, which allows applicants to submit data from published safety and efficacy studies. This significantly reduces development costs and facilitates commercialization.
Table 4.
Advantages and disadvantages of cocrystal preparation methods.
| Method | Advantage | Disadvantage | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milling (liquid-assisted grinding) | Controlling polymorphism Higher yields Broader range of synthesized cocrystals |
Not easy to scale up Use of solvents |
170,171 |
| Solution crystallization (solvent evaporation method) | Simple operation | Not easy to scale up Large amounts of solvents Time-consuming |
172 |
| Hot melt extrusion | No organic solvents Real-time monitoring Continuous production Polymer matrix-assisted crystallization improves cocrystal production efficiency |
Energy consuming Not applicable to thermally unstable drugs |
173,174 |
| Supercritical fluid technology | High-quality cocrystal No organic solvents Continuous production |
High investment | 175 |
| Resonance acoustic mixing | Scale-up production High-throughput screening |
– | 176,177 |
‒, not applicable.
4. ILs
ILs are liquid compounds composed of asymmetric organic cations and anions (Fig. 3A) with a melting point below 100 °C180. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are eutectic mixtures formed primarily by hydrogen bonding, with melting points significantly lower than any individual component181. DESs are also considered as ILs analogs182. ILs and DESs have low volatility, thermal stability, chemical stability, and high adjustability and are considered green solvents that replace organic solvents183. In biomedicine, ILs improve drug solubility, enhance permeation drug delivery, and eliminate solid-state drug polymorphism.
Figure 3.
(A) Cations and anions commonly used in ionic liquids. Choline, geranic acid, malic acid, oleic acid and histidine are ions from natural sources. (B) Protein-avoidant ionic liquid (PAIL)-coated NPs drive biodistribution. PEG-coated NPs mainly accumulated in the liver, whereas PAIL-coated NPs accumulated in the lungs due to RBC hitchhiking.
The apparent solubility of PWSDs has been significantly improved through ILs184, 185, 186. For example, Propylene glycol increased the solubility of ibuprofen (IBU) by 193-fold187. ILs synthesized from salicylic acid and choline (Ch) increased the solubility of IBU by 6000-fold188. The solubilizing ability of ILs is mainly related to anion's type and the interaction between drug molecules. Hu et al.189 synthesized six ILs with acetate anion and six heterocyclic imidazole cations and investigated the solubilizing ability of six ILs on arabinoxylan. Cations' chemical structure directly affected the acetate anion's ability to form hydrogen bonding. Strong hydrogen bonding acceptance led to greater solubilization of ILs. However, the acetate anion formed more extensive hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups in arabinoxylan. Therefore, anions played a significant role in increasing solubility. Wu et al.190 studied the solubility of KCZ in ILs composed of Ch and different anions. In carboxylic acid anion ILs, hydroxyl groups limited the dissolution of KCZ, while carboxyl groups and double bonds increased the dissolution of KCZ. However, in the amino acid ILs, hydroxyl groups increased the dissolution of KCZ. Therefore, the interaction between ILs and KCZ also significantly affected solubility. Hu et al.191 found that isoliquiritigenin solubility in DESs composed of Ch and different organic acids (oxalic acid, malic acid, and gallic acid) was significantly improved. Molecular dynamics simulation proved that the hydrogen bonding formed between drug molecules and ILs was the main reason for improving solubility.
ILs, as permeation enhancers, are used for transdermal delivery of small molecule drugs, biomolecules, and rigid NPs. ILs enhance penetration by extracting lipids in the skin, disrupting the tight arrangement of the stratum corneum (SC), and altering the surface properties of the SC192, 193, 194, 195. In addition, compared with chemical penetration enhancers, ILs/DESs have more substantial skin permeability and lower skin irritation and are a robust functional material for local administration196. The permeability-promoting ability of ILs is related to the ions' type and stoichiometric ratio. Tanner et al.197 investigated the transdermal delivery of hydrophilic acarbose and lipophilic rucotinib by ILs composed of choline and geranic acid (CAGE) in different stoichiometric ratios (2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4). CAGE in a 1:2 stoichiometric ratio had the best transdermal effect, consistent with the results of CAGE transdermal insulin delivery198. Subsequently, they used anions similar to vanillin and cations with a similar structure to Ch to synthesize new ILs. They found that the inter-ionic interactions of ILs were negatively correlated with drug transport by 2D NMR spectroscopy. The hydrophobic portion of the anion entered the skin and disrupted lipids to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Strong inter-ionic interactions reduced the contact between anions and SC lipids and strongly interacted with solvated drugs, resulting in low skin penetration197. Zhao et al.199 bonded citric acid to mesoporous silica and then heated it with lysine to obtain DES-MSN. DESs reversibly changed the microstructure of SC and delivered DES-MSN to deep skin and blood circulation. Similarly, Li et al.200 used DES-MSN to deliver nanoceria and methotrexate to the dermis to synergistically treat rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, DESs provide a new strategy for non-invasive transdermal drug delivery of rigid particles.
ILs can form micelles, micro-emulsions and nanoemulsions in the medium201. Ali et al.202 encapsulated PTX in micelles formed by ILs and Span 20 to achieve transdermal delivery. Only the combination of ILs and Span 20 could form stable micelles. In addition, ILs improved drug encapsulation capability and enhanced skin penetration. ILs' content in the surfactant mixture increased, and the skin permeability of PTX was more vital. Esson et al.203 prepared amphotericin B nanoemulsions with ILs and medium-chain triglycerides as oil phases, which prevented the self-aggregation of amphotericin B and reduced toxicity. Lin et al.204 prepared oil-in-IL nanoemulsions by replacing the aqueous phase with ILs, which served as an intranasal mucosal delivery system for the vaccine. ILs significantly improved the stability of the nanoemulsions, enhanced the permeability of antigens in the nasal mucosa, and induced more robust immune responses. Poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs) consist of a polymer backbone and repeating units of ILs205. Lu et al.206 synthesized amphiphilic block copolymers containing PILs, light, and pH-responsive blocks. The amphiphilic block copolymers self-assembled in water to form spherical NPs. NPs were stimulated to release drugs by pH and ultraviolet irradiation, which significantly inhibited tumor growth in vivo and in vitro.
ILs can extend circulation half-life and change the biological distribution. Hamadani et al.207,208 used Ch and hexenoic acid to synthesize protein-avoidant ionic liquid (PAIL). PAIL-coated PLGA NPs significantly reduced opsonization and prolonged circulation time in vivo. PEG-coated PLGA NPs mainly accumulated in the liver, whereas PAIL-coated PLGA NPs mainly accumulated in the lungs (Fig. 3B). The spontaneous RBC hitchhiking of PAIL-coated PLGA NPs caused this. PAIL-coated PLGA NPs were transferred to vascular endothelial cells under the shear force of the dense capillary bed of lung tissue after tail vein injection.
API-ILs are ILs converted from drug molecules with pharmacological activity209. API-ILs can improve solubility, enhance permeability, and even inhibit polymorphic conversion and crystallization of solid APIs210. Drug polymorphs differ in solubility, stability, dissolution rate, and hardness, directly affecting PK and pharmacodynamics. Drug polymorphs are challenging to detect and differentiate, which brings hidden dangers to drug marketing and application211. API-ILs transform solid drugs into liquid forms and are an effective strategy to solve the polymorphism. For example, IBU with imidazolium, ammonium, or pyridinium formed API-ILs to eliminate polymorphism212. In addition, API-ILs formed by dual APIs can co-delivery and have synergistic therapeutic effects. A clinical combination of diphenhydramine, IBU, or naproxen provides better analgesic and sleeping effects. Wang et al.213 prepared API-ILs of diphenhydramine with IBU and naproxen and dispersed the API-ILs into mesoporous materials to improve powder fluidity and manufacturability, laying the groundwork for the manufacture of tablets and capsules. Etodolac-lidocaine ILs in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio significantly improved solubility and increased etodolac but decreased lidocaine permeability. This may be due to etodolac-lidocaine ILs existed as ion pairs or clusters in the skin214. In addition, etodolac-lidocaine ILs are used to treat ankle sprains, and phase III clinical trials have been completed215.
The potential toxicity and biodegradability of ILs have been widely discussed. Computer simulation methods, such as constructing quantitative structure‒activity relationship models and molecular dynamics simulations, can be used to predict the potential toxicity and explore the toxicity mechanism of ILs, laying the foundation for designing low-toxicity ILs216,217. ILs formed by natural ions (amino acids, Ch, polysaccharides and organic acids) have better biocompatibility and occupy an essential position in the biomedical field218, 219, 220. Currently, CAGE Bio Inc. focuses on the transdermal delivery of CAGE, and has four products in clinical trials. MEDRx is committed to commercializing API-ILs and has developed 10 kinds of API-ILs210.
5. Drug delivery systems
5.1. Polymer-based carriers
Increasing polymer-based carriers are being used to improve drug adsorption and hemodynamic characteristics due to good biocompatibility, low toxicity, cleared bloodstream, and biodegradability221. They have shown their potential for drug delivery in various administration routes. Commonly used polymer-based carriers include polymer micelles (PMs), dendrimers, and gels22. Polymer-based carriers can be coupled to drugs, embedded in a polymer matrix to form a host-guest complex, or loaded into reservoirs formed by polymer-based carriers222. Surface modification alllows the polymer-based carriers to have the targeted delivery ability. In addition, applying pH, light, heat, enzyme, or redox-sensitive copolymer blocks to dissociate and release drugs at controlled sites could improve the precise drug delivery.
Encapsulation of PWSDs by polymer-based carriers can improve drug solubility, in vivo stability, and affinity to intestinal membranes223. PMs' nanostructures can facilitate drug absorption in intestinal epithelial cells via transcytosis or endocytosis and in the systemic circulation via lymphatic transport224,225. Bile salts can also induce micellar transition morphology, or form hybrid micelles and novel hybrid aggregates, enhancing the transcellular channeling of drugs226,227. Dendritic polymers are carriers for facilitating intestinal permeation and drug transepithelial transport. They allow the drug to bypass p-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux and be absorbed via endocytosis228.
5.1.1. PMs
PMs are nanocore-shell structures formed by the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers in aqueous media (Fig. 4A)229. Insoluble drug molecules are encapsulated in hydrophobic micelle cores through non-covalent interactions or chemically coupled to nucleated blocks of block copolymers through covalent bonding230, 231, 232. Compared to micelles formed by traditional small molecule surfactants, PMs have lower apparent CMC, lower toxicity, higher drug-loading capacity, higher kinetic stability, and avoid leakage in blood circulation226. Genexol® PM is the first marketed PTX PM formulation with methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(d,l-lactide) as the polymeric material233, 234, 235. Cremophor EL in Taxol® is the main component causing serious side effects. However, Genexol® PM could give higher doses of PTX without additional toxicity in clinical trials236,237. Except for Genexol® PM, other PM products launched on the market include Nanoxel®, Nanoxel® M, Paclical® and Zisheng® (Table 5)236,238, 239, 240, 241.
Figure 4.
Structure, assembly, and disassembly schematic and different morphologies of polymer micelles. (A) Structure of typical polymer micelles. Genexol® PM is the first polymer micelle product, a PTX-loaded mPEG-b-PDLLA micellar formulation (20–50 nm, mPEG: 2000 g/mol and PDLLA: 1750 g/mol). (B) Polymer micelles: polymer-material assembly, drug loading and disassembly. (C) Polymer-micelle morphology.
Table 5.
Overview of PM-products in market.
| Brand name | API | Block copolymer | Administration route | Development stage | Company | Approval year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genexol PM | Paclitaxel | mPEG-b-PDLLA | IV | South Korea, Philippines, India, Vietnam and Indonesia |
Samyang | 2007 | 236,238 |
| Nanoxel | Paclitaxel | PVP-b-PNIPAM | IV | India | Dabur | 2007 | 239 |
| Nanoxel M | Docetaxel | mPEG-b-PDLLA | IV | South Korea | Samyang | 2012 | 240 |
| Paclical | Paclitaxel | Micellar retinoid-derived XR-17 | IV | Russia | Oasmia | 2015 | 241 |
| Zisheng | Paclitaxel | mPEG-PDLLA | IV | China | Shanghai Yizhong | 2021 | – |
mPEG-b-PDLLA, methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(d,l-lactide); PVP-b-PNIPAM, poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-block-poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide); XR-17, isoforms of N-retinoyl-cysteic acid methyl esters; IV, intravenous injection; ‒, not applicable.
Micellar materials mainly include diblock, triblock (Fig. 4B), tetra block, graft, and ionic copolymers242, 243, 244, 245. PEG and its derivatives are the most widely used hydrophilic blocks in marketed products. Hydrophobic blocks are usually polylactic acid (PLA)242, racemic PLA246, glycolic acid, lactic acid copolymer247, polycaprolactone (PCL)248, polypropylene oxide249, etc. Rasoulianboroujeni et al.250 used PEG as a non-selective solvent for PEG-b-PLA to prepare PMs with over 95% encapsulation efficiency. There were no significant changes in PTX encapsulation, average particle size, and PDI after scaling up the batch size to 25 times. In addition, this method eliminates PEG's safety and regulatory issues and simplifies the scale-up production process. Natural amphiphilic polymers are also used as carriers due to low toxicity. Liu et al.251 prepared an amphiphilic acetylated debranched starch by inserting hydrophobic acetyl groups into debranched starch, forming self-assembly micelles to solubilize CUR. Encapsulation and controlled release of CUR was achieved by hydrophobic interaction between the CUR aromatic group and the acetyl group of acetylated debranched starch.
PMs are rich in morphology, with spherical, vesicular, rod-shaped, hollow, tubular, worm-like, fibrous, and other forms (Fig. 4C)226,252. Spherical PMs are the most classical and are categorized into star and flathead micelles. Star micelles have thicker shell layer structures, and the length of shell-forming embedded segments is much larger than that of nucleating embedded segments253. PM morphology can be modulated by varying structure and relative chain length of block polymers, pH and composition of solvents, and drug capacity254,255. In addition, changing PM morphology, in turn, improves their toxicity and cellular endocytosis256.
PMs are now widely used as targeted delivery systems for antitumor drugs and non-viral genes257. Surface modification of PMs with targeting ligands enables active tumor-targeting. The introduction of stimulus-sensitive fragments or chemical bonds into the polymer materials realizes stimulated release at the tumor, significantly reducing side effects caused by off-target effects258. To deliver the hydrophobic anticancer drug DOX, Zhang et al.259 formed self-assembled PMs by triphenylphosphonium (TPP)-grafted PEG-ss-PLA copolymers using disulfide bonds as intermediate linkers, followed by coating with a chondroitin sulfate (CS) layer. Dual cell membrane/mitochondrial targeting and pH/redox responsive PMs were prepared with 70% encapsulation. The CS layer extends blood circulation while empowering cell membranes with active targeting capabilities. In acidic lysosomes, the CS layer was initially deshielded by pH response, TPP-mediated anchoring to the outer membrane of mitochondria. Then, the disulfide bond was cleaved by GSH response to release DOX.
5.1.2. Dendrimers
Dendrimers are permanently branched polymers consisting of three parts: a core, a branched chain inner shell, and a functional surface group-modified outer shell and have a highly branched three-dimensional structure and abundant terminal functional groups260. Dendrimers have been widely used in the central nervous system261, cancer262, and anti-inflammation fields263. Dendrimers are primarily spherical, and their core initiators can be monatomic, organic, or inorganic molecules, cyclic compounds, amino acids, esters, and polymers like polystyrene264. Repeated branching units connected to the core form an inner shell and easily modified functionalized surface exponential growth with increasing generations of inner shells260. The inner shell has abundant internal cavities that can encapsulate or trap drug molecules through hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and spatial site resistance265. It can encapsulate hydrophobic drugs to form stable host-guest complexes and improve drug stability in vivo. Hydrophobic drug molecules can also be chemically coupled to dendrimer terminal functional groups via esters, amides, imines, disulfide bonds, and other groups266. The core, inner shell and functionalized surface of dendrimers together determine size, solubility, biocompatibility, PK and other properties, and the in vivo fate of payloads260.
Polyamidoamine (PAMAM)267 and poly(propylene imine) are widely used and studied dendrimers in the market268. In addition, dendrimers include dendritic polyglycerol269, carbosilane dendrimers270, poly l-lysine271,272, amphiphilic Janus dendrimers and glycopeptide dendrimers273, etc. The first dendrimer to be synthesized and commercialized was PAMAM, with a complete G1–G10 polymer family, of which the 4th generation PAMAM (G4) is the most widely studied. VivaGel® is the only marketed dendrimer product274. VivaGel® consists of 3% (w/w) SPL7013 and Carbopol® hydrogel to treat bacterial vaginosis. SPL7013 is a dendrimer developed by Starpharma and serves as the active ingredient in VivaGel®. SPL7013 with a polyanionic surface binds to viral targets, preventing the virus from attaching or adsorbing to cells275. Vivagel® was found little adverse effects in phase I clinical trials, but one study showed mild inflammation and epithelial irritation276. Dendrimer OP-101 nano therapy for severe COVID-19 has entered phase II clinical trials277. OP-101 is a covalent conjugate of the fourth-generation hydroxyl-terminated PAMAM (G4-PAMAM-OH) to N-acetylcysteine, significantly improves survival and reduces inflammatory and neurological injury markers in critically ill patients with COVID-19. To increase the solubility of glutaminase inhibitor JHU29, Khoury et al.278 coupled JHU29 to G4-PAMAM-OH dendrimer with an average of 5 JHU29 molecules attached to each dendrimer, which resulted in an approximately 100-fold increase in solubility compared to free JHU29. The structural core of dendritic biopolymer octenylsuccinate hydroxypropyl phytoglycogen is plant glycogen, which is a dendritic α-d-glucan. Xie et al.279 used it as a solubilizer to increase the solubility of CXB, docetaxel, and fenofibrate by 1755, 1137, and 1066 times, respectively.
Compared with traditional polymer carriers, dendrimers have precisely controllable nanoscale dimensions (typically 1–20 nm), defined molecular weights, low PDI, and radially symmetric structures, which can promote cell permeation and increase cellular uptake280. Dendrimers are highly potential nanocarriers due to the abundant internal cavities characterized by high drug-loading capacity260,281. Dendrimers with terminal primary amines such as PAMAM and poly (propylene imine) have significant in vitro cytotoxicity due to cationic groups presenting on surfaces282. Modifying the surfaces using negatively charged or neutral groups (e.g., PEGylation, acetylation, glycosylation, or fluorination) can reduce immunogenicity and systemic toxicity283 and provide targeted delivery and long-lasting sustained-release effects284. Dendrimer toxicity is related to their high stability and non-degradability under physiological conditions, and bioaccumulation in the body can lead to severe toxic reactions285. Therefore, developing biodegradable dendrimers is crucial for clinical applications.
5.1.3. Polymer gels
Polymer gels refer to a semi-solid formulation of solution, suspension, or emulsion with a polymer matrix capable of forming gel, which can be administered locally or systematically286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292. Compared with other polymer-based carriers, gel formulations have unique advantages, such as a three-dimensional structure resembling the extracellular matrix, good biodegradability, low toxicity, and a simple preparation process293. Polymer gels can also act directly on lesions, mitigate systemic adverse effects with sustained and controlled drug release, and serve as reservoirs for PWSDs293. According to different formation principles, gels can be divided into temperature-sensitive, pH, magnetic, electric, and light-responsive gels294,295. Temperature-sensitive gels are more widely used because of their faster sol-gel transition rate. When the temperature changes, the spatial structure of temperature-sensitive gels changes, and intermolecular hydrogen bonding is destroyed. The temperature-sensitive polymer molecules are transformed from dispersed micelles to dense three-dimensional network structures, thus causing sol-gel transition293,296. Commonly used temperature-sensitive materials include PEG-PCL copolymer297, poloxamer298, poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)299, hydroxypropyl chitin300, chitosan301, etc. Lee et al.302 designed a degradable PEG-PCL-PEG thermosensitive gel by introducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) -responsive oxalate functional groups into polymer main chain during the coupling reaction of PEG-PCL diblock copolymers. The thermosensitive gel was degraded into PEG-PCL diblock copolymer in response to high ROS concentration, so the hydrophobic peptide cyclosporine A was released for more than 21 days in vitro and in vivo, with favorable sustained release.
Polymer gels are usually aqueous. Therefore, insoluble drug solubility in gels is a crucial issue that should be considered in gel formulation preparation. Most drugs currently approved for marketing by the FDA are dissolved in ethanol to increase insoluble drug solubility303. Specifically, Differin® commercially available topical gel increases adapalene solubility using propylene glycol304. Carrier technologies such as NPs305, SDs306, liposomes307, and microemulsions308,309 have also been used to improve solubility and transdermal penetration of PWSDs in gels. Permana et al.290 prepared in situ vaginal gels containing gel sheets of itraconazole SDs to improve the solubility of itraconazole. Using P407 and P188 as gelling agents and incorporating HPMC as mucosal adhesion polymer. SDs prepared by water-soluble polymers increased the itraconazole solubility to 4 mg/mL. Additionally, gel sheets and in situ gel systems could improve gel adhesion and spread on the surface of the vaginal epithelium, prolong contact time with vaginal mucus, and achieve drugs' local targeting290. Shu et al.310 developed a thermally responsive hydrogel loaded with IL microemulsion prepared with water, Tween 20, and CAGE as a drug reservoir for transdermal delivery of methotrexate. Microemulsion increased the solubility of methotrexate by 9 times. The gel increased the permeability of methotrexate by 27.6%.
Gels are not able to maintain a stable structure under physiological conditions for the required time due to low mechanical strength and stability, leading to drug sudden releaseand severe adverse reactions311. To improve the long-term stability of the hydrogel and control the release of drugs, Lee et al.312 successfully introduced adamantane (Ad) units at the termini of Pluronic F127 to synthesize F127-Ad. Subsequent host-guest interactions between F127-Ad and polymerized β-CDs (CDPs) resulted in a physically cross-linked micellar stacking structure. The critical gelation concentration of F127-Ad/CDPs was significantly reduced compared to unmodified F127. And increased stability of gels with an increasing number of Ad molecules. In addition, complexation between CDPs and insulin loaded in gels further enhances drugs' sustained release characteristics312.
5.2. Lipid-based carriers
The main components of lipid carriers are lipids and surfactants. Hydrophobic drugs are dissolved in lipids or encapsulated in the phospholipid bilayer. Lipid-based carriers include emulsions, SEDDS, liposomes, transferosomes, SLNs, NLCs, and LNCs, which have biodegradability, high biocompatibility and low immunogenicity313, 314, 315. In addition, lipid-based carriers can also be modified to prolong systemic circulation time, target specific sites and stimulate response release316.
Lipids stimulate the secretion of lipases and bile from the gastrointestinal tract. Then, bile salts, lipids, and lipid digestion products form micelles or vesicles in the intestinal317. Insoluble drugs are dissolved in the colloidal structures and enter the hepatic portal vein via the paracellular and transcellular pathways318. Oral lipid nanoparticles (LNs) first need to penetrate the mucus barrier, which the ones with small particle size, neutrally charge or PEG-modification demonstrate higher penetration ability319. Subsequently, LNs penetrate the epithelial barrier through paracellular, transcellular, and lymphatic transports320. Chitosan reversibly opens tight junctions and facilitates paracellular transport321. Receptor-modified LNs such as transferrin can enhance cellular uptake322. In addition, LNs are rapidly transported to lymphocytes after uptake by microfold cells, entering the lymphatic pathway323. Thus, lipid-based carriers deliver the drugs into the systemic circulation via the hepatic portal vein and lymphatic circulation.
5.2.1. Emulsions
Emulsions are heterogeneous systems formed by two immiscible components in the presence of surfactant and cosurfactant (Fig. 5A). Nanoemulsions are thermodynamic stability systems with 20 to 200 nm particle sizes324,325. Nanoemulsions can encapsulate lipophilic drugs in the oil phase to protect them from the external environment, penetrate physiological barriers, and improve solubility and bioavailability. Nanoemulsions can be further formulated into conventional dosage forms (aerosol, injection, gel, cream, etc.) suitable for oral, parenteral, topical, nasal cavity and lung administration326, 327, 328, 329.
Figure 5.
Lipid-based carriers for solubilization. (A) Nanoemulsions and picking emulsions. Diprivan® is a typically commercialized emulsion consisting of soybean oil, egg phospholipids, propofol and glycerol. Picking emulsions are stabilized by inorganic and polymer particles with high physical stability. (B) Liposomes. AmBisome®, a typical commercialized product, comprises hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, distearoylphosphatidylglycerol and amphotericin B. (C) Transfersomes. Diractin®, an approved formulation of ketoprofen transfersomes, was withdrawn from the market due to its similar therapeutic effect to ketoprofen gel. (D) Solid lipid nanoparticles. (E) Nanostructured lipid carriers. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers have an inherent ability to cross the BBB. (F) Lipid nanocapsules.
Oral nanoemulsions improve bioavailability by enhancing drug stability and initiating lymphatic transport to avoid first-pass elimination330,331. Guo et al.332 encapsulated CUR and 5-fluorouracil in nanoemulsions. The AUC0‒t of CUR and 5-fluorouracil in nanoemulsions was 8.85 and 8.59 times higher than that of pure drugs, respectively. To improve patient compliance, nanoemulsions are often converted into semisolid dosage forms such as hydrogel, cream or ointment333. Hydrogel has high water content, excellent ductility, low skin irritation and high stabilization, and is the most commonly used semisolid dosage form334, 335, 336. Hussain et al.337 loaded rifampicin nanoemulsions into carbomer gel to treat tuberculosis. Rifampicin nanoemulsion gel showed a 4.34-fold increase in AUC0‒∞ compared to nanoemulsions for oral administration.
Intravenous lipid emulsions, with phospholipids as emulsifiers, include parenteral nutritional emulsions and drug-containing emulsions338,339. Injectable emulsion products for delivering drugs in the clinic have been summarized in Table 6340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347. Diprivan® is an injectable emulsion consisting of soybean oil, egg phospholipids, propofol, and glycerol. It is widely used for general anesthesia and sedation due to its rapid onset of action and rapid systemic clearance348. PEGylated nanoemulsions prolong circulation time, but repeated injections can cause the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon. PEG derivatives and branched PEG instead of linear PEG, can attenuate or even avoid the ABC phenomenon349, 350, 351. Li et al.352 encapsulated PTX and docosahexaenoic acid in folic acid-modified nanoemulsions for breast cancer therapy. Docosahexaenoic acid, as an adjuvant, enhanced the drug cytotoxicity. Synergism and active targeting combined to enhance the anti-tumor effects. Hydrophobic contrast agents or dyes encapsulated in nanoemulsions are used for imaging diagnosis353. Perfluorocarbons are highly hydrophobic, and their nanoemulsions are widely used as diagnostic agents354,355. Yang et al.356 prepared nanoemulsions encapsulating PTX and sulforhodamine B, which had therapeutic and diagnostic functions. PTX and sulforhodamine B were covalently coupled through vitamin E and then realized the simultaneous release. In addition, the theranostic nanoemulsions had a long circulation ability and showed excellent therapeutic imaging effects.
Table 6.
Injection emulsion for delivering drugs in the clinic.
| Brand name | API | Indication | Lipid excipient | Company | Approval year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diazepam-Lipuro | Diazepam | Preoperative sedation | SO, MCT, EL | B. Braun | 1985 | 340 |
| Diprivan | Propofol | General anesthesia | SO, EL | AstraZeneca | 1989 | 341 |
| Vitalipid | Vitamins A, D2, E and K1 | Intravenous nutrition | SO, EL | Fresenius Kabi | 1991 | 342 |
| Liple | Alprostadil | Chronic arterial occlusive disease | SO, EP, OA | Mitsubishi Tanabe | 1998 | 343 |
| Limethason | Dexamethasone palmitate | Rheumatoid arthritis | SO, EL | Mitsubishi Tanabe | 1998 | 344 |
| Etomidate-Lipuro | Etomidate | General anesthesia | SO, MCT, EL | B. Braun | 2001 | 345 |
| Cleviprex | Clevidipine | Hypertension | SO, EP | AstraZeneca | 2008 | 346 |
| Cinvanti | Aprepitant | Emesis | SO, EL | Heron | 2017 | 347 |
SO, soybean oil; MCT, medium-chain triglycerides; EL, egg lecithin; EP, egg phospholipid; OA, oleic acid.
Conventional emulsions have unstable phenomena such as coalescence, demulsification and Ostwald ripening357. Compared with conventional emulsions, pickering emulsions are stabilized by solid particles with high physical stability and drug loading358, 359, 360 (Fig. 5A). Particle stabilizers can be inorganic particles, polymer-based particles, and nanocrystals361, 362, 363. Modifying particle stabilizers allows light, heat, and pH-responsive release of drugs. Zhao et al.364 used an azobenzene-PEG adduct as the guest and β-CD-grafted alginate as the host. Self-assembled NPs of the two materials were used as particle stabilizers. Under ultraviolet irradiation, trans-azobenzene-PEG was converted into cis-isomer, resulting in the disassembly of NPs and light-responsive release of CUR. The pH response involves materials' charge transformation and degradation at different pH. Lignin and chitosan oligosaccharide were self-assembled into NPs encapsulating cytarabine by electrostatic interaction. Under acidic conditions, the amino protonation of chitosan oligosaccharide made the NPs loose and released CUR and cytarabine365. Eudragit RL100 can control drug release under alkaline conditions366. Temperature response involves the rapid transition of waxy materials from solid to molten. The molten waxy material is dissolved in the oil phase, realizing emulsions coalescence and drug release367,368.
5.2.2. SEDDSs
SEDDSs are anhydrous homogeneous liquid mixtures composed of drugs, oils, surfactants, and cosolvents and can spontaneously emulsify in the gastrointestinal tract. Oils can solubilize the lipophilic drugs and affect the extent of lymphatic transport. Long-chain fatty acids, unsaturated fatty acids, or long-chain triglycerides enhance lymphatic transport369,370. Long-chain fatty acids in SEDDS formulations are reconverted to triglycerides, which further form chymotrypsins371. Chylomicrons are transported by lymphatic circulation, avoiding the first-pass effect and significantly improving oral bioavailability372. SEDDSs can also open the cellular epithelial tight junctions, inhibit the efflux of P-gp, enhance mucus penetration and adhesion373, 374, 375, 376. SEDDS products in the clinic were summarized in Table 720,377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382.
Table 7.
SEDDSs products in the clinic.
| Brand name | API | Indication | Lipid excipient | Company | Approval year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depakene | Valproic acid | Epilepsy | Corn oil | AbbVie | 1978 | 20 |
| Rocaltrol | Calcitriol | Calcium regulator | Medium-chain triglycerides | Roche | 1978 | 377 |
| Accutane | Isotretinoin | Severe recalcitrant nodular acne | Hydrogenated soybean oil flakes Hydrogenated vegetable oil Soyabean oil |
Roche | 1982 | 377 |
| Sandimmun | Cyclosporine | Organ transplantation | Corn oil Linoleoyl macrogolglycerides |
Novartis | 1990 | 378 |
| Neoral | Cyclosporine | Organ transplantation | Corn oil-mono-di-triglycerides Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil |
Novartis | 1995 | 378 |
| Vesanoid | Tretinoin | Acute promyelocytic leukemia | Hydrogenated soyabean oil Partially hydrogenated soyabean oil Soyabean oil |
Roche | 1995 | 20 |
| Norvir | Ritonavir | HIV infection | Oleic acid Polyoxyl 35 castor oil |
AbbVie | 1996 | 379 |
| Fortovase | Saquinavir | HIV infection | Medium chain mono- and diglycerides | Roche | 1997 | 380 |
| Agenerase | Amprenavir | HIV infection | TPGS | Glaxosmithkline | 1999 | 380 |
| Targretin | Bexarotene | Cutaneous manifestations of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma | Polysorbate 20 | Valeant Luxembourg | 1999 | 380 |
| Kaletra | Ritonavir Lopinavir |
HIV infection | Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil | AbbVie | 2000 | 381 |
| Aptivus | Tipranavir | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome | Mono/diglycerides of caprylic/capric acid Polyoxyl 35 castor oil |
Boehringer Ingelheim | 2005 | 379 |
| Liporaxel | Paclitaxel | Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer | Monoolein Tricaprylin Tween 80 |
Daehwa and KIST | 2016 | 382 |
TPGS, d-alpha tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate; KIST, Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
Cyclosporin A belongs to BCS IV drugs and is used as an immunosuppressant for solid organ transplantation383,384. Sandimmune® and Neoral® are SEDDSs formulations. Sandimmune® is first brought into the market. Neoral® consists of cyclosporin A, alcohol, corn oil-mono-di-triglycerides, and polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil, which forms small droplets in the gastrointestinal tract, further enhancing drug absorption378. Liporaxel® is the world's first oral PTX solution based on lipid self-emulsifying drug delivery technology385. Liporaxel® consists of PTX, monoolein, tricaprylin, and Tween 80, and is indicated for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer therapy386. Compared with Taxol®, Liporaxel® reduces adverse effects such as neurotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions387. The safety and efficacy of Liporaxel® for recurrent/metastatic breast cancer therapy are currently being evaluated, but results have not been reported388.
Conventional SEDDSs have low drug loading and high surfactant content, and cosolvents' volatilization leads to precipitation of lipophilic drugs. Drugs in a supersaturated state also tend to form precipitates or crystals. Precipitation inhibitors (PIs) are added to SEDDSs to form supersaturated SEDDSs (super-SEDDSs), which increase intestinal absorption by increasing drug loading and maintaining drug supersaturation20. PIs include HPMC, PVP, Soluplus389, 390, 391. Bannow et al.392 prepared super-SEDDSs loaded with simvastatin. Super-SEDDSs containing 20% (w/w) PIs showed a 2.4-fold increase in drug loading compared to SEDDSs. In addition, super-SEDDSs did not show crystallization within 6 months at room temperature, whereas SEDDSs showed crystallization within 1 day. Nora et al.393 combined amorphous SD with super-SEDDSs (super-SEDDSs + ASD) for oral ritonavir delivery. The drug loading of conventional SEDDSs was 90% saturation solubility, whereas super-SEDDSs + ASD was 275% saturation solubility. In addition, the AUC0–7h and AUC0–23h of super-SEDDSs + ASD was 3- and 1.5-fold increase compared to the conventional ones, respectively.
Liquid SEDDSs are encapsulated in hard or soft gelatine capsules, and drugs are easily precipitated during storage. Solid SEDDSs (S-SEDDSs) can improve drug stability, and commonly used techniques include spray drying, freeze drying, hot melt extrusion and solid carriers adsorption380. Solid carrier adsorption is a promising technology with more controllable drug release. Solid carriers include mainly porous materials such as silica magnesium aluminosilicate394,395. Yan et al.396 linked poly (acrylic acid) with mesoporous silica through amide bonds to realize the acid-sensitive release of β-elemene self-micro-emulsifying. The drug release under acidic conditions was 1.8 times higher than under neutral conditions. Sirolimus SEDDSs were adsorbed on methyl, amino, and carboxyl-modified mesoporous silica397. The properties of modified groups and the interactions between drug molecules and carrier groups significantly impacted drug release. Methyl-modified mesoporous silica was hydrophobic, and the drugs were difficult to release in water, but they were released rapidly in surfactant-containing solutions. Carboxy-modified mesoporous silica was hydrophilic, and the drugs were released rapidly in water and surfactant-containing solutions. Hydrogen bonding formed between sirolimus and amino groups significantly delayed sirolimus release.
High concentrations of surfactants in SEDDSs cause gastrointestinal irritation by disrupting the intestinal mucosal barrier398. Recent studies have shown that SEDDSs disrupt the intestinal microbiota and cause intestinal inflammation in rats399. S-SEDDSs improve the stability of liquid SEDDSs, but the surface modification and porous structure of solid carriers could affect the dissolution and PK400,401. Therefore, further exploration of in vitro‒in vivo correlation and PK in humans is necessary402.
5.2.3. Liposomes
Liposomes are vesicular structures composed of phospholipids and cholesterol, with a hydrophilic core and hydrophobic lipid bilayer (Fig. 5B)403, 404, 405, 406. Phospholipids and cholesterol are the main components of the cell membrane. Therefore, liposomes have biodegradability, outstanding biocompatibility and low toxicity. Altering the composition and surface modification produce functionalized liposomes such as long-circulation, ligand-targeted, and stimuli-responsive liposomes315,407, 408, 409, 410, 411. Approved liposomes have been summarized in Table 8. For example, AmBisome®, a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, consists of hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, distearoylphosphatidylglycerol, and cholesterol412. Compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate, AmBisome® significantly reduces nephrotoxicity and infusion adverse effects. However, AmBisome® has potential hepatotoxicity. The mechanism remains unknown413.
Table 8.
Liposomal products in the clinic.
| Brand name | API | Indication | Route of administration | Company | Approval year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epaxal | Inactivated hepatitis A virus | Hepatitis A infection | IM | Crucell Berna | 1993 |
| Doxil | Doxorubicin | Ovarian cancer | IV | Sequus | 1995 |
| DaunoXome | Daunorubicin | Advanced HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma |
IV | Galen | 1996 |
| AmBisome | Amphotericin B | Systemic fungal infection | IV | Gilead | 1997 |
| Inflexal V | Haemagglutinins | Flu (influenza) | IM | Crucell Berna | 1997 |
| Depocyt | Cytarabine | Lymphomatous meningitis | IT | Pacira | 1999 |
| Visudyne | Verteporfin | Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization | IV | Novartis | 2000 |
| Myocet | Doxorubicin | Breast neoplasms | IV | Elan | 2001 |
| Lipusu | Paclitaxel | Ovarian cancer | IV | Luye | 2003 |
| DepoDur | Morphine | Postoperative analgesia | Epidural | Pacira | 2004 |
| Mepact | Mifamurtide | Osteosarcoma | IV | Takeda | 2009 |
| Exparel | Bupivacaine | Postoperative analgesia | Local infiltration | Pacira | 2011 |
| Marqibo | Vincristine | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia | IV | Acrotech | 2012 |
| Lipo-Dox | Doxorubicin | Metastatic ovarian cancer Metastatic breast cancer |
IV | Sun | 2013 |
| Onivyde | Irinotecan | Metastatic pancreatic cancer | IV | Ipsen | 2015 |
| Vyxeos | Cytarabine Daunorubicin | Acute myeloid leukemia | IV | Jazz | 2017 |
| Shingrix | Recombinant varicella-Zoster virus glycoprotein E | Herpes zoster | IM | GlaxoSmithKline | 2018 |
| Arikayce | Amikacin | Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease | Inhalation | Insmed | 2018 |
IM, intramuscular injection; IV, intravenous injection; IT, intrathecal injection. Depocyt®, Exparel® and DepoDur® are multivesicular liposomes.
The phospholipid bilayer of liposomes provides space for hydrophobic drugs. Conventional liposomes undergo partial degradation under gastrointestinal lipase and pH conditions, leading to premature drug leakage414. Polymer-modified liposomes have high gastrointestinal stability, long intestinal retention time and increased intestinal permeability415. Wu et al.416 prepared PEG-coated liposomes with different densities expressing Lip, 2%, 5%, and 10% PEG-Lip. The particle size and PDI of 5% PEG-Lip and 10% PEG-Lip remained almost unchanged in gastric fluid during the 150 min. In addition, the penetration thicknesses in the mucus layer of Lip, 2%, 5%, and 10% PEG-Lip were about 30, 40, 70, and 60 μm, respectively. The density of 2% PEG-Lip had mushroom conformation, and the diffusivity was limited by mucus. The density of 10% PEG-Lip had brush conformation, and the interaction between the longer PEG chains and the mucus network hindered the penetration. The density of 5% PEG-Lip had mushroom-brush conformation with moderate length and the highest mucus permeability.
PEGylated liposomes are well-known as passive, long-circulating liposomes. Doxil®, the first approved PEGylated liposome with a terminal half-life of 20 to 45 h, is used to treat ovarian cancer and breast cancer417. Functionalized liposomes improve PK and biological distribution, reduce systemic toxicity, and enhance therapeutic effect, which have attracted wide attention418. Zhu et al.419 prepared PTX liposomes targeting glioma. Ginsenoside Rg3 replaced cholesterol to improve the stability and fluidity of liposomes. The glucose residue in ginsenoside Rg3 had a high affinity for glucose transporters highly expressed in glioma cells, which promoted liposomes to target brain tumors. The liposomes were eliminated slowly in mice, and the accumulated amount in the brain was 3-fold increased compared to conventional liposomes.
Most approved liposomes are conventional ones, but preclinical research mainly focuses on developing and applying functional liposomes. Functionalized liposomes have shown more excellent therapeutic effects in animal models. Several actively targeted liposomes have entered clinical trials, however, some demonstrated unsatisfactory outcomes420. The clinical application of functionalized liposomes may be promoted by exploring the fate in vivo, predicting the potential therapeutic effects, and developing methods for large-scale production421,422. Microfluidic vortex focusing enabled high-throughput production of liposomes with precisely controlled particle size, high stability, and high reproducibility, which brings the promise of simplifying liposome production steps423.
5.2.4. Transferosomes
Transferosomes are composed of phospholipids, edge activators, ethanol, and water and have good permeability and high deformability (Fig. 5C)424. Surfactants are the leading edge activators, improving the membrane's deformability425. The high deformability allows transferosomes to pass through the SC intactly426. Zhang et al.427 found that the penetration depth of transferosomes was 280 μm after application to human cadaveric skin for 24 h. The SC is the main penetration barrier with a 10–15 μm thickness428. Therefore, transferosomes are potent vehicles for topical and systemic drug delivery.
Sahu et al.429 summarized that transferosomes were used to enhance the skin penetration of insoluble plant bioactives. Zhang et al.430 prepared meloxicam transferosomes using cetyl pyridine chloride as an edge activator. Compared with conventional liposomes, the deformability index of transferosomes was much more significant. The permeability coefficient of transferosomes hydrogel in human cadaver skin was 1.71-fold increased compared to meloxicam-loaded hydrogel. Transferosomes are loaded in hydrogels to prolong retention on the skin and improve patient compliance430, 431, 432. Jiang et al.433 prepared cell penetrating peptide (CPP)-modified PTX transfersomes for melanoma therapy. CPP allowed PTX transfersomes to penetrate deep into the tumor spheroid model. Subsequently, CPP-modified PTX transfersomes were loaded into oligopeptide hydrogel, which prolonged the retention time on the skin. The combination minimized tumor size and weight and treated melanoma more efficiently. Currently, there are no transfersomes on the market434. Diractin®, a gel containing ketoprofen transferosomes, was withdrawn from the market because of its therapeutic effect, similar to ketoprofen gel435.
5.2.5. SLNs and NLCs
SLNs are colloidal particles composed of solid lipids and surfactants, which are solid at room and body temperatures (Fig. 5D)436. NLCs are colloidal particles composed of liquid lipids, solid lipids and surfactants, the second generation of SLNs (Fig. 5E)437. Compared with liposomes and emulsions, SLNs can reduce the degradation of API and improve physical stability438. However, the crystal transition of solid lipids in SLNs leads to drug leakage. Liquid lipids in NLCs can reduce the crystallinity of solid lipids and inhibit drug efflux, improving drug loading and storage stability439,440. In addition, SLNs and NLCs are highly biocompatible, biodegradable, and highly attractive in drug delivery, especially brain delivery.
SLNs and NLCs have an inherent ability to cross the BBB441,442. Pawar et al.443 quantified drug concentrations in the brain to visualize the ability of SLNs to cross the BBB. Oral and brain bioavailability of SLNs were 1.6 and 5.8 times higher than that of the pure drug, respectively. SLNs and NLCs are modified with ligands or peptides to enhance brain targeting442,444, 445, 446. For example, Farshbaf et al.447 prepared bortezomib NLCs with dual modifications of D8 and RI-VAP. D8 showed a high affinity for nicotine acetylcholine receptors on brain capillary endothelial cells, which benefited NLCs to cross the BBB. RI-VAP showed a high affinity for the receptors on cancer cells, which urged NLCs to actively target cancer cells. Compared with unmodified NLCs, dual-modified NLCs in BBB and blood–brain tumor barrier models showed a 5.1- and 2.4-fold increase in transcytosis efficiency, respectively. SLNs and NLCs for nasal administration can directly enter the brain parenchyma through the trigeminal and olfactory regions, circumventing the BBB and achieving non-invasive delivery448,449. Sabry et al.450 labeled valsartan-loaded SLNs with rhodamine B, and found that SLNs administered nasally accumulated in the brain by photon imaging.
Based on Quality by Design, researchers screened lipids, surfactants, preparation methods and process parameters to determine the optimal prescriptions for SLNs and NLCs451, 452, 453. Recently, Kovačević et al.454 established a new lipid screening method based on the Hansen solubility parameter. This method significantly reduced the scope of lipid screening and developed NLCs efficiently and quickly. Furthermore, preparing SLNs and NLCs can avoid using organic solvents and make it easy to scale up.
5.2.6. LNCs
LNCs are colloidal NPs with 20 to 200 nm particle sizes, composed of oil, water, PEG-derived amphiphilic surfactants, and lipid surfactants (Fig. 5F)455. LNCs can be prepared by the phase-inversion temperature method without organic solvents456. LNCs have a rigid surfactant layer on the surface, displaying a core-shell structure and having high physical stability457. LNCs have been used to improve oral bioavailability, enhance skin permeability, and cross the BBB458, 459, 460, 461, 462. Studies have shown that LNCs for nasal administration mainly enter the blood circulation through the nasal epithelium, and the olfactory pathway could be ignored462.
The surface charge, particle size, and surface coating of LNCs affect PK. Solutol® HS-15 and Kolliphor® HS-15 are amphiphilic surfactants commonly in LNCs, both form short-chain coatings on the surface. However, DSPE-mPEG 2000 formed a long-chain coating, prolonging the circulating time in vivo463. PEGylated LNCs with different particle sizes had significantly different fates in rats after intravenous injection464. The elimination rate of LNCs with 50 nm particle size was higher than LNCs with 85 nm particle size. The renal excretion and instability in the bloodstream of small-sized LNCs may cause this. Pinton et al.465 found that neutral and positively charged LNCs with 100 nm particle size were taken up through caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Neutral LNCs were directed toward bone marrow cells in the blood, and whiles positively charged ones were directed toward macrophages and tumor cells. PEGylated LNCs have passive targeting properties, and CPP or antibody-modified LNCs can actively deliver drugs. NFL-peptide can target glioma and neural stem cells in the subventricular zone466. Therefore, NFL-peptide-modified retinoic acid LNCs were used to treat demyelinating diseases467.
5.3. Inorganic carriers
Inorganic carriers have intrinsic properties (electrical, magnetic, optical properties) and are widely used in bioimaging and drug delivery468,469. Common inorganic carriers include mesoporous materials, metal-based materials, and LDHs470. Drug loading, the ability to control drug release, and in vivo clearance are the main areas of concern for delivery carriers471. Mesoporous materials have adjustable specific surface area and pore volume, showing excellent drug loading. Drugs can sustain release and stimulate response release by adjusting the shape, pore size, and surface modification of inorganic carriers471,472. In vivo, clearance is related to safety and long-term toxicity and is the main challenge for inorganic carriers. The appearance of biodegradable inorganic carriers, such as silicon dioxide and iron oxide, holds promise for clinical translation473. Except for MSNs, other inorganic carriers are less commonly used for oral delivery. Similar to LNs, MSNs for oral administration also need to overcome biochemical, mucus, and epithelial barriers. The particle size, charge, and surface modification of MSNs could enhance mucus and intestinal epithelial permeability474,475.
5.3.1. MSNs
After the first loading of IBU into MSNs, the research of MSNs in drug delivery and medical diagnosis has increased significantly476,477. Under physiological conditions, MSNs can be degraded into nontoxic silicic acid and polysilicic acid. Controlled degradation of MSNs in vivo can also be achieved by adjusting the size, shape, surface charge, and doping with metal ions or oxides470,478. In addition, MSNs have the advantages of high drug loading, simple preparation, controllable production, and good reproducibility479.
Highly dispersed hydrophobic drugs in MSNs can inhibit drug crystallization and maintain drug amorphous480. Drugs in MSNs are released rapidly upon extensive contact with body fluids, increasing drug solubility and bioavailability. It is worth noting that appropriate pore volume, pore size and drug loading method can significantly improve drug dissolution481. Type et al.482 loaded indomethacin and nimesulide into MSNs and carboxyl-modified MSNs (MSN–COOH), and the drugs were all present in the amorphous form. Due to the high wettability of MSN-COOH, the release medium was more accessible to the pores, which improved the dissolution rate in vitro. The bioavailability of indomethacin and nimesulide in MSN-COOH was 2 times and 3.6 times increased compared to the pure drug. The large pore volume and high drug loading of MSNs create favorable conditions for drug co-delivery. Tarannum et al.483 coupled the cisplatin prodrugs to the MSN inner surface and the gemcitabine prodrugs to the MSN outer surface. The two drugs had differential release properties. Upon exposure to the tumor microenvironment, gemcitabine was released first and inhibited enzyme activity to prevent DNA repair, which increased the accumulation of cisplatin-DNA complexes and cytotoxicity. The tumor inhibition rate was 79%.
MSNs often suffer from premature drug leakage, and the application of gating materials is an effective solution (Fig. 6A). The gating materials are physically or chemically altered by various stimuli (pH, ROS, light, GSH, etc.)484. Zhang et al.485 grafted fucoidan on the surface of MSNs through disulfide bonds. CUR was rapidly released under acidic or GSH conditions. Yang et al.486 prepared adriamycin-loaded MSNs using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as gating materials for chemotherapeutic photodynamic synergistic therapy. AuNPs have strong photothermal conversion ability. Under near-infrared (NIR) light, the generated heat reduced the interaction between drugs and MSNs, prompting a step-like accelerated release. Unlike the above research, Yang et al.487 introduced diselenide into the MSNs preparation process to construct self-destructive vehicles. The photosensitizers and adriamycin were loaded into MSNs. Under infrared light irradiation, ROS generated by photosensitizers destroyed the diselenide, leading to MSNs' disintegration to release drugs.
Figure 6.
Inorganic carriers for solubilization. (A) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The mesoporous structure can encapsulate two drugs for co-delivery. Surface modification allows the stimulation response such as pH, ROS, enzyme and near-infrared light. (B) Layered double hydroxides as acid-responsive carriers. (C) Gold nanoparticles. Drugs, antibodies, and proteins are covalently attached to the nanoparticle surface. (D) Iron oxide nanoparticles. IONs are used as diagnostic agents in the clinic. Ferumoxytol® is the only approved therapeutic agent.
MSNs for oral delivery cause intestinal microecology imbalance and intestinal inflammation488,489. One-year single-dose intravenous injection of MSNs did not cause liver inflammation and apparent chronic toxicity in mice490. The two different results may be caused by the different physicochemical properties of MSNs, dosage, administration frequency, and route of administration. Therefore, the safety, degradation and excretion processes of MSNs should be comprehensively explored to accelerate the clinical translation.
5.3.2. MCNs
MCNs have similar structures and properties to MSNs. MCNs have larger specific surface area and pore volume, improving the adsorption and drug loading. Spherically ordered MCNs showed a 3-fold increase in loading capacity compared to MSNs491. Gastrointestinal administration of MCNs has small intestinal uptake, rapid excretion, and low organ accumulation in mice, showing low toxicity and high biocompatibility492,493.
MCNs could enhance the dissolution and bioavailability of PWSDs494, 495, 496. Lu et al.496 modified chitosan and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide copolymer (pHPMA) on the surface of MCNs sequentially to deliver probucol (PB). PB was highly dispersed in MCNs in an amorphous form. The pHPMA polymer facilitated mucus permeation and could be degraded in time. The exposed chitosan mediated epithelial transport of MCNs. The oral bioavailability of PB was 2.76 times increased compared to the commercial formulation. The loading method of MCNs significantly affects drug release. Niu et al.497 loaded fenofibrate into MCNs by incipient wetness impregnation, the solvent and melting methods. In melting methods, the drugs had a certain crystallinity and low dissolution rate due to the high viscosity of the molten drug. In incipient wetness impregnation, amorphous drugs were deposited at the entrance or surface of pores, showing a rapid release. In the solvent method, drugs distributed on the surface and in the mesopores, showing a rapid release followed by a sustained release.
5.3.3. LDHs
LDHs are layered materials consisting of hosts and guests (Fig. 6B). The positively charged host layer consists of divalent or trivalent metal ions and six octahedrally coordinated OH−, balanced by the guest anions and water molecules between the layers498. Because of simple synthesis, high biocompatibility and broad source of raw materials, LDHs have been widely used in drug delivery, regenerative medicine and biological imaging499,500. Furthermore, a single layer or several layers of LDHs provide more binding sites, significantly improving drug loading501,502. The drug loading of LDHs with only 2–3 layers was 7.34 times higher than NPs502.
LDHs have been used to improve the dissolution rate of PWSDs503, 504, 505, 506, 507. Berberine in LDHs showed significantly higher dissolution rates in water, PBS and 0.1 mol/L HCl (P < 0.0001) compared to the pure drug, requiring half the dose to achieve the same hypoglycemic effect508. There are two mechanisms of drug release from LDHs: ion exchange and corrosion509. Ion exchange refers to exchanging anions in the release medium with drug ions. Senapati et al.510 controlled drug release by changing the charge density of interlayer anions. They used the ion exchange method to embed the raloxifene hydrochloride into LDHs with NO3‒, CO32−, and PO43− as guest anions expressed as LN-R, LC-R, and LP-R, respectively. In LP-R, the disordered arrangement of drug molecules and the weak interaction caused rapid drug release. Due to the ordered arrangement of drug molecules and the strong interaction in LN-R and LC-R, drugs showed a biphasic rapid release followed by sustained release. In addition, the drug release rate in LDHs also depended on the buffers511. Corrosion refers to the gradual degradation of LDHs under acidic conditions. Therefore, LDHs have been studied as acid-responsive carriers. MgAl-LDH could neutralize acid to promote ROS clearance of ceria oxide NPs, treating rheumatoid arthritis512. Peng et al.501 loaded azithromycin and indocyanine green into monolayer LDHs. The cumulative release of azithromycin was less than 5%, 9.05% and 21.01% at pH 7.4, 6.5 and 5.0, respectively. The addition of NIR irradiation resulted in a pulsatile burst release.
5.3.4. MNPs
MNPs are nanoscale particles based on metallic elements, including gold, silver, iron oxide, and zinc oxide NPs513. AuNPs are the most commonly used pure MNPs. Due to the surface plasmon resonance effect, AuNPs have great potential for imaging and therapeutic applications514,515. AuNPs have various shapes, such as rods, spheres, nanocapsules, and nanoshells516,517. Gold nanorods with a specific aspect ratio can absorb NIR penetrating through the skin and are used in cancer imaging and photothermal therapy518. The internal space of gold nanocages and nanoshells is more suitable for encapsulating drugs519,520. AuNPs are mostly non-porous structures, and drugs are adsorbed or covalently attached to the surface (Fig. 6C)521,522. The surface of AuNPs can also be functionalized with polymers, antibodies, peptides, etc.523. PVP-coated AuNPs were coupled to CUR via amide bonds, and folic acid was then linked to CUR for active targeting524. PEG-coated AuNPs (PEG-AuNPs) can prolong circulation time and improve the stability. The terminal groups of PEG-AuNPs provide binding sites for the coupling drugs or targeting ligands525. Cisplatin was complexed to PEG-AuNPs with different types of terminal groups (carboxyl, methoxy, biotin). Based on the amide reaction between the terminal carboxyl group of PEG and the amine group of protein, PEG-AuNPs can co-couple targeted antibody and albumin-drug complexes526. Multiple AuNPs have turned to clinical trials527. CYT-6091, a recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-alpha directly coupled to PEG-AuNPs, demonstrated good safety, tolerability, and tumor-targeting properties in phase I clinical trials528. Wang et al.529 loaded the PTX prodrug analog to CYT-6091 to form the novel nanomedicine CYT-21625 for targeted therapy in thyroid cancer.
Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONs) are the most commonly used metal oxide NPs. Due to inherent magnetism and biocompatibility, IONs are often used as contrast and thermotherapeutic agents for magnetic resonance imaging and magnetothermal therapy (Fig. 6D)530,531. Drugs can be directly coupled with IONs through covalent bonds or encapsulated in surface polymer coatings through weak electrostatic interaction532,533. IBU covalently bound to glycerol phosphate-functionalized IONs through amide bonds534. Yao et al.535 encapsulated simvastatin in a zwitterionic polymer coating of ferroferric oxide NPs to treat triple-negative breast cancer. In addition, IONs can combine imaging and drug delivery to achieve diagnostic and treatment. Reichel et al.536 coupled the hepthamethine cyanine to Ferumoxytol®, which was used for imaging and targeting gliomas. PTX and cisplatin were encapsulated in the polymer coating. After NIR irradiation, the fluorescence of the tumor lasted for 168 h, providing enough time for surgical resection. The targeted delivery of PTX and cisplatin significantly inhibited the growth of postoperative gliomas and improved the survival rate. IONs are mainly used as a diagnostic agent in the clinic. Ferumoxytol® is the only therapeutic agent approved for iron deficiency anemia537. IONs, as drug delivery carriers, have no products on the market, and related clinical trials have been terminated because of no significant curative effect538.
6. Conclusions
We offer a comprehensive review of solubilization techniques, including the solubilization mechanism, limitations, and advantages (Table 9). With the application of combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening, the number of PWSDs has increased dramatically. Low solubility remains a significant challenge for drug development. Conventional solubilization techniques have limitations, such as adverse reactions caused by long-term use, requirements on drug structure, and difficulty in achieving precise drug delivery. With the development of novel DDSs, modifying poorly soluble drugs or packaging drugs in carriers are currently promising development directions.
Table 9.
Solubilization techniques used to enhance the bioavailability of PWSDs.
| Solubilization technique | Solubilization mechanism | Limitation | Advantage | Drug type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystallization strategy | Nanocrystals | Improving the dissolution rate |
In vivo fate of nasal, pulmonary, ocular, and transdermal administration Controlling particle size and crystal morphology |
High drug-loading Easy industrial production High safety Multiple absorption mechanisms |
All PWSDs |
| Cocrystals | Reducing lattice strength Improving the dissolution rate |
Strict requirements for drug structure Time-consuming |
Synergetic therapy Approved by 505 (b) (2) pathway |
Drug molecules with hydrogen bond donors or acceptors | |
| Ionic liquids | The interaction between drug molecules and ionic liquids | Mechanisms at the molecular level Long-term toxicity Lack of regulatory scenario |
High adjustability Eliminate solid-state drug polymorphism Synergetic therapy Transdermal delivery |
All PWSDs | |
| Drug delivery systems | Polymer-based carriers | Encapsulation of PWSDs in carriers | Potential toxicity of carrier materials Unclear PK and mechanism of nanocarriers Difficulties in industrial production |
Prolonging circulation time Stimulus-responsive release Active targeted delivery Drug co-delivery Combination of diagnosis and therapy |
All PWSDs |
| Lipid-based carriers | Lipophilic drug | ||||
| Inorganic carriers | All PWSDs | ||||
Nanocrystals can deliver PWSDs via multiple routes. Compared with DDSs, the high drug loading of nanocrystals allows for increased drug content at the target site539. Compared with spherical NPs, rod-shaped nanocrystals are quickly deposited in pulmonary vessels, reducing phagocytosis and avoiding lysosomal destruction for intracellular delivery. Rod-shaped nanocrystals adsorb proteins or RNA through electrostatic action to obtain a co-delivery platform for synergistic treatment540, 541, 542. Therefore, the co-delivery platform has excellent potential for synergistic treatment of pulmonary diseases543,544. In addition, novel bioimaging techniques can elucidate nanocrystals' fate for nasal, pulmonary, ocular, and transdermal administration, further advancing nanosuspension development and launch545.
ILs are simple to synthesize, with highly tunable physicochemical properties and biological activities. ILs represent a novel strategy to improve solubility, permeability, polymorphism and bioavailability. However, there are still barriers in the application. The biodegradability and toxicity need to be investigated systematically. Then, the mechanism of ILs at the molecular level should be further explored to design ILs that meet specific delivery needs. Finally, the FDA has not provided clear definitions and regulatory requirements for ILs and API-ILs, which may hinder product approval.
The surface functionalization and various materials endow DDSs with the ability to cross the BBB, targeted delivery, and stimulus-responsive release546. DDSs can co-deliver drugs or diagnostic agents, realizing disease diagnosis and synergistic treatment. Many articles and patents about nanocarriers exist, but only several related preparations have been approved547. Among the nanoparticle-based nanomedicines in clinical trials, the success rate of phase III clinical trials is only 14%548. The potential toxicity of carrier materials, unclear PK and mechanism of nanocarriers, and difficulties in industrial production limit the marketability of nanoformulations549, 550, 551. In addition, quality standards for nanoformulations should be clarified to ensure safety and efficacy552.
It is expected that the most appropriate solubilization technique can be directly selected based on the drug's physicochemical properties and clinical needs. For BCS II drugs, dissolution is critical to the absorption. Therefore, micronization, crystallization strategy, and SDs can improve oral bioavailability by increasing dissolution rate. For BCS IV drugs, intestinal permeability should also be enhanced. Otherwise, supersaturated insoluble drugs always precipitate in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to poor drug absorption. The better option for improving the bioavailability of BCS IV drugs is to modify the chemical structure to form soluble prodrugs and salts. However, the methods are limited to BCS IV drugs that are ionizable or easily chemically modified. Nanocrystals are preferably absorbed in the intact state of the gastrointestinal tract553. Due to the adjustable physicochemical properties (particle size, charge, surface modification, and shape), nanocarriers can enhance oral absorption by opening tight junctions, penetrating mucus layers, enhancing epithelial permeability, or targeting lymphatic transport. Notably, drugs with high lipophilicity (log P > 5) and high long-chain triglyceride solubility (>50 mg/g) are more easily transported via lymphatic transport, which are more suitable for making SEDDSs. Prodrug nanocrystals injected intramuscularly show long-lasting release and are suitable for diseases that require long-term management. ILs enhance drug skin penetration and are indicated for treating psoriasis or skin infections. SLNs and NLCs cross the BBB, and their nasal delivery is used to treat brain diseases such as glioblastoma and Alzheimer's disease.
Machine learning can predict the characteristics of new prescriptions based on existing data. Therefore, integrating machine learning into drug formulation development helps reduce development time and costs. Recently, machine learning has been used to predict the effect of excipients on drug solubility, formulation stability, and drug release rates554,555. However, researchers still need to make significant efforts to obtain enough data for accurate predictions in the future. We believe that the clinical application of PWSDs will have excellent prospects.
Author contributions
Bing Xie: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Yaping Liu: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Xiaotong Li: Writing – review & editing. Pei Yang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Wei He: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82073782 and 82241002).
Footnotes
Peer review under the responsibility of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Contributor Information
Pei Yang, Email: pharmyp@163.com.
Wei He, Email: weihe@cpu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Loftsson T., Brewster M.E. Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins: basic science and product development. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;62:1607–1621. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sun D., Gao W., Hu H.X., Zhou S. Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:3049–3062. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Williams H.D., Trevaskis N.L., Charman S.A., Shanker R.M., Charman W.N., Pouton C.W., et al. Strategies to address low drug solubility in discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65:315–499. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.005660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kalhapure R.S., Palekar S., Patel K., Monpara J. Nanocrystals for controlled delivery: state of the art and approved drug products. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:1303–1316. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2110579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang W.Z., Wu X.Y., Qi J., Zhu Q.G., Wu W., Lu Y., et al. Ionic liquids: green and tailor-made solvents in drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25:901–908. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang X.Y., Li C., Wang Y.G., Chen H.B., Zhang X.X., Luo C., et al. Smart drug delivery systems for precise cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:4098–4121. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Göke K., Lorenz T., Repanas A., Schneider F., Steiner D., Baumann K., et al. Novel strategies for the formulation and processing of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;126:40–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng Y.Y., Jiao X.Y., Fan W.P., Yang Z., Wen Y.Q., Chen X.Y. Controllable synthesis of versatile mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles as precision cancer theranostics. Biomaterials. 2020;256 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang X.W., Centurion F., Misra A., Patel S., Gu Z. Molecularly targeted nanomedicine enabled by inorganic nanoparticles for atherosclerosis diagnosis and treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;194 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khizar S., Alrushaid N., Alam Khan F., Zine N., Jaffrezic Renault N., Errachid A., et al. Nanocarriers based novel and effective drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2023;632 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De R., Mahata M.K., Kim K.T. Structure-based varieties of polymeric nanocarriers and influences of their physicochemical properties on drug delivery profiles. Adv Sci. 2022;9 doi: 10.1002/advs.202105373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dutta B., Barick K.C., Hassan P.A. Recent advances in active targeting of nanomaterials for anticancer drug delivery. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;296 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang Y.Q., Wang Y.Y., Li X., Nie D., Liu C., Gan Y. Ligand-modified nanocarriers for oral drug delivery: challenges, rational design, and applications. J Control Release. 2022;352:813–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen X., Lei S., Lin J., Huang P. Stimuli-responsive image-guided nanocarriers as smart drug delivery platforms. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:1487–1504. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2134853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ding H.T., Tan P., Fu S.Q., Tian X.H., Zhang H., Ma X.L., et al. Preparation and application of pH-responsive drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2022;348:206–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tran P., Pyo Y.C., Kim D.H., Lee S.E., Kim J.K., Park J.S. Overview of the manufacturing methods of solid dispersion technology for improving the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs and application to anticancer drugs. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:132. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11030132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rocha B., de Morais L.A., Viana M.C., Carneiro G. Promising strategies for improving oral bioavailability of poor water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2023;18:615–627. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2023.2211801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Da Silva F.L.O., Marques M.B.F., Kato K.C., Carneiro G. Nanonization techniques to overcome poor water-solubility with drugs. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2020;15:853–864. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1750591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sathisaran I., Dalvi S.V. Engineering cocrystals of poorlywater-soluble drugs to enhance dissolution in aqueous medium. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:108. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park H., Ha E.S., Kim M.S. Current status of supersaturable self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:365. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maleki A., Kettiger H., Schoubben A., Rosenholm J.M., Ambrogi V., Hamidi M. Mesoporous silica materials: from physico-chemical properties to enhanced dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Control Release. 2017;262:329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boucetta H., Zhang L., Sosnik A., He W. Pulmonary arterial hypertension nanotherapeutics: new pharmacological targets and drug delivery strategies. J Control Release. 2024;365:236–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang C., Yang Y., Cui X.H., Ding S.W., Chen Z. Three different types of solubilization of thymol in Tween 80: micelles, solutions, and emulsions- a mechanism study of micellar solubilization. J Mol Liq. 2020;306 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jin G., Ngo H.V., Wang J., Cui J.H., Cao Q.R., Park C., et al. Electrostatic molecular effect of differently charged surfactants on the solubilization capacity and physicochemical properties of salt-caged nanosuspensions containing pH-dependent and poorly water-soluble rebamipide. Int J Pharm. 2022;619 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goryo S., Iwata K. Photoionization of 3-methylindole embedded in sodium dodecyl sulfate and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride micelles: migration of electrons generated in micelle cores and their solvation in outside water. J Phys Chem Lett. 2023;14:1479–1484. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Farkaš Agatić Z., Popović K., Kumar D., Škorić D., Poša M. Regular solution theory regarding sodium cholate and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide or dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide binary mixed micelles. J Mol Liq. 2023;379 [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hossain M.A.A., Islam T., Joy M.T.R., Kowser Z., Ahmed M.Z., Rehman M.T., et al. Interaction between gastric enzyme pepsin and tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide in presence of sodium electrolytes: exploration of micellization behavior. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wentworth C.M., Myers R.L., Cremer P.S., Zarzar L.D. Investigating oil solubilization into nonionic micelles by Raman multivariate curve resolution. Aggregate. 2023;4:e385. [Google Scholar]
- 29.D'Elia A., Deering J., Clifford A., Lee B.E.J., Grandfield K., Zhitomirsky I. Electrophoretic deposition of polymethylmethacrylate and composites for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;188 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tiwari S., Ma J., Rathod S., Bahadur P. Solubilization of quercetin in P123 micelles: scattering and NMR studies. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2021;621 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khayyal M.T., El Hazek R.M., El Sabbagh W.A., Frank J., Behnam D., Abdel Tawab M. Micellar solubilization enhances the anti-inflammatory effect of xanthohumol. Phytomedicine. 2020;71 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saraf A., Sharma S., Sachar S. Evaluation of surfactants as solubilizing medium for levofloxacin. J Mol Liq. 2020;319 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Soe H.M.S.H., Kerdpol K., Rungrotmongkol T., Pruksakorn P., Autthateinchai R., Wet osot S., et al. Voriconazole eye drops: enhanced solubility and stability through ternary voriconazole/sulfobutyl ether β-cyclodextrin/polyvinyl alcohol complexes. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2343. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lamprecht A., Ubrich N., Yamamoto H., Schäfer U., Takeuchi H., Lehr C.M., et al. Design of rolipram-loaded nanoparticles: comparison of two preparation methods. J Control Release. 2001;71:297–306. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun Y., Zou M.T., Li C.Y., Li X., Mao T.R., Zheng C. The solubilization of naphthalene using tea saponin as a biosurfactant: effect of temperature. J Mol Liq. 2021;335 [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shalel S., Streichman S., Marmur A. The mechanism of hemolysis by surfactants: effect of solution composition. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;252:66–76. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Manaargadoo Catin M., Ali Cherif A., Pougnas J.L., Perrin C. Hemolysis by surfactants — a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;228:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2015.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shen Y.C., Xiao Y.T., Edkins R.M., Youngs T.G.A., Hughes T.L., Tellam J., et al. Elucidating the hydrotropism behaviour of aqueous caffeine and sodium benzoate solution through NMR and neutron total scattering analysis. Int J Pharm. 2023;647 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pawar B.M., Goswami A., Ruhina Rahman S.N., Sree A., Shunmugaperumal T. On the use of linear model-based optimization to obtain optimum solubility permeability balance (OSPB) in cinnarizine-hydrotropic blends. J Mol Liq. 2023;381 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kunz W., Holmberg K., Zemb T. Hydrotropes. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;22:99–107. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brautbar N., Williams J. Industrial solvents and liver toxicity: risk assessment, risk factors and mechanisms. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002;205:479–491. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Das S., Paul S. Hydrotropic action of cationic hydrotrope p-toluidinium chloride on the solubility of sparingly soluble gliclazide drug molecule: a computational study. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:1461–1473. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rub M.A., Hasan T., Akter R., Kumar D., Kabir ud Din, Asiri A.M., et al. Physico-chemical investigation of the assembly and clouding development nature of the mixture of metformin hydrochloride and ionic/nonionic surfactants: influences of hydrotropes. J Mol Liq. 2023;371 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cui Y. Parallel stacking of caffeine with riboflavin in aqueous solutions: the potential mechanism for hydrotropic solubilization of riboflavin. Int J Pharm. 2010;397:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rahman Z., Siddiqui A., Khan M.A. Assessing the impact of nimodipine devitrification in the ternary cosolvent system through quality by design approach. Int J Pharm. 2013;455:113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miyako Y., Khalef N., Matsuzaki K., Pinal R. Solubility enhancement of hydrophobic compounds by cosolvents: role of solute hydrophobicity on the solubilization effect. Int J Pharm. 2010;393:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thapa R.K., Cazzador F., Grønlien K.G., Tønnesen H.H. Effect of curcumin and cosolvents on the micellization of Pluronic F127 in aqueous solution. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;195 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Md Moshikur R., Shimul I.M., Uddin S., Wakabayashi R., Moniruzzaman M., Goto M. Transformation of hydrophilic drug into oil-miscible ionic liquids for transdermal drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:55332–55341. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c15636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cárdenas Torres R.E., Ortiz C.P., Acree W.E., Jouyban A., Martínez F., Delgado D.R. Thermodynamic study and preferential solvation of sulfamerazine in acetonitrile+methanol cosolvent mixtures at different temperatures. J Mol Liq. 2022;349 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chokshi A., Vaishya R., Inavolu R., Potta T. Intranasal spray formulation containing rizatriptan benzoate for the treatment of migraine. Int J Pharm. 2019;571 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Manconi M., Caddeo C., Nacher A., Diez Sales O., Peris J.E., Ferrer E.E., et al. Eco-scalable baicalin loaded vesicles developed by combining phospholipid with ethanol, glycerol, and propylene glycol to enhance skin permeation and protection. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;184 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li Z.X., MuL H., Weng Larsen S., Jensen H., Østergaard J. An in vitro gel-based system for characterizing and predicting the long-term performance of PLGA in situ forming implants. Int J Pharm. 2021;609 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.do Nascimento E.G., de Azevedo E.P., Alves Silva M.F., Aragão C.F.S., Fernandes Pedrosa M.F., da Silva Junior A.A. Supramolecular aggregates of cyclodextrins with co-solvent modulate drug dispersion and release behavior of poorly soluble corticosteroid from chitosan membranes. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;248 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Millard J.W., Alvarez Núñez F.A., Yalkowsky S.H. Solubilization by cosolvents: establishing useful constants for the log–linear model. Int J Pharm. 2002;245:153–166. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00334-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.He M.Q., Zheng W.W., Wang N.N., Gao H.L., Ouyang D.F., Huang Z.N. Molecular dynamics simulation of drug solubilization behavior in surfactant and cosolvent injections. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2366. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kfoury M., Geagea C., Ruellan S., Greige Gerges H., Fourmentin S. Effect of cyclodextrin and cosolvent on the solubility and antioxidant activity of caffeic acid. Food Chem. 2019;278:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sanches B.M.A., Ferreira E.I. Is prodrug design an approach to increase water solubility?. Int J Pharm. 2019;568 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rautio J., Meanwell N.A., Di L., Hageman M.J. The expanding role of prodrugs in contemporary drug design and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:559–587. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Walther R., Rautio J., Zelikin A.N. Prodrugs in medicinal chemistry and enzyme prodrug therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;118:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Markham A. Fostemsavir: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:1485–1490. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01386-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chien S.T., Suydam I.T., Woodrow K.A. Prodrug approaches for the development of a long-acting drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;198 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Braatz D., Cherri M., Tully M., Dimde M., Ma G., Mohammadifar E., et al. Chemical approaches to synthetic drug delivery systems for systemic applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022;61 doi: 10.1002/anie.202203942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang Z.R., Chen J.W., Little N., Lu J.Q. Self-assembling prodrug nanotherapeutics for synergistic tumor targeted drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2020;111:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Li G.T., Sun B.J., Li Y.Q., Luo C., He Z.G., Sun J. Small-molecule prodrug nanoassemblies: an emerging nanoplatform for anticancer drug delivery. Small. 2021;17 doi: 10.1002/smll.202101460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang H., Monroe M.Y., Leslie F., Flexner C., Cui H.G. Supramolecular nanomedicines through rational design of self-assembling prodrugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2022;43:510–521. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2022.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhao R.Z., Ning X.Y., Wang M.Q., Wang H.H., Xing G., Wang L., et al. A ROS-responsive simvastatin nano-prodrug and its fibronectin-targeted co-delivery system for atherosclerosis treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:25080–25092. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c02354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Luo L., Qi Y.M., Zhong H., Jiang S.N., Zhang H., Cai H., et al. GSH-sensitive polymeric prodrug: synthesis and loading with photosensitizers as nanoscale chemo-photodynamic anti-cancer nanomedicine. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:424–436. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bharate S.S. Modulation of biopharmaceutical properties of acidic drugs using cationic counterions: a critical analysis of FDA-approved pharmaceutical salts. Int J Pharm. 2021;607 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bharate S.S. Recent developments in pharmaceutical salts: FDA approvals from 2015 to 2019. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26:384–398. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cerreia Vioglio P., Chierotti M.R., Gobetto R. Pharmaceutical aspects of salt and cocrystal forms of APIs and characterization challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;117:86–110. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ma J., Wang Y.T., Yang X.Q., Wang B.H. Fast track to acetate-based ionic liquids: preparation, properties and application in energy and petrochemical fields. Top Curr Chem (Cham) 2021;379:2. doi: 10.1007/s41061-020-00315-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Devarapalli R., Indukuri A., Bollineni M., Mondal A., Reddy C.M., Chennuru R. Investigation of poor solubility of a salt-cocrystal hydrate: a case study of the common-ion effect in betrixaban, an anticoagulant drug. Mol Pharm. 2021;18:1138–1149. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Brewster M.E., Loftsson T. Cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical solubilizers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:645–666. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tian B.R., Liu Y.M., Liu J.Y. Cyclodextrin as a magic switch in covalent and non-covalent anticancer drug release systems. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;242 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sarabia Vallejo Á., Caja M.d.M., Olives A.I., Martín M.A., Menéndez J.C. Cyclodextrin inclusion complexes for improved drug bioavailability and activity: synthetic and analytical aspects. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2345. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cid Samamed A., Rakmai J., Mejuto J.C., Simal Gandara J., Astray G. Cyclodextrins inclusion complex: preparation methods, analytical techniques and food industry applications. Food Chem. 2022;384 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Constantin M., Cosman B., Ascenzi P., Simionescu B.C., Fundueanu G. New chromatographic insights on drug: cyclodextrin inclusion complexes and their potential use in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:1696–1709. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2147159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Siva S., Li C.Z., Cui H.Y., Meenatchi V., Lin L. Encapsulation of essential oil components with methyl-β-cyclodextrin using ultrasonication: solubility, characterization, DPPH and antibacterial assay. Ultrason Sonochem. 2020;64 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.104997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ishitsuka Y., Irie T., Matsuo M. Cyclodextrins applied to the treatment of lysosomal storage disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;191 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pardeshi C.V., Kothawade R.V., Markad A.R., Pardeshi S.R., Kulkarni A.D., Chaudhari P.J., et al. Sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin: a functional biopolymer for drug delivery applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;301 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stella V.J., Rajewski R.A. Sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin. Int J Pharm. 2020;583 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Scott L.J. Brexanolone: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79:779–783. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01121-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Seidi F., Jin Y.C., Xiao H.N. Polycyclodextrins: synthesis, functionalization, and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;242 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Topuz F., Uyar T. Advances in the development of cyclodextrin-based nanogels/microgels for biomedical applications: drug delivery and beyond. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;297 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Norouzi Z., Abdouss M. Electrospun nanofibers using β-cyclodextrin grafted chitosan macromolecules loaded with indomethacin as an innovative drug delivery system. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;233 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tang X.C., Wen Y.T., Zhang Z.X., Zhu J.L., Song X., Li J. Rationally designed multifunctional nanoparticles as GSH-responsive anticancer drug delivery systems based on host-guest polymers derived from dextran and β-cyclodextrin. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;320 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bai Y., Liu C.P., Chen D., Liu C.F., Zhuo L.H., Li H., et al. β-Cyclodextrin-modified hyaluronic acid-based supramolecular self-assemblies for pH- and esterase- dual-responsive drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;246 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Li X.B., Liu J.D., Qiu N. Cyclodextrin-based polymeric drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15:1400. doi: 10.3390/polym15061400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kali G., Haddadzadegan S., Bernkop Schnürch A. Cyclodextrins and derivatives in drug delivery: new developments, relevant clinical trials, and advanced products. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;324 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Huang Y.B., Dai W.G. Fundamental aspects of solid dispersion technology for poorly soluble drugs. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2014;4:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang Y., Xu S.Y., Xiao Z.Y., Jiang Y.X., Jiang Q., Li J., et al. Stiripentol enteric solid dispersion-loaded effervescent tablets: enhanced dissolution, stability, and absorption. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022;23:141. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kaushik R., Budhwar V., Kaushik D. An overview on recent patents and technologies on solid dispersion. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2020;14:63–74. doi: 10.2174/1872211314666200117094406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kim J.S., Choi Y.J., Woo M.R., Cheon S., Ji S.H., Im D., et al. New potential application of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system and solid dispersion. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;271 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Naser Y.A., Tekko I.A., Vora L.K., Peng K., Anjani Q.K., Greer B., et al. Hydrogel-forming microarray patches with solid dispersion reservoirs for transdermal long-acting microdepot delivery of a hydrophobic drug. J Control Release. 2023;356:416–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wang S.M., Xie Y.X., Su H.H., Luo Y.R., Wang M.T., Li T., et al. Delivery of curcumin in a carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose carrier: physicochemical properties and biological activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;239 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Pandi P., Bulusu R., Kommineni N., Khan W., Singh M. Amorphous solid dispersions: an update for preparation, characterization, mechanism on bioavailability, stability, regulatory considerations and marketed products. Int J Pharm. 2020;586 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Van Duong T., Van den Mooter G. The role of the carrier in the formulation of pharmaceutical solid dispersions. Part II: amorphous carriers. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13:1681–1694. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1198769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Chavan R.B., Rathi S., Jyothi V.G.S.S., Shastri N.R. Cellulose based polymers in development of amorphous solid dispersions. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2019;14:248–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Van Duong T., Van den Mooter G. The role of the carrier in the formulation of pharmaceutical solid dispersions. Part I: crystalline and semi-crystalline carriers. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13:1583–1594. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1198768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Vasconcelos T., Prezotti F., Araújo F., Lopes C., Loureiro A., Marques S., et al. Third-generation solid dispersion combining Soluplus and poloxamer 407 enhances the oral bioavailability of resveratrol. Int J Pharm. 2021;595 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Lee J., Lee J.J., Lee S., Dinh L., Oh H., Abuzar S.M., et al. Preparation of apixaban solid dispersion for the enhancement of apixaban solubility and permeability. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:907. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Łyszczarz E., Hofmanová J., Szafraniec Szczęsny J., Jachowicz R. Orodispersible films containing ball milled aripiprazole-poloxamer®407 solid dispersions. Int J Pharm. 2020;575 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schittny A., Philipp Bauer S., Detampel P., Huwyler J., Puchkov M. Mechanistic insights into effect of surfactants on oral bioavailability of amorphous solid dispersions. J Control Release. 2020;320:214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hiew T.N., Zemlyanov D.Y., Taylor L.S. Balancing solid-state stability and dissolution performance of lumefantrine amorphous solid dispersions: the role of polymer choice and drug–polymer interactions. Mol Pharm. 2022;19:392–413. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Suzuki K., Kawakami K., Fukiage M., Oikawa M., Nishida Y., Matsuda M., et al. Relevance of liquid–liquid phase separation of supersaturated solution in oral absorption of albendazole from amorphous solid dispersions. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:220. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Patel N.G., Banella S., Serajuddin A.T.M. Moisture sorption by polymeric excipients commonly used in amorphous solid dispersions and its effect on glass transition temperature: III. Methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate and related copolymers (Eudragit®) Int J Pharm. 2023;636 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dharani S., Mohamed E.M., Khuroo T., Rahman Z., Khan M.A. Formulation characterization and pharmacokinetic evaluation of amorphous solid dispersions of dasatinib. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2450. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Zhao L., Orlu M., Williams G.R. Electrospun fixed dose combination fibers for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Int J Pharm. 2021;599 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Deshmukh S., Paradkar A., Abrahmsén Alami S., Govender R., Viridén A., Winge F., et al. Injection moulded controlled release amorphous solid dispersions: synchronized drug and polymer release for robust performance. Int J Pharm. 2020;575 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bhujbal S.V., Mitra B., Jain U., Gong Y., Agrawal A., Karki S., et al. Pharmaceutical amorphous solid dispersion: a review of manufacturing strategies. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:2505–2536. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhang J., Guo M.S., Luo M.Q., Cai T. Advances in the development of amorphous solid dispersions: the role of polymeric carriers. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2023;18 doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Kankala R.K., Xu P.Y., Chen B.Q., Wang S.B., Chen A.Z. Supercritical fluid (SCF)-assisted fabrication of carrier-free drugs: an eco-friendly welcome to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;176 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Csicsák D., Szolláth R., Kádár S., Ambrus R., Bartos C., Balogh E., et al. The effect of the particle size reduction on the biorelevant solubility and dissolution of poorly soluble drugs with different acid-base character. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:278. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.de Oliveira P.V., Sanaiotto O., Kuhn K.Z., Oltramari A., Bortoluzzi A.J., Lanza M., et al. Micronization of naringenin in supercritical fluid medium: in vitro and in vivo assays. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023;82 [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sodeifian G., Sajadian S.A., Derakhsheshpour R. CO2 utilization as a supercritical solvent and supercritical antisolvent in production of sertraline hydrochloride nanoparticles. J CO2 Util. 2022;55 [Google Scholar]
- 116.McGuckin M.B., Wang J.W., Ghanma R., Qin N.Y., Palma S.D., Donnelly R.F., et al. Nanocrystals as a master key to deliver hydrophobic drugs via multiple administration routes. J Control Release. 2022;345:334–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Cheshmehnoor P., Rabbani S., Haeri A. Quercetin nanocrystals prepared by a novel technique improve the dissolution rate and antifibrotic activity of quercetin. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2023;18:89–107. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2022-0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Fontana F., Figueiredo P., Zhang P., Hirvonen J.T., Liu D.F., Santos H.A. Production of pure drug nanocrystals and nano co-crystals by confinement methods. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;131:3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Yue P.F., Zhou W.C., Huang G.T., Lei F.F., Chen Y.C., Ma Z.L., et al. Nanocrystals based pulmonary inhalation delivery system: advance and challenge. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:637–651. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2039809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.He Y., Ye Z.Y.F., Liu X.Y., Wei Z.G., Qiu F., Li H.F., et al. Can machine learning predict drug nanocrystals?. J Control Release. 2020;322:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Tian Z.H., Mai Y.P., Meng T.T., Ma S.J., Gou G.J., Yang J.H. Nanocrystals for improving oral bioavailability of drugs: intestinal transport mechanisms and influencing factors. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22:179. doi: 10.1208/s12249-021-02041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Meola T.R., Dening T.J., Prestidge C.A. Nanocrystal-silica-lipid hybrid particles for the improved oral delivery of ziprasidone in vitro. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;129:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ma M.C., Zhang G.S., Li W., Li M., Fu Q., He Z.G. A carbohydrate polymer is a critical variable in the formulation of drug nanocrystals: a case study of idebenone. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2019;16:1403–1411. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2019.1682546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Qin M.D., Xin J.H., Han W., Li M., Sui X.F., Dong H.M., et al. Stabilizer-induced different in vivo behaviors for intramuscularly long-acting celecoxib nanocrystals. Int J Pharm. 2022;628 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zhang G.S., Guan H.S., Li J.F., Li M., Sui X.F., Tian B.C., et al. Roles of effective stabilizers in improving oral bioavailability of naringenin nanocrystals: maintenance of supersaturation generated upon dissolution by inhibition of drug dimerization. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17:741–750. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Teng C., Li B.B., Lin C.S., Xing X.Y., Huang F.F., Yang Y., et al. Targeted delivery of baicalein-p53 complex to smooth muscle cells reverses pulmonary hypertension. J Control Release. 2022;341:591–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Magar K.T., Boafo G.F., Zoulikha M., Jiang X.H., Li X.T., Xiao Q.Q., et al. Metal phenolic network-stabilized nanocrystals of andrographolide to alleviate macrophage-mediated inflammation in-vitro. Chin Chem Lett. 2023;34 [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lv Y.J., Wu W., Corpstein C.D., Li T.L., Lu Y. Biological and intracellular fates of drug nanocrystals through different delivery routes: recent development enabled by bioimaging and PK modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;188 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Wang T., Qi J.P., Ding N., Dong X.C., Zhao W.L., Lu Y., et al. Tracking translocation of self-discriminating curcumin hybrid nanocrystals following intravenous delivery. Int J Pharm. 2018;546:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Luo Z.M., Lu L.W., Xu W.X., Meng N.N., Wu S.Y., Zhou J.F., et al. In vivo self-assembled drug nanocrystals for metastatic breast cancer all-stage targeted therapy. J Control Release. 2022;346:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Tao Y., Lan Xm, Zhang Y., Fu C.X., Liu L., Cao F., et al. Biomimetic nanomedicines for precise atherosclerosis theranostics. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4442–4460. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Mei D., Gong L.D., Zou Y.R., Yang D., Liu H.B., Liang Y.G., et al. Platelet membrane-cloaked paclitaxel-nanocrystals augment postoperative chemotherapeutical efficacy. J Control Release. 2020;324:341–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Chai Z.L., Ran D.N., Lu L.W., Zhan C.Y., Ruan H.T., Hu X.F., et al. Ligand-modified cell membrane enables the targeted delivery of drug nanocrystals to glioma. ACS Nano. 2019;13:5591–5601. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Li S., Wang Z.M., Yu J., Zhang C., Ye J.Y., Liu H.Z., et al. Intramuscularly injected long-acting testosterone-cholesterol prodrug suspension with three different particle sizes: extended in vitro release and enhanced in vivo safety. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;14:1093–1105. doi: 10.1007/s13346-023-01460-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Qin M.D., Ye G.Y., Xin J.H., Li M., Sui X.F., Sun Y.C., et al. Comparison of in vivo behaviors of intramuscularly long-acting celecoxib nanosuspensions with different particle sizes for the postoperative pain treatment. Int J Pharm. 2023;636 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Correll C.U., Kim E., Sliwa J.K., Hamm W., Gopal S., Mathews M., et al. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of long-acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia: an overview. CNS Drugs. 2021;35:39–59. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00779-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Taki E., Soleimani F., Asadi A., Ghahramanpour H., Namvar A., Heidary M. Cabotegravir/rilpivirine: the last FDA-approved drug to treat HIV. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022;20:1135–1147. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2081153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Deodhar S., Sillman B., Bade A.N., Avedissian S.N., Podany A.T., McMillan J.M., et al. Transformation of dolutegravir into an ultra-long-acting parenteral prodrug formulation. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3226. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30902-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kulkarni T.A., Bade A.N., Sillman B., Shetty B.L.D., Wojtkiewicz M.S., Gautam N., et al. A year-long extended release nanoformulated cabotegravir prodrug. Nat Mater. 2020;19:910–920. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0674-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Nguyen V.T.T., Darville N., Vermeulen A. Pharmacokinetics of long-acting aqueous nano-/microsuspensions after intramuscular administration in different animal species and humans—a review. AAPS J. 2022;25:4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00771-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Ho M.J., Jeong M.Y., Jeong H.T., Kim M.S., Park H.J., Kim D.Y., et al. Effect of particle size on in vivo performances of long-acting injectable drug suspension. J Control Release. 2022;341:533–547. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Wang L.L., Du J., Zhou Y.Q., Wang Y.C. Safety of nanosuspensions in drug delivery. Nanomedicine. 2017;13:455–469. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Salem A., Khanfar E., Nagy S., Széchenyi A. Cocrystals of tuberculosis antibiotics: challenges and missed opportunities. Int J Pharm. 2022;623 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Guo M.S., Sun X.J., Chen J.H., Cai T. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: a review of preparations, physicochemical properties and applications. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:2537–2564. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Bolla G., Sarma B., Nangia A.K. Crystal engineering of pharmaceutical cocrystals in the discovery and development of improved drugs. Chem Rev. 2022;122:11514–11603. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Abramov Y.A., Sun G.X., Zeng Q. Emerging landscape of computational modeling in pharmaceutical development. J Chem Inf Model. 2022;62:1160–1171. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Devogelaer J.J., Meekes H., Tinnemans P., Vlieg E., de Gelder R. Co-crystal prediction by artificial neural networks. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59:21711–21718. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Burke W.J. Escitalopram. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:1477–1486. doi: 10.1517/13543784.11.10.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Shirley M., Perry C.M. Aripiprazole (ABILIFY MAINTENA®): a review of its use as maintenance treatment for adult patients with schizophrenia. Drugs. 2014;74:1097–1110. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Poole R.M., Dungo R.T. Ipragliflozin: first global approval. Drugs. 2014;74:611–617. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Eadie A.L., Brunt K.R., Herder M. Exploring the food and drug administration's review and approval of entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9 doi: 10.1002/prp2.794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Burness C.B. Sonidegib: first global approval. Drugs. 2015;75:1559–1566. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0458-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Markham A. Ertugliflozin: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78:513–519. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0878-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Al-Salama Z.T. Siponimod: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79:1009–1015. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01140-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Almansa C., Mercè R., Tesson N., Farran J., Tomàs J., Plata-Salamán C.R. Co-crystal of tramadol hydrochloride–celecoxib (ctc): a novel API–API co-crystal for the treatment of pain. Cryst Growth Des. 2017;17:1884–1892. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Yu H.M., Zhang L., Liu M.J., Yang D.Z., He G.R., Zhang B.X., et al. Enhancing solubility and dissolution rate of antifungal drug ketoconazole through crystal engineering. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023;16:1349. doi: 10.3390/ph16101349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Drozd K.V., Manin A.N., Boycov D.E., Perlovich G.L. Simultaneous improvement of dissolution behavior and oral bioavailability of antifungal miconazole via cocrystal and salt formation. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1107. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Ren S.Z., Liu M.Y., Hong C., Li G.W., Sun J.B., Wang J.Y., et al. The effects of pH, surfactant, ion concentration, coformer, and molecular arrangement on the solubility behavior of myricetin cocrystals. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Meng Y.Y., Tan F.Y., Yao J.X., Cui Y.N., Feng Y.M., Li Z.P., et al. Preparation, characterization, and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban cocrystals with enhanced in vitro and in vivo properties in beagle dogs. Int J Pharm X. 2022;4 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2022.100119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Duan C.X., Liu W.W., Tao Y.W., Liang F.F., Chen Y.M., Xiao X.Y., et al. Two novel palbociclib-resorcinol and palbociclib-orcinol cocrystals with enhanced solubility and dissolution rate. Pharmaceutics. 2021;14:23. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Panzade P.S., Shendarkar G.R. Pharmaceutical cocrystal: a game changing approach for the administration of old drugs in new crystalline form. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020;46:1559–1568. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2020.1810270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Zhang Y.X., Du X.X., Wang H.X., He Z.G., Liu H.Z. Sacubitril-valsartan cocrystal revisited: role of polymer excipients in the formulation. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18:515–526. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1860940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Omori M., Watanabe T., Uekusa T., Oki J., Inoue D., Sugano K. Effects of coformer and polymer on particle surface solution-mediated phase transformation of cocrystals in aqueous media. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:3825–3836. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Banerjee M., Nimkar K., Naik S., Patravale V. Unlocking the potential of drug‒drug cocrystals—a comprehensive review. J Control Release. 2022;348:456–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Langford R., Pogatzki Zahn E.M., Morte A., Sust M., Cebrecos J., Vaqué A., et al. Co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib versus tramadol or placebo for acute moderate-to-severe pain after oral surgery: randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (STARDOM1) Adv Ther. 2024;41:1025–1045. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02744-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Wang X.J., Du S.Z., Zhang R., Jia X.D., Yang T., Zhang X.J. Drug-drug cocrystals: opportunities and challenges. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2021;16:307–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Gascon N., Almansa C., Merlos M., Miguel Vela J., Encina G., Morte A., et al. Co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib: preclinical and clinical evaluation of a novel analgesic. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2019;28:399–409. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1612557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Chavan R.B., Thipparaboina R., Yadav B., Shastri N.R. Continuous manufacturing of co-crystals: challenges and prospects. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8:1726–1739. doi: 10.1007/s13346-018-0479-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.O'Sullivan A., Long B., Verma V., Ryan K.M., Padrela L. Solid-state and particle size control of pharmaceutical cocrystals using atomization-based techniques. Int J Pharm. 2022;621 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Charpentier M.D., Devogelaer J.J., Tijink A., Meekes H., Tinnemans P., Vlieg E., et al. Comparing and quantifying the efficiency of cocrystal screening methods for praziquantel. Cryst Growth Des. 2022;22:5511–5525. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Hasa D., Jones W. Screening for new pharmaceutical solid forms using mechanochemistry: a practical guide. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;117:147–161. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Haskins M.M., Zaworotko M.J. Screening and preparation of cocrystals: a comparative study of mechanochemistry vs slurry methods. Cryst Growth Des. 2021;21:4141–4150. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Gajda M., Nartowski K.P., Pluta J., Karolewicz B. The role of the polymer matrix in solvent-free hot melt extrusion continuous process for mechanochemical synthesis of pharmaceutical cocrystal. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;131:48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Gajda M., Nartowski K.P., Pluta J., Karolewicz B. Continuous, one-step synthesis of pharmaceutical cocrystals via hot melt extrusion from neat to matrix-assisted processing-state of the art. Int J Pharm. 2019;558:426–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Padrela L., Rodrigues M.A., Duarte A., Dias A.M.A., Braga M.E.M., de Sousa H.C. Supercritical carbon dioxide-based technologies for the production of drug nanoparticles/nanocrystals – a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;131:22–78. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Solares Briones M., Coyote Dotor G., Páez Franco J.C., Zermeño Ortega M.R., de la O Contreras C.M., Canseco González D., et al. Mechanochemistry: a green approach in the preparation of pharmaceutical cocrystals. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:790. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Nagapudi K., Umanzor E.Y., Masui C. High-throughput screening and scale-up of cocrystals using resonant acoustic mixing. Int J Pharm. 2017;521:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Regulatory classification of pharmaceutical co-crystals guidance for industry. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/regulatory-classification-pharmaceutical-co-crystals/ Available from:
- 179.Singh M., Barua H., Jyothi V.G.S.S., Dhondale M.R., Nambiar A.G., Agrawal A.K., et al. Cocrystals by design: a rational coformer selection approach for tackling the API problems. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1161. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Curreri A.M., Mitragotri S., Tanner E.E.L. Recent advances in ionic liquids in biomedicine. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2021;8 doi: 10.1002/advs.202004819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Liu Y.W., Wu Y.J., Liu J.M., Wang W.X., Yang Q.L., Yang G.S. Deep eutectic solvents: recent advances in fabrication approaches and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2022;622 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Smith E.L., Abbott A.P., Ryder K.S. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev. 2014;114:11060–11082. doi: 10.1021/cr300162p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Qader I.B., Prasad K. Recent developments on ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents for drug delivery applications. Pharm Res. 2022;39:2367–2377. doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03315-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Kim J.Y., Shi Y.J., Kwon C.J., Gao Y.S., Mitragotri S. A deep eutectic solvent-based approach to intravenous formulation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Shekaari H., Zafarani-Moattar M.T., Shayanfar A., Mokhtarpour M. Effect of choline chloride/ethylene glycol or glycerol as deep eutectic solvents on the solubility and thermodynamic properties of acetaminophen. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:1222–1235. [Google Scholar]
- 186.Chowdhury M.R., Moshikur R.M., Wakabayashi R., Tahara Y., Kamiya N., Moniruzzaman M., et al. In vivo biocompatibility, pharmacokinetics, antitumor efficacy, and hypersensitivity evaluation of ionic liquid-mediated paclitaxel formulations. Int J Pharm. 2019;565:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Nerurkar J., Beach J.W., Park M.O., Jun H.W. Solubility of (+/‒)-ibuprofen and S (+)-ibuprofen in the presence of cosolvents and cyclodextrins. Pharm Dev Technol. 2005;10:413–421. doi: 10.1081/pdt-54446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Sintra T.E., Abranches D.O., Benfica J., Soares B.P., Ventura S.P.M., Coutinho J.A.P. Cholinium-based ionic liquids as bioinspired hydrotropes to tackle solubility challenges in drug formulation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2021;164:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Hu L.F., Peng H., Zhang Y., Xia Q.W., He H., Ruan R., et al. Insight into the interaction between arabinoxylan and imidazolium acetate-based ionic liquids. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;231 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Wu X.Y., Yu Q., Wu J., Li T., Ding N., Wu W., et al. Ionic liquids containing ketoconazole improving topical treatment of T. Interdigitale infection by synergistic action. Int J Pharm. 2020;589 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Hu Y., Liang P.Y., Wang Z.X., Jiang C.P., Zeng Q.F., Shen C., et al. Exploring the mechanism of solubilization and release of isoliquiritigenin in deep eutectic solvents. Int J Pharm. 2023;644 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Zhang D., Wang H.J., Cui X.M., Wang C.X. Evaluations of imidazolium ionic liquids as novel skin permeation enhancers for drug transdermal delivery. Pharm Dev Technol. 2017;22:511–520. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2015.1131718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Qi Q.M., Mitragotri S. Mechanistic study of transdermal delivery of macromolecules assisted by ionic liquids. J Control Release. 2019;311–312:162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Zheng L.Y., Zhao Z.Y., Yang Y., Li Y.M., Wang C.X. Novel skin permeation enhancers based on amino acid ester ionic liquid: design and permeation mechanism. Int J Pharm. 2020;576 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Yang D.G., Liu C., Ding D.W., Quan P., Fang L. The molecular design of drug-ionic liquids for transdermal drug delivery: mechanistic study of counterions structure on complex formation and skin permeation. Int J Pharm. 2021;602 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Qi Q.M., Duffy M., Curreri A.M., Balkaran J.P.R., Tanner E.E.L., Mitragotri S. Comparison of ionic liquids and chemical permeation enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30 [Google Scholar]
- 197.Tanner E.E.L., Curreri A.M., Balkaran J.P.R., Selig-Wober N.C., Yang A.B., Kendig C., et al. Design principles of ionic liquids for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2019;31 doi: 10.1002/adma.201901103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Tanner E.E.L., Ibsen K.N., Mitragotri S. Transdermal insulin delivery using choline-based ionic liquids (CAGE) J Control Release. 2018;286:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Zhao Z.Y., Li M.J., Zheng L.Y., Yang Y., Cui X.M., Xu T.R., et al. Noninvasive transdermal delivery of mesoporous silica nanoparticles using deep eutectic solvent. J Control Release. 2022;343:43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Li M.J., Cui H., Cao Y.B., Lin Y.M., Yang Y., Gao M., et al. Deep eutectic solvents-hydrogels for the topical management of rheumatoid arthritis. J Control Release. 2023;354:664–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Hu Y.H., Xing Y.Y., Yue H., Chen T., Diao Y.Y., Wei W., et al. Ionic liquids revolutionizing biomedicine: recent advances and emerging opportunities. Chem Soc Rev. 2023;52:7262–7293. doi: 10.1039/d3cs00510k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Ali M.K., Moshikur R.M., Wakabayashi R., Moniruzzaman M., Goto M. Biocompatible ionic liquid-mediated micelles for enhanced transdermal delivery of paclitaxel. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:19745–19755. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Esson M.M., Mecozzi S. Preparation, characterization, and formulation optimization of ionic-liquid-in-water nanoemulsions toward systemic delivery of amphotericin B. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:2221–2226. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Lin X., Sheng Y.N., Zhang X., Li Z.J., Yang Y.L., Wu J., et al. Oil-in-ionic liquid nanoemulsion-based intranasal delivery system for influenza split-virus vaccine. J Control Release. 2022;346:380–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Liu C.X., Raza F., Qian H., Tian X. Recent advances in poly(ionic liquid)s for biomedical application. Biomater Sci. 2022;10:2524–2539. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00046f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Lu B.B., Zhou G.X., Xiao F., He Q.J., Zhang J.H. Stimuli-responsive poly(ionic liquid) nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:7994–8001. doi: 10.1039/d0tb01352h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Hamadani C.M., Dasanayake G.S., Gorniak M.E., Pride M.C., Monroe W., Chism C.M., et al. Development of ionic liquid-coated PLGA nanoparticles for applications in intravenous drug delivery. Nat Protoc. 2023;18:2509–2557. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00843-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Hamadani C.M., Goetz M.J., Mitragotri S., Tanner E.E.L. Protein-avoidant ionic liquid (PAIL)-coated nanoparticles to increase bloodstream circulation and drive biodistribution. Sci Adv. 2020;6 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd7563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Wu X.Y., Zhu Q.G., Chen Z.J., Wu W., Lu Y., Qi J.P. Ionic liquids as a useful tool for tailoring active pharmaceutical ingredients. J Control Release. 2021;338:268–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Shamshina J.L., Rogers R.D. Ionic liquids: new forms of active pharmaceutical ingredients with unique, tunable properties. Chem Rev. 2023;123:11894–11953. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Shi Q., Chen H.B., Wang Y.N., Xu J., Liu Z.Y., Zhang C. Recent advances in drug polymorphs: aspects of pharmaceutical properties and selective crystallization. Int J Pharm. 2022;611 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Santos M.M., Raposo L.R., Carrera G.V.S.M., Costa A., Dionísio M., Baptista P.V., et al. Ionic liquids and salts from ibuprofen as promising innovative formulations of an old drug. ChemMedChem. 2019;14:907–911. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201900040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Wang C.G., Chopade S.A., Guo Y.W., Early J.T., Tang B.X., Wang E., et al. Preparation, characterization, and formulation development of drug‒drug protic ionic liquids of diphenhydramine with ibuprofen and naproxen. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:4190–4201. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Miwa Y., Hamamoto H., Ishida T. Lidocaine self-sacrificially improves the skin permeation of the acidic and poorly water-soluble drug etodolac via its transformation into an ionic liquid. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;102:92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.MEDRx USA I A randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etodolac-lidocaine patch applied once daily in subjects experiencing acute delayed onset muscle soreness. 2016. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02695381/ Available from:
- 216.Coleman D., Gathergood N. Biodegradation studies of ionic liquids. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:600–637. doi: 10.1039/b817717c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Wei P.H., Pan X.J., Chen C.Y., Li H.Y., Yan X.L., Li C.J., et al. Emerging impacts of ionic liquids on eco-environmental safety and human health. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:13609–13627. doi: 10.1039/d1cs00946j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Li X.D., Ma N.N., Zhang L.J., Ling G.X., Zhang P. Applications of choline-based ionic liquids in drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2022;612 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Curreri A.M., Kim J., Dunne M., Angsantikul P., Goetz M., Gao Y., et al. Deep eutectic solvents for subcutaneous delivery of protein therapeutics. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10 doi: 10.1002/advs.202205389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Moshikur R.M., Carrier R.L., Moniruzzaman M., Goto M. Recent advances in biocompatible ionic liquids in drug formulation and delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1179. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Han H.J., Li S., Xu M.Y., Zhong Y.Y., Fan W.J., Xu J.W., et al. Polymer-and lipid-based nanocarriers for ocular drug delivery: current status and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;196 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Li X.T., Peng X.J., Zoulikha M., Boafo G.F., Magar K.T., Ju Y.M., et al. Multifunctional nanoparticle-mediated combining therapy for human diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9:1. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01668-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Nguyen T.T.L., Duong V.A., Maeng H.J. Pharmaceutical formulations with p-glycoprotein inhibitory effect as promising approaches for enhancing oral drug absorption and bioavailability. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1103. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Wang X.Y., Qiu L.Z., Wang X.Y., Ouyang H.Z., Li T.L., Han L.F., et al. Evaluation of intestinal permeation enhancement with carboxymethyl chitosan-rhein polymeric micelles for oral delivery of paclitaxel. Int J Pharm. 2020;573 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Liu C., Liu W., Liu Y.H., Duan H.X., Chen L.Q., Zhang X.T., et al. Versatile flexible micelles integrating mucosal penetration and intestinal targeting for effectively oral delivery of paclitaxel. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:3425–3443. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Cai Y.F., Qi J.P., Lu Y., He H.S., Wu W. The in vivo fate of polymeric micelles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;188 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Patel V., Ray D., Bahadur A., Ma J., Aswal V.K., Bahadur P. Pluronic®-bile salt mixed micelles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;166:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Sadekar S., Ghandehari H. Transepithelial transport and toxicity of PAMAM dendrimers: implications for oral drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:571–588. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Ghezzi M., Pescina S., Padula C., Santi P., Del Favero E., Cantù L., et al. Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: an insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions. J Control Release. 2021;332:312–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Hwang D., Ramsey J.D., Kabanov A.V. Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: from nanoformulation to clinical approval. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;156:80–118. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Lin D.R., Xiao L.J., Qin W., Loy D.A., Wu Z.J., Chen H., et al. Preparation, characterization and antioxidant properties of curcumin encapsulated chitosan/lignosulfonate micelles. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;281 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Peng X.J., Li X.T., Xie B., Lai Y.Y., Sosnik A., Boucetta H., et al. Gout therapeutics and drug delivery. J Control Release. 2023;362:728–754. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Keam B., Lee K.W., Lee S.H., Kim J.S., Kim J.H., Wu H.G., et al. A phase II study of Genexol-PM and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2019;24:751-e231. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Kim H.S., Lee J.Y., Lim S.H., Sun J.M., Lee S.H., Ahn J.S., et al. A prospective phase II study of cisplatin and Cremophor EL-free paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in patients with unresectable thymic epithelial tumors. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:1800–1806. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Kim S.C., Kim D.W., Shim Y.H., Bang J.S., Oh H.S., Wan Kim S., et al. In vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: toxicity and efficacy. J Control Release. 2001;72:191–202. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00275-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Kim T.Y., Kim D.W., Chung J.Y., Shin S.G., Kim S.C., Heo D.S., et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Genexol-PM, a cremophor-free, polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3708–3716. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Kim D.W., Kim S.Y., Kim H.K., Kim S.W., Shin S.W., Kim J.S., et al. Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a novel cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:2009–2014. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Lee K.S., Chung H.C., Im S.A., Park Y.H., Kim C.S., Kim S.B., et al. Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:241–250. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9591-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Ranade A.A., Joshi D.A., Phadke G.K., Patil P.P., Kasbekar R.B., Apte T.G., et al. Clinical and economic implications of the use of nanoparticle paclitaxel (Nanoxel) in India. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:v6–v12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Lee S.W., Yun M.H., Jeong S.W., In C.H., Kim J.Y., Seo M.H., et al. Development of docetaxel-loaded intravenous formulation, Nanoxel-PM™ using polymer-based delivery system. J Control Release. 2011;155:262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Vergote I., Brize A., Lisyanskaya A.S., Lichinitser M. Randomized phase III study comparing paclical-carboplatin with paclitaxel-carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:5517. [Google Scholar]
- 242.Gong F.R., Wang R.R., Zhu Z.Q., Duan J.Y., Teng X., Cui Z.K. Drug-interactive mPEG-b-PLA-Phe(Boc) micelles enhance the tolerance and anti-tumor efficacy of docetaxel. Drug Deliv. 2020;27:238–247. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1718245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Zarrintaj P., Ramsey J.D., Samadi A., Atoufi Z., Yazdi M.K., Ganjali M.R., et al. Poloxamer: a versatile tri-block copolymer for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2020;110:37–67. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Shen F., Zhong H.Q., Ge W.J., Ren J.L., Wang X.H. Quercetin/chitosan-graft-alpha lipoic acid micelles: a versatile antioxidant water dispersion with high stability. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;234 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Fan Q., Wang C.R., Guo R., Jiang X.Y., Li W.T., Chen X.J., et al. Step-by-step dual stimuli-responsive nanoparticles for efficient bacterial biofilm eradication. Biomater Sci. 2021;9:6889–6902. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01038g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.He H.S., Wang L.T., Ma Y.H., Yang Y.Q., Lv Y.J., Zhang Z.C., et al. The biological fate of orally administered mPEG-PDLLA polymeric micelles. J Control Release. 2020;327:725–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Barros C.H.N., Hiebner D.W., Fulaz S., Vitale S., Quinn L., Casey E. Synthesis and self-assembly of curcumin-modified amphiphilic polymeric micelles with antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:104. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00851-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Liu Yn, Fens M.H.A.M., Capomaccio R.B., Mehn D., Scrivano L., Kok R.J., et al. Correlation between in vitro stability and pharmacokinetics of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based micelles loaded with a photosensitizer. J Control Release. 2020;328:942–951. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Fussell S.L., King S.M., Royall C.P., van Duijneveldt J.S. Oxidative degradation of triblock-copolymer surfactant and its effects on self-assembly. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;606:953–960. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Rasoulianboroujeni M., Repp L., Lee H.J., Kwon G.S. Production of paclitaxel-loaded PEG-b-PLA micelles using PEG for drug loading and freeze-drying. J Control Release. 2022;350:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Liu Q., Li F., Ji N., Dai L., Xiong L., Sun Q.J. Acetylated debranched starch micelles as a promising nanocarrier for curcumin. Food Hydrocolloids. 2021;111 [Google Scholar]
- 252.Sun H., Chen S., Li X., Leng Y., Zhou X.Y., Du J.Z. Lateral growth of cylinders. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29863-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Zhao X.B., Si J.X., Huang D.S., Li K., Xin Y., Sui M.H. Application of star poly(ethylene glycol) derivatives in drug delivery and controlled release. J Control Release. 2020;323:565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Hahn L., Zorn T., Kehrein J., Kielholz T., Ziegler A.L., Forster S., et al. Unraveling an alternative mechanism in polymer self-assemblies: an order-order transition with unusual molecular interactions between hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer blocks. ACS Nano. 2023;17:6932–6942. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c00722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Hasannia M., Aliabadi A., Abnous K., Taghdisi S.M., Ramezani M., Alibolandi M. Synthesis of block copolymers used in polymersome fabrication: application in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2022;341:95–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Lim C., Ramsey J.D., Hwang D., Teixeira S.C.M., Poon C.D., Strauss J.D., et al. Drug-dependent morphological transitions in spherical and worm-like polymeric micelles define stability and pharmacological performance of micellar drugs. Small. 2022;18 doi: 10.1002/smll.202103552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Ghosh B., Biswas S. Polymeric micelles in cancer therapy: state of the art. J Control Release. 2021;332:127–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Cao Z.L., Zuo X.L., Liu X.C., Xu G.X., Yong K.T. Recent progress in stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for targeted delivery of functional nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;330 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Zhang X.B., Wang Y., Wei G.Q., Zhao J.Y., Yang G., Zhou S.B. Stepwise dual targeting and dual responsive polymer micelles for mitochondrion therapy. J Control Release. 2020;322:157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Yousefi M., Narmani A., Jafari S.M. Dendrimers as efficient nanocarriers for the protection and delivery of bioactive phytochemicals. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;278 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Li H.D., Zha S., Li H.L., Liu H.T., Wong K.L., All A.H. Polymeric dendrimers as nanocarrier vectors for neurotheranostics. Small. 2022;18 doi: 10.1002/smll.202203629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Sheikh A., Md S., Kesharwani P. RGD engineered dendrimer nanotherapeutic as an emerging targeted approach in cancer therapy. J Control Release. 2021;340:221–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Relaño Rodríguez I., Espinar Buitrago M.S., Martín Cañadilla V., Gómez Ramirez R., Jiménez J.L., Muñoz Fernández M.A. Nanotechnology against human cytomegalovirus in vitro: polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers as antiviral agents. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:65. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00809-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Shaikh A., Kesharwani P., Gajbhiye V. Dendrimer as a momentous tool in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J Control Release. 2022;346:328–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Dey A.D., Bigham A., Esmaeili Y., Ashrafizadeh M., Moghaddam F.D., Tan S.C., et al. Dendrimers as nanoscale vectors: unlocking the bars of cancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86:396–419. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Lyu Z., Ding L., Tintaru A., Peng L. Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications: lessons learned from poly(amidoamine) dendrimers. Acc Chem Res. 2020;53:2936–2949. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Abedi Gaballu F., Dehghan G., Ghaffari M., Yekta R., Abbaspour Ravasjani S., Baradaran B., et al. PAMAM dendrimers as efficient drug and gene delivery nanosystems for cancer therapy. Appl Mater Today. 2018;12:177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Maes C., Abir S., Jacquet P., De Clerck C., Blecker C., Bouquillon S., et al. Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil formulation with poly(propylene imine) dendrimers with surface-grafted glycerol: release kinetics of trans-cinnamaldehyde and germination inhibition effects. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:5177–5185. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Pan Y.W., Zhou S.Q., Liu C., Ma X., H Xing J., Parshad B., et al. Dendritic polyglycerol-conjugated gold nanostars for metabolism inhibition and targeted photothermal therapy in breast cancer stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202102272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Quintana Sánchez S., Barrios Gumiel A., Sánchez Nieves J., Copa Patiño J.L., de la Mata F.J., Gómez R. Bacteria capture with magnetic nanoparticles modified with cationic carbosilane dendritic systems. Biomater Adv. 2022;133 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Liu K.X., Xiang J.J., Wang G.W., Xu H.X., Piao Y., Liu X.R., et al. Linear-dendritic polymer-platinum complexes forming well-defined nanocapsules for acid-responsive drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:44028–44040. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c12156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Joubert F., Munson M.J., Sabirsh A., England R.M., Hemmerling M., Alexander C., et al. Precise and systematic end group chemistry modifications on PAMAM and poly(L-lysine) dendrimers to improve cytosolic delivery of mRNA. J Control Release. 2023;356:580–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Bi F.H., Zhang J., Wei Z.M., Yu D.S., Zheng S., Wang J., et al. Dynamic glycopeptide dendrimers: synthesis and their controllable self-assembly into varied gyco-nanostructures for the biomimicry of glycans. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23:128–139. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Bisso S., Leroux J.C. Nanopharmaceuticals: a focus on their clinical translatability. Int J Pharm. 2020;578 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Rupp R., Rosenthal S.L., Stanberry L.R. VivaGel (SPL7013 Gel): a candidate dendrimer—microbicide for the prevention of HIV and HSV infection. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2:561–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Cohen C.R., Brown J., Moscicki A.B., Bukusi E.A., Paull J.R.A., Price C.F., et al. A phase I randomized placebo controlled trial of the safety of 3% SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel®) in healthy young women administered twice daily for 14 days. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Gusdon A.M., Faraday N., Aita J.S., Kumar S., Mehta I., Choi H.A., et al. Dendrimer nanotherapy for severe COVID-19 attenuates inflammation and neurological injury markers and improves outcomes in a phase2a clinical trial. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo2652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Khoury E.S., Sharma A., Ramireddy R.R., Thomas A.G., Alt J., Fowler A., et al. Dendrimer-conjugated glutaminase inhibitor selectively targets microglial glutaminase in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Theranostics. 2020;10:5736–5748. doi: 10.7150/thno.41714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Xie Y., Yao Y. Octenylsuccinate hydroxypropyl phytoglycogen, a dendrimer-like biopolymer, solubilizes poorly water-soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;180:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Wang X.J., Zhang M., Li Y.N., Cong H.L., Yu B., Shen Y.Q. Research status of dendrimer micelles in tumor therapy for drug delivery. Small. 2023;19 doi: 10.1002/smll.202304006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Mignani S., Shi Xy, Guidolin K., Zheng G., Karpus A., Majoral J.P. Clinical diagonal translation of nanoparticles: case studies in dendrimer nanomedicine. J Control Release. 2021;337:356–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Dias A.P., da Silva Santos S., da Silva J.V., Parise Filho R., Igne Ferreira E., Seoud O.E., et al. Dendrimers in the context of nanomedicine. Int J Pharm. 2020;573 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Sharma R., Liaw K., Sharma A., Jimenez A., Chang M., Salazar S., et al. Glycosylation of PAMAM dendrimers significantly improves tumor macrophage targeting and specificity in glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2021;337:179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Sathe R.Y., Bharatam P.V. Drug-dendrimer complexes and conjugates: detailed furtherance through theory and experiments. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;303 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Leiro V., Spencer A.P., Magalhães N., Pêgo A.P. Versatile fully biodegradable dendritic nanotherapeutics. Biomaterials. 2022;281 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Bialik M., Kuras M., Sobczak M., Oledzka E. Achievements in thermosensitive gelling systems for rectal administration. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5500. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Liao A.H., Shih C.P., Li M.W., Lin Y.C., Chuang H.C., Wang C.H. Development of thermosensitive poloxamer 407-based microbubble gel with ultrasound mediation for inner ear drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:1256–1271. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1938758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.You D.G., An J.Y., Um W., Jung J.M., Oh B.H., Nguyen V.Q., et al. Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-bearing dermal filler ameliorates the dermis microenvironment by supporting CD301b-expressing macrophages. ACS Nano. 2022;16:251–260. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c06096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Hu Y., Zhang S.W., Wen Z.J., Fu H.D., Hu J., Ye X.X., et al. Oral delivery of curcumin via multi-bioresponsive polyvinyl alcohol and guar gum based double-membrane microgels for ulcerative colitis therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;221:806–820. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Permana A.D., Utomo E., Pratama M.R., Amir M.N., Anjani Q.K., Mardikasari S.A., et al. Bioadhesive-thermosensitive in situ vaginal gel of the gel flake-solid dispersion of itraconazole for enhanced antifungal activity in the treatment of vaginal candidiasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:18128–18141. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Seah I., Loh X.J., Su X.Y. A topical gel for extended ocular drug release. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4:1024–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00645-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Chatterjee S., Hui P.C.L., Wat E., Kan C.W., Leung P.C., Wang W. Drug delivery system of dual-responsive PF127 hydrogel with polysaccharide-based nano-conjugate for textile-based transdermal therapy. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;236 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Shi J.Y., Yu L., Ding J.D. PEG-based thermosensitive and biodegradable hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2021;128:42–59. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Raj W., Jerczynski K., Rahimi M., Przekora A., Matyjaszewski K., Pietrasik J. Molecular bottlebrush with pH-responsive cleavable bonds as a unimolecular vehicle for anticancer drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;130 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Agrawal M., Saraf S., Saraf S., Dubey S.K., Puri A., Gupta U., et al. Stimuli-responsive in situ gelling system for nose-to-brain drug delivery. J Control Release. 2020;327:235–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Fan R.R., Cheng Y., Wang R.R., Zhang T., Zhang H., Li J.C., et al. Thermosensitive hydrogels and advances in their application in disease therapy. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14:2379. doi: 10.3390/polym14122379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Dethe M.R., Prabakaran A., Ahmed H., Agrawal M., Roy U., Alexander A. PCL-PEG copolymer based injectable thermosensitive hydrogels. J Control Release. 2022;343:217–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Li H.M., Tang Q., Wang Y., Li M., Wang Y.N., Zhu H., et al. Injectable thermosensitive lipo-hydrogels loaded with ropivacaine for prolonging local anesthesia. Int J Pharm. 2022;611 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Vikulina A.S., Feoktistova N.A., Balabushevich N.G., von Klitzing R., Volodkin D. Cooling-triggered release from mesoporous poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels at physiological conditions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:57401–57409. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c15370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Ma M.S., Zhong Y.L., Jiang X.L. Thermosensitive and pH-responsive tannin-containing hydroxypropyl chitin hydrogel with long-lasting antibacterial activity for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;236 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Chen F., Y Chen C., Zhao D.W., Zhang S.P., Ma G.H., Su Z.G., et al. On-line monitoring of the sol-gel transition temperature of thermosensitive chitosan/β-glycerophosphate hydrogels by low field NMR. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;238 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Lee H.J., Jeong B. ROS-sensitive degradable PEG–PCL–PEG micellar thermogel. Small. 2020;16 doi: 10.1002/smll.201903045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Chaudhari P., Naik R., Sruthi Mallela L., Roy S., Birangal S., Ghate V., et al. A supramolecular thermosensitive gel of ketoconazole for ocular applications: in silico, in vitro, and ex vivo studies. Int J Pharm. 2022;613 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Najafi Taher R., Ghaemi B., Amani A. Delivery of adapalene using a novel topical gel based on tea tree oil nano-emulsion: permeation, antibacterial and safety assessments. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;120:142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Permana A.D., Utami R.N., Layadi P., Himawan A., Juniarti N., Anjani Q.K., et al. Thermosensitive and mucoadhesive in situ ocular gel for effective local delivery and antifungal activity of itraconazole nanocrystal in the treatment of fungal keratitis. Int J Pharm. 2021;602 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Özdoğan A.I., Akca G., Şenel S. Development and in vitro evaluation of gel formulation of atorvastatin solid dispersions. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;61 [Google Scholar]
- 307.Dong Z.Y., Zhang Q., Wang C.H., Hu W.J., Yu X.L., Guo M.X., et al. Combined thermosensitive gel co-loaded with Dermaseptin-PP and PTX liposomes for effective local chemotherapy. Int J Pharm. 2023;18:413–424. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S385470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Lin D.Q., Kelly A.L., Miao S. Preparation, structure-property relationships and applications of different emulsion gels: bulk emulsion gels, emulsion gel particles, and fluid emulsion gels. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;102:123–137. [Google Scholar]
- 309.Tubtimsri S., Weerapol Y. Sustained release gel (polymer-free) of itraconazole-loaded microemulsion for oral candidiasis treatment: time-kill kinetics and cellular uptake. Drug Deliv. 2023;30 doi: 10.1080/10717544.2023.2234099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Shu Y., Xue R., Gao Y.R., Zhang W.X., Wang J.H. A thermo-responsive hydrogel loaded with an ionic liquid microemulsion for transdermal delivery of methotrexate. J Mater Chem B. 2023;11:5494–5502. doi: 10.1039/d2tb02189g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Lv Z.H., Hu T.T., Bian Y.X., Wang G.Y., Wu Z.K., Li H., et al. A MgFe-LDH nanosheet-incorporated smart thermo-responsive hydrogel with controllable growth factor releasing capability for bone regeneration. Adv Mater. 2023;35 doi: 10.1002/adma.202206545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Lee S.Y., Jeon S.I., Sim S.B., Byun Y., Ahn C.H. A supramolecular host-guest interaction-mediated injectable hydrogel system with enhanced stability and sustained protein release. Acta Biomater. 2021;131:286–301. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Seo Y., Lim H., Park H., Yu J.Y., An J., Yoo H.Y., et al. Recent progress of lipid nanoparticles-based lipophilic drug delivery: focus on surface modifications. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:772. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Haddadzadegan S., Dorkoosh F., Bernkop Schnürch A. Oral delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins: technology landscape of lipid-based nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;182 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Zhang W.T., Jiang Y.X., He Y.L., Boucetta H., Wu J., Chen Z.J., et al. Lipid carriers for mRNA delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4105–4126. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Xu Y.N., Fourniols T., Labrak Y., Préat V., Beloqui A., des Rieux A. Surface modification of lipid-based nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2022;16:7168–7196. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c02347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Porter C.J.H., Pouton C.W., Cuine J.F., Charman W.N. Enhancing intestinal drug solubilisation using lipid-based delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:673–691. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Huang Y.P., Yu Q., Chen Z.J., Wu W., Zhu Q.G., Lu Y. In vitro and in vivo correlation for lipid-based formulations: current status and future perspectives. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:2469–2487. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.El Moukhtari S.H., Rodríguez-Nogales C., Blanco Prieto M.J. Oral lipid nanomedicines: current status and future perspectives in cancer treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;173:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Ren Y.H., Wu W., Zhang X.W. The feasibility of oral targeted drug delivery: gut immune to particulates?. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:2544–2558. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Elkomy M.H., Ali A.A., Eid H.M. Chitosan on the surface of nanoparticles for enhanced drug delivery: a comprehensive review. J Control Release. 2022;351:923–940. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Wang D., Jiang Q.F., Dong Z.T., Meng T.Q., Hu F.W., Wang J., et al. Nanocarriers transport across the gastrointestinal barriers: the contribution to oral bioavailability via blood circulation and lymphatic pathway. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;203 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.115130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Clark M.A., Jepson M.A., Hirst B.H. Exploiting M cells for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;50:81–106. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.A N., Kovooru L., Behera A.K., Kumar K.P.P., Srivastava P. A critical review of synthesis procedures, applications and future potential of nanoemulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;287 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Garcia C.R., Malik M.H., Biswas S., Tam V.H., Rumbaugh K.P., Li W., et al. Nanoemulsion delivery systems for enhanced efficacy of antimicrobials and essential oils. Biomater Sci. 2022;10:633–653. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01537k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Cunha S., Forbes B., Sousa Lobo J.M., Silva A.C. Improving drug delivery for Alzheimer's disease through nose-to-brain delivery using nanoemulsions, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) and in situ hydrogels. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:4373–4390. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S305851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Czerniel J., Gostyńska A., Jańczak J., Stawny M. A critical review of the novelties in the development of intravenous nanoemulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2023;191:36–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Kang J.H., Yang M.S., Kwon T.K., Kim D.W., Park C.W. Inhaled deep eutectic solvent based-nanoemulsion of pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Control Release. 2022;352:570–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Singh M., Bharadwaj S., Lee K.E., Kang S.G. Therapeutic nanoemulsions in ophthalmic drug administration: concept in formulations and characterization techniques for ocular drug delivery. J Control Release. 2020;328:895–916. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Ye J.Y., Chen Z.Y., Huang C.L., Huang B., Zheng Y.R., Zhang Y.F., et al. A non-lipolysis nanoemulsion improved oral bioavailability by reducing the first-pass metabolism of raloxifene, and related absorption mechanisms being studied. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:6503–6518. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S259993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Zhang Z.C., Lu Y., Qi J.P., Wu W. An update on oral drug delivery via intestinal lymphatic transport. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:2449–2468. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Guo P., Pi C., Zhao S.J., Fu S.Z., Yang H.R., Zheng X.L., et al. Oral co-delivery nanoemulsion of 5-fluorouracil and curcumin for synergistic effects against liver cancer. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;17:1473–1484. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1796629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Roy A., Nishchaya K., Rai V.K. Nanoemulsion-based dosage forms for the transdermal drug delivery applications: a review of recent advances. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:303–319. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2045944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Rai V.K., Mishra N., Yadav K.S., Yadav N.P. Nanoemulsion as pharmaceutical carrier for dermal and transdermal drug delivery: formulation development, stability issues, basic considerations and applications. J Control Release. 2018;270:203–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Lal D.K., Kumar B., Saeedan A.S., Ansari M.N. An overview of nanoemulgels for bioavailability enhancement in inflammatory conditions via topical delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1187. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Donthi M.R., Munnangi S.R., Krishna K.V., Saha R.N., Singhvi G., Dubey S.K. Nanoemulgel: a novel nano carrier as a tool for topical drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:164. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Hussain A., Altamimi M.A., Alshehri S., Imam S.S., Shakeel F., Singh S.K. Novel approach for transdermal delivery of rifampicin to induce synergistic antimycobacterial effects against cutaneous and systemic tuberculosis using a cationic nanoemulsion gel. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:1073–1094. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S236277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Takagi K., Murotani K., Kamoshita S., Kuroda A. Clinical impact of lipid injectable emulsion in internal medicine inpatients exclusively receiving parenteral nutrition: a propensity score matching analysis from a Japanese medical claims database. BMC Med. 2022;20:371. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02568-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Grumbach C., Krüger V., Czermak P. A new control strategy for high-pressure homogenization to improve the safety of injectable lipid emulsions. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1603. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Hippalgaonkar K., Majumdar S., Kansara V. Injectable lipid emulsions-advancements, opportunities and challenges. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:1526–1540. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9526-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Sahinovic M.M., Struys M.M.R.F., Absalom A.R. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:1539–1558. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Kalepu S., Nekkanti V. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015;5:442–453. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Rehman A.U., Akram S., Seralin A., Vandamme T., Anton N. In: Smart nanocontainers. Nguyen Tri P., Do T.O., Nguyen T.A., editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2020. Lipid nanocarriers: formulation, properties, and applications; pp. 355–382. [Google Scholar]
- 344.Yokoyama K., Watanabe M. Limethason as a lipid microsphere preparation: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1996;20:195–201. [Google Scholar]
- 345.Geng D.D., Li Y., Wang C.Y., Ren B., Wang H.P., Wu C.S., et al. Optimization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of etomidate intravenous lipid emulsion. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:873–883. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1917729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Erickson A.L., DeGrado J.R., Fanikos J.R. Clevidipine: a short-acting intravenous dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker for the management of hypertension. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30:515–528. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.5.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Dranitsaris G., Moezi M., Dobson K., Phelan R., Blau S. A real-world study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three injectable neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist formulations for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:6649–6658. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07082-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Lu M., Liu J., Wu X.K., Zhang Z.Q. Ciprofol: a novel alternative to propofol in clinical intravenous anesthesia?. Biomed Res Int. 2023;2023 doi: 10.1155/2023/7443226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Liu M.Y., Chu Y.Y., Liu H., Su Y.Q., Zhang Q., Jiao J., et al. Accelerated blood clearance of nanoemulsions modified with PEG-cholesterol and PEG-phospholipid derivatives in rats: the effect of PEG-lipid linkages and PEG molecular weights. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:1059–1070. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Liu M., Li J., Zhao D., Yan N., Zhang H.X., Liu M.Y., et al. Branched PEG-modification: a new strategy for nanocarriers to evade of the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon and enhance anti-tumor efficacy. Biomaterials. 2022;283 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Liu M., Zhao D., Yan N., Li J., Zhang H.X., Liu M.Y., et al. Evasion of the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon by branched PEG lipid derivative coating of nanoemulsions. Int J Pharm. 2022;612 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Li B., Tan T.F., Chu W.W., Zhang Y., Ye Y.Z., Wang S.S., et al. Co-delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) by targeting lipid nanoemulsions for cancer therapy. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:75–88. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.2018523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Gorain B., Choudhury H., Nair A.B., Dubey S.K., Kesharwani P. Theranostic application of nanoemulsions in chemotherapy. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25:1174–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Herneisey M., Janjic J.M. Multiple linear regression predictive modeling of colloidal and fluorescence stability of theranostic perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1103. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Kakaei N., Amirian R., Azadi M., Mohammadi G., Izadi Z. Perfluorocarbons: a perspective of theranostic applications and challenges. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1115254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Yang X.G., Wang D., Ma Y., Zhao Q., Fallon J.K., Liu D., et al. Theranostic nanoemulsions: codelivery of hydrophobic drug and hydrophilic imaging probe for cancer therapy and imaging. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2014;9:2773–2785. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Ashkar A., Sosnik A., Davidovich-Pinhas M. Structured edible lipid-based particle systems for oral drug-delivery. Biotechnol Adv. 2022;54 doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Yu H.P., Huang G.T., Ma Y.Q., Liu Y., Huang X.Y., Zheng Q., et al. Cellulose nanocrystals based clove oil Pickering emulsion for enhanced antibacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;170:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Pang B., Liu H., Zhang K. Recent progress on pickering emulsions stabilized by polysaccharides-based micro/nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;296 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Maingret V., Chartier C., Six J.L., Schmitt V., Héroguez V. Pickering emulsions stabilized by biodegradable dextran-based nanoparticles featuring enzyme responsiveness and co-encapsulation of actives. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;284 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Tai Z.G., Huang Y.P., Zhu Q.G., Wu W., Yi T., Chen Z.J., et al. Utility of pickering emulsions in improved oral drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25:2038–2045. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Jiang H., Sheng Y.F., Ngai T. Pickering emulsions: versatility of colloidal particles and recent applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;49:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2020.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Yang D., Feng Y.Q., Yao X.L., Zhao B.F., Li D., Liu N., et al. Recent advances in bioactive nanocrystal-stabilized pickering emulsions: fabrication, characterization, and biological assessment. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023;22:946–970. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Wang X.C., Mohammad I.S., Fan L.F., Zhao Z.M., Nurunnabi M., Sallam M.A., et al. Delivery strategies of amphotericin B for invasive fungal infections. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:2585–2604. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Chen K., Qian Y., Wang C.Y., Yang D.J., Qiu X.Q., Binks B.P. Tumor microenvironment-responsive, high internal phase pickering emulsions stabilized by lignin/chitosan oligosaccharide particles for synergistic cancer therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;591:352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Dieng S.M., Omran Z., Anton N., Thioune O., Djiboune A.R., Sy P.M., et al. Pickering nano-emulsions stabilized by Eudragit RL100 nanoparticles as oral drug delivery system for poorly soluble drugs. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;191 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Hwang Y.H., Jeon K., Ryu S.A., Kim D.P., Lee H. Temperature-responsive janus particles as microsurfactants for on-demand coalescence of emulsions. Small. 2020;16 doi: 10.1002/smll.202005159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Acter S., Vidallon M.L.P., King J.P., Teo B.M., Tabor R.F. Photothermally responsive pickering emulsions stabilised by polydopamine nanobowls. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:8962–8970. doi: 10.1039/d1tb01796a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Trevaskis N.L., Charman W.N., Porter C.J.H. Lipid-based delivery systems and intestinal lymphatic drug transport: a mechanistic update. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:702–716. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Yáñez J.A., Wang S.W.J., Knemeyer I.W., Wirth M.A., Alton K.B. Intestinal lymphatic transport for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:923–942. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Nakmode D., Bhavana V., Thakor P., Madan J., Singh P.K., Singh S.B., et al. Fundamental aspects of lipid-based excipients in lipid-based product development. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:831. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Feeney O.M., Crum M.F., McEvoy C.L., Trevaskis N.L., Williams H.D., Pouton C.W., et al. 50years of oral lipid-based formulations: provenance, progress and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:167–194. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Abou Assi R., M Abdulbaqi I., Seok Ming T., Siok Yee C., A Wahab H., Asif S.M., et al. Liquid and solid self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDs) as carriers for the oral delivery of azithromycin: optimization, in vitro characterization and stability assessment. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1052. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Racaniello G.F., Knoll P., Jörgensen A.M., Arduino I., Laquintana V., Lopedota A.A., et al. Thiolation of non-ionic surfactants for the development of lipid-based mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2022;179:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.AboulFotouh K., Allam A.A., El Badry M., El Sayed A.M. Self-emulsifying drug-delivery systems modulate P-glycoprotein activity: role of excipients and formulation aspects. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018;13:1813–1834. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Cai Y., Liu L., Xia M.Q., Tian C.L., Wu W.Q., Dong B.Q., et al. SEDDS facilitate cinnamaldehyde crossing the mucus barrier: the perspective of mucus and Caco-2/HT29 co-culture models. Int J Pharm. 2022;614 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Salawi A. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: a novel approach to deliver drugs. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:1811–1823. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2083724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Patel D., Wairkar S. Recent advances in cyclosporine drug delivery: challenges and opportunities. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2019;9:1067–1081. doi: 10.1007/s13346-019-00650-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Buya A.B., Beloqui A., Memvanga P.B., Préat V. Self-nano-emulsifying drug-delivery systems: from the development to the current applications and challenges in oral drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1194. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Maji I., Mahajan S., Sriram A., Medtiya P., Vasave R., Khatri D.K., et al. Solid self emulsifying drug delivery system: superior mode for oral delivery of hydrophobic cargos. J Control Release. 2021;337:646–660. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Nikolakakis I., Partheniadis I. Self-emulsifying granules and pellets: composition and formation mechanisms for instant or controlled release. Pharmaceutics. 2017;9:50. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics9040050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382.Jang Y., Chung H.J., Hong J.W., Yun C.W., Chung H. Absorption mechanism of DHP107, an oral paclitaxel formulation that forms a hydrated lipidic sponge phase. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:133–145. doi: 10.1038/aps.2016.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Ghadi R., Dand N. BCS class IV drugs: highly notorious candidates for formulation development. J Control Release. 2017;248:71–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Singh A., Worku Z.A., Van den Mooter G. Oral formulation strategies to improve solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:1361–1378. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2011.606808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Pei Q., Jiang B.W., Hao D.Y., Xie Z.G. Self-assembled nanoformulations of paclitaxel for enhanced cancer theranostics. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:3252–3276. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Hong J.W., Lee I.H., Kwak Y.H., Park Y.T., Sung H.C., Kwon I.C., et al. Efficacy and tissue distribution of DHP107, an oral paclitaxel formulation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:3239–3247. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Kang Y.K., Ryu M.H., Park S.H., Kim J.G., Kim J.W., Cho S.H., et al. Efficacy and safety findings from DREAM: a phase III study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus i.v. paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1220–1226. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Daehwa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd Oral paclitaxel trial in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer as 1st line therapy (OPTIMAL) 2017. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03315364/ Available from:
- 389.Alothaid H., Aldughaim M.S., Yusuf A.O., Yezdani U., Alhazmi A., Habibullah M.M., et al. A comprehensive study of the basic formulation of supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) of albendazolum. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:2119–2126. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1986601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390.Sharma T., Jain A., Kaur R., Saini S., Katare O.P., Singh B. Supersaturated LFCS type III self-emulsifying delivery systems of sorafenib tosylate with improved biopharmaceutical performance: QbD-enabled development and evaluation. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2020;10:839–861. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00772-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Koehl N.J., Henze L.J., Bennett Lenane H., Faisal W., Price D.J., Holm R., et al. In silico, in vitro, and in vivo evaluation of precipitation inhibitors in supersaturated lipid-based formulations of venetoclax. Mol Pharm. 2021;18:2174–2188. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Bannow J., Yorulmaz Y., Löbmann K., Müllertz A., Rades T. Improving the drug load and in vitro performance of supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) using polymeric precipitation inhibitors. Int J Pharm. 2020;575 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Nora G.I., Venkatasubramanian R., Strindberg S., Siqueira Jørgensen S.D., Pagano L., Romanski F.S., et al. Combining lipid based drug delivery and amorphous solid dispersions for improved oral drug absorption of a poorly water-soluble drug. J Control Release. 2022;349:206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Jain S., Dongare K., Nallamothu B., Parkash Dora C., Kushwah V., Katiyar S.S., et al. Enhanced stability and oral bioavailability of erlotinib by solid self nano emulsifying drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2022;622 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Lee Y.Z., Seow E.K., Lim S.C., Yuen K.H., Abdul Karim Khan N. Formulation and in vivo evaluation of a solid self-emulsifying drug delivery system using oily liquid tocotrienols as model active substance. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1777. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Yan B.B., Wang Y.C., Ma Y.Y., Zhao J., Liu Y.Y., Wang L.L. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of poly (acrylic acid) modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles as pH response carrier for β-elemene self-micro emulsifying. Int J Pharm. 2019;572 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.Zhang X.T., Chen Z.Z., Tao C., Zhang J., Zhang M.X., Zhang J.L., et al. Effect of surface property on the release and oral absorption of solid sirolimus-containing self-microemulsifying drug delivery system. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22:108. doi: 10.1208/s12249-021-01978-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Lam H.T., Le Vinh B., Phan T.N.Q., Bernkop Schnürch A. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems and cationic surfactants: do they potentiate each other in cytotoxicity?. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;71:156–166. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Subramaniam S., Elz A., Wignall A., Kamath S., Ariaee A., Hunter A., et al. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) disrupt the gut microbiota and trigger an intestinal inflammatory response in rats. Int J Pharm. 2023;648 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Joyce P., Dening T.J., Meola T.R., Schultz H.B., Holm R., Thomas N., et al. Solidification to improve the biopharmaceutical performance of SEDDS: opportunities and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;142:102–117. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Vithani K., Jannin V., Pouton C.W., Boyd B.J. Colloidal aspects of dispersion and digestion of self-dispersing lipid-based formulations for poorly water-soluble drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;142:16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Bernkop Schnürch A., Jalil A. Do drug release studies from SEDDS make any sense?. J Control Release. 2018;271:55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Jash A., Ubeyitogullari A., Rizvi S.S.H. Liposomes for oral delivery of protein and peptide-based therapeutics: challenges, formulation strategies, and advances. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:4773–4792. doi: 10.1039/d1tb00126d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Matos C., Lobão P. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs loaded liposomes for topical treatment of inflammatory and degenerative conditions. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27:3809–3829. doi: 10.2174/0929867326666190227233321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Wang Z.M., Li J.B., Lin G.M., He Z.G., Wang Y.J. Metal complex-based liposomes: applications and prospects in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. J Control Release. 2022;348:1066–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406.Yuan Z., Gottsacker C., He X.Y., Waterkotte T., Park Y.C. Repetitive drug delivery using light-activated liposomes for potential antimicrobial therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407.Antimisiaris S.G., Marazioti A., Kannavou M., Natsaridis E., Gkartziou F., Kogkos G., et al. Overcoming barriers by local drug delivery with liposomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;174:53–86. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.Large D.E., Abdelmessih R.G., Fink E.A., Auguste D.T. Liposome composition in drug delivery design, synthesis, characterization, and clinical application. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;176 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409.Yuba E. Development of functional liposomes by modification of stimuli-responsive materials and their biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:1093–1107. doi: 10.1039/c9tb02470k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410.Li X.T., Gu J.Y., Xiao Q.Q., Liu Y., Zhou P., Fan L.F., et al. Liposomal codelivery of inflammation inhibitor and collagen protector to the plaque for effective anti-atherosclerosis. Chin Chem Lett. 2023;34 [Google Scholar]
- 411.Xiao Q.Q., Li X.T., Liu C., Yang Y., Hou Y.Q., Wang Y., et al. Liposome-based anchoring and core-encapsulation for combinatorial cancer therapy. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;33:4191–4196. [Google Scholar]
- 412.Hay R.J. Liposomal amphotericin B, AmBisome. J Infect. 1994;28:35–43. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(94)95956-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413.Stone N.R.H., Bicanic T., Salim R., Hope W. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®): a review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical experience and future directions. Drugs. 2016;76:485–500. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0538-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414.Lai W.F., Wong W.T., Rogach A.L. Molecular design of layer-by-layer functionalized liposomes for oral drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:43341–43351. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415.Cao Y.F., Dong X.Y., Chen X.P. Polymer-modified liposomes for drug delivery: from fundamentals to applications. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:778. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416.Wu Y.Y., Wang W.J., Yu Z.W., Yang K., Huang Z.C., Chen Z.Q., et al. Mushroom-brush transitional conformation of mucus-inert PEG coating improves co-delivery of oral liposome for intestinal metaplasia therapy. Biomater Adv. 2022;136 doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 417.Barenholz Y. Doxil®—the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned. J Control Release. 2012;160:117–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418.Ashrafizadeh M., Delfi M., Zarrabi A., Bigham A., Sharifi E., Rabiee N., et al. Stimuli-responsive liposomal nanoformulations in cancer therapy: pre-clinical & clinical approaches. J Control Release. 2022;351:50–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419.Zhu Y., Liang J.M., Gao C.F., Wang A.N., Xia J.X., Hong C., et al. Multifunctional ginsenoside Rg3-based liposomes for glioma targeting therapy. J Control Release. 2021;330:641–657. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420.Wang D., Sun Y.T., Liu Y.G., Meng F.C., Lee R.J. Clinical translation of immunoliposomes for cancer therapy: recent perspectives. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018;15:893–903. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1517747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421.Belfiore L., Saunders D.N., Ranson M., Thurecht K.J., Storm G., Vine K.L. Towards clinical translation of ligand-functionalized liposomes in targeted cancer therapy: challenges and opportunities. J Control Release. 2018;277:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422.Crommelin D.J.A., van Hoogevest P., Storm G. The role of liposomes in clinical nanomedicine development. What now? Now what?. J Control Release. 2020;318:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423.Han J.Y., La Fiandra J.N., DeVoe D.L. Microfluidic vortex focusing for high throughput synthesis of size-tunable liposomes. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6997. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34750-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424.Phatale V., Vaiphei K.K., Jha S., Patil D., Agrawal M., Alexander A. Overcoming skin barriers through advanced transdermal drug delivery approaches. J Control Release. 2022;351:361–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425.Fernández García R., Lalatsa A., Statts L., Bolás Fernández F., Ballesteros M.P., Serrano D.R. Transferosomes as nanocarriers for drugs across the skin: quality by design from lab to industrial scale. Int J Pharm. 2020;573 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 426.Matharoo N., Mohd H., Michniak Kohn B. Transferosomes as a transdermal drug delivery system: dermal kinetics and recent developments. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2024;16:e1918. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427.Zhang Z.J., Michniak Kohn B. Flavosomes, novel deformable liposomes for the co-delivery of anti-inflammatory compounds to skin. Int J Pharm. 2020;585 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428.Xu Y.Y., Zhao M., Cao J.X., Fang T., Zhang J., Zhen Y.L., et al. Applications and recent advances in transdermal drug delivery systems for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4417–4441. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429.Sahu A.N., Mohapatra D. Nanovesicular transferosomes for the topical delivery of plant bioactives. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2021;16:2491–2495. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2021-0316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430.Zhang Z.J., Osmałek T., Michniak Kohn B. Deformable liposomal hydrogel for dermal and transdermal delivery of meloxicam. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:9319–9335. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S274954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 431.Tamilarasan N., Yasmin B.M., Anitha P., Umme H., Cheng W.H., Mohan S., et al. Box-behnken design: optimization of proanthocyanidin-loaded transferosomes as an effective therapeutic approach for osteoarthritis. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2022;12:2954. doi: 10.3390/nano12172954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432.Ramkanth S., Anitha P., Gayathri R., Mohan S., Babu D. Formulation and design optimization of nano-transferosomes using pioglitazone and eprosartan mesylate for concomitant therapy against diabetes and hypertension. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;162 doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433.Jiang T.Y., Wang T., Li T., Ma Y.D., Shen S.Y., He B.F., et al. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery by transfersome-embedded oligopeptide hydrogel for topical chemotherapy of melanoma. ACS Nano. 2018;12:9693–9701. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434.Oyarzún P., Gallardo-Toledo E., Morales J., Arriagada F. Transfersomes as alternative topical nanodosage forms for the treatment of skin disorders. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2021;16:2465–2489. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2021-0335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435.Conaghan P.G., Dickson J., Bolten W., Cevc G., Rother M. A multicentre, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of topical ketoprofen in Transfersome gel (IDEA-033) with ketoprofen-free vehicle (TDT 064) and oral celecoxib for knee pain associated with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:1303–1312. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436.German Cortés J., Vilar Hernández M., Rafael D., Abasolo I., Andrade F. Solid lipid nanoparticles: multitasking nano-carriers for cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:831. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437.Rodrigues da Silva G.H., Moura L.D., Carvalho F.V., Geronimo G., Mendonça T.C., Lima F.F., et al. Antineoplastics encapsulated in nanostructured lipid carriers. Molecules. 2021;26:6929. doi: 10.3390/molecules26226929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438.Zhong Q.X., Zhang L.H. Nanoparticles fabricated from bulk solid lipids: preparation, properties, and potential food applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;273 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2019.102033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439.Pink D.L., Loruthai O., Ziolek R.M., Wasutrasawat P., Terry A.E., Lawrence M.J., et al. On the structure of solid lipid nanoparticles. Small. 2019;15 doi: 10.1002/smll.201903156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440.Mura P., Maestrelli F., D'Ambrosio M., Luceri C., Cirri M. Evaluation and comparison of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as vectors to develop hydrochlorothiazide effective and safe pediatric oral liquid formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:437. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441.Rana I., Khan N., Ansari M.M., Shah F.A., Din F.U., Sarwar S., et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles-mediated enhanced antidepressant activity of duloxetine in lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive model. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;194 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 442.Correia A.C., Monteiro A.R., Silva R., Moreira J.N., Sousa Lobo J.M., Silva A.C. Lipid nanoparticles strategies to modify pharmacokinetics of central nervous system targeting drugs: crossing or circumventing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to manage neurological disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;189 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443.Pawar S.D., Gawali K., Kulhari H., Murty U.S., Kumar P. Amoxapine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles with superior preclinical pharmacokinetics for better brain delivery: LC‒MS/MS and GC‒MS analysis. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023;14:1388–1398. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444.Khan S.A., Rehman S., Nabi B., Iqubal A., Nehal N., Fahmy U.A., et al. Boosting the brain delivery of atazanavir through nanostructured lipid carrier-based approach for mitigating neuroAIDS. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1059. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445.Khonsari F., Heydari M., Sharifzadeh M., Valizadeh H., Dinarvand R., Atyabi F. Transferrin decorated-nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) are a promising delivery system for rapamycin in Alzheimer's disease: an in vivo study. Biomater Adv. 2022;137 doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446.Eleraky N.E., Omar M.M., Mahmoud H.A., Abou Taleb H.A. Nanostructured lipid carriers to mediate brain delivery of temazepam: design and in vivo study. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:541. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12050451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447.Farshbaf M., Mojarad Jabali S., Hemmati S., Khosroushahi A.Y., Motasadizadeh H., Zarebkohan A., et al. Enhanced BBB and BBTB penetration and improved anti-glioma behavior of Bortezomib through dual-targeting nanostructured lipid carriers. J Control Release. 2022;345:371–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448.Costa C.P., Moreira J.N., Sousa Lobo J.M., Silva A.C. Intranasal delivery of nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles and nanoemulsions: a current overview of in vivo studies. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:925–940. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449.Agrawal M., Saraf S., Saraf S., Dubey S.K., Puri A., Patel R.J., et al. Recent strategies and advances in the fabrication of nano lipid carriers and their application towards brain targeting. J Control Release. 2020;321:372–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450.Sabry S.A., Abd El Razek A.M., Nabil M., Khedr S.M., El Nahas H.M., Eissa N.G. Brain-targeted delivery of valsartan using solid lipid nanoparticles labeled with rhodamine b; a promising technique for mitigating the negative effects of stroke. Drug Deliv. 2023;30 doi: 10.1080/10717544.2023.2179127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451.Cunha S., Costa C.P., Loureiro J.A., Alves J., Peixoto A.F., Forbes B., et al. Double optimization of rivastigmine-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for nose-to-brain delivery using the quality by design (QbD) approach: formulation variables and instrumental parameters. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:599. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12070599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452.Shu X., Zhang L., Liao W.Y., Liu J.F., Mao L., Yuan F., et al. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) stabilized by natural or synthetic emulsifiers for lutein delivery: improved physicochemical stability, antioxidant activity, and bioaccessibility. Food Chem. 2023;403 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453.Correia A.C., Moreira J.N., Sousa Lobo J.M., Silva A.C. Design of experiment (DoE) as a quality by design (QbD) tool to optimise formulations of lipid nanoparticles for nose-to-brain drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2023;20:1731–1748. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2274902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454.Kovačević A.B., Müller R.H., Keck C.M. Formulation development of lipid nanoparticles: improved lipid screening and development of tacrolimus loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) Int J Pharm. 2020;576 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455.Dabholkar N., Waghule T., Krishna Rapalli V., Gorantla S., Alexander A., Narayan Saha R., et al. Lipid shell lipid nanocapsules as smart generation lipid nanocarriers. J Mol Liq. 2021;339 [Google Scholar]
- 456.Basu S.M., Yadava S.K., Singh R., Giri J. Lipid nanocapsules co-encapsulating paclitaxel and salinomycin for eradicating breast cancer and cancer stem cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;204 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457.Graván P., Aguilera Garrido A., Marchal J.A., Navarro Marchal S.A., Galisteo González F. Lipid-core nanoparticles: classification, preparation methods, routes of administration and recent advances in cancer treatment. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;314 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.102871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458.Ashour A.A., Ramadan A.A., Abdelmonsif D.A., El-Kamel A.H. Enhanced oral bioavailability of Tanshinone IIA using lipid nanocapsules: formulation, in-vitro appraisal and pharmacokinetics. Int J Pharm. 2020;586 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459.Zancan L.R., Bruinsmann F.A., Paese K., Türck P., Bahr A., Zimmer A., et al. Oral delivery of ambrisentan-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules as a novel approach for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Pharm. 2021;610 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460.Kalvodová A., Zbytovská J. Lipid nanocapsules enhance the transdermal delivery of drugs regardless of their physico-chemical properties. Int J Pharm. 2022;628 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461.Ibrahim A., Abdel Gaber S.A., Fawzi Kabil M., Ahmed Farid O.A.H., Hirsch A.K.H., El Sherbiny I.M., et al. Baicalin lipid nanocapsules for treatment of glioma: characterization, mechanistic cytotoxicity, and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;19:1549–1560. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2139370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462.Mohsen K., Azzazy H.M.E., Allam N.K., Basalious E.B. Intranasal lipid nanocapsules for systemic delivery of nimodipine into the brain: in vitro optimization and in vivo pharmacokinetic study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;116 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463.Lainé A.L., Gravier J., Henry M., Sancey L., Béjaud J., Pancani E., et al. Conventional versus stealth lipid nanoparticles: formulation and in vivo fate prediction through FRET monitoring. J Control Release. 2014;188:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464.Lebreton V., Kaeokhamloed N., Vasylaki A., Hilairet G., Mellinger A., Béjaud J., et al. Pharmacokinetics of intact lipid nanocapsules using new quantitative FRET technique. J Control Release. 2022;351:681–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465.Pinton L., Magri S., Masetto E., Vettore M., Schibuola I., Ingangi V., et al. Targeting of immunosuppressive myeloid cells from glioblastoma patients by modulation of size and surface charge of lipid nanocapsules. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18:31. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00589-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466.Audrey G., Claire L.C., Joel E. Effect of the NFL-TBS.40-63 peptide on canine glioblastoma cells. Int J Pharm. 2021;605 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467.Carradori D., Labrak Y., Miron V.E., Saulnier P., Eyer J., Préat V., et al. Retinoic acid-loaded NFL-lipid nanocapsules promote oligodendrogenesis in focal white matter lesion. Biomaterials. 2020;230 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468.Yang Y., Wu H., Liu B., Liu Z. Tumor microenvironment-responsive dynamic inorganic nanoassemblies for cancer imaging and treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;179 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469.Chang L.H., Chuang E.Y., Cheng T.M., Lin C., Shih C.M., Wu A.T., et al. Thrombus-specific theranostic nanocomposite for codelivery of thrombolytic drug, algae-derived anticoagulant and NIR fluorescent contrast agent. Acta Biomater. 2021;134:686–701. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470.Wang X.W., Zhong X.Y., Li J.X., Liu Z., Cheng L. Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:8669–8742. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00461h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471.Zou Y.D., Huang B.T., Cao L.H., Deng Y.H., Su J.C. Tailored mesoporous inorganic biomaterials: assembly, functionalization, and drug delivery engineering. Adv Mater. 2021;33 doi: 10.1002/adma.202005215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472.Kankala R.K., Han Y.H., Xia H.Y., Wang S.B., Chen A.Z. Nanoarchitectured prototypes of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for innovative biomedical applications. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:126. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01315-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473.Zhou H., Ge J.X., Miao Q.Q., Zhu R., Wen L., Zeng J.F., et al. Biodegradable inorganic nanoparticles for cancer theranostics: insights into the degradation behavior. Bioconjug Chem. 2020;31:315–331. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474.Wang Y., Cui Y., Zhao Y.T., Zhao Q.F., He B., Zhang Q., et al. Effects of surface modification and size on oral drug delivery of mesoporous silica formulation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;513:736–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475.Zhang Y., Xiong M.T., Ni X.M., Wang J.R., Rong H.H., Su Y.Q., et al. Virus-mimicking mesoporous silica nanoparticles with an electrically neutral and hydrophilic surface to improve the oral absorption of insulin by breaking through dual barriers of the mucus layer and the intestinal epithelium. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:18077–18088. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c00580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476.Vallet Regi M., Rámila A., del Real R.P., Pérez Pariente J. A new property of MCM-41: drug delivery system. Chem Mater. 2000;13:308–311. [Google Scholar]
- 477.Xu B.L., Li S.S., Shi R., Liu H.Y. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:435. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01654-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478.Bindini E., Chehadi Z., Faustini M., Albouy P.A., Grosso D., Cattoni A., et al. Following in situ the degradation of mesoporous silica in biorelevant conditions: at last, a good comprehension of the structure influence. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:13598–13612. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b19956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479.Semeykina V., Zharov I. Medium controlled aggregative growth as a key step in mesoporous silica nanoparticle formation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;615:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480.Rengarajan G.T., Enke D., Steinhart M., Beiner M. Stabilization of the amorphous state of pharmaceuticals in nanopores. J Mater Chem. 2008;18:2537–2539. [Google Scholar]
- 481.Park H., Cha K.H., Hong S.H., Abuzar S.M., Lee S., Ha E.S., et al. Pharmaceutical characterization and in vivo evaluation of orlistat formulations prepared by the supercritical melt-adsorption method using carbon dioxide: effects of mesoporous silica type. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:333. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482.Gou K.J., Wang Y.M., Guo X.M., Wang Y.X., Bian Y., Zhao H.Q., et al. Carboxyl-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the controlled delivery of poorly water-soluble non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Acta Biomater. 2021;134:576–592. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483.Tarannum M., Hossain M.A., Holmes B., Yan S., Mukherjee P., Vivero Escoto J.L. Advanced nanoengineering approach for target-specific, spatiotemporal, and ratiometric delivery of gemcitabine-cisplatin combination for improved therapeutic outcome in pancreatic cancer. Small. 2022;18 doi: 10.1002/smll.202104449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484.García-Fernández A., Aznar E., Martínez Máñez R., Sancenón F. New advances in in vivo applications of gated mesoporous silica as drug delivery nanocarriers. Small. 2020;16 doi: 10.1002/smll.201902242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485.Zhang X., Zhu Y.F., Fan L.H., Ling J.H., Yang L.Y., Wang N., et al. Delivery of curcumin by fucoidan-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles: fabrication, characterization, and in vitro release performance. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;211:368–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486.Yang Y., Lin Y.Z., Di D.H., Zhang X., Wang D., Zhao Q.F., et al. Gold nanoparticle-gated mesoporous silica as redox-triggered drug delivery for chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;508:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487.Yang Y.J., Chen F.M., Xu N., Yao Q.C., Wang R., Xie X.C., et al. Red-light-triggered self-destructive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cascade-amplifying chemo-photodynamic therapy favoring antitumor immune responses. Biomaterials. 2022;281 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488.Deng Y.D., Zhang X.D., Yang X.S., Huang Z.L., Wei X., Yang X.F., et al. Subacute toxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles to the intestinal tract and the underlying mechanism. J Hazard Mater. 2021;409 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489.Yu Y., Wang Z., Wang R., Jin J., Zhu Y.Z. Short-term oral administration of mesoporous silica nanoparticles potentially induced colon inflammation in rats through alteration of gut microbiota. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:881–893. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S295575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490.Mohammadpour R., Cheney D.L., Grunberger J.W., Yazdimamaghani M., Jedrzkiewicz J., Isaacson K.J., et al. One-year chronic toxicity evaluation of single dose intravenously administered silica nanoparticles in mice and their ex vivo human hemocompatibility. J Control Release. 2020;324:471–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491.Gisbert-Garzarán M., Berkmann J.C., Giasafaki D., Lozano D., Spyrou K., Manzano M., et al. Engineered pH-responsive mesoporous carbon nanoparticles for drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:14946–14957. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c01786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492.Mamai M., Giasafaki D., Salvanou E.A., Charalambopoulou G., Steriotis T., Bouziotis P. Biodistribution of mesoporous carbon nanoparticles via technetium-99m radiolabelling after oral administration to mice. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2021;11:3260. doi: 10.3390/nano11123260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493.Ran F., Lei W., Cui Y., Jiao J., Mao Y.L., Wang S.Y., et al. Size effect on oral absorption in polymer-functionalized mesoporous carbon nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;511:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494.Ávila M.I., Alonso-Morales N., Baeza J.A., Rodríguez J.J., Gilarranz M.A. High load drug release systems based on carbon porous nanocapsule carriers. Ibuprofen case study. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:5293–5304. doi: 10.1039/d0tb00329h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495.Gu L.W., Li C., Lin J., Wang Q., Yin M., Zhang L.N., et al. Drug-loaded mesoporous carbon with sustained drug release capacity and enhanced antifungal activity to treat fungal keratitis. Biomater Adv. 2022;136 doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496.Lu H.Y., Yang G.Z., Ran F., Gao T.B., Sun C.S., Zhao Q.F., et al. Polymer-functionalized mesoporous carbon nanoparticles on overcoming multiple barriers and improving oral bioavailability of probucol. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;229 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497.Niu X., Wan L., Hou Z., Wang T.Y., Sun C.S., Sun J., et al. Mesoporous carbon as a novel drug carrier of fenofibrate for enhancement of the dissolution and oral bioavailability. Int J Pharm. 2013;452:382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498.Ameena Shirin V.K., Sankar R., Johnson A.P., Gangadharappa H.V., Pramod K. Advanced drug delivery applications of layered double hydroxide. J Control Release. 2021;330:398–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499.Murali A., Lokhande G., Deo K.A., Brokesh A., Gaharwar A.K. Emerging 2D nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Mater Today (Kidlington) 2021;50:276–302. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500.Bian Y.X., Cai X.J., Lv Z.H., Xu Y.M., Wang H., Tan C.L., et al. Layered double hydroxides: a novel promising 2D nanomaterial for bone diseases treatment. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10 doi: 10.1002/advs.202301806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 501.Peng L.Q., Mei X., He J., Xu J.K., Zhang W.K., Liang R.Z., et al. Monolayer nanosheets with an extremely high drug loading toward controlled delivery and cancer theranostics. Adv Mater. 2018;30 doi: 10.1002/adma.201707389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502.Zhang H., Zhang L., Cao Z.B., Cheong S., Boyer C., Wang Z.G., et al. Two-dimensional ultra-thin nanosheets with extraordinarily high drug loading and long blood circulation for cancer therapy. Small. 2022;18 doi: 10.1002/smll.202200299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503.Vajedi F.S., Dehghani H., Zarrabi A. Design and characterization of a novel pH-sensitive biocompatible and multifunctional nanocarrier for in vitro paclitaxel release. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;119 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504.Wang L., Zhang B.R., Yang X.T., Guo S.T., Waterhouse G.I.N., Song G.R., et al. Targeted alleviation of ischemic stroke reperfusion via atorvastatin-ferritin Gd-layered double hydroxide. Bioact Mater. 2023;20:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505.Asiabi H., Yamini Y., Alipour M., Shamsayei M., Hosseinkhani S. Synthesis and characterization of a novel biocompatible pseudo-hexagonal NaCa-layered double metal hydroxides for smart pH-responsive drug release of dacarbazine and enhanced anticancer activity in malignant melanoma. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;97:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506.Leão A.D., Alvarez Lorenzo C., Soares Sobrinho J.L. One-pot synthesis of the organomodified layered double hydroxides-glibenclamide biocompatible nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;193 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507.Gutiérrez Gutiérrez F., Sánchez Jiménez C., Rangel Castañeda I.A., Carbajal Arízaga G.G., Macías Lamas A.M., Castillo Romero A., et al. Encapsulation of curcumin into layered double hydroxides improve their anticancer and antiparasitic activity. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;72:897–908. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508.Wang A.T., Yang W., Yang X.Y., Mei X., Hu T.T., Liang R.Z., et al. MgAl monolayer hydrotalcite increases the hypoglycemic effect of berberine by enhancing its oral bioavailability. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;127 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509.Hu T.T., Gu Z., Williams G.R., Strimaite M., Zha J.J., Zhou Z., et al. Layered double hydroxide-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51:6126–6176. doi: 10.1039/d2cs00236a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 510.Senapati S., Thakur R., Verma S.P., Duggal S., Mishra D.P., Das P., et al. Layered double hydroxides as effective carrier for anticancer drugs and tailoring of release rate through interlayer anions. J Control Release. 2016;224:186–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511.Luengo C.V., Crescitelli M.C., Lopez N.A., Avena M.J. Synthesis of layered double hydroxides intercalated with drugs for controlled release: successful intercalation of ibuprofen and failed intercalation of paracetamol. J Pharm Sci. 2021;110:1779–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512.Fu H., Guo Y.D., Fang W.M., Wang J.X., Hu P., Shi J.L. Anti-acidification and immune regulation by nano-ceria-loaded Mg-Al layered double hydroxide for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;11 doi: 10.1002/advs.202307094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513.Han R.F., Xiao Y., Bai Q.Q., Choi C.H.J. Self-therapeutic metal-based nanoparticles for treating inflammatory diseases. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:1847–1865. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514.Yang Y., Zheng X., Chen L., Gong X.F., Yang H., Duan X.M., et al. Multifunctional gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:2041–2067. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S355142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515.Malik M.A., Hashmi A.A., Al Bogami A.S., Wani M.Y. Harnessing the power of gold: advancements in anticancer gold complexes and their functionalized nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B. 2023;12:552–576. doi: 10.1039/d3tb01976d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516.Hossain S.I., Luo Z., Deplazes E., Saha S.C. Shape matters-the interaction of gold nanoparticles with model lung surfactant monolayers. J R Soc Interface. 2021;18 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517.Tarantino S., Caricato A.P., Rinaldi R., Capomolla C., De Matteis V. Cancer treatment using different shapes of gold-based nanomaterials in combination with conventional physical techniques. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:500. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518.Zhang Y.Y., Wang T.G., Tian Y., Zhang C.N., Ge K., Zhang J.C., et al. Gold nanorods-mediated efficient synergistic immunotherapy for detection and inhibition of postoperative tumor recurrence. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:1978–1992. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519.Hitchcock J., White A.L., Hondow N., Hughes T.A., Dupont H., Biggs S., et al. Metal-shell nanocapsules for the delivery of cancer drugs. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;567:171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520.Li C.M., Zhao T.Y., Li L.X., Hu X.G., Li C., Chen W.Y., et al. Stimuli-responsive gold nanocages for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1321. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521.Huang H.G., Liu R.H., Yang J., Dai J., Fan S.H., Pi J., et al. Gold nanoparticles: construction for drug delivery and application in cancer immunotherapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1868. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522.Moreno-Alcántar G., Picchetti P., Casini A. Gold complexes in anticancer therapy: from new design principles to particle-based delivery systems. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62 doi: 10.1002/anie.202218000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523.Goddard Z.R., Marín M.J., Russell D.A., Searcey M. Active targeting of gold nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49:8774–8789. doi: 10.1039/d0cs01121e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524.Mahalunkar S., Yadav A.S., Gorain M., Pawar V., Braathen R., Weiss S., et al. Functional design of pH-responsive folate-targeted polymer-coated gold nanoparticles for drug delivery and in vivo therapy in breast cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:8285–8302. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S215142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525.Wróblewska A.M., Milewska A., Drozd M., Matczuk M. Targeted delivery of cisplatin by gold nanoparticles: the influence of nanocarrier surface modification type on the efficiency of drug binding examined by CE-ICP-MS/MS. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2324. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526.Fernandes A.R., Jesus J., Martins P., Figueiredo S., Rosa D., Martins L.M.D.R.S., et al. Multifunctional gold-nanoparticles: a nanovectorization tool for the targeted delivery of novel chemotherapeutic agents. J Control Release. 2017;245:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527.Zhang R., Kiessling F., Lammers T., Pallares R.M. Clinical translation of gold nanoparticles. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13:378–385. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01232-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528.Yao L., Bojic D., Liu M.Y. Applications and safety of gold nanoparticles as therapeutic devices in clinical trials. J Pharm Anal. 2023;13:960–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529.Nilubol N., Yuan Z.Q., Paciotti G.F., Tamarkin L., Sanchez C., Gaskins K., et al. Novel Dual-action targeted nanomedicine in mice with metastatic thyroid cancer and pancreatic meuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:1019–1029. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530.Mao Z.Y., Li X., Wang P.F., Yan H.L. Iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications: an updated patent review (2015-2021) Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2022;32:939–952. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2022.2109413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531.Cui R., Wang L., Zhang D.Y., Zhang K., Dou J.P., Dong L.N., et al. Combination therapy using microwave ablation and d-mannose-chelated iron oxide nanoparticles inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:3475–3485. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532.El Boubbou K. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as drug carriers: preparation, conjugation and delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018;13:929–952. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 533.Turrina C., Milani D., Klassen A., Rojas González D.M., Cookman J., Opel M., et al. Carboxymethyl-dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for drug delivery: influence of the coating thickness on the particle properties. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23 doi: 10.3390/ijms232314743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534.Uchiyama M.K., Hebeda C.B., Sandri S., Paula Silva M., Romano M., Cardoso R.M., et al. In vivo evaluation of toxicity and anti-inflammatory activity of iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated with ibuprofen. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2021;16:741–758. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2020-0459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535.Yao X.X., Xie R.H., Cao Y.B., Tang J., Men Y.Z., Peng H.B., et al. Simvastatin induced ferroptosis for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:311. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01058-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536.Reichel D., Sagong B., Teh J., Zhang Y., Wagner S., Wang H.Q., et al. Near infrared fluorescent nanoplatform for targeted intraoperative resection and chemotherapeutic treatment of glioblastoma. ACS Nano. 2020;14:8392–8408. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537.Huang Y., Hsu J.C., Koo H., Cormode D.P. Repurposing ferumoxytol: diagnostic and therapeutic applications of an FDA-approved nanoparticle. Theranostics. 2022;12:796–816. doi: 10.7150/thno.67375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 538.El-Boubbou K. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as drug carriers: clinical relevance. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018;13:953–971. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539.Chen Z.J., Wu W., Lu Y. What is the future for nanocrystal-based drug-delivery systems?. Ther Deliv. 2020;11:225–229. doi: 10.4155/tde-2020-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540.Du X.Q., Hou Y.Q., Huang J., Pang Y., Ruan C.L., Wu W., et al. Cytosolic delivery of the immunological adjuvant Poly I:C and cytotoxic drug crystals via a carrier-free strategy significantly amplifies immune response. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:3272–3285. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 541.Teng C., Lin C.S., Huang F.F., Xing X.Y., Chen S.Y., Ye L., et al. Intracellular codelivery of anti-inflammatory drug and anti-miR 155 to treat inflammatory disease. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10:1521–1533. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542.Lai Y.Y., Xie B., Zhang W.T., He W. Pure drug nanomedicines - where we are? Chin J Nat Med. 2024:1–38. [Google Scholar]
- 543.Li B.B., Teng C., Yu H.L., Jiang X.H., Xing X.Y., Jiang Q., et al. Alleviating experimental pulmonary hypertension via co-delivering FoxO1 stimulus and apoptosis activator to hyperproliferating pulmonary arteries. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:2369–2382. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544.Yang Y., Zoulikha M., Xiao Q.Q., Huang F.F., Jiang Q., Li X.T., et al. Pulmonary endothelium-targeted nanoassembly of indomethacin and superoxide dismutase relieves lung inflammation. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4607–4620. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 545.Pardhi E., Vasave R., Srivastava V., Yadav R., Mehra N.K. Nanocrystal technologies in biomedical science: from the bench to the clinic. Drug Discov Today. 2024;29 doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546.Liu Q.Y., Zou J.H., Chen Z.J., He W., Wu W. Current research trends of nanomedicines. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:4391–4416. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547.Gadekar V., Borade Y., Kannaujia S., Rajpoot K., Anup N., Tambe V., et al. Nanomedicines accessible in the market for clinical interventions. J Control Release. 2021;330:372–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548.He H.L., Liu L.S., Morin E.E., Liu M., Schwendeman A. Survey of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines-lessons learned from successes and failures. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:2445–2461. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549.Zhang A.X., Meng K.Y., Liu Y.D., Pan Y.H., Qu W., Chen D.M., et al. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of nanocarriers in vivo and their influences. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;284 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 550.Su C., Liu Y.Z., Li R.Z., Wu W., Fawcett J.P., Gu J.K. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the biomaterials used in Nanocarrier drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;143:97–114. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 551.Zhang P.F., Xiao Y.F., Sun X., Lin X.N., Koo S., Yaremenko A.V., et al. Cancer nanomedicine toward clinical translation: obstacles, opportunities, and future prospects. Med. 2023;4:147–167. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 552.Shan X.T., Gong X., Li J., Wen J.Y., Li Y.P., Zhang Z.W. Current approaches of nanomedicines in the market and various stage of clinical translation. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:3028–3048. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 553.Wang Y., Tan X.Y., Fan X.Y., Zhao L.X., Wang S.H., He H.B., et al. Current strategies for oral delivery of BCS IV drug nanocrystals: challenges, solutions and future trends. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18:1211–1228. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1903428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 554.Bannigan P., Aldeghi M., Bao Z., Häse F., Aspuru-Guzik A., Allen C. Machine learning directed drug formulation development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 555.Sarkar C., Das B., Rawat V.S., Wahlang J.B., Nongpiur A., Tiewsoh I., et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technology driven modern drug discovery and development. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2026. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






