Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 28;14(1):299–312. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12384

Table 1.

Biomass accumulation in control and transgenic poplars under nitrate nutrition

WT Transgenic
Sample Nitrate (mm) Length (cm) FW (g) DW (g) Length (cm) FW (g) DW (g)
Aerial Plant 10 31.84 ± 0.70 5.40 ± 0.12cde 2.28 ± 0.07cd 39.16 ± 1.03 7.61 ± 0.19bc 3.10 ± 0.10bc
Main Roots 2.10 ± 0.28 0.78 ± 0.10 2.36 ± 0.98 1.04 ± 0.43
Lateral Roots 6.32 ± 1.47cd 1.33 ± 0.42 4.72 ± 0.97 1.50 ± 0.59
Aerial Plant 50 51.62 ± 1.09 10.02 ± 0.30b 3.51 ± 0.16b 63.63 ± 1.20a 22. 35 ± 1.12a 8.42 ± 0.27a
Main Roots 3.78 ± 0.65 0.82 ± 0.30 4.00 ± 0.82 1.71 ± 0.50
Lateral Roots 5.31 ± 0.44cde 1.12 ± 0.50 6.23 ± 1.44cde 1.54 ± 0.46

The parameters length, fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) were compared between WT and transgenics grown under different concentrations of nitrate. Means with different lowercase letters are significantly different, P < 0.01 (ANOVA and Tukey's test).