Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0314542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314542

Table 2. Exercise protocols and results of included studies.

Study Groups by exercise type Treatment duration, weeks Frequency, n/week Session duration, min Outcome Baseline, mean Post-treatment, mean
RCT
Lee, YH. 2010 [28] Combineda 10 3 60 ALT 17 U/L 18 U/L
Aerobic 10 3 60 ALT 53 U/L 67 U/L
Controlb N/A N/A N/A ALT 30 U/L 38 U/L
Davis 2011 [30] Combineda 16 2 60–90 HFF 6.4%
Controlb N/A N/A N/A HFF 8.2%
Hasson 2012 [31] Resistancec 16 2 60 HFF
Controlc,d N/A N/A N/A HFF
De Piano 2012 [32] Aerobic 52 3 60 ALT 46 U/L 39 U/L
GGT 27 U/L 22 U/L
Combineda 52 3 60 ALT 24 U/L 20 U/L
GGT 19 U/L 17 U/L
Lee, S. 2012 [33] Aerobic 12 3 60 MRS 4.7% 3.7%
Resistance 12 3 60 MRS 2.9% 1.8%
Controle N/A N/A N/A MRS 2.2% 3.1%
Lee, S. 2013 [34] Aerobic 12 3 60 MRS 2.2% 1.3%
Resistance 12 3 60 MRS 2.0% 2.1%
Controlf N/A N/A N/A MRS 3.0% 3.8%
Hay 2016 [35] High-intensity 24 3 30-45g MRS 6.4% 6.1%
Moderate-intensity 24 3 30-45g MRS 5.8% 7.3%
Controle N/A N/A N/A MRS 5.7% 7.4%
De Lira 2017 [36] Low-intensity 12 3 Differedg ALT 20 U/L 20 U/L
High-intensity 12 3 Differedg ALT 26 U/L 23 U/L
Lee, S. 2019 [37] Aerobic 24 3 60 MRS 2.5% 1.9%
Resistance 24 3 60 MRS 3.0% 2.7%
Combineda 24 3 60 MRS 2.2% 1.6%
González-Ruíz 2022 [40] High-intensity 24 4 60 CAP 222 dB/m 202 dB/m
ALT 17 U/L 16 U/L
GGT 18 U/L 19 U/L
Low-intensity 24 4 60 CAP 240 dB/m 234 dB/m
ALT 22 U/L 23 U/L
GGT 22 U/L 24 U/L
High- and low-intensity 24 4 60 CAP 218 dB/m 202 dB/m
ALT 15 U/L 14 U/L
GGT 20 U/L 18 U/L
School-based 24 1 60 CAP 220 dB/m 224 dB/m
ALT 19 U/L 21 U/L
GGT 16 U/L 16 U/L
Tas 2023 [25] High-intensity 4 3 45 MRI-PDFF 5.3% 5.0%
ALT 20 U/L 20 U/L
Controle N/A N/A N/A MRI-PDFF 9.0% 8.2%
ALT 30 U/L 29 U/L
NRCT
Labayen 2020 [38] Combineda 22 3 90 HFF 5.6% 4.5%
GGT 17 U/L 15 U/L
Controlh N/A N/A N/A HFF 5.2% 5.2%
GGT 15 U/L 15 U/L
Iraji 2021 [39] School-based 8 3 50–60 ALT 40 U/L 35 U/L
High-intensity 8 3 36–40 ALT 37 U/L 33 U/L
Controli N/A N/A N/A ALT 37 U/L 38 U/L
Uncontrolled trial
Bell 2007 [26] Combineda 8 3 60 ALT 26 U/L 26 U/L
Van der Heijden 2010(a) [27] Aerobic 12 4 50 MRSj 9% 6%
ALT 39 U/L 35 U/L
Van der Heijden 2010(b) [29] Resistance 12 2 60 MRS 9.2% 9.4%

See S4 File for detailed descriptions of interventions. Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; N/A, not applicable; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; ALT, alanine transaminase; GGT, gamma‐glutamyltransferase; HFF, hepatic fat fraction;—, no data available; NRCT, non-randomized controlled trial.

aCombined aerobic and resistance training.

bThe control group received no intervention.

cNo baseline values were reported for the intervention groups. The baseline mean hepatic fat fraction for the entire study population was 6.1%.

dThe control group received carbohydrate nutrition education once per week and a total of four motivational interviewing sessions. The resistance exercise group received the same intervention in addition to strength training twice per week.

eThe control group was instructed to maintain their current leisure activities and refrain from beginning an exercise program.

fThe control group was asked not to participate in structured physical activities. All participants were also asked to follow a weight-maintenance diet.

gDiffered based on energy expenditure of 350 kcal

hThe control group attended 45-minute lifestyle sessions and 45-minute psycho-educational sessions once every two weeks for 22 weeks. The exercise group had the same 22-week program in addition to the exercise intervention.

iThe control group did not have a specified intervention.

jValues approximated from bar graph.