Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 6;16:1921–1935. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S495883

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Included Studies for Studying the Effect of OSA on DED

Study Country & region Study type Mean age (year) Gender (male;%) BMI (kg/m2) Sample size OSA patients Non-OSA patients (control) Dry eye assessment tool Treatment for OSA patients General results (OSA patients) Enrolled for quantitative analysisa
Acar, 2013 29 Turkey Prospective cohort 48.1 ± 10.5 70.4 Non-OSA: 28.3 ± 4.7; OSA: 31.5 ± 5.9 280 254 (mild: 60; moderate: 72; severe: 122) 26 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS - Poorer dry eye data among OSA subgroups (all parameters) v
Fox, 2017 30 US Cross-
sectional
53.2 ± 13.5 56.7 Non-OSA: 31.0 ± 12.5; OSA: 33.0 ± 6.8 201 166 (mild: 33; moderate: 70; severe: 63) 35 CFS - No significant impact on CFS among OSA subgroups v
Gunes, 2023 31 Turkey Cross-
sectional
47.1 ± 12.0 68.9 - 106 77 (mild: 23; moderate: 27; severe: 27) 29 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI Nil Poorer dry eye data among OSA subgroups (all parameters) v
Hao, 2023 32 China Cross-
sectional
39.7 ± 17.8 66.2 Non-OSA: 26.6 ± 2.0; OSA: 30.5 ± 4.9 71 27 (mild and moderate: 14; severe: 13) 44 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS - Poorer dry eye data among OSA subgroups (most parameters); no significant impact on Schirmer test v
Kadyan, 2010 33 UK Prospective cohort 55.6 ± 10.9 80.0 Non-OSA: 32.9 ± 5.2; OSA: 35.0 ± 7.2 115 89 (all were moderate to severe) 26 TBUT CPAP (67/89) Poorer dry eye data (all parameters) v
Karaca, 2016 34 Turkey Cohort 47.5 ± 11.5 67.0 Non-OSA: 25.9 ± 3.6; OSA: 30.4 ± 5.0 100 50 (mild: 15; moderate: 15; severe: 20) 50 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI Nil Poorer dry eye data (all parameters) v
Lin, 2022b 35 Taiwan Prospective cohort 40.9 ± 10.0 69.6 Non-OSA: 23.7 ± 3.6; OSA: 26.5 ± 3.9 181 155 (mild: 53; moderate: 42; severe: 60) 26 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS Nil Poorer dry eye data among OSA subgroups (TBUT); no significant impact on Schirmer test, OSDI, and CFS v
Muhafiz, 2020 36 Turkey Prospective cohort 46.3 ± 10.8 - - 59 32 (mild: 9; moderate: 6; severe: 17) 27 TBUT, Schirmer test Nil Poorer TBUT in OSA patients; no significant impact on Schirmer test v
Pu, 2022 37 China Case-
control
53.9 ± 13.0 61.6 Non-OSA: 26.6 ± 4.9; OSA: 30.4 ± 5.5 250 125 (mild: 32; moderate: 54; severe: 39) 125 TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS - Poorer dry eye data among OSA subgroups (all parameters) v
Karaca, 2019 38 Turkey Cross-
sectional
49.6 ± 9.3 82.0 Mixeda 60 Mixeda (simple snoring and mild: 24; severe: 36) TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS Nil Severe-OSA patients had significantly poorer TBUT only when compared to mild- and non-OSA patients; no significant difference in the rest of the parameters -
Liu, 2022 39 China Cohort 38.9 ± 8.8 93.2 27.2 ± 3.1 103 103 (mild: 21; moderate: 20; severe: 62) - TBUT, Schirmer test, OSDI, CFS Nil Severe-OSA patients had the poorest TBUT, Schirmer test, and CFS; no significant impact on OSDI -

Notes: aFor studies not suitable for quantitative analysis despite meeting the whole selection criteria, one study (Liu et al, 2022) is due to lack of a control group for further comparison; one study (Karaca et al, 2019) is due to unextractable statistical data for synthesis. bOriginal data obtained from author.

Abbreviations: OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; DED, dry eye disease; TBUT, tear breakup time; OSDI, ocular surface disease index; CFS, corneal fluorescence-staining score (Oxford grading system); CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure.